Data Appendix Available Online A data appendix to replicate main results is available in the online version of this article. Please note: Wiley-Blackwell, Inc. is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Understanding foreign direct investment in the southern African development community: an analysis based on project-level data
Article first published online: 26 APR 2010
© 2010 International Association of Agricultural Economists
Volume 41, Issue 3-4, pages 337–347, May / July 2010
How to Cite
Mhlanga, N., Blalock, G. and Christy, R. (2010), Understanding foreign direct investment in the southern African development community: an analysis based on project-level data. Agricultural Economics, 41: 337–347. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00440.x
- Issue published online: 26 APR 2010
- Article first published online: 26 APR 2010
- Received 30 October 2009; received in revised form 12 February 2010; accepted 15 February 2010
- Foreign direct investment (FDI);
- FDI determinants;
This article uses a uniquely rich project-level data set to analyze determinants and trends of foreign direct investment (FDI) flows to the Southern African Development Community region. We control for the source of the investment, the sector in which the investment is undertaken, and the investment type in addition to project size. The results indicate market size to have a positive impact on FDI flows under all specifications—a result consistent with earlier studies. Other variables are unstable depending on specification and the subset of the data used. Furthermore, we find no significant differences in factors that drive FDI flows by source country, while greenfield investments are seen to respond more to the growth potential of the market relative to other forms of investment. In general, we find macroeconomic variables to be poor at explaining project-level FDI in the region. The descriptive analysis of the data points us more in the direction of the gravity model, with factors such as colonial ties and proximity of the investing country appearing to matter. Limited flows and minimal sectoral diversity call for enhanced investment promotion and collaborative efforts among member states.