SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

LITERATURE CITED

  • Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton , NJ .
  • Andersson, M., and Y. Iwasa.1996. Sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:5358.
  • Arnold, S. J. 1986. Limits on stabilizing, disruptive, and correlational selection set by the opportunity for selection. Am. Nat. 128:143146.
  • Arnold, S. J., and M. J. Wade. 1984a. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection—-theory. Evolution 38:709719.
  • Arnold, S. J., and M. J. Wade. 1984b. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection—applications. Evolution 38:720734.
  • Arnold, S. J., and D. Duvall. 1994. Animal mating systems: a synthesis based on selection theory. Am. Nat. 143:317348.
  • Avise, J. C., A. G. Jones, D. Walker, J. A. DeWoody, and   Collaborators. 2002. Genetic mating systems and reproductive natural histories of fishes: lessons for ecology and evolution. Ann. Rev. Genet. 36:1945.
  • Becher, S. A., and A. E. Magurran. 2004. Multiple mating and reproductive skew in Trinidadian guppies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271:10091014.
  • Bateman, A. J. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349368.
  • Bro-Jørgensen, J. 2007. The intensity of sexual selection predicts weapon size in male bovids. Evolution 61:13161326.
  • Candolin, U. 2003. The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biol. Rev. 78:575595.
  • Clutton-Brock, T. H. 1983. Selection in relation to sex. Pp. 457481 in D. S.Bendall, ed. Evolution from molecules to men. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge .
  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., P. H. Harvey, and B. Rudder. 1977. Sexual dimorphism, socionomic sex ratio and body weight in primates. Nature 269:797800.
  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., S. D. Albon, and P. H. Harvey. 1980. Antlers, body size and breeding group size in the Cervidae. Nature 285:565566.
  • Coltman, D. W., D. R. Bancroft, J. A. Smith, T. H. Clutton-Brock, and J. M. Pemberton. 1999. Male reproductive success in a promiscuous mammal: behavioural estimates compared with genetic paternity. Mol. Ecol. 8:11991209.
  • Crow, J. F. 1958. Some possibilities for measuring selection intensities in man. Human Biol. 30:113.
  • Crow, J. F. 2002. Perspective: here's to Fisher, additive genetic variance, and the fundamental theorem of natural selection. Evolution 56:13131316.
  • Darwin, C. 1871. The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. J. Murray, London .
  • Dewsbury, D. A. 2005. The Darwin-Bateman paradigm in historical context. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45:831837.
  • Emlen, S. T., and L. W. Oring. 1977. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science 197:215223.
  • Fairbairn, D. J., and A. E. Wilby. 2001. Inequality of opportunity: measuring the potential for sexual selection. Evol. Ecol. Res. 3:667686.
  • Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. Mackay. 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman Group, Harlow , UK .
  • Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon, Oxford .
  • Grafen, A. 1987. Measuring sexual selection: why bother? Pp. 221233 in J. W.Bradbury and M. B.Andersson, eds. Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, Chichester .
  • Grafen, A. 1988. On the uses of data on lifetime reproductive success. Pp. 454471 in T. H.Clutton-Brock, ed. Reproductive success. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago .
  • Hersch, E. I., and P. C. Phillips. 2004. Power and potential bias in field studies of natural selection. Evolution 58:479485.
  • Hubbell, S. P., and L. K. Johnson. 1987. Environmental variance in lifetime mating success, mate choice, and sexual selection. Am. Nat. 130:91112.
  • Hughes, C. 1998. Integrating molecular techniques with field methods in studies of social behavior: a revolution results. Ecology 79:383399.
  • Janzen, F. J., and E. D. Brodie. 1989. Tall tails and sexy males – sexual behavior of rough-skinned newts (Taricha granulosa) in a natural breeding pond. Copeia 1989:10681071.
  • Jennions, M. D., and M. Petrie. 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. Camb. Phil. Soc. 75:2164.
  • Johnsen, A., J. T. Lifjeld, A. Andersson, J. Örnborg, and T. Amundsen. 2001. Male characteristics and fertilisation success in bluethroats. Behaviour 138:13711390.
  • Jones, A. G., and W. R. Ardren. 2003. Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Mol. Ecol. 12:25112523.
  • Jones, A. G., G. Rosenqvist, A. Berglund, S. J. Arnold, and J. C. Avise. 2000. The Bateman gradient and the cause of sexual selection in a sex-role-reversed pipefish. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 267:677680.
  • Jones, A. G., D. Walker, and J. C. Avise. 2001. Genetic evidence for extreme polyandry and extraordinary sex-role reversal in a pipefish. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268:25312535.
  • Jones, A. G., J. R. Arguello, and S. J. Arnold. 2002. Validation of Bateman's principles: a genetic study of mating patterns and sexual selection in newts. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269:25332539.
  • Jones, A. G., J. R. Arguello, and S. J. Arnold. 2004. Molecular parentage analysis in experimental newt populations: the response of mating system measures to variation in the operational sex ratio. Am. Nat. 164:444456.
  • Jones, A. G., G. Rosenqvist, A. Berglund, and J. C. Avise. 2005. The measurement of sexual selection using Bateman's principles: an experimental test in the sex-role-reversed pipefish Syngnathus typhle. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45:874884.
  • Koenig, W. D., and S. S. Albano. 1986. On the measurement of sexual selection. Am. Nat. 127:403409.
  • Kokko, H., A. Mackenzie, J. D. Reynolds, J. Lindstrom, and W. J. Sutherland. 1999. Measures of inequality are not equal. Am. Nat. 72:358382.
  • Lande, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain: body size allometry. Evolution 33:402416.
  • Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:12101226.
  • Lorch, P. D. 2002. Understanding reversals in the relative strength of sexual selection on males and females: a role for sperm competition? Am. Nat. 159:645657.
  • Lorch, P. D. 2005. Using upper limits of “Bateman gradients” to estimate the opportunity for sexual selection. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45:924930.
  • Lorch, P. D., L. F. Bussiere, and D. T. Gwynne. 2008. Quantifying the potential for sexual dimorphism using upper limits on Bateman gradients. Behaviour 145:124.
  • Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer, Sunderland , MA .
  • Mills, S. C., A. Grapputo, E. Koskela, and T. Mappes. 2007. Quantitative measures of sexual selection with respect to the operational sex ratio: a comparison of selection indices. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 274:143150.
  • Møller, A. P. 1997. Immune defence, extra-pair paternity, and sexual selection in birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264:561566.
  • Morisita, M. 1962. Iδ, a measure of dispersion of individuals. Res. Pop. Ecol. 4:17.
  • Nonacs, P. 2000. Measuring and using skew in the study of social behavior and evolution. Am. Nat. 156:577589.
  • Parker, P. G., and Z. Tang-Martinez. 2005. Bateman gradients in field and laboratory studies: a cautionary tale. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45:895902.
  • Payne, R. B. 1984. Sexual selection, lek and arena behavior, and sexual size dimorphism in birds. Ornithol. Monogr. 33:153.
  • Pemberton, J. M., S. D. Albon, F. E. Guinness, T. H. Clutton-Brock, and G. A. Glover. 1992. Behavioral estimates of male mating success tested by DNA fingerprinting in a polygynous mammal. Behav. Ecol. 3:6675.
  • Price, G. R. 1970. Selection and covariance. Nature 227:520521.
  • Rios-Cardenas, O. 2005. Patterns of parental investment and sexual selection in teleost fishes: do they support Bateman's principles? Integr. Comp. Biol. 45:885894.
  • Robertson, A. 1966. A mathematical model of the culling process in dairy cattle. Anim. Prod. 8:93108.
  • Rosenthal, G. G., and C. S. Evans. 1998. Female preference for swords in Xiphophorus helleri reflects a bias for large apparent size. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:44314436.
  • Ruzzante, D., D. C. Hamilton, D. L. Kramer, and J. W. A. Grant. 1996. Scaling of the variance and the quantification of resource monopolization. Behav. Ecol. 7:199207.
  • Say, L., F. Naulty, and T. J. Heyden. 2003. Genetic and behavioural estimates of reproductive skew in male fallow deer. Mol. Ecol. 12:27932800.
  • Sheldon, B. C., and H. Ellegren. 1998. Paternal effort related to experimentally manipulated paternity of male collared flycatchers. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265:17371742.
  • Sheldon, B. C., and H. Ellegren. 1999. Sexual selection resulting from extrapair paternity in collared flycatchers. Anim. Behav. 57:285298.
  • Shuster, S. M., and M. J. Wade. 2003. Mating systems and strategies. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton , NJ .
  • Sutherland, W. J. 1985a. Chance can produce a sex difference in variance in mating success and explain Bateman's data. Anim. Behav. 33:13491352.
  • Sutherland, W. J. 1985b. Measures of sexual selection. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 1:90101.
  • Sutherland, W. J. 1987. Random and deterministic components of variance in mating success. Pp. 209219 in J. W.Bradbury and M. B.Andersson, eds. Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, Chichester .
  • Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. Pp. 136179 in B.Campbell, ed. Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971. Heinemann, London .
  • Wade, M. J. 1979. Sexual selection and variance in reproductive success. Am. Nat. 114:742747.
  • Wade, M. J. 1987. Measuring sexual selection. Pp. 197207 in J. W.Bradbury and M. B.Andersson, eds. Sexual selection: testing the alternatives. Wiley, Chichester .
  • Wade, M. J., and S. J. Arnold. 1980. The intensity of sexual selection in relation to male sexual behavior, female choice, and sperm precedence. Anim. Behav. 28:446461.
  • Wade, M. J., and S. M. Shuster. 2004. Sexual selection: Harem size and the variance in male reproductive success. Am. Nat. 164:E83E89.
  • Webster, M. S., K. A. Tarvin, E. M. Tuttle, and S. Pruett-Jones. 2007. Promiscuity drives sexual selection in a socially monogamous bird. Evolution 61:22052211.