SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Figure S1. The phylogeny of species recognition.

Figure S2. Species discrimination as a function of social context (mating vs. territorial interactions; A) and the sex of the discriminating animal (B).

Figure S3. Species discrimination as a function of the familiarity with the nonconspecific cue(s) (familiar, “sympatric” heterospecific versus unfamiliar, “allopatric” heterospecific; A), and the type of cues that provide potential information on species identity (B).

Table S1. Predictors of species recognition based on the maximum response reported by a study for a given species.

Table S2. Species recognition as a function of the phylogenetic relatedness between the focal species and heterospecific.

Table S3. Predictors of species recognition based on analyses in which data were excluded from those studies that suffered methodological problems (Table 4).

Table S4. Source data.

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
EVO_1319_sm_FigureS1.pdf480KSupporting info item
EVO_1319_sm_FigureS2.pdf688KSupporting info item
EVO_1319_sm_FigureS3A.pdf534KSupporting info item
EVO_1319_sm_FigureS3B.pdf570KSupporting info item
EVO_1319_sm_SuppMat.doc611KSupporting info item

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.