Procedural Justice and Sanctions in Social Dilemmas: The Moderating Effects of Group Feedback and Identification

Authors

  • DAVID DE CREMER,

    Corresponding author
    1. Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
      David De Cremer, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus Centre of Behavioral Ethics, Department of Business–Society Management, Erasmus University, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: ddecremer@rsm.nl
    Search for more papers by this author
  • NIEK HOOGERVORST,

    1. Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • PIETER DESMET

    1. Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author

David De Cremer, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus Centre of Behavioral Ethics, Department of Business–Society Management, Erasmus University, Burgemeester Oudlaan 50, 3062 PA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: ddecremer@rsm.nl

Abstract

An experimental study investigated the role of sanctioning systems in shaping individual contributions in step-level public good dilemmas. It was predicted and found that procedural justice of the sanctioning system (i.e., accurate vs. inaccurate evaluations of contributions) influenced contributions. Specifically, when group members identified strongly with the group, procedural justice exerted influence only when the group failed in establishing the public good. In contrast, when group members did not identify strongly with the group, procedural justice of the sanction only exerted influence if the group succeeded. These findings suggest that integrating the social dilemma and procedural justice literature may be beneficial for understanding the conditions that determine the effectiveness of sanctioning systems.

Ancillary