Original Article

You have free access to this content

Is Electronic Brainstorming or Brainwriting the Best Way to Improve Creative Performance in Groups? An Overlooked Comparison of Two Idea-Generation Techniques

  1. Nicolas Michinov*

Article first published online: 18 OCT 2012

DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.01024.x

Issue

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Special Issue: THEME: Organisational Psychology

Volume 42, Issue Supplement S1, pages E222–E243, December 2012

Additional Information

How to Cite

Michinov, N. (2012), Is Electronic Brainstorming or Brainwriting the Best Way to Improve Creative Performance in Groups? An Overlooked Comparison of Two Idea-Generation Techniques. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42: E222–E243. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.01024.x

Author Information

  1. University Rennes 2, Rennes, France

*Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Nicolas Michinov, Université Rennes 2, CRPCC-LAUREPS, EA 1285, Place du Recteur Henri le Moal, F-35000 Rennes, France. E-mail: nicolas.michinov@univ-rennes2.fr

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 26 DEC 2012
  2. Article first published online: 18 OCT 2012

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (469K)

References

  • Aiken, M., Vanjani, M., & Paolillo, J. (1996). A comparison of two electronic idea generation techniques. Information and Management, 30, 91–99.
  • Brown, V. R., & Paulus, P. B. (2002). Making group brainstorming more effective: Recommendations from an associative memory perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 208–212.
    Direct Link:
  • Brown, V., Tumeo, M., Larey, T. S., & Paulus, P. (1998). Modeling cognitive interactions during group brainstorming. Small Group Research, 29, 495–526.
  • Camacho, L. M., & Paulus, P. B. (1995). The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1071–1080.
  • Campbell, J. P. (1968). Individual versus group problem solving in an industrial sample. Journal of Applied Psychology, 3, 205–210.
  • Connolly, T., Routhieux, R. L., & Schneider, S. K. (1993). On the effectiveness of group brainstorming: Test of one underlying mechanism. Small Group Research, 24, 490–503.
  • Coskun, H. (2005). Cognitive stimulation with convergent and divergent thinking exercises in brainwriting: Incubation, sequence priming, and group context. Small Group Research, 36, 466–498.
  • Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1993). Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 531–537.
  • Dennis, A. R., & Williams, M. L. (2005). A meta-analysis of group size effects in electronic brainstorming. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 1, 24–42.
  • DeRosa, D., Hantula, D., Kock, N., & D'Arcy, J. (2004). Trust and leadership in virtual teamwork: A media naturalness perspective. Human Resource Management, 43, 219–232.
    Direct Link:
  • DeRosa, D. M., Smith, C. L., & Hantula, D. A. (2007). The medium matters: Mining the long-promised merit of group interaction in creative idea generation tasks in a meta-analysis of the electronic group brainstorming literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1549–1581.
  • de Vreede, G.-J., Briggs, R. O., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2010). Exploring asynchronous brainstorming in large groups: A field comparison of serial and parallel subgroups. Human Factors, 52, 189–202.
  • Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497–509.
  • Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Tracking down the blocking effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 392–403.
  • Dugosh, K. L., & Paulus, P. B. (2005). Cognitive and social comparison processes in brainstorming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 313–320.
  • Dugosh, K. L., Paulus, P. B., Roland, E. J., & Yang, H.-C. (2000). Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 722–735.
  • Gallupe, R. B., Cooper, W. H., Grise, M. L., & Bastianutti, L. M. (1994). Blocking electronic brainstorms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 77–86.
  • Geschka, H. (1993). The development and assessment of creative thinking techniques: A German perspective. In S. G. Isaksen , M. C. Murdock , R. L. Firestien , & D. J. Treffinger (Eds.), Nurturing and developing creativity: The emergence of a discipline (pp. 215–236). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  • Goodman, G. (1995). Brainwriting: What to do when there's not a cloud in the brainstorming sky. In J. Heilbrunn (Eds.), Marketing encyclopedia: Issues and trends shaping the future (pp. 40–46). Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books.
  • Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1988). Trial by fire in an industrial setting: A practical evaluation of three creative problem-solving techniques. In K. Gronhaug & G. Kaufmann (Eds.), Innovation: A cross-disciplinary perspective (pp. 205–232). Oslo, Norway: Norwegian University Press.
  • Heslin, P. A. (2009). Better than brainstorming? Potential contextual boundary conditions to brainwriting for idea generation in organizations. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82, 129–145.
    Direct Link:
  • Howard, T. J., Dekoninck, E. A., & Culley, S. J. (2010). The use of creative stimuli at early stages of industrial product innovation. Research in Engineering Design, 21, 263–274.
  • Jarvenpaa, S. L., Knoll, K., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). Is anybody out there? Antecedents of trust in global virtual teams. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14, 29–64.
  • Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10, 791–815.
  • Johnson, H., & Carruthers, L. (2006). Supporting creative and reflective processes. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 64, 998–1030.
  • Kohn, N. W., Paulus, P. B., & Choi, Y. (2011). Building on the ideas of others: An examination of the idea combination process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 554–561.
  • Lamm, H., & Trommsdorff, G. (1973). Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming). European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 361–387.
    Direct Link:
  • Lepsinger, R., & DeRosa, D. (2010). Virtual team success: A practical guide for working and leading from a distance. San Francisco: Wiley.
  • Lubart, T. (2005). How can computers be partners in the creative process. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 63, 365–369.
  • Madsen, D. B., & Finger, J. R. (1978). Comparison of a written feedback procedure, group brainstorming, and individual brainstorming. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 120–123.
  • Meyerson, D., Weick, K. E., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Swift trust and temporary groups. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 166–195). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Michinov, N. (2012). The use of electronic brainstorming to collect ideas in scientific research teams: A challenge for future online research. In C. N. Silva (Ed.), Online research methods in urban and planning studies: Design and outcomes (pp. 157–172). Hershey, PA: IGI-Global.
  • Michinov, N., & Michinov, E. (2009). Advantages and pitfalls of social interactions in the digital age: Practical recommendations for improving virtual group functioning. In A. T. Heatherton & V. A. Walcott (Eds.), Handbook of social interactions in the 21st century (pp. 83–96). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
  • Michinov, N., & Primois, C. (2005). Improving productivity and creativity in online groups through social comparison process: New evidence for asynchronous electronic brainstorming. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 11–28.
  • Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 3–23.
  • Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Enhancing creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 392–430). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 186–213.
  • Nijstad, B. A., Stroebe, W., & Lodewijkx, H. F. M. (2002). Cognitive stimulation and interference in groups: Exposure effects in an idea generation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 535–544.
  • Nunamaker, J. F., Jr., Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., Vogel, D. R., & George, J. F. (1991). Electronic meeting systems to support group work. Communications of the ACM, 34, 41–61.
  • Osborn, A. F. (1957). Applied imagination. New York: Scribner.
  • Paulus, P. B. (2000). Groups, teams, and creativity: The creative potential of idea-generating groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 237–262.
    Direct Link:
  • Paulus, P. B., & Brown, V. R. (2003). Enhancing ideational creativity in groups: Lessons from research on brainstorming. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 110–136). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Paulus, P. B., & Brown, V. R. (2007). Toward more creative and innovative group idea generation: A cognitive-social motivational perspective of brainstorming. Social and Personality Compass, 1, 248–265.
    Direct Link:
  • Paulus, P. B., Dugosh, K. L., Dzindolet, M. T., Coskun, H., & Putman, V. L. (2002). Social and cognitive influences in group brainstorming: Predicting production gains and losses. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 299–325). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Paulus, P. B., & Dzindolet, M. T. (1993). Social influence processes in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 575–586.
  • Paulus, P. B., & Yang, H. (2000). Idea generation in groups: A basis for creativity in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 76–87.
  • Petrovic, O., & Krickl, O. (1994). Traditionally moderated versus computer-supported brainstorming: A comparative study. Information and Management, 27, 233–243.
  • Pissarra, J., & Jesuino, J. C. (2005). Idea generation through computer-mediated communication: The effects of anonymity. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20, 275–291.
  • Smith, G. F. (1998). Idea-generation techniques: A formulary of active ingredients. Journal of Creative Behavior, 2, 107–133.
    Direct Link:
  • Stroebe, W., & Diehl, M. (1994). Why groups are less effective than their members: On productivity losses in idea-generating groups. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (pp. 271–303). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Stroebe, W., Nijstad, B. A., & Rietzschel, E. F. (2010). Beyond productivity loss in brainstorming groups: The evolution of a question. Advances of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 158–210.
  • Taylor, D. W., Berry, P. C., & Block, C. H. (1958). Does group participation when using brainstorming facilitate or inhibit creative thinking? Administrative Science Quarterly, 3, 23–47.
  • Valacich, J. S., Dennis, A. R., & Connolly, T. (1994). Idea generation in computer-based groups: A new ending for an old story. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 448–467.
  • Valacich, J. S., George, J. F., Nunamaker, J. F., Jr., & Vogel, D. R. (1994). Physical proximity effects on computer-mediated group idea generation. Small Group Research, 25, 83–104.
  • VanGundy, A. B. (1983). Brainwriting for new product ideas: An alternative to brainstorming. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 1, 67–74.
  • VanGundy, A. B. (1988). Techniques of structured problem solving (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  • VanGundy, A. B. (1993). Productivity loss in brainstorming and brainwriting groups. Unpublished manuscript, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK.
  • VanGundy, A. B. (1995). Creativity in marketing. In J. Heilbrunn (Ed.), Marketing encyclopedia: Issues and trends shaping the future (pp. 31–39). Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books.
  • Walther, J. B., Anderson, J. F., & Park, D. W. (1994). Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: A meta-analysis of social and antisocial communication. Communication Research, 21, 460–487.
  • Ziegler, R., Diehl, M., & Zijlstra, G. (2000). Idea production in nominal and virtual groups: Does computer-mediated communication improve group brainstorming? Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 3, 141–158.
View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (469K)