SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Felipe N. Moreno-Gómez, Leonardo D. Bacigalupe, Andrés A. Silva-Escobar, Mauricio Soto-Gamboa, Female and male phonotactic responses and the potential effect of sexual selection on the advertisement calls of a frog, Animal Behaviour, 2015, 104, 79

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Astrid Eben, Roland Mühlethaler, Jürgen Gross, Hannelore Hoch, First evidence of acoustic communication in the pear psyllid Cacopsylla pyri L. (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), Journal of Pest Science, 2015, 88, 1, 87

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    P. A. De Luca, Mass Correlates With Increased Mating Success for Older but not Younger Males in Thornbug Treehoppers, Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 2015, 108, 3, 222

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Kasey D. Fowler-Finn, Joseph T. Kilmer, Allysa C. Hallett, Rafael L. Rodríguez, Variation in signal–preference genetic correlations in Enchenopa treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae), Ecology and Evolution, 2015, 5, 14
  5. 5
    CHARLES S. HENRY, STEPHEN J. BROOKS, JAMES B. JOHNSON, ATSUSHI MOCHIZUKI, PETER DUELLI, A new cryptic species of the Chrysoperla carnea group (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) from western Asia: parallel speciation without ecological adaptation, Systematic Entomology, 2014, 39, 2
  6. 6
    Darren Rebar, Rafael L. Rodríguez, Trees to treehoppers: genetic variation in host plants contributes to variation in the mating signals of a plant-feeding insect, Ecology Letters, 2014, 17, 2
  7. 7
    R. L. Rodríguez, A. C. Hallett, J. T. Kilmer, K. D. Fowler-Finn, Curves as traits: genetic and environmental variation in mate preference functions, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2013, 26, 2
  8. 8
    A. C. R. Lackey, J. W. Boughman, Divergent sexual selection via male competition: ecology is key, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2013, 26, 8
  9. 9
    Rafael L. Rodríguez, Janette W. Boughman, David A. Gray, Eileen A. Hebets, Gerlinde Höbel, Laurel B. Symes, Diversification under sexual selection: the relative roles of mate preference strength and the degree of divergence in mate preferences, Ecology Letters, 2013, 16, 8
  10. 10
    Matthew R. Wilkins, Nathalie Seddon, Rebecca J. Safran, Evolutionary divergence in acoustic signals: causes and consequences, Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2013, 28, 3, 156

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    D. Rebar, R. L. Rodriguez, Genetic variation in social influence on mate preferences, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2013, 280, 1763, 20130803

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Charles S. Henry, Stephen J. Brooks, Peter Duelli, James B. Johnson, Marta M. Wells, Atsushi Mochizuki, Obligatory duetting behaviour in the Chrysoperla carnea-group of cryptic species (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): its role in shaping evolutionary history, Biological Reviews, 2013, 88, 4
  13. 13
    Kasey D. Fowler-Finn, Rafael L. Rodríguez, Repeatability of mate preference functions in Enchenopa treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae), Animal Behaviour, 2013, 85, 2, 493

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    R.L. Rodríguez, N. Al-Wathiqui, Causes of variation in sexual allometry: a case study with the mating signals and genitalia ofEnchenopatreehoppers (Hemiptera Membracidae), Ethology Ecology & Evolution, 2012, 24, 2, 187

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Maarten de Groot, Maja Derlink, Petra Pavlovčič, Janez Prešern, Andrej Čokl, Meta Virant-Doberlet, Duetting Behaviour in the Leafhopper Aphrodes makarovi (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae), Journal of Insect Behavior, 2012, 25, 5, 419

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Kasey D. Fowler-Finn, Rafael L. Rodríguez, EXPERIENCE-MEDIATED PLASTICITY IN MATE PREFERENCES: MATING ASSURANCE IN A VARIABLE ENVIRONMENT, Evolution, 2012, 66, 2
  17. 17
    RAFAEL L. RODRÍGUEZ, NOORIA AL-WATHIQUI, Genotype × environment interaction in the allometry of body, genitalia and signal traits in Enchenopa treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae), Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 105, 1
  18. 18
    K. D. Fowler-Finn, R. L. Rodríguez, The evolution of experience-mediated plasticity in mate preferences, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2012, 25, 9
  19. 19
    D. S. PROCTER, A. J. MOORE, C. W. MILLER, The form of sexual selection arising from male–male competition depends on the presence of females in the social environment, Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 2012, 25, 5
  20. 20
    Wataru Kojima, Takuma Takanashi, Yukio Ishikawa, Vibratory communication in the soil: pupal signals deter larval intrusion in a group-living beetle Trypoxylus dichotoma, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2012, 66, 2, 171

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Jaime L. Grace, Kerry L. Shaw, COEVOLUTION OF MALE MATING SIGNAL AND FEMALE PREFERENCE DURING EARLY LINEAGE DIVERGENCE OF THE HAWAIIAN CRICKET, LAUPALA CERASINA, Evolution, 2011, 65, 8
  22. 22
    Martine E. Maan, Ole Seehausen, Ecology, sexual selection and speciation, Ecology Letters, 2011, 14, 6
  23. 23
    Rafael L. Rodríguez, Nooria Al-Wathiqui, Genotype × environment interaction is weaker in genitalia than in mating signals and body traits in Enchenopa treehoppers (Hemiptera: Membracidae), Genetica, 2011, 139, 7, 871

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Paul A. De Luca, Reginald B. Cocroft, The Influence of Age on Male Mate-Searching Behaviour in Thornbug Treehoppers, Ethology, 2011, 117, 5
  25. 25
    R. Terry Bowyer, Janet L. Rachlow, Kelley M. Stewart, Victor Van Ballenberghe, Vocalizations by Alaskan moose: female incitation of male aggression, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2011, 65, 12, 2251

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    Ilka M. Kureck, Antje Neumann, Susanne Foitzik, Wingless ant males adjust mate-guarding behaviour to the competitive situation in the nest, Animal Behaviour, 2011, 82, 2, 339

    CrossRef