SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Lisa M. Dilks, Tucker S. McGrimmon, Shane R. Thye, Status, emotional displays, and the relationally-based evaluation of criminals and their behavior, Social Science Research, 2015, 50, 246

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Marc W. Patry, Steven D. Penrod, Death Penalty Decisions: Instruction Comprehension, Attitudes, and Decision Mediators, Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 2013, 13, 3, 204

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Sara C. Appleby, Lisa E. Hasel, Saul M. Kassin, Police-induced confessions: an empirical analysis of their content and impact, Psychology, Crime & Law, 2013, 19, 2, 111

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Tyler G. Okimoto, Michael Wenzel, Kyli Hedrick, Refusing to apologize can have psychological benefits (and we issue no mea culpa for this research finding), European Journal of Social Psychology, 2013, 43, 1
  5. 5
    Deborah C. Stearns, W. Gerrod Parrott, When feeling bad makes you look good: Guilt, shame, and person perception, Cognition & Emotion, 2012, 26, 3, 407

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Martin V. Day, Michael Ross, The value of remorse: How drivers' responses to police predict fines for speeding., Law and Human Behavior, 2011, 35, 3, 221

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Wendy P. Heath, Arresting and convicting the innocent: the potential role of an “inappropriate” emotional display in the accused, Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2009, 27, 3
  8. 8
    Tyler G. Okimoto, Michael Wenzel, Punishment as restoration of group and offender values following a transgression: value consensus through symbolic labelling and offender reform, European Journal of Social Psychology, 2009, 39, 3
  9. 9
    Alayna Jehle, Monica K. Miller, Markus Kemmelmeier, The influence of accounts and remorse on mock jurors’ judgments of offenders., Law and Human Behavior, 2009, 33, 5, 393

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Tyler G. Okimoto, Michael Wenzel, Justice, 2008,

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    Terry A. Maroney, Law and Emotion: A Proposed Taxonomy of an Emerging Field., Law and Human Behavior, 2006, 30, 2, 119

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Dena M. Gromet, John M. Darley, Restoration and Retribution: How Including Retributive Components Affects the Acceptability of Restorative Justice Procedures, Social Justice Research, 2006, 19, 4, 395

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Wendy P. Heath, Bruce D. Grannemann, Michelle A. Peacock, How the Defendant's Emotion Level Affects Mock Jurors' Decisions When Presentation Mode and Evidence Strength Are Varied, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2004, 34, 3
  14. 14
    C. Mazé, R. Finkelstein, M. Quentin, Un jury sous influence : l’impact des affects, du type d’expertise et des circonstances aggravantes sur l’activité décisionnelle des jurés, Psychologie Française, 2004, 49, 4, 357

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    John H. Brooks, John R. Reddon, The Two Dimensional Nature of Remorse, Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 2003, 38, 2, 1

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Brian H. Bornstein, Lahna M. Rung, Monica K. Miller, The effects of defendant remorse on mock juror decisions in a malpractice case, Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2002, 20, 4
  17. 17
    Dale T. Miller, DISRESPECT AND THEEXPERIENCE OFINJUSTICE, Annual Review of Psychology, 2001, 52, 1, 527

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Keith E. Niedermeier, Irwin A. Horowitz, Norbert L. Kerr, Exceptions to the Rule: The Effects of Remorse, Status, and Gender on Decision Making, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2001, 31, 3
  19. 19
    Dennis J. Devine, Laura D. Clayton, Benjamin B. Dunford, Rasmy Seying, Jennifer Pryce, Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups., Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2001, 7, 3, 622

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    Gregg J. Gold, Bernard Weiner, Remorse, Confession, Group Identity, and Expectancies About Repeating a Transgression, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2000, 22, 4, 291

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Todd E. Hogue, Jason Peebles, The influence of remorse, intent and attitudes toward sex offenders on judgments of a rapist, Psychology, Crime & Law, 1997, 3, 4, 249

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    Paul Skolnick, Jerry I. Shaw, Is Defendant Status a Liability or a Shield? Crime Severity and Professional Relatedness, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1994, 24, 20
  23. 23
    Brian S. Klaas, Daniel C. Feldman, The evaluation of disciplinary appeals in non-union organizations, Human Resource Management Review, 1993, 3, 1, 49

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Christy Taylor, Chris L. Kleinke, Effects of Severity of Accident, History of Drunk Driving, Intent, and Remorse on Judgments of a Drunk Driver, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1992, 22, 21
  25. 25
    Edith Greene, Russell Wade, Of private talk and public print: General pre-trial publicity and juror decision-making, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1988, 2, 2
  26. 26
    Yvonne Hardaway Osborne, Neil B. Rappaport, Robert G. Meyer, An investigation of persuasion and sentencing severity with mock juries, Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 1986, 4, 3
  27. 27
    W. Andrew Harrel, The Effects of Alcohol Use and Offender Remorsefulness on Sentencing Decisions, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1981, 11, 1
  28. 28
    W. Andrew Harrel, RETALIATORY AGGRESSION BY HIGH AND LOW MACHIAVELLIANS AGAINST REMORSEFUL AND NON-REMORSEFUL WRONGDOERS, Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 1980, 8, 2, 217

    CrossRef

  29. 29
    Nancy M. Shields, Accounts and Other Interpersonal Strategies in a Credibility Detracting Context, The Pacific Sociological Review, 1979, 22, 2, 255

    CrossRef

  30. 30
    W. Andrew Harrell, Aggression against a Remorseful Wrongdoer: The Effects of Self-Blame and Concern for the Victim, The Journal of Social Psychology, 1979, 107, 2, 267

    CrossRef

  31. 31
    Richard A. Kulka, Joan B. Kessler, Is Justice Really Blind?–The Influence of Litigant Physical Attractiveness on Juridical Judgment, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1978, 8, 4
  32. 32
    Helmut Lamm, David G. Myers, 1978,

    CrossRef