• Please log in or register to access this feature.

The Effect of Mugshot Inspections on Eyewitness Identification Accuracy†

  1. John C. Brigham*,
  2. Donna L. Cairns

Article first published online: 31 JUL 2006

DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01214.x

Issue

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volume 18, Issue 16, pages 1394–1410, December 1988

Additional Information

How to Cite

Brigham, J. C. and Cairns, D. L. (1988), The Effect of Mugshot Inspections on Eyewitness Identification Accuracy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18: 1394–1410. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01214.x

Author Information

  1. Florida State University

*2 Correspondence concerning this article should be sent to John C. Brigham, Department of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, 32306.

  • †

    The authors would like to thank Robert Bothwell, Melissa Pigott, and Lt. Bill Taylor of Florida State University Police Department for their assistance in this study.

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 31 JUL 2006
  2. Article first published online: 31 JUL 2006

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

Get PDF (999K)

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Tim Valentine, Josh P Davis, Amina Memon, Andrew Roberts, Live Showups and Their Influence on a Subsequent Video Line-up, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2012, 26, 1
    Direct Link:
  2. 2
    Kally J. Nelson, Cara Laney, Nicci Bowman Fowler, Eric D. Knowles, Deborah Davis, Elizabeth F. Loftus, Change blindness can cause mistaken eyewitness identification, Legal and Criminological Psychology, 2011, 16, 1
    Direct Link:
  3. 3
    Charles A. Goodsell, Jeffrey S. Neuschatz, Scott D. Gronlund, Effects of mugshot commitment on lineup performance in young and older adults, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2009, 23, 6
    Direct Link:
  4. 4
    Michelle R. Blunt, Hunter A. McAllister, Mug shot exposure effects: Does size matter?, Law and Human Behavior, 2009, 33, 2, 175

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    Gary L. Wells, Deah S. Quinlivan, Suggestive eyewitness identification procedures and the Supreme Court's reliability test in light of eyewitness science: 30 years later., Law and Human Behavior, 2009, 33, 1, 1

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Kathy Pezdek, Kathryn Sperry, Shana M. Owens, Interviewing witnesses: The effect of forced confabulation on event memory., Law and Human Behavior, 2007, 31, 5, 463

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Ryann M. Haw, Jason J. Dickinson, Christian A. Meissner, The phenomenology of carryover effects between show-up and line-up identification, Memory, 2007, 15, 1, 117

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Kenneth A. Deffenbacher, Brian H. Bornstein, Steven D. Penrod, Mugshot Exposure Effects: Retroactive Interference, Mugshot Commitment, Source Confusion, and Unconscious Transference., Law and Human Behavior, 2006, 30, 3, 287

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Dawn J. Dekle, Viewing composite sketches: lineups and showups compared, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2006, 20, 3
    Direct Link:
  10. 10
    Kathy Pezdek, Iris Blandon-Gitlin, When is an intervening line-up most likely to affect eyewitness identification accuracy?, Legal and Criminological Psychology, 2005, 10, 2
    Direct Link:
  11. 11
    Amina Memon, Lorraine Hope, James Bartlett, Ray Bull, Eyewitness recognition errors: The effects of mugshot viewing and choosing in young and old adults, Memory & Cognition, 2002, 30, 8, 1219

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Otto H. MacLin, Ryan L. Tapscott, Roy S. Malpass, The development of a computer system to collect descriptions of culprits, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2002, 16, 8
    Direct Link:
  13. 13
    Jennifer E. Dysart, R. C. L. Lindsay, Robin Hammond, Paul Dupuis, Mug shot exposure prior to lineup identification: Interference, transference, and commitment effects., Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86, 6, 1280

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Christian A. Meissner, John C. Brigham, Colleen M. Kelley, The influence of retrieval processes in verbal overshadowing, Memory & Cognition, 2001, 29, 1, 176

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Sean Pryke, R. C. L. Lindsay, Joanna D. Pozzulo, Sorting mug shots: methodological issues, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2000, 14, 1
    Direct Link:
  16. 16
    Rogers Elliott, Expert testimony about eyewitness identification: A critique., Law and Human Behavior, 1993, 17, 4, 423

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Kenneth A. Deffenbacher, A Maturing of Research on the Behaviour of Eyewitnesses, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1991, 5, 5
    Direct Link:
  18. 18
    Gänter Köhnken, Maria Fiedler, Charlotte Möhlenbeck, Psychology and Law,
    Direct Link:
Get PDF (999K)