Department of Sociology, Davison Hall, 26 Nichol Avenue, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901; e-mail: amische@sociology.rutgers.edu.
1573-7861/asset/bannerforeground.gif?v=1&s=fefce5e81d731350728fb4654ac6db87ff79192a)
Bourdieu in Contention and Deliberation: Response to Lamont and Lizardo
Article first published online: 6 FEB 2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2011.01311.x
© 2012 Eastern Sociological Society
Additional Information
How to Cite
Mische, A. (2012), Bourdieu in Contention and Deliberation: Response to Lamont and Lizardo. Sociological Forum, 27: 245–250. doi: 10.1111/j.1573-7861.2011.01311.x
- †
Department of Sociology, Davison Hall, 26 Nichol Avenue, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901; e-mail: amische@sociology.rutgers.edu.
Publication History
- Issue published online: 6 FEB 2012
- Article first published online: 6 FEB 2012
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- Bourdieu;
- cognition;
- culture;
- projectivity;
- relationality;
- theory
This essay responds toLamont’s (2011)article “How Has Bourdieu Been Good to Think With? The Case of the United States,” andLizardo’s (2011)essay “The Three Phases of Bourdieu’s U.S. Reception,” both of which appear in this issue.