SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

LITERATURE CITED

  • Alonzo, S. H. 2008. Female mate choice copying affects sexual selection in wild populations of the ocellated wrasse. Anim. Behav. 75:17151723.
  • Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton , NJ .
  • Arnaiz-Villena, A., J. Moscoso, V. Ruiz-del-Valle, J. Gonzalez, R. Reguera, M. Wink, and J. I. Serrano-Vela. 2007. Bayesian phylogeny of Fringillinae birds: status of the singular African oriole finch Linurgus olivaceus and the evolution and heterogeneity of the genus Carpodacus. Acta Zool. Sinica 53:826834.
  • Arnold, S. J. 1994. Bateman principles and the measurement of sexual selection in plants and animals. Am. Nat. 144(Suppl):S126S149.
  • Arnold, S. J., and M. Wade. 1984. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: applications. Evolution 38:720734.
  • Beatty, J. H. 2006. The evolutionary contingency thesis. in E.Sober, ed. Conceptual issues in evolutionary biology. MIT Press, Cambridge , MA .
  • Byers, J., E. Hebets, and J. Podos. 2010. Female mate choice based upon male motor performance. Anim. Behav. 79:771778.
  • Cronin, H. 1991. The ant and the peacock. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge , UK .
  • Darwin, C. 1871. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. John Murray, London .
  • Dawkins, R. 2004. The ancestor's tale. Houghton Mifflin, New York .
  • Doucet, S. M., D. J. Mennill, and G. E. Hill. 2007. The evolution of signal design in manakin plumage ornaments. Am. Nat. 169:S63S80.
  • Durães, R., B. A. Loiselle, P. G. Parker, and J. G. Blake. 2009. Female mate choice across spatial scales: influence of lek and male attributes on mating success of blue-crowned manakins. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 276:18751881.
  • Endler, J. A. 1986. Natural selection in the wild. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton , NJ .
  • Endler, J. A., and A. L. Basolo. 1998. Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:415420.
  • Espmark, Y., T.Amundsen, and G.Rosenqvist, eds. 2000. Animal signals: signaling and signal design in animal communication. Tapir Acad. Press, Trondheim , Norway .
  • Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:115.
  • Fisher, R. A. 1915. The evolution of sexual preference. Eugenics Rev. 7:184191.
  • Fisher, R. A. 1930. The genetical theory of natural selection. Clarendon Press, Oxford .
  • Fisher, R. A. 1958. The genetical theory of natural selection. Dover Publications, New York .
  • Fuller, R. C., D. Houle, and J. Travis. 2005. Sensory bias as an explanation for the evolution of mating preferences. Am. Nat. 166:437446.
  • Ghiselin, M. T. 1987. Species concepts, individuality, and objectivity. Biol. Philos. 2:127143.
  • Gil, D., and M. Gahr. 2002. The honesty of bird song: multiple constraints for multiple traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:133141.
  • Gomulkiewicz, R., and A. Hastings. 1990. Ploidy and evolution by sexual selection: a comparison of haploid and diploid female choice models near fixation equilibria. Evolution 44:757770.
  • Goodwin, T. W. 1980. The biochemistry of the carotenoids. Volume 1 Plants. Chapman and Hall, London .
  • Gotelli, N. J., and G. R. Graves. 1996. Null models in ecology. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington , DC .
  • Gould, S. J., and R. C. Lewontin. 1979. The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 205:581598.
  • Grafen, A. 1990. Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process. J. Theor. Biol. 144:473516.
  • Griffith, S. C., T. H. Parker, and V. A. Olson. 2006. Melanin- versus carotenoid-based sexual signals: is the difference really so black and red? Anim. Behav. 71:749763.
  • Hamilton, W. D., and M. Zuk. 1982. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science 218:384387.
  • Hardy, G. H. 1908. Mendelian proportions in a mixed population. Science 28:4950.
  • Hauser, M. D. 1998. The evolution of communication. Bradford Books MIT Press, Cambridge .
  • Hill, G. E. 2002. A red bird in a brown bag: the function and evolution of colorful plumage in the house finch. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford .
  • Hill, G. E. 2006. Female mate choice for ornamental coloration. Pp. 137200 in G. E.Hill and K. J.McGraw, eds. Bird coloration: function and evolution. Harvard Univ., Cambridge .
  • Hill, G. E., C. Y. Inouye, and R. Montgomerie. 2002. Dietary carotenoids predict plumage coloration in wild House Finches. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269:11191124.
  • Hubbell, S. P. 1979. Tree dispersion, abundance, and diversity in a tropical dry forest. Science 203:12991309.
  • Hubbell, S. P. 2001. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton , NJ .
  • Irwin, R. E. 1988. The evolutionary importance of behavioural development: the ontogeny and phylogeny of bird song. Anim. Behav. 36:814824.
  • Iwasa, Y., and A. Pomiankowski. 1994. The evolution of mate preferences for multiple sexual ornaments. Evolution 48:853867.
  • Jones, T. M., R. J. Quinnell, and A. Balmford. 1998. Fisherian flies: benefits of female choice in a lekking sandfly. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265:16511657.
  • Kimura, M., and J. F. Crow. 1964. The number of alleles that can be maintained in a finite population. Genetics 94:725738.
  • Kirkpatrick, M. 1982. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 82:112.
  • Kirkpatrick, M. 1987. Sexual selection by female choice in polygynous animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:4370.
  • Kirkpatrick, M., and M. J. Ryan. 1991. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:3338.
  • Kokko, H., R. Brooks, J. M. McNamara, and A. I. Houston. 2002. The sexual selection continuum. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269:13311340.
  • Kokko, H., M. D. Jennions, and R. Brooks. 2006. Unifying and testing models of sexual selection. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37:4366.
  • Kotiaho, J. S., N. R. LeBas, M. Puurtinen, and J. L. Tomkins. 2007. On the resolution of the lek paradox. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23:13.
  • Krugman, P. 2009. How did economists get it so wrong? New York Times Sunday Magazine 6 September 2009:3643.
  • Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:37213725.
  • MacArthur, R. H. 1972. Geographical ecology. Harper & Row, New York .
  • Mangels, A. R., J. M. Holden, G. R. Beecher, M. R. Forman, and E. Lanza. 1993. Carotenoid content of fruits and vegetables: an evaluation of analytical data. J. Am. Dietetic Assoc. 93:284296.
  • Maynard Smith, J., and D. Harper. 2003. Animal signals. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford .
  • McGraw, K. J. 2006a. Mechanics of carotenoid-based coloration. Pp. 177242 in G. E.Hill and K. J.McGraw, eds. Bird coloration, vol. 1, mechanisms and measurements. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge , MA .
  • McGraw, K. J. 2006b. Mechanics of melanin-based coloration in birds. Pp. 243294 in G. E.Hill and K. J.McGraw, eds. Bird coloration, Vol. I, mechanisms and measurements. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge , MA .
  • Nei, M. 2005. Selectionism and neutralism in molecular evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:23182342.
  • Nitecki, M. H., and A.Hoffman, eds. 1987. Neutral models in biology. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford .
  • Nowicki, S., S. Peters, and J. Podos. 1998. Song learning, early nutrition, and sexual selection in songbirds. Am. Zool. 38:179190.
  • Otto, S. R. 1991. On evolution under sexual and viability selection: a two-locus diploid model. Evolution 45:14431457.
  • Oxford English Dictionary. 2005. in C.Soanes and A.Stevenson, eds. The Oxford Dictionary of English Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford .
  • Palmer, A. R. 1999. Detecting publication bias in meta-analyses: a case study of fluctuating asymmetry and sexual selection. Am. Nat. 154:220233.
  • Pomiankowski, A., and Y. Iwasa. 1993. The evolution of multiple sexual ornaments by Fisher's process of sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 253:173181.
  • Price, J. J., and L. M. Whalen. 2009. Plumage evolution in the oropendolas and caciques: different divergence rates in polygynous and monogamous taxa. Evolution 63:29852998.
  • Prum, R. O. 1990a. A test of the monophyly of the manakins (Pipridae) and of the cotingas (Cotingidae) based on morphology. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology of the Univ. of Michigan 723:144.
  • Prum, R. O. 1990b. Phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of display behavior in the neotropical manakins (Aves: Pipridae). Ethology 84:202231.
  • Prum, R. O. 1992. Syringeal morphology, phylogeny, and evolution of the neotropical manakins (Aves: Pipridae). Am. Museum Novitates 3043:65 pp.
  • Prum, R. O. 1994. Phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of alternative social behavior in the manakins (Aves: Pipridae). Evolution 48:16571675.
  • Prum, R. O. 1997. Phylogenetic tests of alternative intersexual selection mechanisms: macroevolution of male traits in a polygynous clade (Aves: Pipridae). Am. Nat. 149:668692.
  • Prum, R. O. 2002. Why ornithologists should care about the theropod origin of birds. Auk 119:117.
  • Prum, R. O. 2008. Whose your daddy? Science 322:17991800.
  • Rice, S. H. 2004. Evolutionary theory: mathematical and conceptual foundations. Sinauer, Sunderland , MA .
  • Ridgely, R. S., and G. Tudor. 1989. The birds of South America. Volume 1. The oscine passerines. Univ. of Texas Press, Austin , TX .
  • Rowe, L., and D. Houle. 1996. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variation by condition dependent traits. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 263:14151421.
  • Searcy, W. A., and S. Nowicki. 2005. The evolution of animal communication: reliability and deception in signaling systems. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton , NJ .
  • Shuster, S. M., and M. J. Wade. 2003. Mating systems and strategies. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton , NJ .
  • Snow, D. W. 2004. Family Pipridae (Manakins). Pp. 110169 in J.Del Hoyo, A.Elliot, and D. A.Christie, eds. Handbook of the birds of the world. Lynx Editions, Barcelona , Spain .
  • Sober, E. 2006a. Parsimony. Pp. 531538 in A.Sarkar and J.Pfiefer, eds. The philosophy of science an encyclopedia. Routledge, New York .
  • Sober, E. 2006b. Two outbreaks of lawlessness in recent philosophy of biology. Philos. Science 64:S458S467.
  • Strong, D. R., Jr. 1980. Null hypotheses in ecology. Synthese 43:271285.
  • Tello, J. G., R. G. Moyle, D. J. Marchese, and J. Cracraft. 2009. Phylogeny and phylogenetic classification of the tyrant flycatchers, cotingas, manakins, and their allies (Aves: Tyrannides). Cladistics 25:429467.
  • Tomkins, J., J. Radwan, J. S. Kotiaho, and T. Tregenza. 2004. Genic capture and resolving the paradox of the lek. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:323328.
  • Turner, G. F., and M. T. Burrows. 1995. A model of sympatric speciation by sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. London B 260:287292.
  • Wallace, A. R. 1895. Natural selection and tropical nature. Macmillan and Co., London and New York .
  • West-Eberhard, M. J. 1983. Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58:155183.