Data Appendix Available Online A data appendix to replicate main results is available in the online version of this article. Please note: Wiley-Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Agricultural water management and poverty in Ethiopia
Article first published online: 7 SEP 2012
© 2012 International Association of Agricultural Economists
Volume 43, Issue Supplement s1, pages 99–111, November 2012
How to Cite
Hagos, F., Jayasinghe, G., Awulachew, S. B., Loulseged, M. and Yilma, A. D. (2012), Agricultural water management and poverty in Ethiopia. Agricultural Economics, 43: 99–111. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-0862.2012.00623.x
- Issue published online: 5 NOV 2012
- Article first published online: 7 SEP 2012
- Received 11 March 2011; received in revised form 14 February 2012; accepted 2 July 2012
- Consumption expenditure;
- Propensity score matching;
- Regression analysis;
The main focus of this article is to explore whether access to selected agricultural water management (AWM) technologies has led to significant reduction in poverty and, if they did so, to identify which technologies had higher impacts. In measuring impact we estimated the average treatment effect for the treated on crop income and measured the differences in consumption expenditures per adult equivalent of those with access and without access using matched data. The estimated average treatment effect was significant and amounted to USD 82 per season. Moreover, there was 24 less poverty incidence among users of AWM technologies compared to nonusers. All technologies were found to have significant poverty reducing impacts with micro dams, deep wells, river diversions, and ponds leading to 37%, 26%, 11%, and 9% reduction in poverty incidence compared to rainfed system. Finally, our study identified the most important correlates of poverty on the basis this we made the policy recommendations to build assets (AWM technologies, livestock, etc); to enhance human resource development and improve the functioning of labor markets for enhanced impact of AWM technologies on poverty.