SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

LITERATURE CITED

  • Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Monographs in Behavior and Ecology. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton , NJ .
  • Balinski, M., and R. Laraki. 2007. A theory of measuring, electing, and ranking. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:87208725.
  • Beigel, H. G. 1954. Body height in mate selection. J. Soc. Psych. 39:257268.
  • Bolker, B. M., M. E. Brooks, C. J. Clark, S. W. Geange, J. R. Poulsen, M. H. H. Stevens, and J.-S. S. White. 2009. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:127135.
  • Buss, D. M. 1989. Sex differences in human mate preferences: evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behav. Brain Sci. 12:149.
  • Cameron, C., S. Oskamp, and W. Sparks. 1977. Courtship American style: newspaper ads. Family Coord. 26:2730.
  • Courtiol, A., J.-B. Ferdy, B. Godelle, M. Raymond, and J. Claude. 2010. Height and body mass Influence on human body outlines: a quantitative approach using an elliptic Fourier analysis. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. In press .
  • Cox, R. M., and R. Calsbeek. 2009. Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism, and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict. Am. Nat. 173:176187.
  • Darwin, C. 1879. The descent of man. Published in 1879 by John Murray, London, 2nd edition. Penguin Classics 2004, London .
  • Ellis, B. J. 1995. The evolution of sexual attraction: evaluative mechanisms in women. Pp. 279281 in L. C. J. H.Barkow and J.Tooby, eds. The adapted mind. Oxford Univ. Press, New York , NY .
  • Fink, B., N. Neave, G. Brewer, and B. Pawlowski. 2007. Variable preferences for sexual dimorphism in stature (SDS): further evidence for an adjustment in relation to own height. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 43:22492257.
  • Fisher, R. A. 1918. The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance. T. R. Soc. Edinburgh 52:399433.
  • Galton, F. 1889. Natural inheritance. London and New York MacMillan and Co.
  • Gillis, J. S., and W. E. Avis. 1980. The male-taller norm in mate selection. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B. 6:396401.
  • Gimelfarb, A. 1988a. Processes of pair formation leading to assortative mating in biological populations: dynamic interaction model. Theor. Popul. Biol. 34:123.
  • Gimelfarb, A. 1988b. Processes of pair formation leading to assortative mating in biological populations: encounter-mating model. Am. Nat. 131:865884.
  • Graziano, W., T. Brothen, and E. Berscheid. 1978. Height and attraction: do men and women see eye-to-eye? J. Pers. 46:128145.
  • Hensley, W. E. 1994. Height as a basis for interpersonal attraction. Adolescence 29:469474.
  • Iwasa, Y., and A. Pomiankowski. 1999. Good parent and good genes models of handicap evolution. J. Theor. Biol. 200:97109.
  • Jackson, L., and K. Ervin. 1992. Height stereotypes of women and men: the liabilities of shortness for both sexes. J. Soc. Psych. 132:433445.
  • Kirkpatrick, M., A. S. Rand, and M. J. Ryan. 2006. Mate choice rules in animals. Anim. Behav. 71:12151225.
  • Knuth, D. E. 1998. The art of computer programming, vol. 3: sorting and searching, chapter Sorting by merging, Pp. 158168. 2nd edition. Addison-Wesley, Reading , MA .
  • Koenker, R. 2006. Parametric links for binary response. R News 6:3234.
  • Koenker, R., and J. Yoon. 2009. Parametric links for binary choice models: A Fisherian-Bayesian colloquy. J. Econometrics 152:120130.
  • Kuhl, F. P., and C. R. Giardina. 1982. Elliptic Fourier features of a closed outline. Comput. Graph. Image Process. 18:236258.
  • Kurzban, R., and J. Weeden. 2005. HurryDate: Mate preferences in action. Evol. Hum. Behav. 26:227244.
  • Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:37213725.
  • Lindenfors, P., J. L. Gittleman, and K. E. Jones. 2007. Sexual size dimorphism in Mammals. Pp. 1626 in D. J.Fairbairn, W. U.Blanckenhorn, and T.Székely, eds. Sex, size, and gender roles. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford .
  • Lynch, M., and B. Walsh. 1997. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sinauer Associates Inc., U.S .
  • Lynn, M., and B. A. Shurgot. 1984. Responses to lonely hearts advertisements: effects of reported physical attractiveness, physique, and coloration. Pers. Soc. Psych. Bull. 10:349357.
  • McCullagh, P., and J. Nelder. 1989. Generalized linear models. Chapman and Hall, London .
  • McManus, I. C., and C. G. N. Mascie-Taylor. 1984. Human assortative mating for height: non-linearity and heteroscedasticity. Hum. Biol. 56:617623.
  • Mueller, U., and A. Mazur. 2001. Evidence of unconstrained directional selection for male tallness. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 50:302311.
  • Nettle, D. 2002a. Height and reproductive success in a cohort of British men. Hum. Nat. 13:473491.
  • Nettle, D. 2002b. Women's height, reproductive success and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in modern humans. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269:19191923.
  • Pawlowski, B. 2003. Variable preferences for sexual dimorphism in height as a strategy for increasing the pool of potential partners in humans. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270:709712.
  • Pawlowski, B., and S. Koziel. 2002. The impact of traits offered in personal advertisements on response rates. Evol. Hum. Behav. 23:139149.
  • Pearson, K. 1897. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution: on the law of ancestral heredity. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 62:386412.
  • Pearson, K., and A. Lee. 1903. On the laws of inheritance in man: i. inheritance of physical characters. Biometrika Trust 2:357462.
  • Pinheiro, J., D. Bates, S. DebRoy, D. Sarkar, and the R Core team. 2008. Nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models, R package version 3.1-90.
  • Price, T., D. Schluter, and N. E. Heckman. 1993. Sexual selection when the female directly benefits. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 48:187211.
  • Ryan, M. J., A. S. Rand, and T. Tregenza. 2003. Sexual selection in female perceptual space: how female Tungara frogs perceive and respond to complex population variation in acoustic mating signals. Evolution 57:26082618.
  • Salska, I., D. A. Frederick, B. Pawlowski, A. H. Reilly, K. T. Laird, and N. A. Rudd. 2008. Conditional mate preferences: factors influencing preferences for height. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 44:203215.
  • Shepperd, J. A., and A. J. Strathman. 1989. Attractiveness and height: the role of stature in dating preference, frequency of dating, and perceptions of attractiveness. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B. 15:617627.
  • Sheskin, D. 2007. The handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. Chapman and Hall, New York .
  • Spuhler, J. N. 1982. Assortative mating with respect to physical characteristics. Soc. Biol. 29:5366.
  • Venables, W. N., and B. D. Ripley. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S. 4th edition. Springer, NY .
  • Weeden, J., and J. Sabini. 2005. Physical attractiveness and health in western societies: a review. Psychol. Bull. 131:635653.