Editor: Patrizia Romano
Yeast selection for fuel ethanol production in Brazil
Article first published online: 22 AUG 2008
© 2008 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved
FEMS Yeast Research
Special Issue: THEMATIC ISSUE: Alcoholic fermentation: beverages to biofuel
Volume 8, Issue 7, pages 1155–1163, November 2008
How to Cite
Basso, L. C., De Amorim, H. V., De Oliveira, A. J. and Lopes, M. L. (2008), Yeast selection for fuel ethanol production in Brazil. FEMS Yeast Research, 8: 1155–1163. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00428.x
- Issue published online: 15 OCT 2008
- Article first published online: 22 AUG 2008
- Received 1 February 2008; revised 15 July 2008; accepted 15 July 2008.First published online 22 August 2008.
- fuel ethanol;
- industrial fermentation;
- ethanol yield;
- yeast selection;
- Saccharomyces cerevisiae;
- indigenous yeast
- Top of page
- Materials and methods
- Results and discussion
Brazil is one of the largest ethanol biofuel producers and exporters in the world and its production has increased steadily during the last three decades. The increasing efficiency of Brazilian ethanol plants has been evident due to the many technological contributions. As far as yeast is concerned, few publications are available regarding the industrial fermentation processes in Brazil. The present paper reports on a yeast selection program performed during the last 12 years aimed at selecting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains suitable for fermentation of sugar cane substrates (cane juice and molasses) with cell recycle, as it is conducted in Brazilian bioethanol plants. As a result, some evidence is presented showing the positive impact of selected yeast strains in increasing ethanol yield and reducing production costs, due to their higher fermentation performance (high ethanol yield, reduced glycerol and foam formation, maintenance of high viability during recycling and very high implantation capability into industrial fermenters). Results also suggest that the great yeast biodiversity found in distillery environments could be an important source of strains. This is because during yeast cell recycling, selective pressure (an adaptive evolution) is imposed on cells, leading to strains with higher tolerance to the stressful conditions of the industrial fermentation.
- Top of page
- Materials and methods
- Results and discussion
Energy crises and environmental concerns are making bioethanol an attractive renewable fuel source. Fuel bioethanol for transportation has received considerable attention in Brazil, mainly after the first oil crisis of 1973, leading the country to launch a national program to replace part of gasoline by ethanol (Amorim & Leão, 2005). Since then, ethanol production has greatly increased, making Brazil the largest producer and exporter for many decades (Richard, 2006). Recently, however, Brazil has been surpassed in terms of volumetric bioethanol production by the United States (Valdes, 2007), reaching 21 billion liters per year during the 2007/2008 crop season (Oliveira et al., 2007). In the United States, most of the ethanol is produced from corn, amounting to 24 billion liters in 2007 (RFA, 2008), with an estimated energy balance of 1.3 (units of energy from the produced ethanol per 1 unit of energy used for its production). On the other hand, Brazil produces ethanol from sugar cane with an estimated energy balance of 8.0 for this particular crop (Leite, 2005). In Brazil, nearly all the ethanol produced is used as biofuel, today representing >40% of total gasoline consumed in the country. Scientific and technological advances, for example, regarding sugar cane varieties, agricultural and fermentation process management and engineering have led to increased efficiency in Brazilian distilleries. The benefits of suitable Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for bioethanol fermentations have been less visible.
The Brazilian fermentation process is quite unusual in that yeast cells are intensively recycled (>90% of the yeast is reused from one fermentation to the next), resulting in very high cell densities inside the fermenter (10–17% w/v, wet basis), which contributes to a very short fermentation time.
Sugar cane juice and molasses (in varying proportion) are used as substrates, and ethanol concentrations of 8–11% (v/v) are achieved within a period of 6–11 h at 32–35 °C. After fermentation, yeast cells are collected by centrifugation, acid washed (the yeast slurry is treated with diluted sulfuric acid at pH 2.0–2.5 for 1–2 h, in order to reduce bacterial contamination) and repitched, comprising at least two fermentation cycles per day during a production season of 200–250 days (Wheals et al., 1999). High cell densities, cell recycling and high ethanol concentration, all contribute to reduced yeast growth, which in turn leads to high ethanol yields (90–92% of the theoretical sugar conversion into ethanol).
Ethanol plants in Brazil traditionally use baker's yeast as starter cultures, because of its low cost and availability at the required amount. For example, some distilleries start with 1–12 tons of pressed baker's yeast. However, we have shown previously (Basso et al., 1993) by karyotyping analyses of yeast samples from five distilleries that baker's yeast and two other S. cerevisiae strains used (TA and NF) were unable to compete with indigenous (wild) yeasts that contaminated the industrial processes. It was also observed that only a wild strain (JA-1) previously isolated from one distillery could survive the recycling process, and in most of the distilleries a succession of different indigenous S. cerevisiae strains performed the industrial fermentation (Basso et al., 1993). More recently, Silva-Filho et al. (2005) demonstrated, by PCR-fingerprinting of yeast samples from six distilleries, that indigenous strains could be more adapted to the industrial process than commercial ones, also identifying dominant strains.
The reason why such starter yeast strains were unable to survive could be due to the stressful conditions imposed by industrial fermentation. High ethanol concentration, high temperature, osmotic stress due to sugar and salts, acidity, sulfite and bacterial contamination are recognized stress conditions faced by yeast during the industrial processes (Alves, 1994), some of them acting synergistically (Dorta et al., 2006) and particularly with cell recycling.
Additional factors can act upon yeast, affecting fermentation performance, such as the presence of toxic levels of aluminum and potassium in the medium. The acidic condition of fermentation renders aluminum (absorbed by sugarcane in acid soils) in its toxic form (Al3+), reducing yeast viability, cellular trehalose levels and fermentation rate, with negative impacts on ethanol yields (Basso et al., 2004). The toxic effects of aluminum can be partially alleviated by magnesium ions and completely abolished in a molasses-rich medium, suggesting the presence of chelating compounds in this substrate (Basso et al., 2004). High potassium levels, especially in molasses, also exert a detrimental effect on yeast performance (Alves, 1994).
In this paper, a strategy for suitable yeast strain selection for Brazilian bioethanol fermentations is presented. This strategy uses the industrial process itself with cell recycling in order to impose selective pressure on the indigenous yeast population. Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with prevalence and persistence in industrial fermentations were selected for improved fermentation performance.
Materials and methods
- Top of page
- Materials and methods
- Results and discussion
Nearly 350 different S. cerevisiae strains were analyzed in this work. From these, 24 strains were introduced in industrial fermentations, and their designation and origin are presented in Table 1.
|Strains and designation||Origin|
|Baker's yeast||Three commercial brands (Fleischmann, Itaiquara and Mauri)|
|IZ-1904||Biological Science Department, Esalq/Usp, Piracicaba, Brazil|
|TA||Genetics Department, Esalq/Usp, Piracicaba, Brazil|
|BG-1, CR-1, SA-1||Copersucar, Brazil (isolated from ethanol plants in 1993)|
|M-26||Unesp, Assis, Brazil (isolated from ethanol plant)|
|Y-904||Mauri, Brazil (distilling yeast)|
|PE-2, PE-5, VR-1, BR-1||Isolated in this work from ethanol plants in 1994|
|BR-2, ME-2, VR-2||Isolated in this work from ethanol plants in 1995|
|MA-3||Isolated in this work from ethanol plants in 1996|
|MA-4||Isolated in this work from ethanol plants in 1997|
|CAT-1, CB-1, NR-1||Isolated in this work from ethanol plants in 1998|
|BT-1||Isolated in this work from ethanol plants in 2000|
|AL-1||Isolated in this work from ethanol plants in 2002|
Karyotyping of yeast isolates from distillery samples
Depending on the season, 20–78 distilleries were engaged in this study and most of them, except 2 (in North–Northeast region), were located in Brazilian Centre-Southern region, where >90% of the Brazilian ethanol is produced (comprising the States of São Paulo, Minas Gerais, Paraná and Mato Grosso do Sul). Yeast samples (amounting to 1160 during the 1993–2005 period) from distilleries were aseptically collected after the centrifugation step and plated on YPD agar medium (yeast extract 10 g L−1; peptone 20 g L−1; glucose 20 g L−1; agar 20 g L−1) supplemented with chloramphenicol and tetracycline (100 μg mL−1 each) to suppress bacterial contaminants. After growth at 28–30 °C for 48 h (or 4–5 days in case of reduced growth yeasts), a small portion (1–4 mg of wet weight) of 11 isolated colonies from each sample (picked up randomly and representing all the biotypes observed) were individually treated according to the protocol of Blondin & Vézinhet (1988). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed as a transverse alternating-field electrophoresis (TAFE) version using a Gene-Line (Beckman) instrument set at 170 mA for 4 h and 4-s pulses, followed by 150 mA for 18 h and 60-s pulses. The CHEF-DRIII (BioRad) was also used with three running blocks at 6 V cm−1: 1 h with 5 s pulses, 8 h with 60-s pulses and 12 h with 100-s pulses (Lopes, 2000).
Three hundred and fifty strains maintained in lyophilized form (reactivated at least every 2 years) were reactivated and propagated at 30 °C in molasses medium diluted to 10% (w/v) total sugar (sucrose, glucose and fructose expressed as hexose content). The medium volume was doubled every 24 h without shaking or supplying air, and yeast biomass was collected by centrifugation (800 g for 20 min). Fermentation trials were carried out at 33 °C in 150-mL centrifuge vials, simulating the industrial fermentation process as far as possible. A fermentation substrate containing c. 20% (w/v) total sugar (composed of cane juice and molasses – 50% of the sugar obtained from each source) was added in three equal portions spaced by 1.5 h upon addition of yeast suspension of a given strain. The yeast suspension (with 33% yeast biomass, w/v wet weight) represented c. 30% of the total fermentation volume, similar to industrial conditions. After fermentation, yeast cells were collected by centrifugation (800 g for 20 min), weighed, treated with sulfuric acid (pH 2.5 for 1 h) and reused in a subsequent fermentation, comprising at least five fermentation cycles. Samples run in triplicate for each strain and for each fermentation cycle, were analyzed for ethanol (steam distillation, followed by densimetry using an AP Paar electronic densimeter DMA48 model), yeast viability (methylene blue staining; Zago et al., 1989), glycerol, sucrose, glucose and fructose [high performance chromatography (HPAEC), Dionex DX-300, on a CarboPac PA1 4 × 250 mm column, using 100 mM NaOH as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 0.9 mL min−1 and pulsed-amperometric detection]. Yeast cell glycogen and trehalose were also estimated at the beginning of the fermentation assay and at the end of the last cycle. Trehalose was selectively extracted by trichloroacetic acid at 0 °C for 20 min (Trevelyan & Harrison, 1956) and measured by the anthrone reaction (Brin, 1966) or by HPAEC, giving similar results. Glycogen was determined by the Becker method modified according to Rocha-Leão et al. (1984).
Aerobic strain propagation, reintroduction into industrial fermentations and yeast population dynamics
The selected strains from the above-mentioned laboratory trials (14 presenting desirable fermentation features) as well as strains from other sources (listed in Table 1, except baker's yeasts) were individually and aerobically cultured (30–32 °C) in molasses medium in a 250-L high oxygen transfer fermenter (Heinrich FRINGS, GmbH). The inoculum originated from 20 L yeast suspension (1.5–2.0% w/v, wet weight) grown in molasses medium with 10% (w/v) sugar, as described previously, but with mechanical stirring (150 r.p.m.). After addition of 20 L sterilized mineral solution (containing 17.4 g K2HPO4, 13.2 g (NH4)2SO4, 6 g urea, 9.8 g MgSO4·7H2O, 0.6 g ZnSO4·7H2O and 0.2 g MnSO4·H2O) to the fermenter, 20 L sterilized molasses medium (20% w/v total sugar) was pumped at a flow rate of 1 L h−1. The fermenter was supplied with filtered air at a flow rate of 10 m3 h−1. After feeding, another 40 L mineral solution was added and the fermenter was fed once again with 20 L molasses medium (20% w/v total sugar), resulting in a final 120 L yeast suspension (10–12% w/v, wet weight) with 95–100% cell viability. These selected strains were introduced into industrial fermentations of up to 78 Brazilian distilleries (as is shown in Table 2, depending on the crop season) during 1993–2005, and the strains' population dynamics were monitored by karyotyping of approximately monthly collected yeast samples from distilleries. They were introduced as a mixture of selected strains (0.5 kg wet weight of each strain) with or without baker's yeast (1–12 tons of commercially available pressed yeast). After the 1996 campaign, some selected yeast strains were available in an active dry form and used in larger amounts (10–100 kg per distillery).
|Crop season||Number of distilleries and samples*||Number of karyotyping analysis||Introduced strains†|
|1993/1994||20 (43)||473||Baker's(8), TA(10), JA-1(8), IZ-1904(4)|
|1994/1995||25 (109)||1199||Baker's(5), CR-1(20), JA(20),SA-1 (20), IZ-1904(4)|
|1995/1996||25 (98)||1078||Baker's(5), PE-2(13), PE-5(11), SA-1(25), VR-1(25), BR-1(2)|
|1996/1997||30 (130)||1430||Baker's(8), PE-2(28), ME-2(14), SA-1(1), VR-1(28), VR-2(28), BR-2(2)|
|1997/1998||39 (117)||1287||Baker's(17), CR-1(1), BG-1(7), PE-2(30), SA-1(4), VR-1(30), MA-3(4)|
|1998/1999||39 (111)||1221||Baker's(16), BG-1(10), CR-1(2), PE-2(25), SA-1(5), Y-904(1), MA-4(4)|
|1999/2000||37 (130)||1430||Baker's(15), BG-1(11), CAT-1(2), SA-1(5), PE-2(24), VR-1(10), Y-904(1), CB-1(1), NR-1(2)|
|2000/2001||71 (205)||2255||Baker's(17), BG-1(19), CAT-1(4), CR-1(2), PE-2(41), SA-1(9), VR-1(6)|
|2001/2002||71 (217)||2387||Baker's(15), BG-1(25), CAT-1(13), CR-1(2), M-26(1), PE-2(53), VR-1(10), Y-904(1), BT-1(3)|
|2002/2003||70 (205)||2255||Baker's(11), BG-1(18), CAT-1(19), CR-1(1), M-26(1), PE-2(49), Y-904(1)|
|2003/2004||78 (265)||2915||Baker's(17), BG-1(20), CAT-1(27), PE-2(54), SA-1(6), AL-1(3)|
|2004/2005||70 (237)||2607||Baker's(12), BG-1(23), CAT-1(24), PE-2(52), SA-1(9)|
Results and discussion
- Top of page
- Materials and methods
- Results and discussion
Prevalence of indigenous strains in industrial fermentation
Karyotyping by means of PFGE has proved to be a powerful technique for differentiation between S. cerevisiae strains in Brazilian fuel ethanol plants. Nevertheless, the TAFE system was superior when compared with the CHEF system, presenting sharp bands and allowing a better differentiation between strains. All strains used were easily identified by their unique profile (Fig. 1).
When this study was initiated in 1993, baker's yeasts (Fleishmann and Itaiquara) JA-1, TA and IZ-1904 were the available strains, frequently used in distilleries. For the next crop season (1994/95), BG-1, CR-1 and SA-1 strains (isolated by Copersucar, Brazil) also became available. Until August 1993, Fleischmann and Itaiquara baker's yeast karyotype profiles were different from each other, but subsequently these two commercial brands of baker's yeast presented the same karyotype profile, also corresponding to Mauri baker's yeast (data not shown).
Following up some of these strains in industrial fermentations during the first two crop seasons, it became apparent that, in most of the distilleries, baker's yeast was rapidly replaced by wild strains in a period as short as 20–30 days of recycling, while in a few others, this substitution occurred later (50–60 days), in spite of 250 days of recycling during the fermentation season. The same trend occurred with another traditionally used strain, IZ-1904, and with many others that were evaluated as an attempt to improve industrial fermentation (TA and all other brands of baker's yeast commercially available in Brazil). All these starter cultures were overcome by indigenous yeast strains, mostly S. cerevisiae, as predicted by the numbers of bands in the karyotype profile (Vaughan-Martini et al., 1993; Zolan, 1995). During these first two crop seasons, it was observed that only the strains that were previously isolated from the industrial environment (such as JA-1, CR-1 and SA-1) showed longer persistence, being able to establish themselves in industrial fermentations for up to 180–190 days of recycling.
A great biodiversity is found in distilleries
A great biodiversity was observed in industrial fermentations (Fig. 2a), each distillery with its own population, showing a succession of different strains. Prevalent strains were found infrequently (Fig. 2b), and even more rarely – strains with persistence. Prevalent and persistent strains received special attention because this suggested competitiveness and stress tolerance during industrial fermentation, respectively.
Therefore, in the following seasons, the karyotyping analysis was performed not only to follow up introduced strains but also to identify prevalent and persistent indigenous strains.
Unfortunately, most of the indigenous yeast strains, irrespective of their dominance and persistence, showed undesirable fermentation features, such as excessive foam formation, high sedimentation rate (even during fermentation), longer fermentation time and high residual sugar after fermentation. This was demonstrated by a previous screening of 340 different indigenous strains isolated from up to 50 different distilleries during the 1993–2005 crop seasons. These strains were subjected to fermentation trials using industrial substrates (cane juice and molasses) and evaluated for foam formation, flocculation and residual sugar (incomplete fermentation). It was noticed that 67% of the strains produced excessive amount of foam, 33% were flocculent and 53% were not able to metabolize all sugar from the medium, even after fermentation time of 21 h. Unfortunately, some strains presented two or three of these undesirable features. Only 20% of the evaluated indigenous strains did not present such constraints.
High foam-producing strains do not allow the use of fermenters' total capacity and also consume more antifoam products, thus increasing ethanol production costs. When agar-plated, 40% of the indigenous strains showed rough morphology colonies, and within such strains, a great majority showed undesirable fermentation features. It was noticed that a rough morphology was frequently associated with pseudohyphal growth and a high sedimentation rate during fermentation. Additionally, flocculent or high sedimentation strains impair the centrifugation step of the industrial process. Most of the foam-producing strains also lead to yeast flotation, and both flotation and flocculation (Fig. 3) reduce the yeast contact with the substrate, increasing the fermentation time and resulting in high residual sugar concentration after fermentation. The industrial process as devised in most Brazilian plants operates better with a homogeneous yeast suspension during fermentation. Few ethanol plants in Brazil operate without centrifugation, and in these particular cases, higher sedimentation rate strains are required. This is also used in small-sized ‘cachaça’ (a Brazilian potable spirit) fermentation facilities (Silva et al., 2006).
These findings point to a frequent practice used today by some distilleries that wrongly select yeast just by collecting the population at the end of the fermentation season. Indeed, such strains could be stress-tolerant and may present some dominance in the fermenter, but a great majority of them do not present desirable fermentation features.
Non-Saccharomyces yeasts were also found
In only a few distilleries could non-Saccharomyces (mainly Schizosaccharomyces pombe, Dekkera bruxellensis and Candida krusei) be identified, and even so with a low prevalence (these non-Saccharomyces yeasts represent <5% of the total strains observed). In an isolated episode, S. pombe was found in a higher proportion than an S. cerevisiae introduced strain (CAT-1) in a distillery operating with a low ethanol concentration (c. 6% v/v). When compared with CAT-1 in a fermentation trial with a final ethanol concentration of 7.8% v/v, this isolated S. pombe showed, respectively, a longer fermentation time (20 and 7 h), lower cell viability (45% and 90%) and reduced growth. These effects were more pronounced at higher ethanol concentrations (9.0%), and this observation suggested that such yeasts will hardly compete with S. cerevisiae in a regular operating ethanol plant. There are also some reports on the high frequency of D. bruxellensis strains in ethanol plants in the northeast region of Brazil (Guerra, 1998; Liberal et al., 2007), but the prevalence of such non-Saccharomyces strain could be due to an oxygenation step in these fermentation processes, since Delia et al. (1994) and Guerra (1998) observed a stimulating effect of oxygen on growth of this yeast.
The search for suitable indigenous strains
After discarding high-foaming, flocculating and high residual sugar strains, only a small fraction (68 out of 340 evaluated strains) of the indigenous population were found to be promising strains. They were further screened in fermentation trials simulating the industrial fermentation for high ethanol yield, low glycerol formation, maintenance of high viability during recycling and high trehalose and glycogen at intracellular levels. From this screening, it was possible to select 14 strains that presented suitable fermentation profiles regarding the desirable parameters.
These selected strains presented remarkable physiological and technological parameters. Table 3 shows the fermentation characteristics of a selected strain (PE-2) as compared with baker's yeast. Ethanol yield, as the fraction of metabolized sugar converted to ethanol, was higher for the selected strain. Despite the apparently low difference in ethanol yield between PE-2 and baker's strain, this difference (3.1) amounts to an increase of 2.1 million liter of ethanol per crop season in a medium-capacity distillery. Table 3 also indicates that glycerol formation is inversely related to ethanol yield and that a low-glycerol-producing strain would have a huge impact on industrial yields. It is well known that glycerol formation is coupled to yeast growth (Nordstrom, 1966; Oura, 1973); hence, it was expected that the selected strain, presenting a more vigorous growth, would produce more glycerol. Because glycerol is also formed in response to stress factors (notably osmostress) (Walker, 1998), it can be considered that fermentations with cell recycling, as performed in this work, impose stress conditions on baker's yeast. Reduced cell viability, as well as low glycogen and trehalose intracellular levels, observed in baker's yeast, indicate that this strain does not survive under these fermentation conditions, and this might explain the short-lived nature of this yeast in industrial fermentations. It is worth noting that the PE-2 fermentation profile was very similar to BG-1, CAT-1, CR-1, SA-1 and VR-1 strains (data not shown).
|Ethanol yield (%)*||88.1 (± 1.01)||92.0 (± 1.12)|
|Glycerol (%)*||5.40 (± 0.25)||3.38 (± 0.33)|
|Biomass gain (%)†||5.8 (± 0.61)||8.2 (± 0.84)|
|Viability (%)‡||48 (± 1.1)||94 (± 1.9)|
|Trehalose (% dry basis)§||4.0 (± 0.22)||9.5 (± 0.29)|
|Glycogen (% dry basis)§||9.0 (± 0.43)||16.0 (± 0.51)|
There is some evidence that trehalose acts as a stress protectant and, together with glycogen, can help yeast to cope with several adverse physiological conditions (Walker, 1998). In our experience with fuel ethanol yeast strains, cell viability declines dramatically when trehalose levels are reduced beyond 0.2% (dry cell weight basis; data not shown), and perhaps the capacity of the selected strains to sustain high trehalose levels during recycling (Table 3) may account for their improved stress tolerance.
The yeast population dynamics in industrial fermentations
The last and decisive step of this yeast selection program was the reintroduction of the 14 selected strains not only in distilleries from where they were isolated, but in as many ethanol plants as possible in order to assess their implantation capability in industrial fermentations. The first-selected strains introduced were BR-1, PE-2, PE-5, SA-1 and VR-1 in the 1995/1996 crop season (Table 2), because they were isolated during the former season (1994/1995) (Table 1). As soon as a promising strain arose, it was introduced in the next crop season. This was performed during the 1993–2005 period involving up to 78 distilleries per crop season, in which a mixture of different strains were introduced and monitored by karyotyping (of approximately monthly collected yeast samples). As many as 12 760 isolated colonies were karyotyped during this period (Table 2). It was also very important to cover several crop seasons (campaigns), because changes in the weather, sugar cane varieties and industrial processing conditions could affect yeast performance. Indeed, some strains that presented good implantation capabilities during the 1994–1998 seasons (as JA-1, CR-1, VR-1 and VR-2) were not able to establish themselves in industrial fermentations during the following seasons. It can be suggested that the increasing molasses proportion in substrates during the 1998–2005 period, due to higher international sugar prices (resulting in a greater production and utilization of molasses, a by-product of sugar industry), also contributed to additional stresses upon yeast. High-concentration molasses substrates are well known to exert a suppressive effect in industrial ethanol fermentations (Amorim & Lopes, 2005).
Figure 4a shows the dynamics of a yeast population in a distillery that started the fermentation process with 0.5 kg (wet weight) of each selected strain (PE-2, SA-1 and VR-1) mixed with 1 ton of pressed baker's yeast. After 29 days of recycling, baker's yeast was not found and all selected strains were present in different proportions. Only the PE-2 strain was able to dominate over the introduced strains, as well as over the contaminant indigenous yeasts, representing the total biomass in the fermenter at 193 days of recycling. Figure 4b also presents the yeast population dynamics in another distillery where PE-2, BG-1 and CAT-1 strains were introduced (10 kg of each in active dry form). Similarly, one can see a better adaptability of the PE-2 strain in this distillery. The CAT-1 strain quickly dominated the fermentation but disappeared after 80 days of recycling, whereas the BG-1 strain could not be implanted, in this particular distillery. These data suggest that variations (not yet studied) might be affecting strains' adaptability in some distilleries.
The results from Fig. 4a clearly show that the selected yeast strains successfully compete with baker's yeast, commencing from such a disproportional biomass ratio at the start of fermentation (0.5 kg of selected yeast strains vs. 1 ton of baker's yeast; in some distilleries, even 12 tons). When starting with several selected strains, it was apparent that, in most cases, one of the strains showed better adaptability to a particular distillery, as shown in Fig. 4b. However, no correlation between strain adaptability and some particular industrial process feature could be found (fed batch or continuous fermentation, high or low molasses proportion, final ethanol concentration and operating temperature). Nevertheless, Silva-Filho et al. (2005) found that a yeast cell PCR-fingerprint profile (P18) was dominant in cane juice-fermenting distilleries, while P6 and P1A profiles were dominant in molasses medium.
In a parallel study, it was also observed that such selected indigenous yeast strains, contrary to baker's yeast, sporulated abundantly, producing asci with three or four spores in a few hours (<24 h) and generated some rough colonies (Lopes, 2000; Lopes et al., 2002). Rough colonies (associated with pseudohyphal growth) were also observed in selected strains during their implantation in industrial fermentations (0–10% of the colonies for each strain).
Lopes (2000) and Lopes et al. (2002) isolated 273 PE-2 variants with chromosomal rearrangements from 12 distilleries that used this yeast as the starter culture. Considering these changes in the electrophoretic profile (due to chromosomal rearrangements), the discriminatory power of the karyotyping technique was greatly increased (not published). We could observe a range of 0–40% of chromosomal rearrangements during the implantation period for PE-2, CAT-1 and BG-1 strains (depending on the distillery), but this was more frequent during the late period of the season. Future work will be performed to identify any technological advantage of these variants, mainly regarding better adaptability or higher stress tolerance during fuel ethanol fermentations.
Few selected yeast strains appear to be useful for industrial fermentations
Unfortunately, most of the 14 laboratory-selected strains showed poor implantation capability, when considering the whole period of this study (12 years), even though some strains were able to dominate in a few distilleries during particular crop seasons in Brazil. Few strains were consistently able to contribute good fermentation performance for many distilleries and for many seasons. Table 4 presents the best-performing strains with their implantation capabilities, comprising three strains isolated in this study (PE-2, CAT-1 and VR-1) and others (BG-1, CR-1 and SA-1) isolated by Copersucar (Brazil), showing their dominance and prevalence in industrial fermentations. It can be seen in Table 4 that, during 12 crop seasons, the PE-2 strain, for instance, was implanted in 58% of the distilleries where it was introduced, representing 54% of the yeast population at the end of the crop season (160–200 days of recycling).
|Introduced strains||Permanence (%)*||Prevalence (%)†|
|PE-2||58 (± 4.1)||54 (± 5.2)|
|CAT-1||51 (± 4.3)||45 (± 5.8)|
|BG-1||42 (± 5.1)||65 (± 4.8)|
|SA-1||32 (± 5.0)||44 (± 6.6)|
|VR-1||25 (± 4.3)||15 (± 3.0)|
|CR-1||7 (± 6.2)||6 (± 6.3)|
To date, there are no similar data covering so many distilleries for such a long time period during which many process variations can be expected in the Brazilian bioethanol industrial sector. PE-2, CAT-1 and BG-1 showed a remarkable capacity of competing with indigenous yeast, surviving and dominating during industrial fermentations, and they are currently the most widely used strains in ethanol plants in Brazil. During 2007/2008, PE-2 and CAT-1 strains were used in about 150 distilleries, representing c. 60% of the fuel ethanol produced in Brazil.
Once implanted into a distillery, selected strains may reduce ethanol production costs not only by increasing ethanol yield or simplifying fermentation handling/operations but also through reducing antifoam consumption. Foam production is an important economic issue, and Fig. 5 shows the relationship between antifoam consumption and yeast population dynamics in a distillery during 197 days of operation. In this plant, the PE-2 strain was used as the starter culture and quickly became the dominant strain, but was subsequently replaced by foam-producing indigenous strains. There was a direct relationship between the presence of the selected strain and the low consumption of antifoam products, indicating potential economical benefits, albeit for limited periods.
- Top of page
- Materials and methods
- Results and discussion
In c. 40% of the distilleries involved in this study, no selected yeast strains could be implanted successfully and compete with indigenous yeasts. This represents economic losses due to the combined effects of foaming, flocculation, high glycerol formation and high residual sugar. Newly selected yeasts, likely isolated from the industrial plants in question, may prove suitable for specific distillery fermentations and will augment the efficiency of Brazilian fuel ethanol plants in the future.
- Top of page
- Materials and methods
- Results and discussion
We wish to acknowledge Graeme Walker for reviewing the manuscript, suggestions and linguistic improvements. We also thank Thiago O. Basso (for helping with the manuscript and figures), Fermentec (for technical support and funding), all the distilleries engaged in this study and FEMS, for the Invited Speaker Meeting Grant to L.C.B., to attend the ISSY26 in Sorrento, Italy.
- Top of page
- Materials and methods
- Results and discussion
- 1994) Fatores que afetam a formação de ácidos orgânicos bem como outros parâmetros da fermentação alcoólica. MS Thesis, ESALQ Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP. (
- 2005) A experiência do Proálcool. Fermentação alcoólica: Ciência e Tecnologia (AmorimHV, ed), pp. 190–191. Fermentec, Piracicaba, SP. & (
- 2005) Ethanol production in a petroleum dependent world: the Brazilian experience. Sugar J 67: 11–14. & (
- 1993) Dominância das leveduras contaminantes sobre as linhagens industriais avaliada pela técnica da cariotipagem. Anais Congresso Nacional da STAB 5: 246–250. , , , , & (
- 2004) Aluminium toxicity towards yeast fermentation and the protective effect of magnesium. International Congress on Yeasts–Yeasts in Science and Biotechnology The Quest for Sustainable Development, Book of Abstracts, Rio de Janeiro, p. PB-14. , , , , & (
- 1988) Identification de souches de levure oenologiques par leur caryotypes obtenus en eletrophorese en champ pulse. Rev Française Oenol 28: 7–11. & (
- 1966) Tranketalose: clinical aspects. Met Enzymol 9: 506–514. (
- 1994) Brettanomyces development during alcoholic fermentation of beet molasses and its control. Distilled beverage industry fermentation technology, Orlando (USA), Book of Abstracts, 73–80. , & (
- 2006) Synergism among lactic acid, sulfite, pH and ethanol in alcoholic fermentation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (PE-2 and M-26). World J Microb Biot 22: 177–182. , , , & (
- 1998) Mecanismo de infecção da fermentação alcoólica industrial por Brettanomyces bruxellensis, impacto no processo e medidas operacionais do agente infeccioso. PhD Thesis, Instituto de Biociências Campus de Rio Claro, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Rio Claro, SP. (
- 2005) Biomassa, a esperança verde para poucos. http://www.agrisustentavel.com/san/biomassa.htm (accessed on 28 January 2008). (
- 2007) Identification of Dekkera bruxellensis as a major contaminant yeast in continuous fuel ethanol fermentation. J Appl Microb 102: 538–547. , , , , , , & (
- 2000) Estudo do polimorfismo cromossômico em Saccharomyces cerevisiae (linhagem PE2) utilizada no processo industrial de produção de etanol. PhD Thesis, Instituto de Biociências de Rio Claro, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Julio de Mesquita Filho”, Rio Claro, SP. (
- 2002) Chromosomal polymorphism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (strain PE-2) used in the industrial fermentation for ethanol production. Yeast Genet Mol Biol Meeting (Madison,WI), p. 159 (abstract 348). , & (
- 1966) Yeast growth and glycerol formation. Acta Chem Scand 20: 1016–1025. (
- 2007) Acompanhamento da safra brasileira. Cana-de-açúcar–safra 2007/2008, terceiro levantamento. 13p. CONAB, Brasilia, DF http://www.conab.gov.br/conabweb/download/safra/2lev-cana.pdf (accessed on 28 January 2008) , , , , , , & (
- 1973) Reaction products of yeast fermentation. Process Biochem 12: 644–651. (
- RFA (2008) Renewable Fuel Associations, annual world ethanol production by country. http://www.ethanolrfa.org/industry/statistics/ (accessed on 1 February 2008).
- 2006) Brazil: a world leader. Sugar J 69: 11–15. (
- 1984) Glycogen accumulation during growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: catabolite repression effects. IRCS Med Sci 12: 411–412. , & (
- 2006) Studies on the kinetic parameters for alcoholic fermentation by flocculent Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains and non-hydrogen sulfide-producing strains. World J Microb Biot 22: 857–863. , & (
- 2005) Yeast population dynamics of industrial fuel ethanol fermentation process assessed by PCR-fingerprinting. Antonie van Leeuwenkoek 88: 13–23. , , , , & (
- 1956) Studies on yeast metabolism. 5. The trehalose content of baker's yeast during anaerobic fermentation. Biochem J 62: 177–183. & (
- 2007) Ethanol demand driving the expansion of Brazil's sugar industry. Sugar J 70: 9–11. (
- 1993) Electrophoretic karyotyping as a taxonomic tool in the genus. Saccharomyces. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 63: 145–156. , & (
- 1998) Yeast Physiology and Biotechnology. John Willey & Sons, Chichester. (
- 1999) Fuel ethanol after 25 years. Trends Biot 17: 482–487. , , & (
- 1989) Métodos Analíticos para o controle da Produção de alcool. Fermentec/CEBTEC/ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, SP. , , , & (
- 1995) Chromosome-length polymorphism in fungi. Microbiol Rev 59: 686–698. (