SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Luana S Maroja, Zachary M McKenzie, Elizabeth Hart, Joy Jing, Erica L Larson, David P Richardson, Barriers to gene exchange in hybridizing field crickets: the role of male courtship effort and cuticular hydrocarbons, BMC Evolutionary Biology, 2014, 14, 1, 65

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Gustavo S. Requena, Glauco Machado, Mating behavior of a Neotropical arachnid with exclusive paternal care, acta ethologica, 2014, 17, 1, 23

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Kenyon B. Mobley, Maria Abou Chakra, Adam G. Jones, No evidence for size-assortative mating in the wild despite mutual mate choice in sex-role-reversed pipefishes, Ecology and Evolution, 2014, 4, 1
  4. 4
    Geetanjali Mishra, Omkar, Phenotype-dependent mate choice in Propylea dissecta and its fitness consequences, Journal of Ethology, 2014, 32, 3, 165

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    D. A. Edward, The description of mate choice, Behavioral Ecology, 2014,

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Jean-Guy J. Godin, Heather L. Auld, Covariation and repeatability of male mating effort and mating preferences in a promiscuous fish, Ecology and Evolution, 2013, 3, 7
  7. 7
    Maria R. Servedio, Reuven Dukas, EFFECTS ON POPULATION DIVERGENCE OF WITHIN-GENERATIONAL LEARNING ABOUT PROSPECTIVE MATES, Evolution, 2013, 67, 8
  8. 8
    A. T. Kahn, T. Dolstra, M. D. Jennions, P. R. Y. Backwell, Strategic male courtship effort varies in concert with adaptive shifts in female mating preferences, Behavioral Ecology, 2013, 24, 4, 906

    CrossRef