Original Article
Juvenile Competency and Responsibility: Public Perceptions
Article first published online: 5 OCT 2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00947.x
© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc
Additional Information
How to Cite
Bradley, A. R., Mayzer, R., Schefter, M., Olufs, E., Miller, J. and Laver, M. (2012), Juvenile Competency and Responsibility: Public Perceptions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42: 2411–2432. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00947.x
Publication History
- Issue published online: 18 OCT 2012
- Article first published online: 5 OCT 2012
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
The current study examined the relationship between knowledge of adolescent brain development and attitudes about juvenile competency, responsibility, likelihood to recidivate, and rehabilitative capacity. In addition, it examined what factors—a juvenile's age, the type of crime committed, or the immediacy of the crime—influenced participants' perceptions. Participants displayed some knowledge of adolescent brain development and social maturity, and tended to see adolescents as not ready, emotionally or psychologically, to handle the proceedings of adult court or a jury trial. However, a delay in criminal behavior (immediate vs. next morning) and type of victim (targeted vs. random) heavily influenced ratings of responsibility, likelihood to recidivate, and rehabilitative capacity. Implications for jury decision making and public policy are discussed.

1559-1816/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=2f1e2d4ae318cd9a67ef221a9da46c594a8538fa)
