We thank Jason Shafer, Jill Bogert, Michele Massey, Scott Cummings, Tracy Michalski, and Troy Mark for their help in coding studies. We also thank David Day, Alice Eagly, and William M. Bowen for their comments on an earlier version of this paper, as well as an anonymous reviewer for most helpful and thoughtful comments.
Evaluating Gender Biases on Actual Job Performance of Real People: A Meta-Analysis1
Article first published online: 31 JUL 2006
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume 30, Issue 10, pages 2194–2215, October 2000
How to Cite
Bowen, C.-C., Swim, J. K. and Jacobs, R. R. (2000), Evaluating Gender Biases on Actual Job Performance of Real People: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30: 2194–2215. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02432.x
- Issue published online: 31 JUL 2006
- Article first published online: 31 JUL 2006
This study examined gender bias on job performance in work settings where confounding variables (e. g., organizational level, experience, education) were cautiously taken into consideration to ensure fair comparisons. Although previous meta-analyses examined gender biases on evaluations, findings in tightly controlled laboratory environments may differ from those in highly complicated field studies. We found little evidence of overall gender bias in performance appraisals in nonconfounded field studies. However, there were significant pro-male biases when only men served as raters. Measure-specific gender stereotypicality, instead of genera! stereotypicality about the job, produced gender bias in performance appraisal. Masculine measures produced pro-male bias, and feminine measures produced pro-female bias.