TESTING THE LINK BETWEEN POPULATION GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION AND CLADE DIVERSIFICATION IN COSTA RICAN ORCHIDS
Version of Record online: 21 MAY 2012
© 2012 The Author(s). Evolution© 2012 The Society for the Study of Evolution.
Volume 66, Issue 10, pages 3035–3052, October 2012
How to Cite
Kisel, Y., Moreno-Letelier, A. C., Bogarín, D., Powell, M. P., Chase, M. W. and Barraclough, T. G. (2012), TESTING THE LINK BETWEEN POPULATION GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION AND CLADE DIVERSIFICATION IN COSTA RICAN ORCHIDS. Evolution, 66: 3035–3052. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01663.x
- Issue online: 1 OCT 2012
- Version of Record online: 21 MAY 2012
- Accepted manuscript online: 17 APR 2012 01:27PM EST
- Received September 20, 2011, Accepted March 28, 2012, Data Archived: Dryad: doi:10.5061/dryad.55md6hj5
Table S1. Information for voucher specimens added to collections of Lankester Botanic Garden, Costa Rica.
Table S2. Sampling locations for all study species.
Table S3. Details of AFLP method used for each study species.
Table S4. Scoring analysis details for AFLP datasets.
Table S5. GenBank accession numbers for newly generated matK sequences.
Table S6. Ecological characteristics of study clades.
Table S7. Branch circumference mean and variance for all study species.
Figure S1. Sampling locations for study species from the Masdevallia-Trisetella and Lepanthes-Lepanthopsis clade pairs.
Figure S2. Sampling locations for study species from the Platystele-Dryadella and Epidendrum-Brassavola clade pairs.
Figure S3. Sampling locations for study species from the Scaphyglottis-Jacquiniella clade pair.
Figure S4. The relationship between Φst and distance for all study species, for the reduced dataset.
Figure S5. Associations of overall neutral genetic differentiation and species range size with species phylogeny (data from the reduced dataset).
|EVO_1663_sm_suppmat.doc||1736K||Supporting info item|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.