SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Figure S1. PC1 vs. PC2 calculated separately for Paxton females (A), Paxton males (B), Enos females (C), and Enos males (D).

Table S1. Evaluation of number of morphological clusters in each lake.

Table S2. Eigenvalues and the percent variance explained by each PC in a variance--covariance matrix and a correlation matrix for data from Paxton and Enos Lakes.

Table S3. PC Loadings of the x and y coordinate of each landmark for the combined analysis of Paxton and Enos Lakes.

Table S4. Loadings of x and y coordinates for Paxton Lake fish along all 26 PC axes.

Table S5. Eigenvalues and the percent variance explained by each PC in a variance--covariance matrix and a correlation matrix for data from Paxton Lakes.

Table S6. MANCOVA for Paxton Lake only, comparing head shape between sex and species with size as a covariate.

Table S7. MANCOVA for both lakes comparing head shape between sex, species, and lake.

Table S8. Parameter values used in simulations.

Appendix S1. Details of the model

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
EVO_1332_sm_Appendix1.doc75KSupporting info item
EVO_1332_sm_SuppMat.doc718KSupporting info item

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.