REDUCING MUTATION LOAD THROUGH SEXUAL SELECTION ON MALES
Version of Record online: 28 JUN 2011
© 2011 The Author(s). Evolution© 2011 The Society for the Study of Evolution.
Volume 65, Issue 10, pages 2816–2829, October 2011
How to Cite
McGuigan, K., Petfield, D. and Blows, M. W. (2011), REDUCING MUTATION LOAD THROUGH SEXUAL SELECTION ON MALES. Evolution, 65: 2816–2829. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01346.x
- Issue online: 3 OCT 2011
- Version of Record online: 28 JUN 2011
- Accepted manuscript online: 20 MAY 2011 12:09PM EST
- Received January 04, 2011, Accepted April 22, 2011, Data Archived: Dryad: doi:0.5061/dryad.4k271
Figure S1. The mean viability of Control (solid line) and Selection (dashed line) MA lines each generation (generation 3 through 25).
Figure S2. Line mean correlations among productivity assays.
Figure S3. Mean (± SE) number of male and female offspring produced by individual Control females mated to unrelated Control or Selection males.
Table S1. Estimates (95% Bayesian CI) of male mating success among (VB) and within (VE) MA line variances and mean without (Control) and with (Selection) sexual selection on males, assayed at six time points.
Table S2. Estimates (95% Bayesian CI) of productivity among (VB) and within (VE) MA line variances and mean, assayed after 26 generations of mutation accumulation without (Control) and with (Selection) sexual selection on males.
Table S3. Pairwise correlations between estimates of male mating success for Control and Selection lines in generations 3, 7,11, and 23 (G3, G7, G11, G23) and 20 (G20), where Control (C) or Selection (S) line females chose.
|EVO_1346_sm_SuppMat.pdf||87K||Supporting info item|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.