SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

LITERATURE CITED

  • Akam, M. 2000. Arthropods: developmental diversity within a (super) phylum. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 97:44383331.
  • Alberch, P. 1985. Problems with the interpretation of developmental sequences. Syst. Zool. 34:4658.
  • Alberch, P., S. J. Gould, G. F. Oster, and D. B. Wake. 1979. Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. Paleobiology 5:296317.
  • Arthur, W. 2000. The concept of developmental reprogramming and the quest for an inclusive theory of evolutionary mechanisms. Evol. Dev. 2:4957.
  • Beeman, R. W., J. J. Stuart, S. J. Brown, and R. E. Denell. 1993. Structure and function of the homeotic gene complex (Hom-C) in the beetle Tribolium castaneum. Bioessays 15:439444.
  • Bolker, J. A. 2000. Modularity in development and why it matters to Evo-Devo. Am. Zool. 40:770776.
  • Bonner, J. T. 1982. Evolution and development. Springer-Verlag, Berlin .
  • Bookstein F. L. 1996. Combining the tools of geometric morphometrics. Pp. 131151 in L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. Naylor, and D. Slice, eds. Advances in morphometrics. Plenum Press, New York .
  • Callebaut, W., and D. Rasskin-Gutman. 2005. Modularity: understanding the development and evolution of natural complex systems. MIT Press, Cambridge , MA .
  • Chatterton, B. D. E., and S. E. Speyer. 1997. Ontogeny. Pp. 173247 in R. L. Kaesler, ed. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Part O, Arthropoda 1. Trilobita, Revised, 1. Geological Society of America. and Univ.of Kansas Press, Lawrence , KS .
  • Chernoff, B., and P. M. Magwene. 1999. Morphological integration: forty years later. Pp. 319353 in Olson, E. C. and R. L. Miller, eds. Morphological integration. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago .
  • Cheverud, J. M., G. P. Wagner, and M. M. Dow. 1989. Methods for the comparative analysis of variation patterns. Syst. Zool. 38:201213.
  • Ciampaglio, C. N. 2002. Determining the role that ecological and developmental constraints play in controlling disparity: examples from the crinoid and blastozoan fossil record. Evol. Dev. 4:170188.
  • David, B. 1990. Mosaic pattern of heterochronies: variation and diversity in Pourtalesiidae (deep-sea echinoids). Evol. Biol. 24:297327.
  • Eble, G. J. 2000. Contrasting evolutionary flexibility in sister groups: disparity and diversity in Mesozoic atelostomate echinoids. Paleobiology 26:5679.
  • Eble, G. J.. 2004. The macroevolution of phenotypic integration. Pp. 253273 in M. Pigliucci and K. Preston, eds. Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford .
  • Eble, G. J.. 2005. Morphological modularity and macroevolution: conceptual and empirical aspects. Pp. 221238 in W. Callebaut and D. Rasskin-Gutman, eds. Modularity: understanding the development and evolution of natural complex systems. MIT Press, Cambridge , MA .
  • Erwin, D. H. 2007. Disparity: morphological pattern and developmental context. Palaeontology 50:5773.
  • Foote, M. J. 1989. Perimeter-based Fourier analysis: a new morphometric method applied to the trilobite cranidium. J. Paleontol. 63:880885.
  • Foote, M. J.. 1991. Morphologic patterns of diversification: examples from trilobites. Palaeontology 34:461485.
  • Foote, M. J.. 1993a. Contributions of individual taxa to overall morphological disparity. Paleobiology 19:403419.
  • Foote, M. J.. 1993b. Discordance and concordance between morphological and taxonomic diversity. Paleobiology 19:185204.
  • Foote, M. J.. 1994. Morphological disparity in Ordovician–Devonian crinoids and the early saturation of morphological space. Paleobiology 20:320344.
  • Foote, M. J.. 1997. The evolution of morphological diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28:129152.
  • Fusco, G., N. C. Hughes, M. Webster, and A. Minelli. 2004. Exploring developmental modes in a fossil arthopod: growth and trunk segmentation of the trilobite Aulacopleura konincki. Am. Nat. 163:167183.
  • Gerber, S. 2011. Comparing the differential filling of morphospace and allometric space through time: the morphological and developmental dynamics of Early Jurassic ammonoids. Paleobiology 37:369382.
  • Gerber, S., and M. J. Hopkins. 2009. Theoretical developmental morphology and morphospace occupancy. An example with trilobite cranidia. Geol. Soc. Am., Abstracts with Programs. 41:684.
  • Gerber, S., P. Neige, and G. J. Eble. 2007. Combining ontogenetic and evolutionary scales of morphological disparity: a study of early Jurassic ammonites. Evol. Dev. 9:472482.
  • Gerber, S., G. J. Eble, and P. Neige. 2008. Allometric space and allometric disparity: a developmental perspective in the macroevolutionary analysis of morphological disparity. Evolution 62:14501457.
  • Gerber, S., G. J. Eble, and P. Neige. 2011. Developmental aspects of morphological disparity dynamics: a simple analytical exploration. Paleobiology 37:237251.
  • Godfrey, L. R., and M. R. Sutherland. 1995. Flawed inference: why size based tests of heterochronic processes do not work. J. Theor. Biol. 172:4361.
  • Goswami, A. 2007. Cranial modularity and sequence heterochrony in mammals. Evol. Dev. 9:290298.
  • Goswami, A., and P. D. Polly. 2010a. Methods for studying morphological integration and modularity. Pp. 213243 in J. Alroy and G. Hunt, eds. Quantitative methods in paleobiology. Paleontological Society Special Publications, 16. Yale University Printing and Publishing Services, New Haven, CT.
  • Goswami, A., and P. D. Polly. 2010b. The influence of modularity on cranial morphological disparity in Carnivora and Primates (Mammalia). PLoSOne, 5:e9517.
  • Gould, S. J. 1966. Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol. Rev. Camb. Phil. Soc. 41:587640.
  • Gould, S. J.. 1977. Ontogeny and phylogeny. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge .
  • Gould, S. J.. 1988. The use of heterochrony. Pp. 185187 in M. L. McKinney, ed. Heterochrony in evolution: a multidisciplinary approach. Plenum Press, New York .
  • Gould, S. J.. 1989. Wonderful life: the Burgess Shale and the nature of history. Norton, New York .
  • Gould, S. J.. 1991. The disparity of the Burgess Shale arthropod fauna and the limits of cladistic analysis: why we must strive to quantify morphospace. Paleobiology 17:411423.
  • Gould, S. J.. 2000. Of coiled oysters and big brains: how to rescue the terminology of heterochrony, now gone astray. Evol. Dev. 2:241248.
  • Hall, B. K. 2003. Evo-devo: evolutionary developmental mechanisms. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 47:491495.
  • Hartnoll, R. G. 1969. Mating in Brachyura. Crustaceana 16:161181.
  • Hopkins, M. J., and M. Webster. 2008. Morphological and ontogenetic change in the “early” Cambrian trilobite Zacanthopsis during an interval of environmental change. Pp. 185187 in I. Ribano, R. Gozalo, and D. Garcia-Bellido, eds. Advances in trilobite research. Cuadernos del Museo Geominero, 9. Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, Madrid .
  • Hopkins, M. J., and M. Webster. 2009. Ontogeny and geographic variation of a new species of the corynexochine trilobite Zacanthopsis (Dyeran, Cambrian). J. Paleontol. 83:524547.
  • Hughes, N. C. 2003a. Trilobite body patterning and the evolution of arthropod tagmosis. Bioessays 25:386395.
  • Hughes, N. C.. 2003b. Trilobite tagmosis and body patterning from morphological and developmental perspectives. Integr. Comp. Biol. 43:185206.
  • Hughes, N. C.. 2007. The evolution of trilobite body patterning. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 35:401434.
  • Hugues, N. C., and R. E. Chapman. 1995. Growth and variation in the Silurian proetide trilobite Aulacopleura konincki and its implications for trilobite palaeobiology. Lethaia 28:333353.
  • Jablonski, D. 2000. Micro- and macroevolution: scale and hierarchy in evolutionary biology and paleobiology. Pp. 1552 in D. H. Erwin and S. L. Wing, eds. Deep time: paleobiology's perspective. Paleobiology, supp. 26. The Paleontological Society. Allen Press, Lawrence , KS .
  • Kent, J. T., and K. V. Mardia. 2001. Shape, Procrustes tangent projections and bilateral symmetry. Biometrika 88:469485.
  • Klingenberg, C. P. 1996. Multivariate allometry. Pp. 2349 in L. F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G. Naylor, and D. Slice, eds. Advances in morphometrics. Plenum Press, New York .
  • Klingenberg, C. P.. 1998. Heterochrony and allometry: the analysis of evolutionary change in ontogeny. Biol. Rev. 73:79123.
  • Klingenberg, C. P.. 2008. Morphological integration and developmental modularity. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 39:115132.
  • Klingenberg, C. P., and R. Froese. 1991. A multivariate comparison of allometric growth patterns. Syst. Zool. 40:410419.
  • Klingenberg, C. P., M. Barluenga, and A. Meyer. 2002. Shape analysis of symmetric structures: quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry. Evolution 56:19091920.
  • MacLeod, N. 1999. Generalizing and extending the eigenshape method of shape space visualization and analysis. Paleobiology 25:107138.
  • Mardia, K. V., F. L. Bookstein, and I. J. Moreton. 2000. Statistical assessment of bilateral symmetry of shapes. Biometrika 87:285300.
  • McKinney, M. L., and K. J. McNamara. 1991. Heterochrony: the evolution of ontogeny. Plenum Press, New York .
  • McNamara, K. J., and M. L. McKinney. 2005. Heterochrony, disparity, and macroevolution. Paleobiology 31:1726.
  • McShea, D. W., and E. P. Venit. 2001. What is a part? Pp. 259284 in G. P. Wagner, ed. The character concept in evolutionary biology, Academic Press, San Diego , CA .
  • Mitteroecker, P., P. Gunz, G. W. Weber, and F. L. Bookstein. 2004. Regional dissociated heterochrony in multivariate analysis. Ann. Anat. 186:463470.
  • Mitteroecker, P., P. Gunz, and F. L. Bookstein. 2005. Heterochrony and geometric morphometrics: a comparison of cranial growth in Pan paniscus versus Pan troglodites. Evol. Dev. 7:244258.
  • Mosimann, J. E. 1970. Size allometry: size and shape variables with characterizations of the lognormal and generalized gamma distributions. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 65:930945.
  • Needham, J. 1933. On the dissociability of the fundamental processes in ontogenesis. Biol. Rev. 8:180223.
  • Olson, E. C., and R. L. Miller. 1958. Morphological integration. The Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago .
  • Olson, M. E., and J. A. Rosell. 2006. Using heterochrony to detect modularity in the evolution of stem diversity in the plant family Moringaceae. Evolution 60:724734.
  • Pavlicev, M., J. M. Cheverud, and G. P. Wagner. 2009. Measuring morphological integration using eigenvalue variance. Evol. Biol. 36:157170.
  • Poe, S. 2004. A test for patterns of modularity in sequences of developmental events. Evolution 58:18521855.
  • R. Development Core Team 2009. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R. Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna , Austria . ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available at http://www.R-project.org (accessed December 14, 2009).
  • Raff, R. 1996. The shape of life: genes, development, and the evolution of animal form. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago .
  • Raff, E. C., and R. A. Raff. 2000. Dissociability, modularity, evolvability. Evol. Dev. 2:235237.
  • Rohlf, F. J. 1993. Relative warps analysis and an example of its application to mosquito wings. Pp. 131159 in L. F. Marcus, E. Bello, and A. Garcia-Valdecasas, eds. Contributions to morphometrics. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid .
  • Rohlf, F. J., and D. E. Slice. 1990. Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Syst. Zool. 39:4059.
  • Schlosser, G. 2001. Using heterochrony plots to detect the dissociated coevolution of characters. J. Exp. Zool. 291:282304.
  • Schlosser, G.. 2004. The role of modules in development and evolution. Pp. 519582 in G. Schlosser and G. P. Wagner, eds. Modularity in development and evolution. The Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago .
  • Schlosser, G., and G. P. Wagner. 2004. Modularity in development and evolution. The Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago .
  • Shea, B. T. 2002. Are some heterochronic transformations likelier than others? Pp. 79101 in N. Minugh-Purvis and K. J. McNamara, eds. Human evolution through developmental change. Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore , MD .
  • Smith, K. K. 2001. Heterochrony revisited: the evolution of developmental sequences. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 73:169186.
  • Smith, K. K.. 2002. Sequence heterochrony and the evolution of development. J. Morphol. 252:8297.
  • Stadler, B. M. R., P. F. Stadler, G. P. Wagner, and W. Fontana. 2001. The topology of the possible: formal spaces underlying patterns of evolutionary change. J. Theor. Biol. 213:241274.
  • Sundberg, F. A. 2000. Homeotic evolution in Cambrian trilobites. Paleobiology 26:258270.
  • Van Valen, L. 1965. The study of morphological integration. Evolution 19:347349
  • Von Dassow, G., and E. Munro. 1999. Modularity in animal development and evolution: elements of a conceptual framework for EvoDevo. J. Exp. Zool. 285:307325.
  • Wagner, G. P. 1984. On the eigenvalue distribution of genetic and phenotypic dispersion matrices: evidence for a nonrandom organization for quantitative character variation. J. Math. Biol. 21:7795.
  • Wagner, G. P.. 1996. Homologues, natural kinds and the evolution of modularity. Am. Zool. 36:3643.
  • Wagner, G. P., and L. Altenberg. 1996. Perspective: complex adaptation and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50:967976.
  • Wagner, G. P., J. Mezey, and R. Calabretta. 2005. Natural selection and the origin of modules. Pp. 3349 in W. Callebaut and D. Rasskin-Gutman, eds. Modularity: understanding the development and evolution of natural complex systems. MIT Press, Cambridge , MA .
  • Wagner, G. P., M. Pavlicev, and J. M Cheverud. 2007. The road to modularity. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8:921931.
  • Wagner, P. J. 1995. Testing evolutionary constraint hypotheses with Early Paleozoic gastropods. Paleobiology 21:248272.
  • Webster, M., and M. L. Zelditch. 2005. Evolutionary modifications of ontogeny: heterochrony and beyond. Paleobiology 31:354372.
  • Webster, M., and M. L. Zelditch. 2008. Integration and regulation of developmental systems in trilobites. Pp. 427433 in I. Ribano, R. Gozalo, and D. Garcia-Bellido, eds. Advances in trilobite research. Cuadernos del Museo Geominero, 9. Instituto Geológico y Minero de España, Madrid .
  • Webster, M., and M. L. Zelditch. 2011. Modularity of a Cambrian ptychoparioid trilobite cranidium. Evol. Dev. 13:96109.
  • Whittington, H. B. 1992. Trilobites. Boydell Press, Bury St Edmunds , England .
  • Whittington, H. B.. 1997. The trilobite body. Pp. 87135 in R. L. Kaesler, ed. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Part O, Arthropoda 1. Trilobita, Revised, 1. Geological Society of America and Univ. of Kansas Press, Lawrence , KS .
  • Whittington, H. B., and S. R. A. Kelly. 1997. Morphological terms applied to Trilobita. Pp. 313329 in R. L. Kaesler, ed. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Part O, Arthropoda 1. Trilobita, Revised, 1. Geological Society of America and Univ. of Kansas Press, Lawrence , KS .