ANTAGONISTIC VERSUS NONANTAGONISTIC MODELS OF BALANCING SELECTION: CHARACTERIZING THE RELATIVE TIMESCALES AND HITCHHIKING EFFECTS OF PARTIAL SELECTIVE SWEEPS
Version of Record online: 27 SEP 2012
© 2012 The Author(s). Evolution© 2012 The Society for the Study of Evolution.
Volume 67, Issue 3, pages 908–917, March 2013
How to Cite
Connallon, T. and Clark, A. G. (2013), ANTAGONISTIC VERSUS NONANTAGONISTIC MODELS OF BALANCING SELECTION: CHARACTERIZING THE RELATIVE TIMESCALES AND HITCHHIKING EFFECTS OF PARTIAL SELECTIVE SWEEPS. Evolution, 67: 908–917. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01800.x
- Issue online: 5 MAR 2013
- Version of Record online: 27 SEP 2012
- Accepted manuscript online: 8 SEP 2012 12:00PM EST
- Received May 30, 2012, Accepted August 19, 2012
Table S1. Additive and dominance variance for fitness components, under different balancing selection models.
Figure S1. Allele frequency change: exact versus approximate results.
Figure S2. Relative transit times with large selection coefficients.
Figure S3. Linkage disequilibrium between the A and B locus, immediately following a partial selective sweep.
|EVO_1800_sm_suppmatS1.doc||3110K||Supporting info item|
Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.