Department of Sociology, Queens College, CUNY, 252 Powdermaker Hall; 65-30 Kissena Boulevard, Flushing, New York 11367-1597; e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.
Members Only: Gated Communities and Residential Segregation in the Metropolitan United States1
Version of Record online: 21 JUL 2008
© 2008 Eastern Sociological Society
Volume 23, Issue 3, pages 536–555, September 2008
How to Cite
Vesselinov, E. (2008), Members Only: Gated Communities and Residential Segregation in the Metropolitan United States. Sociological Forum, 23: 536–555. doi: 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2008.00075.x
The research for this article was supported by the University of South Carolina College of Liberal Arts Scholarship Support (CLASS) Award to the author, who thanks the anonymous reviewers for their useful comments and Katie Woodlieff for research assistance on the earlier draft of the article.
- Issue online: 21 JUL 2008
- Version of Record online: 21 JUL 2008
- gated communities;
- residential segregation;
- urban sociology
Using the American Housing Survey for 2001 and Census 2000, I examine the link between gated communities and residential segregation. I hypothesize that gating and segregation are defined by similar mechanisms, thus reinforcing urban inequality in U.S. cities. The results, however, indicate a more complex relationship. On the one hand, there are common mechanisms behind the two processes: the pursuit of higher property values, fear of crime, and fear of increased social heterogeneity. An increase in percent recent immigrants leads to higher levels of both segregation and gating. On the other hand, factors such as region, percent black, percent Hispanic, percent college graduates, and functional specialization affect the two processes differentially. Although segregation is less pronounced and declining in the U.S. urban Southwest, gated communities are much more prominent there. The results challenge the notion that the declines in residential segregation in recent decades indicate social progress.