Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Terms and Conditions set out at http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/onlineopen#OnlineOpen_Terms
THE CONTRIBUTION OF FEMALE MEIOTIC DRIVE TO THE EVOLUTION OF NEO-SEX CHROMOSOMES
Article first published online: 21 MAY 2012
© 2012 The Author(s). Evolution© 2012 The Society for the Study of Evolution.
Volume 66, Issue 10, pages 3198–3208, October 2012
How to Cite
Yoshida, K. and Kitano, J. (2012), THE CONTRIBUTION OF FEMALE MEIOTIC DRIVE TO THE EVOLUTION OF NEO-SEX CHROMOSOMES. Evolution, 66: 3198–3208. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01681.x
- Issue published online: 1 OCT 2012
- Article first published online: 21 MAY 2012
- Accepted manuscript online: 9 MAY 2012 09:47PM EST
- Received January 19, 2012, Accepted April 22, 2012, Data Archived: Dryad doi:10.5061/dryad.73cf7
- female meiotic drive;
- multiple sex chromosome;
Sex chromosomes undergo rapid turnover in certain taxonomic groups. One of the mechanisms of sex chromosome turnover involves fusions between sex chromosomes and autosomes. Sexual antagonism, heterozygote advantage, and genetic drift have been proposed as the drivers for the fixation of this evolutionary event. However, all empirical patterns of the prevalence of multiple sex chromosome systems across different taxa cannot be simply explained by these three mechanisms. In this study, we propose that female meiotic drive may contribute to the evolution of neo-sex chromosomes. The results of this study showed that in mammals, the XY1Y2 sex chromosome system is more prevalent in species with karyotypes of more biarmed chromosomes, whereas the X1X2Y sex chromosome system is more prevalent in species with predominantly acrocentric chromosomes. In species where biarmed chromosomes are favored by female meiotic drive, X-autosome fusions (XY1Y2 sex chromosome system) will be also favored by female meiotic drive. In contrast, in species with more acrocentric chromosomes, Y-autosome fusions (X1X2Y sex chromosome system) will be favored just because of the biased mutation rate toward chromosomal fusions. Further consideration should be given to female meiotic drive as a mechanism in the fixation of neo-sex chromosomes.
Sex chromosomes can undergo rapid turnover, that is, sex-linked chromosomes differ between closely related species or populations (White 1973; Charlesworth and Mank 2010). Sex chromosome turnover can occur via several mechanisms, such as the transposition of an existing sex-determination gene to an autosome (Woram et al. 2003), de novo evolution of a sex-determination gene on an autosome (Kondo et al. 2006; Tanaka et al. 2007; van Doorn and Kirkpatrick 2007; Hediger et al. 2010), and fusions between an autosome and a sex chromosome (White 1973; Charlesworth and Charlesworth 1980; Kitano et al. 2009; Kaiser and Bachtrog 2010; Kitano and Peichel 2012). Although sex chromosomes are considered stable in some taxonomic groups, such as mammals, genomic data indicate that such sex chromosomes have undergone chromosomal fusions with autosomes during their evolution (Wilcox et al. 1996; Charchar et al. 2003; Kohn et al. 2004; Charlesworth et al. 2005). Because turnover of sex chromosomes may play a substantial role in phenotypic divergence (Roberts et al. 2009) and reproductive isolation between incipient species (Kitano et al. 2009), elucidation of the forces driving sex chromosome turnover is essential to better understand the mechanisms of sex chromosome evolution and speciation.
A centromeric fusion between an autosome and a sex chromosome is one of the mechanisms by which neo-sex chromosomes evolve. Most vertebrate species with sex chromosomes have a simple male heteromorphic (XX female/XY male) or a simple female heteromorphic (ZW female/ZZ male) system. In species with the XY system, a centromeric fusion between an autosome and a Y chromosome creates an X1X2Y sex chromosome system (White 1973) (Fig. 1A), in which males have one neo-Y chromosome (a fused chromosome), one ancestral X chromosome (X1), and one neo-X chromosome (X2; a free copy of the autosome involved in the fusion), whereas females have two pairs of X chromosomes (two X1 chromosomes and two X2 chromosomes). A fusion between an autosome and an X chromosome gives rise to an XY1Y2 sex chromosome system, in which males have one neo-X chromosome (a fused chromosome), one ancestral Y chromosome (Y1), and one neo-Y chromosome (Y2; a free copy of the autosome involved in the fusion), while females have one pair of neo-X chromosome (Fig. 1A). Although such multiple sex chromosome systems can be also derived from centromeric fissions (Fig. 1B), centromeric fusions are considered to be the main mechanisms in most cases of multiple sex chromosome systems in fishes and mammals (see references in Table 1 and Kitano and Peichel 2012): there is only one mammalian case (Wallabia bicolor) with an XY1Y2 sex chromosome system that was likely derived from a fission of a Y chromosome (Toder et al. 1997).
|Order||Family||Genus||Species||Female 2n||Male 2n||Female NF||Male NF||Female % acrocentric||Male % acrocentric||System||References|
|Primates||Aotidae||Aotus||azarae||50||49||74||76||0.52||0.45||X1X2Y||(Pieczarka and Nagamachi 1988; Mudry et al. 1990)|
|Primates||Aotidae||Aotus||boliviensis||50||49||64||63||0.72||0.71||X1X2Y||(Ma et al. 1976; Pieczarka and Nagamachi 1988)|
|Primates||Aotidae||Aotus||inflatus||50||49||66||65||0.68||0.67||X1X2Y||(Pieczarka and Nagamachi 1988)|
|Primates||Aotidae||Aotus||sp.||50||49||74||73||0.52||0.51||X1X2Y||(Mudry de Pargament et al. 1984)|
|Primates||Atelidae||Alouatta||belzebul||50||49||70||70||0.60||0.57||X1X2Y||(Armada et al. 1987)|
|Primates||Atelidae||Alouatta||fusca||50||49||68||66||0.64||0.65||X1X2Y||(de Oliveira et al. 1998, 2002)|
|Primates||Atelidae||Alouatta||palliata||54||53||78||76||0.56||0.57||X1X2Y||(Ma et al. 1975)|
|Primates||Callitrichidae||Callimico||goeldii||48||47||72||71||0.50||0.49||X1X2Y||(Margulis et al. 1995)|
|Primates||Pitheciidae||Cacajao||calvus||46||45||62||62||0.65||0.62||X1X2Y||(Finotelo et al. 2010)|
|Rodentia||Cricetidae||Deltamys||kempi||38||37||38||38||1.00||0.97||X1X2Y||(Sbalqueiro et al. 1984; Montes et al. 2008)|
|Rodentia||Muridae||Mus||minutoides||36||35||36||36||1.00||0.97||X1X2Y||(Matthey 1965; Fredga 1970)|
|Rodentia||Muridae||Vandeleuria||oleracea||29||29||41||41||0.59||0.59||X1X2Y||(Sharma and Raman 1972)|
|Chiroptera||Phyllostomidae||Choeroniscus||godmani||20||19||28||26||0.60||0.63||X1X2Y||(Hsu et al. 1968; Patton and Gardner 1971)|
|Chiroptera||Phyllostomidae||Mesophylla||macconnelli||22||21||22||21||1.00||1.00||X1X2Y||(Baker and Hsu 1970)|
|Artiodactyla||Bovidae||Tragelaphus||strepsiceros||32||31||58||58||0.19||0.13||X1X2Y||(Wallace and Fairall 1968)|
|Diprotodontia||Macropodidae||Lagorchestes||conspicillatus||16||15||16||15||1.00||1.00||X1X2Y||(Martin and Hayman 1966)|
|Rodentia||Muridae||Mus||musculoides||18||19||36||35||0.00||0.16||XY1Y2||(Veyrunes et al. 2004)|
|Rodentia||Muridae||Taterillus||arenarius||30||31||36||36||0.80||0.84||XY1Y2||(Dobigny et al. 2003, 2005)|
|Rodentia||Muridae||Taterillus||petteri||18||19||28||28||0.44||0.53||XY1Y2||(Dobigny et al. 2003, 2005)|
|Rodentia||Muridae||Taterillus||pygargus||22||23||38||40||0.27||0.26||XY1Y2||(Dobigny et al. 2002)|
|Rodentia||Muridae||Taterillus||sp.1||22||23||40||40||0.18||0.26||XY1Y2||(Dobigny et al. 2002)|
|Rodentia||Muridae||Taterillus||sp.2||24||25||44||44||0.17||0.24||XY1Y2||(Dobigny et al. 2002)|
|Rodentia||Muridae||Taterillus||tranieri||14||15||24||23||0.29||0.47||XY1Y2||(Dobigny et al. 2004)|
|Chiroptera||Phyllostomidae||Artibeus||jamaicensis||30||31||50||51||0.33||0.35||XY1Y2||(Yonenaga et al. 1969)|
|Chiroptera||Phyllostomidae||Artibeus||lituratus||30||31||50||51||0.33||0.35||XY1Y2||(Yonenaga et al. 1969)|
|Chiroptera||Phyllostomidae||Artibeus||toltecus||30||31||50||51||0.33||0.35||XY1Y2||(Yonenaga et al. 1969)|
|Chiroptera||Phyllostomidae||Carollia||subrufa||20||21||32||33||0.40||0.43||XY1Y2||(Yonenaga et al. 1969)|
|Chiroptera||Phyllostomidae||Carolia||perspicillata||20||21||32||33||0.40||0.43||XY1Y2||(Yonenaga et al. 1969)|
|Artiodactyla||Cervidae||Muntiacus||muntjak||6||7||10||11||0.33||0.43||XY1Y2||(Wurster and Benirschke 1970)|
|Artiodactyla||Bovidae||Gazella||granti||30||31||60||60||0.06||0.06||XY1Y2||(Effron et al. 1976)|
|Artiodactyla||Bovidae||Gazella||gazella||34||35||60||60||0.29||0.29||XY1Y2||(Effron et al. 1976)|
|Artiodactyla||Bovidae||Gazella||dorcas||30||31||60||60||0.06||0.06||XY1Y2||(Effron et al. 1976)|
|Artiodactyla||Bovidae||Gazella||spekei||32||33||60||60||0.18||0.18||XY1Y2||(Effron et al. 1976)|
|Artiodactyla||Bovidae||Gazella||leptoceros||32||33||60||60||0.18||0.18||XY1Y2||(Effron et al. 1976)|
|Artiodactyla||Bovidae||Gazella||subgutturosa||30||31||60||60||0.06||0.06||XY1Y2||(Effron et al. 1976)|
|Soricomorpha||Soricidae||Sorex||araneus Race A||22||23||42||42||0.09||0.17||XY1Y2||(Ott 1968)|
|Diprotodontia||Potoroidae||Potorous||tridactylus||12||13||22||22||0.17||0.31||XY1Y2||(Sharman and Barber 1952; Shaw and Krooth 1964)|
|Diprotodontia||Macropodidae||Wallabia||bicolor||10||11||18||20||0.20||0.18||XY1Y2||(Metcalfe et al. 1998)|
Three mechanisms to promote the fixation of fusions between autosomes and sex chromosomes have been proposed. First, the presence of sexually antagonistic genes (i.e., genes with alleles that have differential fitness effects in males and females) on an autosome may drive the fusion of that autosome to an existing sex chromosome (Charlesworth and Charlesworth 1980). If a sexually antagonistic allele is present on an autosome, this allele will not easily spread within a population because of opposing selection pressures on that one allele between two sexes (Rice 1984). A translocation of the sexually antagonistic allele to a sex chromosome, either X or Y, can resolve the intralocus sexual conflict because males and females can have different alleles frequencies at the sexually antagonistic locus (Rice 1984). Second, in an inbreeding population, the presence of an autosomal locus with heterozygote advantage may promote a fusion of that autosome to sex chromosomes (Charlesworth and Wall 1999). When autosomal loci with heterozygote advantage are moved onto an X chromosome or a Y chromosome, the resulting male progeny can be heterozygous at that locus and would be favored. Third, genetic drift may promote fixation of fused chromosomes in small isolated populations (Lande 1979, 1985). Centromeric fusions often exhibit a heterozygote disadvantage (Lande 1979; King 1993) and are selected against when they are in the minority, but they would be rather favored when they are in the majority. Once genetic drift brings fused chromosomes into the majority, the derived fusions become a majority, so the fusions become more likely fixed than the ancestral karyotype. This mechanism, however, requires a very small population size (Lande 1979). In the former two mechanisms, theoretical models predict that Y-autosome fusions (X1X2Y sex chromosome systems) will be more common than X-autosome fusions (XY1Y2 sex chromosome systems) (Charlesworth and Charlesworth 1980; Charlesworth and Wall 1999). Our previous studies in fish demonstrated that X1X2Y sex chromosome systems (35/38) are more common than XY1Y2 sex chromosome systems (3/38) (Kitano and Peichel 2012). However, XY1Y2 and X1X2Y sex chromosome systems are equally common in mammals (White 1973). Thus, additional mechanisms might also have contributed to the fixation of multiple sex chromosome systems in mammals.
Here, we propose that female meiotic drive serves as another mechanism for the fixation of sex chromosome–autosome fusions. During female meiosis, only one of the four meiotic products develops into an egg. Therefore, any bias in the segregation of homologous chromosomes between the eggs and the polar bodies during the first meiotic division can have a substantial influence on the genetic composition of the progeny (Fig. 2A) (Pardo-Manuel de Villena and Sapienza 2001b; Burt and Trivers 2006; Fishman and Saunders 2008). For example, female meiotic drive may play a substantial role in mammalian karyotype evolution (Pardo-Manuel de Villena and Sapienza 2001a). Pardo-Manuel de Villena and Sapienza (2001a) compiled the karyotypes of 1170 mammalian species across disparate taxa and found that the frequencies of acrocentric chromosomes exhibit bimodal distribution patterns: species with almost exclusively biarmed chromosomes and species with almost exclusively acrocentric chromosomes are more common than expected by chance (Fig. 3A). They hypothesized that this pattern can be explained by the centromere drive (Pardo-Manuel de Villena and Sapienza 2001a). In this hypothesis, different number of centromeres in homologous chromosomes can cause nonrandom segregation (Pardo-Manuel de Villena and Sapienza 2001a) (Fig. 2B). In heterozygous carriers of centromeric fusions, transmission frequencies of the fused chromosomes (i.e., biarmed chromosomes) into eggs or polar bodies during the first female meiosis can substantially diverge from the 1:1 ratio (Pardo-Manuel de Villena and Sapienza 2001a,b). In some species, such as the mouse (Mus musculus), eggs have preference for chromosomes with more centromeres than polar bodies, so acrocentric chromosomes with two centromeres are more likely to be transmitted to the eggs than to polar bodies (Fig. 2B) (Pardo-Manuel de Villena and Sapienza 2001a). In other species, such as humans, polar bodies have preference for chromosomes with more centromeres than eggs, and thus fused biarmed chromosomes, which have fewer centromeres than the two acrocentric chromosomes, are more likely to be transmitted to the eggs than to polar bodies (Fig. 2B) (Pardo-Manuel de Villena and Sapienza 2001a,b). Reflecting the differences in the shape of chromosomes preferentially transmitted into eggs, all chromosomes are acrocentric in the mouse, whereas most chromosomes are biarmed in the human (Pardo-Manuel de Villena and Sapienza 2001a). Furthermore, they proposed that this bias may be caused by difference in the efficiency of centromere capture between the meiotic spindles from eggs and polar bodies (Fig. 2B) (Pardo-Manuel de Villena and Sapienza 2001b).
Female meiotic drive could potentially affect the fixation of X chromosome–autosome fusions, as they would be more easily fixed in species with preferential transmission of fused biarmed chromosomes into eggs (right panel of Fig. 2B) than in species where fused chromosomes are preferentially transmitted to polar bodies (left panel of Fig. 2B). Even when X-autosome fusions occur in males, the fused X chromosomes will be transmitted to the daughters, because the sons never inherit an X chromosome from the father. This study thus hypothesizes that X-autosome fusions (XY1Y2 sex chromosome systems) occur more frequently in species with more biarmed chromosomes than in species with more acrocentric chromosomes. In contrast, Y-autosome fusions (X1X2Y sex chromosome system) occur exclusively in males and are never influenced by female meiotic drive. However, because acrocentric chromosomes, but not biarmed chromosomes, are a source of centromeric fusions, Y-autosome fusions may occur more frequently in species with acrocentric chromosomes than in species with biarmed chromosomes. Although the biased mutation rate may also favor X-autosome fusions in these species, fused chromosomes are unlikely to be transmitted to the eggs due to the female meiotic drive. Thus, while X-autosome fusions will be rarely fixed, Y-autosome fusions can accumulate in species with more acrocentric chromosomes. Thus, this study predicts that the X1X2Y sex chromosome systems would be more prevalent in species with more acrocentric chromosomes. To test these hypotheses, we compiled cases of X1X2Y and XY1Y2 sex chromosome systems in mammals and investigated the association of the two multiple sex chromosome systems with the percentages of acrocentric chromosomes.
Materials and Methods
Several cases of XY1Y2 sex chromosome systems and X1X2Y sex chromosome systems in mammals have been previously reported by White (1973). In this study, we searched the Web of Science database using several keywords, such as “XY1Y2,”“X1X2Y,”“neo-sex chromosome,”“multiple sex chromosome,”“X-autosome fusion,” and “Y-autosome fusion.” The original papers were gathered and the references therein were also checked.
For calculation of the percentages of acrocentric chromosomes, chromosome shapes were classified according to Levan's classification (Levan et al. 1964). Although there are several terms of chromosome shapes, we followed the terminology used in Pardo-Manuel de Villena and Sapienza (2001a) to be consistent with their previous work: subtelocentric and telocentric chromosomes were classified as acrocentric chromosomes, while metacentric and submetacentric chromosomes were classified as biarmed chromosomes (i.e., nonacrocentric chromosomes). The karyotype data of species with multiple sex chromosome systems were taken from the papers listed in Table 1. The frequencies of acrocentric chromosomes were calculated on the basis of female karyotype, and analysis of the male karyotype generated the same conclusions (data not shown). For comparison, the karyotype data of 1170 mammalian species were also compiled from the supplementary table of Pardo-Manuel de Villena and Sapienza (2001a).
The association between the percentages of acrocentric chromosomes and the sex chromosome systems was first tested in the species listed in Table 1 using the Mann–Whitney U-test. However, shared evolutionary history will likely produce correlation between karyotypes and sex chromosome systems; thus, all species are not phylogenetically independent (Felsenstein 1985). Therefore, we performed phylogenetic correction. Data were analyzed from nine phylogenetically independent pairs of species, including one species with an XY1Y2 sex chromosome system and another with an X1X2Y sex chromosome system. Tests with phylogenetically independent pairs ensure that any change in each pair reflect an independent evolutionary event (Felsenstein 1985).
For phylogenetic correction, a phylogenetic tree (Fig. 4) was generated using published literatures on the interorder tree (Nishihara et al. 2006), the Artiodactyla tree (Hassanin and Douzery 2003), the Rodentia tree (Jansa and Weksler 2004; Lecompte et al. 2008), and the Diprotodontia tree (Cardillo et al. 2004). The nine phylogenetically independent pairs examined are shown in Figure 4. Because the pairs 3, 5, and 9 diverge more than other pairs, these pairs may contain more events of transition than other pairs. However, the purpose of this study is not to estimate the transition rate, but to investigate the correlation between the frequency of acrocentric chromosomes and the type of multiple sex chromosome system in phylogenetically independent contrasts. Therefore, we included these three pairs for our analysis. Multiple species with the same sex chromosome systems are often monophyletic and cluster at the tip of the phylogenetic tree. For example, the genus Gazella consists of six species with the XY1Y2 sex chromosome system. In such cases, we performed the following two analyses. First, we calculated the average percentage of acrocentric chromosomes within that cluster. For example, in Gazella, the average value was determined to be 0.138. Second, only one species was randomly picked from the cluster and the association between the percentages of acrocentric chromosomes and the sex chromosome systems of the nine phylogenetically independent pairs was tested using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The random sampling was repeated 100 times.
We found that 23 species across five orders have an XY1Y2 sex chromosomes system and 19 species across seven orders have an X1X2Y sex chromosome system (Table 1; Fig. 4). The percentages of acrocentric chromosomes of the species with the X1X2Y sex chromosome system (Fig. 3C) were significantly larger than those of the species with the XY1Y2 sex chromosome system (Fig. 3B) (Mann–Whitney U-test, U= 25.5, Z=−4.88, P < 10−5). Compared to the histogram of the percentages of acrocentric chromosomes of 1170 mammalian species compiled by Pardo-Manuel de Villena and Sapienza (2001a) (Fig. 3A), the distribution of mammals with the XY1Y2 sex chromosome system was skewed to the left, while the distribution of mammals with the X1X2Y sex chromosome system was skewed to the right.
Species belonging to the same genus, such as Artibeus, Carolina, Gazella, Sorex, Taterillus, Aotus, Alouatta, had the same type of multiple sex chromosome system within the genus (Fig. 4), suggesting the importance of phylogenetic correction. The results of the analysis of the nine phylogenetically independent pairs did not change our conclusion. When we used the average percentages of acrocentric chromosomes for the genus with the same sex chromosome system, the percentages of acrocentric chromosomes in species with the X1X2Y sex chromosome system was significantly higher than those with the XY1Y2 sex chromosome system (Fig. 5) (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, S= 0, P= 0.0039). When we used randomly picked species from the genus with the same sex chromosome system, the percentage of acrocentric chromosomes was significantly higher in the species with the X1X2Y sex chromosome system than in the species with the XY1Y2 sex chromosome system (mean ± SE of the P-value of Wilcoxon signed-rank test with 100 iterations = 0.0048 ± 0.0016).
DRIVING FORCES FOR THE EVOLUTION OF MULTIPLE SEX CHROMOSOME SYSTEMS
Our data support the hypothesis that female meiotic drive can contribute to the fixation of X-autosome fusions in mammals. In species with more biarmed chromosomes than acrocentric chromosomes, X chromosomes fused with autosomes may exhibit a greater likelihood of transmission to eggs than to polar bodies during female meiosis due to female meiotic drive, resulting in the prevalence of the XY1Y2 sex chromosome systems in these species. In contrast, in species with more acrocentric chromosomes, the higher number of acrocentric chromosomes could increase the probability of centromeric fusions. However, even if X-autosome fusions occur in these species, fused chromosomes are likely to be excluded from the eggs during female meiosis due to the female meiotic drive. In contrast, Y-autosome fusions occur exclusively in males and are not influenced by female meiotic drive. Thus, Y-autosome fusions can accumulate, whereas X-autosome fusions are rarely fixed in species with more acrocentric chromosomes.
The importance of female meiotic drive in mammalian X-autosome fusions does not exclude the contribution of the other three mechanisms. Rather, a combination of multiple mechanisms should influence the fixation of X-autosome fusions. For example, many cases of neo-sex chromosomes have been reported in small isolated populations of insects (Charlesworth and Wall 1999), supporting the hypothesis that genetic drift or heterozygote advantage may promote the fixation of sex chromosome–autosome fusions in these species. In addition, sexually antagonistic genes or genes controlling sexually dimorphic traits have been reported on neo-sex chromosomes in sticklebacks and cichlids (Kitano et al. 2009; Roberts et al. 2009), suggesting that sexually antagonistic selection may also play a role in turnover of sex chromosomes (Charlesworth and Charlesworth 1980; van Doorn and Kirkpatrick 2007; Veltsos et al. 2008), although we cannot exclude the possibility that the presence of sexually antagonistic alleles on neo-sex chromosomes is a consequence rather than the mechanism for the formation of neo-sex chromosomes. Consistent with the models of sexual antagonism and heterozygote advantage, X1X2Y sex chromosome systems are more common than XY1Y2 sex chromosome systems in fish (Kitano and Peichel 2012). However, in mammals, XY1Y2 sex chromosome systems are nearly as common as X1X2Y sex chromosome systems (White 1973; this study). These differences between fish and mammals may reflect taxonomic differences in the relative importance of each driving force and/or patterns of female meiotic drive. Further studies on the patterns of multiple sex chromosome systems and female meiotic drive across diverse taxa will contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying the variation in the prevalence of different multiple sex chromosome systems.
FEMALE MEIOTIC DRIVE AS AN EVOLUTIONARY FORCE
Understanding the contribution of female meiotic drive to sex chromosome–autosome fusions is important because sex chromosome turnover may promote phenotypic divergence and the establishment of reproductive isolation between species. First, abnormal segregation of fused chromosomes during male meiosis can cause hybrid sterility (King 1993). In addition, sex chromosomes can play special roles in speciation, because sex chromosomes have several unique characteristics of transcriptional regulation (Ohno 1967; Vicoso and Charlesworth 2006), such as dosage compensation (Wu and Xu 2003; Livernois et al. 2012) and inactivation of X chromosomes during early spermatogenesis (Presgraves 2008), and the efficacy of selection (Rice 1984; Vicoso and Charlesworth 2006). Although empirical data demonstrate that established sex chromosomes may play a special role in speciation (Coyne and Orr 2004; Presgraves 2008; Qvarnstrom and Bailey 2008), little is known about the roles of neo-sex chromosomes in speciation, except in a few cases (Kitano et al. 2009). Further studies on the role of neo-sex chromosomes in phenotypic divergence and reproductive isolation across diverse taxa will lead to the elucidation of the roles of sex chromosome turnover in speciation.
Female meiotic drive can play an important role in many evolutionary processes in addition to the turnover of sex chromosomes. Female meiotic drive can also contribute to karyotype evolution of autosomes (Pardo-Manuel de Villena and Sapienza 2001a), and divergence in karyotype of autosome can contribute to reproductive isolation between species (King 1993). In species with ZW sex chromosomes, female meiotic drive can cause sex ratio bias (Rutkowska and Badyaev 2008). The fixation of supernumerary chromosomes (B chromosomes) may also be influenced by female meiotic drive (Bidau and Martí 2004; Palestis et al. 2004). Although centromere drive is one of the proposed mechanisms of female meiotic drive (Henikoff et al. 2001; Malik and Bayes 2006; Fishman and Saunders 2008), little is known regarding the molecular mechanisms of female meiotic drive. The elucidation of the molecular mechanisms of female meiotic drive is imperative for a better understanding of sex chromosome evolution and speciation.
Female meiotic drive plays an important role in the evolution of X-autosome fusions in mammals. Because sex chromosome–autosome fusions can contribute to important evolutionary processes, such as speciation, further molecular studies should be conducted to elucidate the mechanisms of female meiotic drive. The relative contribution of female meiotic drive and patterns of female meiotic drive may vary between taxa. It is, thus, imperative to investigate the prevalence of different multiple sex chromosome systems and patterns of female meiotic drive across diverse taxa for a better understanding of neo-sex chromosome evolution in animals.
Associate Editor: J. Mank
This research was supported by the Uehara Memorial Foundation, JST PRESTO program, Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientist (B) (22770075) and Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (23113007 and 23113001) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture to JK. We thank K. Peichel for helpful comments on the manuscript and all members of Kitano Laboratory for technical assistance and discussion.
- 1987. Chromosome studies in Alouatta belzebul. Am. J. Primatol. 13:283–296. , , , , and .
- 1970. Further studies on the sex-chromosome systems of the American leaf-nosed bats (Chiroptera, Phyllostomatidae). Cytogenetics 9:131–138. , and .
- 2004. B chromosomes and Robertsonian fusions of Dichroplus pratensis (Acrididae): intraspecific support for the centromeric drive theory. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 106:347–350 , and .
- 2006. Genes in conflict. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge , U.K . , and .
- 2004. A species-level phylogenetic supertree of marsupials. J. Zool. 264:11–31. , , , and .
- 2003. Complex events in the evolution of the human pseudoautosomal region 2 (PAR2). Genome Res. 13:281–286. , , , , , , , , , and .
- 1999. Inbreeding, heterozygote advantage and the evolution of neo-X and neo-Y sex chromosomes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266:51–56. , and .
- 1980. Sex differences in fitness and selection for centric fusions between sex-chromosomes and autosomes. Genet. Res. 35:205–214. , and .
- 2010. The birds and the bees and the flowers and the trees: lessons from genetic mapping of sex determination in plants and animals. Genetics 186:9–31. , and .
- 2005. Steps in the evolution of heteromorphic sex chromosomes. Heredity 95:118–128. , , and .
- 1969. Les formules gonosomiques dites aberrantes chez les Mammifères Euthériens. Chromosoma 27:268–287.
- 2004. Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland . , and .
- 2002. The phylogeny of howler monkeys (Alouatta, Platyrrhini): reconstruction by multicolor cross-species chromosome painting. Chromosome Res. 10:669–683. , , , , , , , and .
- 1998. The karyotype of Alouatta fusca clamitans from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: evidence for a y-autosome translocation. Genet. Mol. Biol. 21:3. , , , and .
- 2002. Explosive chromosome evolution and speciation in the gerbil genus Taterillus (Rodentia, Gerbillinae): a case of two new cryptic species. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 96:117–124. , , and .
- 2003. A new sibling species of Taterillus (Muridae, Gerbillinae) from West Africa. Mamm. Biol. 68:299–316. , , , , and .
- 2004. Viability of X-autosome translocations in mammals: an epigenetic hypothesis from a rodent case-study. Chromosoma 113:34–41. , , , and .
- 2005. Recent radiation in West African Taterillus (Rodentia, Gerbillinae): the concerted role of chromosome and climatic changes. Heredity 95: 358–368. , , , , and .
- 1976. Chromosome studies in the mammalian subfamily Antilopinae. Genetica 46:419–444. , , , and .
- 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1–15.
- 2010. Chromosome phylogeny of the subfamily Pitheciinae (Platyrrhini, Primates) by classic cytogenetics and chromosome painting. BMC Evol. Biol. 10:189. , , , , , , , and .
- 2008. Centromere-associated female meiotic drive entails male fitness costs in monkeyflowers. Science 322:1559–1562. , and .
- 1965a. New sex determining mechanism in a mammal. Nature 206:1176.
- 1965b. A new sex determining mechanism in a mammal. Chromosomes of Indian mongoose (Herpestes auropunctatus). Hereditas 52:411–420.
- 1970. Unusual sex chromosome inheritance in mammals. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 259:15–36.
- 2003. Molecular and morphological phylogenies of Ruminantia and the alternative position of the Moschidae. Syst. Biol. 52:206–228. , and .
- 2010. Molecular characterization of the key switch F provides a basis for understanding the rapid divergence of the sex-determining pathway in the housefly. Genetics 184:155–170. , , , , , and .
- 2001. The centromere paradox: stable inheritance with rapidly evolving DNA. Science 293:1098–1102. , , and .
- 1968. The multiple sex chromosome system of American leaf-nosed bats (Chiroptera, Phyllostomidae). Cytogenetics 7:27–39. , , and .
- 2004. Phylogeny of muroid rodents: relationships within and among major lineages as determined by IRBP gene sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 31:256–276. , and .
- 2010. Evolution of sex chromosomes in insects. Annu. Rev. Genet. 44:91–112. , and .
- 1993. Species evolution: the role of chromosomal change. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York .
- 2012. Turnover of sex chromosomes and speciation in fishes. Environ. Biol. Fish. DOI: 10.1007/s10641-011-9853-8. , and .
- 2009. A role for a neo-sex chromosome in stickleback speciation. Nature 461:1079–1083. , , , , , , , , , , et al.
- 2004. Wide genome comparisons reveal the origins of the human X chromosome. Trends Genet. 20:598–603. , , , , and .
- 2006. Genomic organization of the sex-determining and adjacent regions of the sex chromosomes of medaka. Genome Res. 16:815–826. , , , , , , , , , , et al.
- 1979. Effective deme sizes during long-term evolution estimated from rates of chromosomal rearrangement. Evolution 33:234–251.
- 1985. The fixation of chromosomal rearrangements in a subdivided population with local extinction and colonization. Heredity 54:323–332. .
- 2008. Phylogeny and biogeography of African Murinae based on mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences, with a new tribal classification of the subfamily. BMC Evol. Biol. 8:199. , , , , , and .
- 1964. Nomenclature of for centric position on chromosomes. Hereditas 52:201–220. , , and .
- 2012. The origin and evolution of vertebrate sex chromosomes and dosage compensation. Heredity 108:50–58. , , and .
- 1975. Y-autosome translocation in the howler monkey, Alouatta palliata. J. Med. Primatol. 4:299–307. , , , , and .
- 1976. Translocation of Y chromosome to an autosome in the Bolivian owl monkey, Aotus. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 45:191–202. , , , , and .
- 2006. Genetic conflicts during meiosis and the evolutionary origins of cetromere complexity. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 34:569–573. , and .
- 1995. The Y-autosome translocation of Callimico goeldii. Int. J. Primatol. 16:145–155. , , , , and .
- 1966. A complex sex-chromosome system in the hare-wallaby Lagorchestes conspicillatus Gould. Chromosoma 19:159–175. , and .
- 1965. Un type nouveau de chromosomes sexuels multiples chez une souris africaine du groupe Mus (Leggada) Minutoides (Mammalia-Rodentia). Chromosoma 16:351–364.
- 1998. Mapping the distribution of the telomeric sequence (T2AG3)n in the Macropodoidea (Marsupialia), by fluorescence in situ hybridization. I. The swamp wallaby, Wallabia bicolor. Chromosome Res. 6:603–610. , , , and .
- 2008. DNA sequence analysis and the phylogeographical history of the rodent Deltamys kempi (Sigmodontinae, Cricetidae) on the Atlantic Coastal Plain of south of Brazil. J. Evol. Biol. 21:1823–1835. , , , , and .
- 1984. The Aotus from Northern Argentina. Primates 25:530–537. , , and .
- 1990. Chromosome comparison among five species of Patyrrhini (Alouatta caraya, Aotus azarae, Callithrix jacchus, Cebus apella, and Saimiri sciureus). Primates 31:415–420. , , and .
- 2006. Pegasoferae, an unexpected mammalian clade revealed by tracking ancient retroposon insertions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:9929–9934. , , and .
- 1967. Sex chromosomes and sex-linked genes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin .
- 1968. Nachweis natürlicher reproduktiver Isolation zwischen Sorex gemellus sp. n. und Sorex araneus Linnaeus 1758 in der Schweiz. Rev. Suisse Zool. 75:53–75.
- 2004. B chromosomes are more frequent in mammal with acrocentric karyotypes: support for the theory of centromeric drive. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271:S22–S24. , , , and .
- 2001a. Female meiosis drives karyotypic evolution in mammals. Genetics 159:1179–1189. , and .
- 2001b. Nonrandom segregation during meiosis: the unfairness of females. Mamm. Genome 12:331–339. , and .
- 1971. Parallel evolution of multiple sex-chromosome systems in the phyllostomatid bats, Carollia and Choeroniscus. Experientia 27:105–106. , and .
- 1988. Cytogenetic studies of Aotus from Eastern Amazonia: Y/autossome rearrangement. Am. J. Primatol. 14:255–263. , and .
- 2008. Sex chromosomes and speciation in Drosophila. Trends Genet. 24:336–343.
- 2008. Speciation through evolution of sex-linked genes. Heredity 102:4–15. , and .
- 1984. Sex chromosomes and the evolution of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:735–742.
- 2009. Sexual conflict resolved by invasion of a novel sex determiner in Lake Malawi cichlid fishes. Science 326:998–1001. , , and .
- 2008. Meiotic drive and sex determination: molecular and cytological mechanisms of sex ratio adjustment in birds. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 363:1675–1686. , and .
- 1984. An X1X1X2X2/X1X2Y mechanism of sex determination in a South American rodent, Deltamys kempi (Rodentia, Cricetidae). Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 38:50–55. , , and .
- 1972. Odd diploid number in both sexes and a unique multiple sex-chromosome system of a rodent, Vandeleuria o. oleracea (Bennett). Cytogenetics 11:247–258. , and .
- 1952. Multiple sex-chromosomes in the marsupial, Potorous. Heredity 6:345–355. , and .
- 1964. The chromosomes of the Tasmanian rat-kangaroo (Potorous tridactylis apicalis). Cytogenetics 24:19–33. , and .
- 2007. Evidence for different origins of sex chromosomes in closely related Oryzias fishes: substitution of the master sex-determining gene. Genetics 177:2075–2081. , , , , and .
- 1997. Comparative chromosome painting between two marsupials: origins of an XX/XY1Y2 sex chromosome system. Mamm. Genome 8:418–422. , , , , , and .
- 2007. Turnover of sex chromosomes induced by sexual conflict. Nature 449:909–912. , and .
- 2008. The inexorable spread of a newly arisen neo-Y chromosome. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000082. , , and .
- 2004. Autosome and sex chromosome diversity among the African pygmy mice, subgenus Nannomys (Murinae; Mus). Chromosome Res. 12:369–382. , , , , , , , and .
- 2006. Evolution on the X chromosome: unusual patterns and processes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7:645–653. , and .
- 1968. Chromosome analysis in the Kruger National Park: a rare translocation chromosome in the kudu. S. Afr. J. Med. Sci. 33:113–118. , and .
- 1973. Animal cytology and evolution. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge , U.K .
- 1996. Comparative mapping identifies the fusion point of an ancient mammalian X-autosomal rearrangement. Genomics 35:66–70. , , , and .
- 2003. Comparative genome analysis of the primary sex-determining locus in salmonid fishes. Genome Res. 13:272–280. , , , , , , , , , , et al.
- 2003. Sexual antagonism and X inactivation—the SAXI hypothesis. Trends Genet. 19:243–247. , and .
- 1970. Indian muntjac, Muntiacus muntjak: a deer with a low diploid chromosome number. Science 168:1364–1366. , and .
- 1969. Karyotypes of seven species of Brazilian bats. Caryologia 22:63–79. , , and .