• Bannon, L. J. 1991 From human factors to human actors: the role of psychology and human-computer interaction studies in systems design’. in J.Greenbaum & M.Kyng (Eds). Design at work: cooperative design of computer systems. Hillsdale : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2544.
  • Bergman, S., & Frissen, V. 1997 De eindgebruiker bestaat niet - de dynamiek van het gebruik van ICT in het leven van alledag’. in B.Tiggelaar (Ed). I & I jaarboek - Onderzoek in nieuwe media. Amsterdam : Otto Cramwinckel, 6874.
  • Crab tree, A. 2003 Designing collaborative systems: a practical guide to ethnography. London : Springer, 178.
  • Crabtree, A. 2004 Design in the absence of practice: breaching experiments. Proceedings of 2004 ACM Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems, 1st-4th August, Cambridge, Masachusetts: ACM Press.
  • Dant, T. 1999 Material culture in the social world: values, activities, life styles. Buckingham : Open University Press, 227.
  • DigiTAG 2005 Television on a handheld receiver: broadcasting with DVB-H. Geneva : Digital Terrestrial Television Action Group.
  • Frissen, V. 2004 De domesticatie van de digitale wereld. Rotterdam : Erasmus Universiteit.
  • Garfinkel, H. 1967 Studies of the routine grounds of everyday activities”. in Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs , New Jersey : Prentice-Hall, 3575.
  • Gibson 1977 The Theory of affordences’. in Shaw, Robert and Bransford (Eds). Perceiving, Acting and Knowing: Towards an Ecological Psychology. London : John Wiley 6782.
  • Haddon, L. 2005 The innovatory use of ICTs’. in L.Haddon & E.Mante-Meijer & B.Sapio & K.-H.Kommonen & L.Fortunati & A.Kant (Eds). Everyday innovators: researching the role of users in shaping ICT's Vol. 32). Dordrecht : Springer, 5466.
  • Hand, M, Shove, E & Southerton, D. 2005 Explaining Showering: a Discussion of the Material, Conventional, and Temporal Dimensions of Practice. in Sociological Research Online, 10 (2)
  • Molotch, H. L. 2003 Where stuff comes from: how toasters, toilets, cars, computers, and many others things come to be as they are. New York; London : Routledge, 324.
  • Norman, D.A. 1988 The Psychology of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York , 95.
  • Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T. J. 2003 Introduction: how users and non-users matter’. in N.Oudshoorn & T. J.Pinch (Eds). How users matter: the co-construction of users and technology. Cambridge : The MIT Press, 125.
  • Pierson, J. 2005 Domestication at work in small businesses. in T.Berker & M.Hartmann & Y.Punie & K.Ward (Eds). Domestication of media and technology. Berkshire : Open University Press, 205226.
  • Podnar, M. Hauswirth, and M. Jazayeri. 2002 Mobile Push: Delivering Content to Mobile Users. in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Distributed Event-Based (ICDS/DEBS'02). Vienna, Austrtia, p. 564.
  • Rammert, W. 1999 Relations that constitute technology and media that make a difference: toward a social pragmatic theory of technicization’. in Techné: Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Technology, 4 (3.
  • Sanders, E.B.N. 2002 From user-cntred to particiaptory design approaches. in J. Frascara, Design and the social sciences: Making Connections, 1: 18, London: Taylor and Francis.
  • Schuler, D & Namioka, A. 1993 Participatory design: principles and practices. Hillsdale , N.J. : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Silverstone, R., & Haddon, L. 1996 Design and domestication of information and communication technologies: technical change and everyday life. in R.Mansell & R.Silverstone (Eds). Communication by design: the politics of information and communication technologies. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 4474.
  • Tuomi, I. 2002 Networks of innovation: change and meaning in the age of the Internet. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 251.
  • Warde, A. Introduction to the sociology of consumption. Sociology, 24 (1): 122.