The authors thank Matthew Allen, Gregory Ruark, and Amanda Angie for their contributions to the present effort. We also thank an anonymous reviewer whose comments were especially helpful in revising the manuscript. Parts of this effort were supported by a series of grants from the U.S. Department of Defense, Michael D. Mumford, Principal Investigator.
Violence in Ideological and Non-Ideological Groups: A Quantitative Analysis of Qualitative Data1
Version of Record online: 21 MAY 2008
© 2008 Copyright the Authors. Journal compilation © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Volume 38, Issue 6, pages 1521–1561, June 2008
How to Cite
Mumford, M. D., Bedell-Avers, K. E., Hunter, S. T., Espejo, J., Eubanks, D. and Connelly, M. S. (2008), Violence in Ideological and Non-Ideological Groups: A Quantitative Analysis of Qualitative Data. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38: 1521–1561. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00358.x
- Issue online: 21 MAY 2008
- Version of Record online: 21 MAY 2008
Multiple models have been proposed to account for violence among ideological groups. To identify critical variables contributing to violent behavior in these groups, violent ideological groups were compared to relevant comparison groups. A historically based content analysis was conducted to assess these groups with respect to a number of variables examining leader, group, organizational, and environmental attributes held to influence violence. Discriminant analyses revealed that violent ideological groups differed from comparison groups with respect to leader extremism, group righteousness, organizational indoctrination, and environmental conflict and disruption. Regression analyses revealed that these discriminant functions predicted a number of notable violent and ideological criteria. The implications of these findings for understanding the origins of violence in ideological groups are discussed.