Work on this manuscript was supported by a grant from the National Cancer Institute (R01 CA68354). The authors are grateful to all of the patients who participated in this study, as well as to the physicians and their staff who referred patients to the study. Thanks are also extended to Renee Rhodes and Pamela Snyder for their assistance with data collection and analyses.
Quality of Life Following Prostate Cancer: The Role of Agency and Unmitigated Agency1
Article first published online: 31 JUL 2006
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume 34, Issue 12, pages 2559–2585, December 2004
How to Cite
Helgeson, V. S. and Lepore, S. J. (2004), Quality of Life Following Prostate Cancer: The Role of Agency and Unmitigated Agency. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34: 2559–2585. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb01992.x
- Issue published online: 31 JUL 2006
- Article first published online: 31 JUL 2006
The relations of agency (positive focus on self) and unmitigated agency (focus on self to the exclusion of others) to men's quality of life following prostate cancer was examined. Whereas agency was associated with indicators of a good quality of life, unmitigated agency was associated with indicators of a poor quality of life, particularly more intrusive thoughts about the illness, more depressive symptoms, and worse mental functioning over time. The primary psychological mechanism that explained these relations was reduced self-efficacy. Unmitigated agency was associated with feeling less capable of controlling the demands the illness imposed. Unmitigated agency also was associated with adverse changes in bowel and urine function; and changes in bowel and urine function explained the relation of unmitigated agency to poor quality of life.