We would like to thank Ronald Cohen, Marjorie Hershey, Christopher Jencks, Donald Kinder, E. Allan Lind, Jane Mansbridge, and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on earlier versions of the paper.
The Influence of Perceived Injustice on the Endorsement of Political Leaders1
Version of Record online: 31 JUL 2006
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume 15, Issue 8, pages 700–725, December 1985
How to Cite
Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K. A. and McGraw, K. M. (1985), The Influence of Perceived Injustice on the Endorsement of Political Leaders. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15: 700–725. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1985.tb02269.x
This paper is based upon presentations to the American Political Science Association Meeting in Denver, Colorado, September, 1982 and to the Society of Experimental Social Psychology Meeting in Pittsburgh, PA, October, 1983.
- Issue online: 31 JUL 2006
- Version of Record online: 31 JUL 2006
Recent public opinion polls have suggested that there is a striking lack of public support for national political leaders and institutions. The two studies discussed in this paper explore why public evaluations of political leaders and institutions are low. In particular, they examine the role of perceived injustice in creating dislike for and distrust of leaders and institutions. This focus upon justice is contrasted with the more traditional focus upon the level of outcomes received from the political system and upon congruence in citizen-leader policy preferences. The results strongly support a focus upon justice by showing that judgments of injustice exercise an influence upon leadership evaluations and in stitutional endorsements which is independent of beliefs about the level of outcomes the political system is providing to citizens or of public support for government policies. In fact, both studies suggest that judgments of justice or injustice have more influence upon the endorsement of political leaders and institutions than do outcome-related concerns.