SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Alessandro Tadei, Katarina Finnilä, Julia Korkman, Benny Salo, Pekka Santtila, Features used by judges to evaluate expert witnesses for psychological and psychiatric legal issues, Nordic Psychology, 2014, 66, 4, 239

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Jennifer M. Fletcher, Anthony D. G. Marks, Donald W. Hine, William L. Coventry, Heritability of Preferred Thinking Styles and a Genetic Link to Working Memory Capacity, Twin Research and Human Genetics, 2014, 17, 06, 526

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Kristine A. Peace, Raeanne L. Valois, Trials and Tribulations: Psychopathic Traits, Emotion, and Decision-Making in an Ambiguous Case of Sexual Assault, Psychology, 2014, 05, 10, 1239

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Alicia Summers, Sophia Gatowski, Shirley Dobbin, Terminating parental rights: the relation of judicial experience and expectancy-related factors to risk perceptions in child protection cases, Psychology, Crime & Law, 2012, 18, 1, 95

    CrossRef

  5. 5
    David A. Bright, Jane Goodman-Delahunty, Mock Juror Decision Making in a Civil Negligence Trial: The Impact of Gruesome Evidence, Injury Severity, and Information Processing Route, Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 2011, 18, 3, 439

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Jennifer M. Fletcher, Anthony D.G. Marks, Donald W. Hine, Working memory capacity and cognitive styles in decision-making, Personality and Individual Differences, 2011, 50, 7, 1136

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Margit E. Oswald, Ingrid Stucki, Automatic Judgment and Reasoning About Punishment, Social Justice Research, 2010, 23, 4, 290

    CrossRef

  8. You have free access to this content8
    Justin J. Gunnell, Stephen J Ceci, When emotionality trumps reason: A study of individual processing style and juror bias, Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2010, 28, 6
  9. 9
    Joel D. Lieberman, Daniel A. Krauss, The effects of labelling, expert testimony, and information processing mode on juror decisions in SVP civil commitment trials, Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 2009, 6, 1
  10. 10
    Dipayan Biswas, The effects of option framing on consumer choices: Making decisions in rational versus experiential processing modes, Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 2009, 8, 5
  11. 11
    Anthony D.G. Marks, Donald W. Hine, Rebecca L. Blore, Wendy J. Phillips, Assessing individual differences in adolescents’ preference for rational and experiential cognition, Personality and Individual Differences, 2008, 44, 1, 42

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Jacquelyn Burkell, Deciding for Ourselves: Some Thoughts on the Psychology of Assessing Reasonable Expectations of Privacy, Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 2008, 50, 3, 307

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Joel D. Lieberman, Daniel A. Krauss, Mariel Kyger,, Maribeth Lehoux,, Determining dangerousness in sexually violent predator evaluations: cognitive–experiential self-theory and juror judgments of expert testimony, Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2007, 25, 4
  14. 14
    Terry A. Maroney, Law and Emotion: A Proposed Taxonomy of an Emerging Field., Law and Human Behavior, 2006, 30, 2, 119

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Shai Danziger, Simone Moran, Vered Rafaely, The Influence of Ease of Retrieval on Judgment as a Function of Attention to Subjective Experience, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2006, 16, 2, 191

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Allison M. Wright, Robyn E. Holliday, Police officers' perceptions of older eyewitnesses, Legal and Criminological Psychology, 2005, 10, 2
  17. 17
    Jamie Arndt, Joel D. Lieberman, Alison Cook, Sheldon Solomon, Terror Management in the Courtroom: Exploring the Effects of Mortality Salience on Legal Decision Making., Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2005, 11, 3, 407

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Dae Ho Lee, Daniel A. Krauss, Joel Lieberman, The effects of judicial admonitions on hearsay evidence, International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 2005, 28, 6, 589

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    Daniel A. Krauss, Joel D. Lieberman, Jodi Olson, The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases, Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2004, 22, 6