SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

LITERATURE CITED

  • Alba, R., P. Payton, Z. J. Fei, R. McQuinn, P. Debbie, G. B. Martin, S. D. Tanksley, and J. J. Giovannoni. 2005. Transcriptome and selected metabolite analyses reveal multiple points of ethylene control during tomato fruit development. Plant Cell 17:29542965.
  • Atanassova, B., L. Shtereva, Y. Georgieva, and E. Balatcheva. 2004. Study on seed coat morphology and histochemistry in three anthocyaninless mutants in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) in relation to their enhanced germination. Seed Sci. Technol. 32:7990.
  • Atherton, J. G., and J. Rudich. 1986. The tomato crop: a scientific basis for improvement. pp. 661. Chapman and Hall, London .
  • Bai, Y. L., and P. Lindhout. 2007. Domestication and breeding of tomatoes: what have we gained and what can we gain in the future? Ann. Bot. 100:1081094.
  • Balibrea, M. E., C. Martinez-Andujar, J. Cuartero, M. C. Bolarin, and F. Perez-Alfocea. 2006. The high fruit soluble sugar content in wild Lycopersicon species and their hybrids with cultivars depends on sucrose import during ripening rather than on sucrose metabolism. Funct. Plant Biol. 33:279288.
  • Barraclough, T. G., and A. P. Vogler. 2000. Detecting the geographical pattern of speciation from species-level phylogenies. Am. Nat. 155:419434.
  • Barrett, S. C. H. 2008. Major evolutionary transitions in flowering plant reproduction: an overview. Int. J. Plant Sci. 169:15.
  • Baudry, E., C. Kerdelhue, H. Innan, and W. Stephan. 2001. Species and recombination effects on DNA variability in the tomato genus. Genetics 158:17251735.
  • Baxter, C. J., M. Sabar, W. P. Quick, and L. J. Sweetlove. 2005. Comparison of changes in fruit gene expression in tomato introgression lines provides evidence of genome-wide transcriptional changes and reveals links to mapped QTLs and described traits. J. Exp. Bot. 56:15911604.
  • Bernacchi, D., and S. D. Tanksley. 1997. An interspecific backcross of Lycopersicon esculentum x L. hirsutum: linkage analysis and a QTL study of sexual compatibility factors and floral traits. Genetics 147:861877.
  • Bernal, A. J., Q. L. Pan, J. Pollack, L. Rose, A. Kozik, N. Willits, Y. Luo, M. Guittet, E. Kochetkova, and R. W. Michelmore. 2005. Functional analysis of the plant disease resistance gene Pto using DNA shuffling. J. Biol. Chem. 280:2307323083.
  • Bloom, A. J., L. B. Randall, M. J. Truco, N. M. Holbrook, and M. A. Zwieniecki. 2001. Genetics and water relations of the chilling response in wild and cultivated tomatoes. Ecological Society of America Annual Meeting, Madison , WI .
  • Bloom, A. J., M. A. Zwieniecki, J. B. Passioura, L. B. Randall, N. M. Holbrook, and D. A. St Clair. 2004. Water relations under root chilling in a sensitive and tolerant tomato species. Plant Cell Environ. 27:971979.
  • Bouck, A., and T. Vision. 2007. The molecular ecologist's guide to expressed sequence tags. Mol. Ecol. 16:907924.
  • Brand, A., N. Shirding, S. Shleizer, and N. Ori. 2007. Meristem maintenance and compound-leaf patterning utilize common genetic mechanisms in tomato. Planta 226:941951.
  • Brouwer, D. J., E. S. Jones, and D. A. St Clair. 2004. QTL analysis of quantitative resistance to Phytophthora infestans (late blight) in tomato and comparisons with potato. Genome 47:475492.
  • Caicedo, A. L. 2008. Geographic diversity cline of R gene homologs in wild populations of Solanum pimpinellifolium (Solanaceae). Am. J. Bot. 95:393398.
  • Caicedo, A. L., and B. A. Schaal. 2004. Population structure and phylogeography of Solanum pimpinellifolium inferred from a nuclear gene. Mol. Ecol. 13:18711882.
  • Canady, M. A., V. Meglic, and R. T. Chetelat. 2005. A library of Solanum lycopersicoides introgression lines in cultivated tomato. Genome 48:685697.
  • Castric, V., and X. Vekemans. 2004. Plant self-incompatibility in natural populations: a critical assessment of recent theoretical and empirical advances. Mol. Ecol. 13:28732889.
  • Causse, M., P. Duffe, M. C. Gomez, M. Buret, R. Damidaux, D. Zamir, A. Gur, C. Chevalier, M. Lemaire-Chamley, and C. Rothan. 2004. A genetic map of candidate genes and QTLs involved in tomato fruit size and composition. J. Exp. Bot. 55:16711685.
  • Champagne, C., and N. Sinha. 2004. Compound leaves: equal to the sum of their parts? Development 131:44014412.
  • Chen, K. Y., and S. D. Tanksley. 2004. High-resolution mapping and functional analysis of se2.1: a major stigma exsertion quantitative trait locus associated with the evolution from allogamy to autogamy in the genus Lycopersicon. Genetics 168:15631573.
  • Chen, K. Y., B. Cong, R. Wing, J. Vrebalov, and S. D. Tanksley. 2007. Changes in regulation of a transcription factor lead to autogamy in cultivated tomatoes. Science 318:643645.
  • Chetelat, R. T., and Y. Ji. 2007. Cytogenetics and evolution. Pp. 77112 in M. K.Razdan and A. K.Mattoo, eds. Genetic improvement of Solanaceous crops. Science Publishers, Enfield , NH .
  • Cipollini, M. L. 2000. Secondary metabolites of vertebrate-dispersed fruits: evidence for adaptive functions. Revista Chilena De Historia Natural 73:421440.
  • Cipollini, M. L., and D. J. Levey. 1997. Secondary metabolites of fleshy vertebrate-dispersed fruits: adaptive hypotheses and implications for seed dispersal. Am. Nat. 150:346372.
  • Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43:362381.
  • Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Assoc., Inc., Sunderland , MA .
  • Cuartero, J., M. C. Bolarin, M. J. Asins, and V. Moreno. 2006. Increasing salt tolerance in the tomato. J. Exp. Bot. 57:10451058.
  • D'Arcy, W. G. 1979. The classification of the Solanaceae. Biol. Taxon. Solanaceae Lond. 347.
  • Dawkins, R., and J. R. Krebs. 1979. Arms races between and within species. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 205:489511.
  • De Nettancourt, D. 2001. Incompatibility and incongruity in wild and cultivated plants. Springer, Berlin .
  • Dobzhansky, T. 1970. Genetics of the evolutionary process. Columbia Univ. Press, New York , NY .
  • Doganlar, S., A. Frary, and S. D. Tanksley. 2000. The genetic basis of seed-weight variation: tomato as a model system. Theor. Appl. Genet. 100:12671273.
  • Doganlar, S., A. Frary, M. C. Daunay, R. N. Lester, and S. D. Tanksley. 2002. A comparative genetic linkage map of eggplant (Solanum melongena) and its implications for genome evolution in the Solanaceae. Genetics 161:16971711.
  • Dorus, S., S. A. Busby, U. Gerike, J. Shabanowitz, D. F. Hunt, and T. L. Karr. 2006. Genomic and functional evolution of the Drosophila melanogaster sperm proteome. Nat. Genet. 38:14401445.
  • Downie, A. B., L. M. A. Dirk, Q. L. Xu, J. Drake, D. Q. Zhang, M. Dutt, A. Butterfield, R. R. Geneve, J. W. Corum, K. G. Lindstrom, and J. C. Snyder. 2004. A physical, enzymatic, and genetic characterization of perturbations in the seeds of the brownseed tomato mutants. J. Exp. Bot. 55:961973.
  • Downie, A. B., D. Q. Zhang, L. M. A. Dirk, R. R. Thacker, J. A. Pfeiffer, J. L. Drake, A. A. Levy, A. Butterfield, J. W. Buxton, and J. C. Synder. 2003. Communication between the maternal testa and the embryo and/or endosperm affect testa attributes in tomato. Plant Physiol. 133:145160.
  • Endler, J. A. 1986. Natural selection in the wild. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton , NJ .
  • Eshed, Y., and D. Zamir. 1994. A genomic library of Lycopersicon pennellii in Lycopersicon esculentum—a tool for fine mapping of genes. Euphytica 79:175179.
  • Feder, M. E., and T. Mitchell-Olds. 2003. Evolutionary and ecological functional genomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4:651657.
  • Foolad, M. R. 2004. Recent advances in genetics of salt tolerance in tomato. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 76:101119.
  • Foolad, M. R., and G. Y. Lin. 1999. Relationships between cold- and salt-tolerance during seed germination in tomato: germplasm evaluation. Plant Breeding 118:4548.
  • Foolad, M. R., and G. Y. Lin. 2000. Relationship between cold tolerance during seed germination and vegetative growth in tomato: germplasm evaluation. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 125:679683.
  • Foolad, M. R., L. P. Zhang, and G. Y. Lin. 2001. Identification and validation of QTLs for salt tolerance during vegetative growth in tomato by selective genotyping. Genome 44:444454.
  • Foolad, M. R., P. Subbiah, C. Kramer, G. Hargrave, and G. Y. Lin. 2003a. Genetic relationships among cold, salt and drought tolerance during seed germination in an interspecific cross of tomato. Euphytica 130:199206.
  • Foolad, M. R., L. P. Zhang, and P. Subbiah. 2003b. Genetics of drought tolerance during seed germination in tomato: inheritance and QTL mapping. Genome 46:536545.
  • Frary, A., and S. D. Tanksley. 2001. The molecular map of tomato. Pp. 405420 in R. L.Philips and I. K.Vasil, eds. DNA based markers in plants. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht .
  • Frary, A., T. C. Nesbitt, S. Grandillo, E. Van Der Knaap, B. Cong, J. P. Liu, J. Meller, R. Elber, K. B. Alpert, and S. D. Tanksley. 2000. fw2.2: a quantitative trait locus key to the evolution of tomato fruit size. Science 289:8588.
  • Frary, A., Y. M. Xu, J. P. Liu, S. Mitchell, E. Tedeschi, and S. Tanksley. 2005. Development of a set of PCR-based anchor markers encompassing the tomato genome and evaluation of their usefulness for genetics and breeding experiments. Theor. Appl. Genet. 111:291312.
  • Fridman, E., T. Pleban, and D. Zamir. 2000. A recombination hotspot delimits a wild-species quantitative trait locus for tomato sugar content to 484 bp within an invertase gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 0:47184723.
  • Fridman, E., F. Carrari, Y. S. Liu, A. R. Fernie, and D. Zamir. 2004. Zooming in on a quantitative trait for tomato yield using interspecific introgressions. Science 305:17861789.
  • Fridman, E., J. H. Wang, Y. Iijima, J. E. Froehlich, D. R. Gang, J. Ohlrogge, and E. Pichersky. 2005. Metabolic, genomic, and biochemical analyses of glandular trichomes from the wild tomato species Lycopersicon hirsutum identify a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of methylketones. Plant Cell 17:12521267.
  • Fulton, T. M., R. S. Van Der Hoeven, N. T. Eannetta, and S. D. Tanksley. 2002. Identification, analysis, and utilization of conserved ortholog set markers for comparative genomics in higher plants. Plant Cell 14:14571467.
  • Graham, E. B. 2005. Genetic diversity and crossing relationship of Lycopersicon chilense. PhD Thesis Pp. 141. Genetics. Univ. of California, Davis, Davis , CA.
  • Halitschke, R., J. A. Stenberg, D. Kessler, A. Kessler, and I. T. Baldwin. 2008. Shared signals—‘alarm calls' from plants increase apparency to herbivores and their enemies in nature. Ecol. Lett. 11:2434.
  • Hancock, C. N., K. Kondo, B. Beecher, and B. McClure. 2003. The S-locus and unilateral incompatibility. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 358:11331140.
  • Hawkes, J. G., R. N. Lester, and A. D. Skelding. 1979. The biology and taxonomy of the Solanaceae. P. 738. Academic Press, London , UK .
  • Herrera, C. M., and O. Pellmyr. 2002. Plant-animal interactions: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell, Malden , MA .
  • Hogenboom, N. G. 1972. Breaking breeding barriers in Lycopersicon. I. The genus Lycopersicon, its breeding barriers and the importance of breaking these barriers. Euphytica 21:221227.
  • Hollocher, H., and C. I. Wu. 1996. The genetics of reproductive isolation in the Drosophila simulans clade: X vs autosomal effects and male vs female effects. Genetics 143:12431255.
  • Igic, B., W. A. Smith, K. A. Robertson, B. A. Schaal, and J. R. Kohn. 2007. Studies of self-incompatibility in wild tomatoes: I. S-allele diversity in Solanum chilense Dun. (Solanaceae). Heredity 99:553561.
  • ISGI. 2004. The International Solanaceae Genome Project (SOL): systems approach to diversity and adaptation Pp. 328 in I. S. G.Initiative, D.Zamir, ed. Cornell Univ., Ithaca .
  • Izaguirre, M. M., A. L. Scopel, I. T. Baldwin, and C. L. Ballare. 2003. Convergent responses to stress: solar ultraviolet-B radiation and Manduca sexta herbivory elicit overlapping transcriptional responses in field-grown plants of Nicotiana longiflora. Plant Physiol. 132:17551767.
  • Karr, T. L. 2008. Application of proteomics to ecology and population biology. Heredity 100:200206.
  • Kessler, S., and N. Sinha. 2004. Shaping up: the genetic control of leaf shape. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 7:6572.
  • Kessler, A., R. Halitschke, and I. T. Baldwin. 2004. Silencing the jasmonate cascade: induced plant defenses and insect populations. Science 305:665668.
  • Knapp, S. 2002. Tobacco to tomatoes: a phylogenetic perspective on fruit diversity in the Solanaceae. J. Exp. Bot. 53:20012022.
  • Kohler, G. R., and D. A. St Clair. 2005. Variation for resistance to aphids (Homoptera: Aphididae) among tomato inbred backcross lines derived from wild Lycopersicon species. J. Econ. Entomol. 98:988995.
  • Kondo, K., M. Yamamoto, R. Itahashi, T. Sato, H. Egashira, T. Hattori, and Y. Kowyama. 2002. Insights into the evolution of self-compatibility in Lycopersicon from a study of stylar factors. Plant J. 30:143153.
  • Lan, L. F., M. N. Li, Y. Lai, W. Y. Xu, Z. S. Kong, K. Ying, B. Han, and Y. B. Xue. 2005. Microarray analysis reveals similarities and variations in genetic programs controlling pollination/fertilization and stress responses in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Mol. Biol. 59:151164.
  • Lee, C. E., and T. Mitchell-Olds. 2006. Ecological and evolutionary genomics of populations in nature. Mol. Ecol. 15:11931196.
  • Legnani, R., P. Gognalons, K. G. Selassie, G. Marchoux, A. Moretti, and H. Laterrot. 1996. Identification and characterization of resistance to tobacco etch virus in Lycopersicon species. Plant Disease 80:306309.
  • Lester, R. N., and J. H. Kang. 1998. Embryo and endosperm function and failure in Solanum species and hybrids. Ann. Bot. 82:445453.
  • Levey, D. J., J. J. Tewksbury, M. L. Cipollini, and T. A. Carlo. 2006. A field test of the directed deterrence hypothesis in two species of wild chili. Oecologia 150:6168.
  • Lippman, Z. B., Y. Semel, and D. Zamir. 2007. An integrated view of quantitative trait variation using tomato interspecific introgression lines. Curr. Opin. Genet. Develop. 17:545552.
  • Livingstone, K. D., V. K. Lackney, J. R. Blauth, R. Van Wijk, and M. K. Jahn. 1999. Genome mapping in Capsicum and the evolution of genome structure in the Solanaceae. Genetics 152:11831202.
  • McClure, B. A., and V. Franklin-Tong. 2006. Gametophytic self-incompatibility: understanding the cellular mechanisms involved in “self” pollen tube inhibition. Planta 224:233245.
  • McCormick, S. 1998. Self-incompatibility and other pollen-pistil interactions. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 1:1825.
  • Menda, N., Y. Semel, D. Peled, Y. Eshed, and D. Zamir. 2004. In silico screening of a saturated mutation library of tomato. Plant J. 38:861872.
  • Mitchell-Olds, T., and J. Schmitt. 2006. Genetic mechanisms and evolutionary significance of natural variation in Arabidopsis. Nature 441:947952.
  • Monforte, A. J., and S. D. Tanksley. 2000. Development of a set of near isogenic and backcross recombinant inbred lines containing most of the Lycopersicon hirsutum genome in a L. esculentum genetic background: a tool for gene mapping and gene discovery. Genome 43:803813.
  • Moore, S., P. Payton, M. Wright, S. Tanksley, and J. Giovannoni. 2005. Utilization of tomato microarrays for comparative gene expression analysis in the Solanaceae. J. Exp. Bot. 0:28852895.
  • Moyle, L. C. 2007. Comparative genetics of potential prezygotic and postzygotic isolating barriers in a Lycopersicon species cross. J. Hered. 98:123135.
  • Moyle, L. C., and E. B. Graham. 2005. Genetics of hybrid incompatibility between Lycopersicon esculentum and L. hirsutum. Genetics 169:355373.
  • Moyle, L. C., and E. B. Graham. 2006. Genome-wide associations between hybrid sterility QTL and marker transmission ratio distortion. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23:973980.
  • Moyle, L. C., and T. Nakazato. 2008. Comparative genetics of hybrid incompatibility: sterility in two Lycopersicon species crosses. Genetics 179:14371453.
  • Moyle, L. C., M. S. Olson, and P. Tiffin. 2004. Patterns of reproductive isolation in three angiosperm genera. Evolution 58:11951208.
  • Mueller, L. A., T. H. Solow, N. Taylor, B. Skwarecki, R. Buels, J. Binns, C. W. Lin, M. H. Wright, R. Ahrens, Y. Wang, et al. 2005a. The SOL Genomics Network. A comparative resource for Solanaceae biology and beyond. Plant Physiol. 138:13101317.
  • Mueller, L. A., S. D. Tanksley, J. J. Giovannoni, J. Van Eck, S. Stack, D. Choi, B. D. Kim, M. S. Chen, Z. K. Cheng, C. Y. Li, et al. 2005b. The Tomato Sequencing Project, the first cornerstone of the International Solanaceae Project (SOL). Comp. Funct. Genom. 6:153158.
  • Nakazato, T., M. Bogonovich, and L. C. Moyle. 2008. Environmental factors predict adaptive phenotypic differentiation within and between two wild Andean tomatoes. Evolution 62:744792.
  • Nesbitt, T. C., and S. D. Tanksley. 2002. Comparative sequencing in the genus Lycopersicon: implications for the evolution of fruit size in the domestication of cultivated tomatoes. Genetics 162:365379.
  • Newbigin, E., and M. K. Uyenoyama. 2005. The evolutionary dynamics of self-incompatibility systems. Trends Genet. 21:500505.
  • Orr, H. A. 2005. The genetic theory of adaptation: a brief history. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6:119127.
  • Orr, H. A., and M. Turelli. 2001. The evolution of postzygotic isolation: accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities. Evolution 55:10851094.
  • Ouborg, N. J., and W. H. Vriezen. 2007. An ecologist's guide to ecogenomics. J. Ecol. 95:816.
  • Ouyang, B., T. Yang, H. X. Li, L. Zhang, Y. Y. Zhang, J. H. Zhang, Z. J. Fei, and Z. B. Ye. 2007. Identification of early salt stress response genes in tomato root by suppression subtractive hybridization and microarray analysis. J. Exp. Bot. 0:507520.
  • Ouziad, F., P. Wilde, E. Schmelzer, U. Hildebrandt, and H. Bothe. 2006. Analysis of expression of aquaporins and Na+/H +transporters in tomato colonized by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and affected by salt stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 57:177186.
  • Paran, I., and E. Van Der Knaap. 2007. Genetic and molecular regulation of fruit and plant domestication traits in tomato and pepper. J. Exp. Bot. 0:38413852.
  • Paran, I., and D. Zamir. 2003. Quantitative traits in plants: beyond the QTL. Trends Genet. 19:303306.
  • Patterson, B. D., R. Paull, and R. M. Smillie. 1978. Chilling resistance in Lycopersicon hirsutum Humb. and Bonpl. a wild tomato with a wide altitudinal distribution. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 5:609617.
  • PBI Solanum Project. 2008. Solanaceae Source. http://www.nhm.ac.uk/solanaceaesource/ Accessed February 28, 2008.
  • Peralta, I. E., and D. M. Spooner. 2001. Granule-bound starch synthase (GBSSI) gene phylogeny of wild tomatoes (Solanum L. section Lycopersicon Mill. Wettst. subsection Lycopersicon). Am. J. Bot. 88:18881902.
  • Peralta, I. E., S. K. Knapp, and D. M. Spooner. 2005. New species of wild tomatoes (Solanum section Lycopersicon: Solanaceae) from Northern Peru. Syst. Bot. 30:424434.
  • Pillen, K., O. Pineda, C. B. Lewis, and S. D. Tanksley. 1996. Status of genome mapping tools in the taxon Solonaceae. Pp. 282308 in A. H.Paterson, ed. Genome mapping in plants. R. G. Landes Company, Austin .
  • Pnueli, L., L. Carmel-Goren, D. Hareven, T. Gutfinger, J. Alvarez, M. Ganal, D. Zamir, and E. Lifschitz. 1998. The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. Development 125:19791989.
  • Pozo, M. J., C. Cordier, E. Dumas-Gaudot, S. Gianinazzi, J. M. Barea, and C. Azcon-Aguilar. 2002. Localized versus systemic effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on defence responses to Phytophthora infection in tomato plants. J. Exp. Bot. 0:525534.
  • Richman, A. D., M. K. Uyenoyama, and J. R. Kohn. 1996. Allelic diversity and gene genealogy at the self-incompatibility locus in the Solanaceae. Science 273:12121216.
  • Rick, C. M. 1963. Barriers to inbreeding in Lycopersicon peruvianum. Evolution 17:216232.
  • Rick, C. M. 1966. Some plant-animal relations of the Galapagos islands. Pp. 215224 in R. I.Bowman, ed. The Galapagos. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley , CA.
  • Rick, C. M. 1973. Potential genetic resources in tomato species: clues from observations in native habitats. Pp. 255269 in A. M.Srb, ed. Genes, enzymes, and populations. Plenum Press, New York , NY .
  • Rick, C. M. 1976. Natural variability in wild species of Lycopersicon and its bearing on tomato breeding. Agraria 30:249259.
  • Rick, C. M. 1978. Tomato germplasm resources. The 1st International Symposium on Tropical Tomato, Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Shanhua , Taiwan . Pp. 214224.
  • Rick, C. M. 1979. Biosystematic studies in Lycopersicon and closely related species of Solanum. Biol. Taxon. Solanaceae 7:667679.
  • Rick, C. M., and R. T. Chetelat. 1996. Past, present, and future prospects for using wild germplasm resources for tomato improvement. First International Conference on the Processing Tomato, Recife , Brazil 145149.
  • Rick, C. M., and M. Holle. 1990. Andean Lycopersicon esculentum var. cerasiforme: genetic variation and its evolutionary significance. Econ. Bot. 44:6978.
  • Rick, C. M., and R. Lamm. 1955. Biosystematic studies on the status of Lycopersicon chilense. Am. J. Bot. 42:663675.
  • Rick, C. M., E. Kesicki, J. F. Fobes, and M. Holle. 1976. Genetic and biosystematic studies on 2 new sibling species of Lycopersicon from inter-Andean Peru. Theor. Appl. Genet. 47:5568.
  • Rick, C. M., J. F. Fobes, and M. Holle. 1977. Genetic variation in Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium: evidence of evolutionary change in mating systems. Plant Syst. Evol. 127:139170.
  • Rick, C. M., M. Holle, and R. W. Thorp. 1978. Rates of cross pollination in Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium: impact of genetic variation in floral characters. Plant Syst. Evol. 129:3144.
  • Rick, C. M., J. F. Fobes, and S. D. Tanksley. 1979. Evolution of mating systems in Lycopersicon hirsutum as deduced from genetic variation in electrophoretic and morphological characters. Plant Syst. Evol. 132:279298.
  • Rivers, B. A., R. Bernatzky, S. J. Robinson, and W. Jahnen-Dechent. 1993. Molecular diversity at the self-incompatibility locus is a salient feature in natural populations of wild tomato (Lycopersicon peruvianum). Mol. Gen. Genet. 238:419427.
  • Rose, L. E., C. H. Langley, A. J. Bernal, and R. W. Michelmore. 2005. Natural variation m the Pto pathogen resistance gene within species of wild tomato (Lycopersicon). I. Functional analysis of Pto alleles. Genetics 171:345357.
  • Rose, L. E., R. W. Michelmore, and C. H. Langley. 2007. Natural variation in the Pto disease resistance gene within species of wild tomato (Lycopersicon). II. Population genetics of Pto. Genetics 175:13071319.
  • Rudich, J., and U. Luchinsky. 1986. Water economy. Pp. 335368 in J. G.Atherton and J.Rudich, eds. The tomato crop: a scientific basis for improvement. Kluwer, New York , NY .
  • Sasa, M. M., P. T. Chippindale, and N. A. Johnson. 1998. Patterns of postzygotic isolation in frogs. Evolution 52:18111820.
  • Schauer, N., D. Zamir, and A. R. Fernie. 2005. Metabolic profiling of leaves and fruit of wild species tomato: a survey of the Solanum lycopersicum complex. J. Exp. Bot. 0:297307.
  • Schauer, N., Y. Semel, U. Roessner, A. Gur, I. Balbo, F. Carrari, T. Pleban, A. Perez-Melis, C. Bruedigam, J. Kopka, et al. 2006. Comprehensive metabolic profiling and phenotyping of interspecific introgression lines for tomato improvement. Nat. Biotechnol. 24:447454.
  • Schlueter, J. A., P. Dixon, C. Granger, D. Grant, L. Clark, J. J. Doyle, and R. C. Shoemaker. 2004. Mining EST databases to resolve evolutionary events in major crop species. Genome 47:868876.
  • Schmidt, D. D., A. Kessler, D. Kessler, S. Schmidt, M. Lim, K. Gase, and I. T. Baldwin. 2004. Solanum nigrum: a model ecological expression system and its tools. Mol. Ecol. 0:981995.
  • Scott, S. J., and R. A. Jones. 1982. Low temperature seed germination of Lycopersicon species evaluated by survival analysis. Euphytica 31:869883.
  • Sela-Buurlage, M. B., O. Budai-Hadrian, Q. Pan, L. Carmel-Goren, R. Vunsch, D. Zamir, and R. Fluhr. 2001. Genome-wide dissection of Fusarium resistance in tomato reveals multiple complex loci. Mol. Genet. Genom. 265:11041111.
  • Singh, K. B., R. C. Foley, and L. Onate-Sanchez. 2002. Transcription factors in plant defense and stress responses. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 5:430436.
  • Spooner, D. M., I. E. Peralta, and S. Knapp. 2005. Comparison of AFLPs with other markers for phylogenetic inference in wild tomatoes [Solanum L. section Lycopersicon (Mill.) Wettst.]. Taxon 54:4361.
  • Stadler, T., K. Roselius, and W. Stephan. 2005. Genealogical footprints of speciation processes in wild tomatoes: demography and evidence for historical gene flow. Evolution 59:12681279.
  • Stadler, T., U. Arunyawat, and W. Stephan. 2008. Population genetics of speciation in two closely related wild tomatoes (Solanum section Lycopersicon). Genetics 178:339350.
  • Stebbins, G. L. 1950. Variation and Evolution in plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York , NY .
  • Stevens, M. A., and C. M. Rick. 1986. Genetics and Breeding. Pp. 35109 in J. G.Atherton and J.Rudich, eds. The tomato crop: a scientific basis for improvement. Kluwer, New York , NY .
  • Stinchcombe, J. R., and H. E. Hoekstra. 2008. Combining population genomics and quantitative genetics: finding the genes underlying ecologically important traits. Heredity 100:158170.
  • Swanson, R., A. F. Edlund, and D. Preuss. 2004. Species specificity in pollen-pistil interactions. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38:793818.
  • Swanson, R., T. Clark, and D. Preuss. 2005. Expression profiling of Arabidopsis stigma tissue identifies stigma-specific genes. Sexual Plant Reprod. 18:163171.
  • Tanksley, S. D., and F. Figueroa. 1985. Gametophytic self-incompatibility is controlled by a single major locus on Chromosome 1 in Lycopersicon peruvianum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:50935096.
  • Tanksley, S. D., and T. M. Fulton. 2007. Dissecting quantitative trait variation – examples from the tomato. Euphytica 154:365370.
  • Tanksley, S. D., M. W. Ganal, J. P. Prince, M. C. Devicente, M. W. Bonierbale, P. Broun, T. M. Fulton, J. J. Giovannoni, S. Grandillo, G. B. Martin, et al. 1992. High-density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 132:11411160.
  • Tao, Y., Z. B. Zeng, J. Li, D. L. Hartl, and C. C. Laurie. 2003. Genetic dissection of hybrid Incompatibilities between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. II. Mapping hybrid male sterility loci on the third chromosome. Genetics 164:13991418.
  • Taylor, I. B. 1986. Biosystematics of the tomato. Pp. 134 in J. G.Atherton and J.Rudich, eds. The tomato crop: a scientific basis for improvement. Chapman and Hall, London .
  • Tewksbury, J. J., and G. P. Nabhan. 2001. Seed dispersal—Directed deterrence by capsaicin in chillies. Nature 412:403404.
  • Thaler, J. S., and R. M. Bostock. 2004. Interactions between abscisic-acid-mediated responses and plant resistance to pathogens and insects. Ecology 85:4858.
  • Thaler, J. S., B. Owen, and V. J. Higgins. 2004. The role of the jasmonate response in plant susceptibility to diverse pathogens with a range of lifestyles. Plant Physiol. 135:530538.
  • Thomas, M. A., and R. Klaper. 2004. Genomics for the ecological toolbox. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:439445.
  • True, J. R., B. S. Weir, and C. C. Laurie. 1996. A genome-wide survey of hybrid incompatibility factors by the introgression of marked segments of Drosophila mauritiana chromosomes into Drosophila simulans. Genetics 142:819837.
  • Uyenoyama, M. K. 2003. Genealogy-dependent variation in viability among self-incompatibility genotypes. Theor. Popul. Biol. 63:281293.
  • Vallejos, C. E. 1979. Genetic diversity of plants for response to low temperatures and its potential use in crop plants. P. 565 in J. M.Lyons, D.Graham and J. K.Raison, eds. Low temperature stress in crop plants: the role of the membrane. Academic Press, New York , NY .
  • Wahaj, S. A., D. J. Levey, A. K. Sanders, and M. L. Cipollini. 1998. Control of gut retention time by secondary metabolites in ripe Solanum fruits. Ecology 79:23092319.
  • Warren, D. L., R. E. Glor, and M. Turelli. 2008. Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution in press .
  • Wolf, S., D. Yakir, M. A. Stevens, and J. Rudich. 1986. Cold temperature tolerance of wild tomato species. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 111:960964.
  • Wright, S. I., R. W. Ness, J. P. Foxe, and S. C. H. Barrett. 2008. Genomic consequences of outcrossing and selfing in plants. Int. J. Plant Sci. 169:105118.
  • Yoshida, K. T., M. Endo, M. Nakazono, H. Fukuda, T. Demura, T. Tsuchiya, and M. Watanabe. 2005. cDNA microarray analysis of gene expression changes during pollination, pollen-tube elongation, fertilization, and early embryogenesis in rice pistils. Sexual Plant Reprod. 17:269275.
  • Young, K. R., C. U. Ulloa, J. L. Luteyn, and S. Knapp. 2002. Plant evolution and endemism in Andean South America: an introduction. Bot. Rev. 68:421.
  • Zamir, D. 2001. Improving plant breeding with exotic genetic libraries. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2:983989.
  • Zamir, D. 2008. New and views: plant breeders go back to nature. Nat. Genet. 40:269270.
  • Zgallai, H., K. Steppe, and R. Lemeur. 2006. Effects of different levels of water stress on leaf water potential, stomatal resistance, protein and chlorophyll content and certain anti-oxidative enzymes in tomato plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 48:679685.