SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Table S1. Pairwise comparisons of stripe placements between lines sharing a maternal parent.

Table S2. Variance at different stages in the cross as compared to bootstrapped confidence intervals.

Table S3. Slopes of regression of stripe position on embryo length.

Table S4. Primers used for genotyping D. simulans- D. sechellia hybrids.

Table S5. ANOVA tables for length: F3 backcross classes tested separately.

Table S6. ANOVA tables for length: model with F3 backcross lines pooled.

Table S7. ANOVA tables for absolute stripe position: F3 backcross classes tested separately.

Table S8. ANOVA tables for absolute stripe position: model with F3 backcross lines pooled.

Table S9. ANOVA tables for relative stripe position: F3 backcross classes tested separately.

Table S10. ANOVA tables for relative stripe position: model with F3 backcross lines pooled.

Table S11. Most significant markers by stripe and by line.

Table S12. Most significant markers by stripe and effect, backcross lines pooled.

Table S13. Proportion of variance due to developmental age, over both models and measurement types.

Figure S1. Inheritance of expression pattern boundary positions for gt and Kr.

Figure S2. Departures from Mendelian inheritance do not effect length or stripe phenotypes.

Figure S3. Mean values for phenotypes by genotype at marker positions.

Figure S4. Significance of genotype-phenotype associations for gt and Kr boundary positions.

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
EVO_1206_sm_FigS1-S4.pdf4349KSupporting info item
EVO_1206_sm_TableS1-S13.xls3242KSupporting info item

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.