Present address: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, 25 Willcocks Street, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B2, Canada.
REMATING IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER: ARE INDIRECT BENEFITS CONDITION DEPENDENT?
Version of Record online: 12 APR 2010
© 2010 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2010 The Society for the Study of Evolution
Volume 64, Issue 9, pages 2767–2774, September 2010
How to Cite
Long, T. A. F., Pischedda, A. and Rice, W. R. (2010), REMATING IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER: ARE INDIRECT BENEFITS CONDITION DEPENDENT?. Evolution, 64: 2767–2774. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.00997.x
- Issue online: 7 SEP 2010
- Version of Record online: 12 APR 2010
- Received November 2, 2009Accepted March 17, 2010
- 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton , NJ .
- 2000. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Anim. Behav. 60:145–164. , and .
- 2005. Sexual conflict. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton , NJ . , and .
- 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349–368.
- 2001. Female polyandry affects their sons’ reproductive success in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum. J. Evol. Biol. 14:186–193. , and .
- 2006. Evidence for adaptive male mate choice in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 273:917–922. , and .
- 1995. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373:241–244. , , , , and .
- 2001. Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:1671–1675. , , and .
- 2000. Correlated effects of sperm competition and postmating female mortality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:13162–13165. , and .
- 1988. Reproductive success: studies of individual variation in contrasting breeding systems. The Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago .
- 2006. Sexual selection and condition-dependent mate preferences. Curr. Biol. 16:R755–R765. , , and .
- 1996. Genetic modification of heterochromatic association and nuclear organization in Drosphila. Nature 381:529–531. , and .
- 2002. Material and genetic benefits of female multiple mating and polyandry. Anim. Behav. 64:361–367. , and .
- 1989. A cost of mating in female fruit flies. Nature 338:760–761. , and .
- 2006. Male perception of female mating status: its effect on copulation duration, sperm defence and female fitness. Anim. Behav. 72:1259–1268.
- 2005. Assessing the potential for an ongoing arms race within and between the sexes: selection and heritable variation. Evolution 59:1540–1551. , , , and .
- 2008. Adult male nutrition and reproductive success in Drosphila melanogaster. Evolution 62:3170–3117. , , and .
- 2009. The conditional economics of sexual conflict. Biol. Lett. 5:660–662. , , , and .
- 2002. The X chromosome is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269:499–505. , , and .
- 1983. The study of mate choice. Pp. 3–32 in P.Bateson, ed. Mate Choice. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge , UK .
- 1998. Inference of sperm competition from broods of field-caught Drosophila. Evolution 52:1334–1341. , and .
- 2005. The indirect benefits of mating with attractive males outweigh the direct costs. PLoS Biol. 3:289–294. , , and .
- 1998. Perspective: chase-away sexual selection: antagonistic seduction versus resistance. Evolution 52:1–7. , and .
- 1998. Multiple mating in wild Drosophila melanogaster revisited by microsatellite analysis. Mol. Ecol. 7:915–917. , , , and .
- 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. 72:283–327. , and .
- 2000. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. 75:21–64. , and .
- 2005. Sexual selection when fertilization is not guaranteed. Evolution 59:1876–1885. , and .
- 2009. Direct observation of female mating frequency using time-lapse photography. Fly 3:1–3. , and .
- 2006. The cost of mating rises nonlinearly with copulation frequency in a laboratory population of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 19:1795–1802. , , and .
- 2000. The influence of male and female body size on copulation duration and fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster. Hereditas 132:243–247. , and .
- 2008. Lifetime and intergenerational fitness consequences of harmful male interactions for female lizards. Ecology 89:56–64. , , and .
- 2006. Standing genetic variance for female resistance to harm from males and its relationship to intralocus sexual conflict. Evolution 60:97–105. , , and .
- 2005. Natural selection and genetic variation for female resistance to harm from males. J. Evol. Biol. 18:568–575. , and .
- 2009a. Estimating the heritability of female lifetime fecundity in a locally adapted Drosophila melanogaster population. J. Evol. Biol. 22:637–643. , , , and .
- 2009b. A cost of sexual attractiveness to high fitness females. PLoS Biol. 7:e1000254. , , , and .
- 2009. Sexual selection against deleterious mutations via variable male search success. Biol. Lett. 5:795–797. , , and .
- 2000. Forced matings in natural populations of Drosophila. Am. Nat. 156:100–103.
- 2007. Larval rearing environment affects several post-copulatory traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Biol. Lett. 3:607–610. , , , , , and .
- 1965. Competition involving dominant mutants in experimental populations of Drosphila melanogaster. Genetics 52:165–189.
- 2005. Patterns of sperm precedence are not affected by female mating history in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 59:2608–2615. , , and .
- 2005. Sexy sons from re-mating do not recoup the direct costs of harmful male interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system. J. Evol. Biol. 18:1315–1323. , , and .
- 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. Pp. 123–166 in M. S.Blum and N. A.Blum, eds. Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects. Academic Press, New York .
- 1990. Nonmating costs of exposure to males in female Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 36:419–425. , and .
- 1987. Male size and mating success in Drosophila melanogaster: the roles of male and female behaviour. Anim. Behav. 35:555–562. , , and .
- 2006. Intralocus sexual conflict diminishes the benefits of sexual selection. PLoS Biol. 4:e356. , and .
- 2008. Sexual behaviour and inclusive fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Am. Nat. 171:10–21. , , and .
- 1984. Sex-chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:735–742.
- 1990. A consensus combined P-value test and the family-wide significance of component tests. Biometrics 46:303–308. .
- 2001. Intersexual ontogenetic conflict. J. Evol. Biol. 14:685–693. , and .
- 2006. Assessing sexual conflict in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system. Philos. Tran. R. Soc. Lond. B 361:287–299. , , , , , and .
- 1996. An experimental test of condition-dependent mating behavior and habitat choice by water striders in the wild. Behav. Ecol. 7:474–479. , , and .
- 2005. Escalation, retreat, and female indifference as alternative outcomes of sexually antagonistic coevolution. Am. Nat. 165:S5–S18. , , and .
- 2007. An experimental test for indirect benefits in Drosophila melanogaster. BMC Evol. Biol. 7:36. , , and .
- 2005. The evolution of polyandry: sperm competition, sperm selection and offspring viability. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 36:125–146.
- 2005. Assessing putative interlocus sexual conflict in Drosophila melanogaster using experimental evolution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 272:2029–2035. , , and .
- 2008. Sexual conflict is not counterbalanced by good genes in the laboratory Drosophila melanogaster model system. J. Evol. Biol. 21:1808–1813. , , , and .
- 2004. Sexual responsiveness is condition-dependent in female guppies, but preference functions are not. BMC Ecol. 4:5. , and .
- 1983. The evolution of insect mating systems. Harvard Univ/ Press, Cambridge , MA . , and .
- 1998. Benefits of multiple mates in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus. Evolution 52:1726–1730. , and .
- 1980. The intensity of sexual selection in relation to male sexual behavior female choice and sperm precedence. Anim. Behav. 28:446–461. , and .
- 1998. Effects of male genetic contribution and paternal investment to egg and hatchling size in the cricket, Gryllus firmus. J. Evol. Biol. 11:135–146. , , and .
- 1999. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: causes and consequences of mating preferences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14:26–31. , and .
- 2009. Seminal fluid protein allocation and male reproductive success. Curr. Biol. 19:751–757. , , , , , , , and .