Do fertilizer subsidies crowd out organic manures? The case of Malawi

Authors

  • Stein Holden,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Economics and Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1432 Ås, Norway
      Tel.: +47 64965699; fax: +47 64965701. E-mail address: stein.holden@umb.no (S. Holden).
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Rodney Lunduka

    1. Department of Economics and Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 1432 Ås, Norway
    Search for more papers by this author

  • Current address: CABI Africa, ICRAF Complex, United Nations Avenue, P.O Box 633-00621, Gigiri, Nairobi, Kenya.

  • Data Appendix Available OnlineA data appendix to replicate main results is available in the online version of this article. Please note: Wiley-Blackwell, Inc. is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Tel.: +47 64965699; fax: +47 64965701. E-mail address: stein.holden@umb.no (S. Holden).

Abstract

We assess the impacts of the Malawian Farm Input Subsidy Program on manure use at the farm plot level using more than 3,000 farm plot observations from six districts in central and southern Malawi over three years (2006, 2007, and 2009). The probabilities and intensities of manure use were investigated with the correlated random effects (CRE) probit and tobit models. The endogeneity of access to fertilizer subsidies and fertilizer use intensity was controlled for with a control function approach. Both the probability of manure use and intensity of manure use were positively correlated with the intensity of fertilizer use. A 1% increase in fertilizer use intensity is associated with a 1.94%–1.96% increase in the intensity of manure use outside the subsidy program and a 0.62%–1.66% increase in manure use with the subsidy program. A 1% increase in average fertilizer price was associated with a 0.43%–0.76% increase in the probability of manure use and a 3.5%–5.3% increase in the intensity of manure use.

Ancillary