SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

LITERATURE CITED

  • Alizon, S., A. Hurford, N. Mideo, and M. van Baalen. 2009. Virulence evolution and the trade off hypothesis: history, current state of affairs and the future. J. Evol. Biol. 22:245259.
  • Anderson, R. M., and R. M. May. 1982a. Coevolution of hosts and parasites. Parasitology 85:411426.
  • Anderson, R. M., and R. M. May.. 1982b. Directly transmitted diseases: control by vaccination. Science 215:10531060.
  • Atkins, K. E., A. F. Read, N. J. Savill, K. G. Renz, S. W. Walken-Brown, andM. E. Woolhouse. 2011. Modelling Marek’s disease virus (MDV) infection: parameter estimates for mortality rate and infectiousness. BMC Vet. Res. 7:70. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22078942.
  • Baigent, S. J., and F. Davison. 2004. Marek’s disease virus: Biology and life cycle. Elsevier Academic Press.
  • Baigent, S. J., L. P. Smith, R. J. W. Currie, and V. K. Nair. 2005. Replication kinetics of Marek’s disease vaccine virus in feathers and lymphoid tissus using PCR and virus isolation. J. Gen. Virol. 86:29892998.
  • Baigent, S. J., L. P. Smith, V. K. Nair, and R. J. W. Currie. 2006. Vaccinal control of Marek’s disease: current challenges, and future strategies to maximize protection. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 112:7886.
  • Boots, M., and A. Sasaki. 1999. ‘Small Worlds’ and the Evolution of Virulence: Infection Occurs Locally and at a Distance. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 266:19331938.
  • Bublot, M., and J. Sharma. 2004. Vaccination against Marek’s disease. in V. Nair and F. Davison, eds. Marek’s Disease: an evolving problem. Elsevier Academic Press, London , U.K.
  • Bull, J. J. 1994. Perspective: virulence. Evolution 48:14231437.
  • Bull, J. J., and D. Ebert. 2008. Invasion thresholds and the evolution of nonequilibrium virulence. Evol. Appl. 1:172182. Available at http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1752-4571.2007.00003.x.
  • Day, T. 2002. On the evolution of virulence and the relationship between various measures of mortality. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 269:13171323.
  • Day, T. 2003. Virulence evolution and the timing of disease life-history events. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18:113118.
  • Day, T., and S. R. Proulx. 2004. A general theory for the evolutionary dynamics of virulence. Am. Nat. 163:E40E63.
  • de Roode, J. C., A. J. Yates, and S. Altizer. 2008. Virulence-transmission trade offs and population divergence in virulence in a naturally occurring butterfly parasite. PNAS 105:74897494.
  • Dieckmann, U. 2002. Adaptive dynamics of pathogen-host interactions. Pp. 3959 in U. Dieckmann, J. A. J. Metz, M. W. Sabelis, and K. Sigmund, eds. Adaptive dynamics of infectious diseases: in pursuit of virulence management. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York .
  • Donham, K. J., D. Cumro, S. J. Reynolds, and J. A. Merchant. 2000. Dose-response relationships between occupational aerosol exposures and cross-shift declines of lung function in poultry workers: recommendations for exposure limits. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 42:260269.
  • Dwyer, G., S. Levin, and B. L. 1990. A simulation model of the population dynamics and evolution of myxomatosis. Ecol. Monogr. 60: 423447.
  • Ebert, D., and J. J. Bull. 2003. Challenging the trade off model for the evolution of virulence: is virulence management feasible? Trends Microbiol. 11:1520. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12526850.
  • Ebert, D., and K. L. Mangin. 1997. The influence of host demography on the evolution of virulence of a microsporidian gut parasite. Evolution 51:18281837.
  • Fenner, F., and B. Fantini. 1999. Biological control of vertebrate pests: the history of myxomatosis - an experiment in evolution. CABI Publishing, Wallingford , U.K.
  • Fenner, F., M. F. Day, and G. M. Woodroofe. 1956. Epidemiological consequences of the mechanical transmission of myxomatosis by mosquitoes. J. Hyg. 54:284303.
  • Frank, S. A. 1992. A kin selection model for the evolution of virulence. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 250:195197. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1362989.
  • Frank, S. A.. 1996. Models of parasite virulence. Q. Rev. Biol. 71:3778.
  • Fraser, C., T. D. Hollingsworth, R. Chapman, F. de Wolf, and W. P. Hanage, 2007. Variation in HIV-1 set-point viral load: epidemiological analysis and an evolutionary hypothesis. PNAS 104:17441–17446. Available at http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2077275\&tool=pmcentrez\&rendertype=abstract.
  • Gandon, S., and T. Day. 2008. Evidences of parasite evolution after vaccination. Vaccine. Vaccine 26S:C47.
  • Gandon, S., M. J. Mackinnon, S. Nee, and A. F. Read. 2001. Imperfect vaccines and the evolution of pathogen virulence. Nature 414:751755.
  • Gandon, S., M. J. Mackinnon, S. Nee, and A. F. Read. 2003. Imperfect vaccines: some epidemiological and evolutionary consequences. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 270:11291136.
  • Islam, A., and S. W. Walkden Brown. 2007. Quantitative profiling of the shedding rate of the three Marek’s disease virus (MDV) serotypes reveals that challenge with virulent MDV markedly increases shedding of vaccinal viruses. J. Gen. Virol. 88:21212128.
  • Islam, A. F. M. F., S. W. Walkden Brown, S. C. Burgess, and P. J. Groves. 2001. Marek’s disease in broiler chickens: effect of route of infection and herpesvirus of turkey-vaccination status on detection of virus from blood or spleen by polymerase chain reaction, and on weights of birds, bursa and spleen. Avian Pathol. 30:621628.
  • Islam, A. F. M. F., S. W. Walkden Brown, P. J. Groves, and G. J. Underwood, 2008. Kinetics of Marek’s disease virus (MDV) infection in broiler chickens 1: effect of varying vaccination to challenge interval on vaccinal protection and load of MDV and herpesvirus of turkey in the spleen and feather dander over time. Avian Pathol. 37:225235.
  • Islam, A. F. M. F., S. W. Walkden Brown, A. Islam, G. J. Underwood, and P. J. Groves. 2006. Relationship between Marek’s disease virus load in peripheral blood lymphocytes at various stages of infection and clinical Marek’s disease in broiler chickens. Avian Pathol. 35:4248.
  • Jensen, K. H., T. Little, A. Skorping, and D. Ebert. 2006. Empirical support for optimal virulence in a castrating parasite. PLoS Biol. 4:12651269.
  • Keeling, M. J., and B. T. Grenfell. 2000. Individual-based perspectives on R0. J. Theor. Biol. 203:5161.
  • Levin, S., and D. Pimentel. 1981. Selection of intermediate rates of increase in parasite-host systems. Am. Nat. 117:308315.
  • Lipsitch, M.. 1997. Vaccination against colonising bacteria with multiple serotypes. PNAS 94:65716576.
  • Mackinnon, M. J., and A. F. Read. 1999. Genetic relationships between parasite virulence and transmission in the rodent malaria Plasmodium chabaudi. Evolution 53:689703.
  • Morrow, C., and F. Fehler. 2004. Marek’s disease: a worldwide problem. Pp. 4961 in F. Davison and V. Nair, eds. Marek’s Disease: an evolving problem. Elsevier Academic Press, London , U.K.
  • Nair, V.. 2005. Evolution of Marek’s disease—a paradigm for incessant race between the pathogen and the host. Vet. J. 170:175183.
  • Nidelet, T., J. Koella, and O. Kaltz. 2009. Effects of shortened host life span on the evolution of parasite life history and virulence in a microbial host-parasite system. BMC Evol. Biol. 9:65.
  • Osterrieder, N., J. P. Kamil, D. Schumacher, B. K. Tischer, and S. Trapp. 2006. Marek’s disease virus: from miasma to model. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 4:753761.
  • Paul, R. E. L., T. Lafond, C. D. M. Muller-Graf, S. Nithiuthai, P. T. Brey, and J. C. Koella. 2004. Experimental evaluation of the relationship between lethal or non-lethal virulence and transmission success in malaria parasite infections. BMC Evol. Biol. 4:30.
  • Read, A. F., and M. J. Mackinnon. 2008. Pathogen evolution in a vaccinated world. Pp. 139152 in S. C. Stearns and J. Koella, eds. Evolution in Health and Disease, 2nd ed. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford , New York .
  • Read, A. F.. 1994. The evolution of virulence. Trends Microbiol. 2:7376.
  • Renz, K., J. Cooke, B. Cheetham, Z. Hussain, A. Islam, G. Tannock, and S. Walkden Brown. 2012. Pathotyping of Australian isolates of Mareks disease virus and association of pathogenicity with meq gene polymorphism. Avian Pathol. 41:161176.
  • Restif, O. 2009. Evolutionary epidemiology 20 years on: challenges and prospects. Infect. Genet. Evol. 9:108123. Available at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18977460.
  • Sabelis, M. W., and J. A. J. Metz. 2002. Taking stock: relating theory to experiment. Pp. 379398 in U. Dieckmann, J. A. J. Metz, M. W. Sabelis, and K. Sigmund, eds. Adaptive dynamics of infectious diseases: in pursuit of virulence management. Cambridge University Press, New York .
  • Sasaki, A., and Y. Iwasa. 1991. Optimal growth schedule of pathogens within a host: switching between lytic and latent cycles. Theor. Popul. Biol. 39:201239.
  • Sheppard, A. 2004. The structure and economics of broiler production in England. Defra Commissioned: Special Studies in Agricultural Economics 65. Available at https://eric.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/handle/10036/67675/Brreport.pdf?sequence=1
  • Takai, H., S. Pedersen, J. O. Johnsen, J. H. M. Metz, P. W. G. G. Koerkamp, G. H. Uenk, V. R. Phillips, M. R. Holden, R. W. Sneath, J. L. Short, R. P. White, J. Hartung, J. Seedorf, M. Schröder, K. H. Linkert, and C. M. Wathes. 1998. Concentrations and emissions of airborne dust in livestock buildings in Northern Europe. J. Agr. Eng. Res. 70:5977.
  • Walkden Brown, S., A. Islam, A. Islam, S. Burgess, P. Groves, and J. Cooke, 2013. Pathotyping of Australian isolates of Mareks disease virus in commercial broiler chickens vaccinated with HVT or bivalent (HVT/SB1) vaccine and association with viral load in spleen and feather dander. In press. Aust. Vet. J.
  • Wathes, C. M. 1994. Air and surface hygiene. Pp. 123148, in C. R. Wathes and C. D., eds. Livestock housing. CAB International, Wallingford .
  • Wathes, C. M.. 1998. Aerial emissions from poultry production. World Poulry Sci. J. 54:241251.
  • Witter, R. L.. 1997. Increased virulence of Marek’s disease virus field isolates. Avian Dis. 41:149163.
  • Witter, R. L.. 1998. The changing landscape of Marek’s disease. Avian Pathol. 27:S46S53.
  • Witter, R. L.. 2001. Protective efficacy of Marek’s disease vaccines. Curr. Top. Microbiol. 255:5891.
  • Witter, R. L., and L. F. Lee. 1984. Polyvalent Marek’s disease vaccines: safety, efficacy and protective synergism in chickens with maternal antibodies. Avian Pathol. 13:7592.
  • Witter, R. L., B. W. Calnek, C. Buscaglia, I. M. Gimeno, and K. A. Schat. 2005. Classification of Marek’s disease viruses according to pathotype: philosophy and methodology. Avian Pathol. 34:7590.