CORRELATIONS BETWEEN HETEROZYGOSITY AND REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS IN THE BLUE TIT (CYANISTES CAERULEUS): AN ANALYSIS OF INBREEDING AND SINGLE LOCUS EFFECTS
Version of Record online: 28 JUN 2011
© 2011 The Author(s). Evolution© 2011 The Society for the Study of Evolution.
Volume 65, Issue 11, pages 3175–3194, November 2011
How to Cite
Olano-Marin, J., Mueller, J. C. and Kempenaers, B. (2011), CORRELATIONS BETWEEN HETEROZYGOSITY AND REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS IN THE BLUE TIT (CYANISTES CAERULEUS): AN ANALYSIS OF INBREEDING AND SINGLE LOCUS EFFECTS. Evolution, 65: 3175–3194. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01369.x
- Issue online: 24 OCT 2011
- Version of Record online: 28 JUN 2011
- Accepted manuscript online: 3 JUN 2011 02:00AM EST
- Received January 17, 2011, Accepted May 16, 2011, Data Archived: Dryad doi:10.5061/dryad.rk280
Table S1. Effect of individual multilocus heterozygosity, measured as HL, on fledging success in nests with and without EPY.
Table S2. Results of the analysis in GENELAND to estimate population genetic structure.
Table S3. Effect of the individual level of admixture (maxq) on multilocus heterozygosity (measured as HL), clutch size, and number of sired eggs.
Figure S1. Effect sizes of heterozygosity at single loci (SLH) on estimates of the reproductive success of blue tits.
Figure S2. Histogram of the individual level of admixture (maxq) from the replicate run of STRUCTURE with the highest value of Ln P(D) for(A) K = 3,(B) K = 6, and(C) the "best" GENELAND run (K = 5).
Figure S3. Individual membership coefficients to the different subpopulations (q values) grouped by year of study from the replicate run of STRUCTURE with the highest value of Ln P(D) for(A) K = 3 and(B) K = 6.
Figure S4. Map of estimated population membership from the "best" GENELAND run (K = 5).
|EVO_1369_sm_Tables.pdf||500K||Supporting info item|
|EVO_1369_sm_Figures.pdf||220K||Supporting info item|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.