SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • rumen;
  • real-time PCR;
  • anaerobic fungi;
  • Ruminococcus flavefaciens;
  • Fibrobacter succinogenes

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References

Traditional methods for enumerating and identifying microbial populations within the rumen can be time consuming and cumbersome. Methods that involve culturing and microscopy can also be inconclusive, particularly when studying anaerobic rumen fungi. A real-time PCR SYBR Green assay, using PCR primers to target total rumen fungi and the cellulolytic bacteria Ruminococcus flavefaciens and Fibrobacter succinogenes, is described, including design and validation. The DNA and crude protein contents with respect to the fungal biomass of both polycentric and monocentric fungal isolates were investigated across the fungal growth stages to aid in standard curve generation. The primer sets used were found to be target specific with no detectable cross-reactivity. Subsequently, the real-time PCR assay was employed in a study to detect these populations within cattle rumen. The anaerobic fungal target was observed to increase 3.6-fold from 0 to 12 h after feeding. The results also indicated a 5.4-fold increase in F. succinogenes target between 0 and 12 h after feeding, whereas R. flavefaciens was observed to maintain more or less consistent levels. This is the first report of a real-time PCR assay to estimate the rumen anaerobic fungal population.


Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References

The digestion of plant material and subsequent conversion for energy requirements to the host ruminant are performed through a complex symbiotic relationship of microbiota within the rumen (Mackie, 1997). The composition and proportion of microorganisms are influenced by external factors, such as diet, feeding frequency, age, geographical location and ruminant–host interaction (Hungate, 1966; Dehority & Orpin, 1997). A need to better understand the intricacies of these interactions first led researchers to investigate what were considered to be key microbial members within the rumen with respect to fatty acid metabolism, fibre degradation, methanogenesis and bacterial predation (Mackie, 1997). Much research has focused on the cellulolytic degrading microorganisms and the effect of diet and feeding frequency on these populations (Krause et al., 2003).

Early studies involved direct counting of bacteria using traditional enumeration methods such as microscopy and colony counts (Leedle et al., 1982). Most research has centred on the role of the three prominent fibre-degrading bacteria Fibrobacter succinogenes, Ruminococcus albus and Ruminococcus flavefaciens. In addition to the major cellulolytic bacterial populations, the rumen also possesses highly fibrolytic anaerobic rumen fungi. Anaerobic rumen fungi were first described by Orpin (1975) and are thought to play an important role in fibre degradation within the rumen (Orpin & Joblin, 1997).

Anaerobic filamentous fungal populations have proven to be more difficult to enumerate than bacteria, mainly as a result of their dual life stages: a motile free-swimming zoospore and then a fibre-attached mature thallus (Orpin, 1994). Initially, enumeration of anaerobic fungi focused on zoospore counts (Orpin, 1975). Zoospore counts could not be completely extrapolated to thallus-forming units (TFUs), particularly when considering polycentric species, which are capable of forming new rhizobium from fragments of old rhizomycelium in addition to zoospores (Hespell et al., 1997). A most probable number (MPN) method of serially diluted fungal samples was developed to calculate TFUs (Theodorou et al., 1990; Obispo & Dehority, 1992). This method revealed that zoospore counts, although much more rapid, were underestimating the fungal populations of the rumen.

With the advancement of molecular enumeration methods, in particular 16S/18S rRNA gene probing methods, researchers were able to monitor bacterial and fungal species within the rumen (Stahl et al., 1988; Dore et al., 1993). Because of the high level of conservation within the fungal 18S rDNA gene sequence (Bowman et al., 1992), a more appropriate target for identification, the internal transcribed spacer 1 region (ITS1), should be targeted. Located between the 18S rDNA and 5.8S rDNA genes, this region was identified as containing high levels of sequence variation, and is used for the phylogenetic identification of anaerobic rumen fungi (Li & Heath, 1992; Brookman et al., 2000).

Real-time PCR is a powerful tool that allows for the rapid quantification (Freeman et al., 1999) of a target DNA sequence through the design of specific primer sets. Researchers have shown that this technique can be used successfully on samples extracted from rumen contents to monitor populations in the rumen (Tajima et al., 2001; Ouwerkerk et al., 2002; Klieve et al., 2003). In this study, we describe the design and use of a SYBR Green real-time PCR assay to monitor two fibrolytic bacterial species, F. succinogenes and R. flavefaciens, and the total anaerobic fungal population. A growth curve study of anaerobic fungal isolates, in terms of their DNA and protein contents with respect to fungal biomass at various stages, was performed. This allowed for the generation of standard curves based on fungal DNA from pure cultures, thus enabling the calculation of fungal biomass or fungal contribution to microbial nitrogen within the rumen. This is the first description of a real-time PCR assay that can rapidly monitor anaerobic rumen fungal populations.

Materials and methods

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References

Bacterial cultures and growth medium

All anaerobic microbial cultures were grown on media 10 plus 30% rumen fluid under anaerobic conditions at 39°C (Caldwell & Bryant, 1966). The following strains of rumen bacteria were used as reference strains: Fibrobacter succinogenes (S85, BL2, HM2 and REH9-1) (gift from Professor R. Mackie, University of Illinois, IL), Ruminococcus albus (AR67) and Ruminococcus flavefaciens (Y1 and R13e2) (Krause et al., 1999). Additional rumen bacterial strains, as indicated in Table 1, were taken from our existing collection. Several anaerobic fungal isolates from our collection were also used for reference purposes when developing these methods: Neocallimastix spp. isolates CX, LM1 and PN1 from sheep (McSweeney et al., 1994) and TBT2 from banteng, Orpinomyces spp. isolates F9 and F11 from banteng and Piromyces spp. isolates TNL1 from nilgai, TZB2 from zebra and KS13 from kangaroo (Tuckwell et al., 2005). Nine aerobic chytrid fungal isolates covering three of the four aerobic orders were grown on PYG 2% agar at 22°C (gift from Drs F. Gleason and P. McGee, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia). The aerobic fungal isolates were as follows: order Blasticladiales, one isolate from the family Blastocladiacea (Allomyces arbuscula Allo Mar CW16) and two from the family Catenariacea (Catenaria sp. Poly AD-20 and Catenophlyctis sp. CC4-10Z); two fungal isolates from the family Chytridiacea within the order Chytridiales (Cladochytrium sp. AUS11 and Rhizophydium sp. AUS7); and, finally, within the order Spizellomycetates, three isolates from the family Spizellomycetaceae (Rhyizophlyctis sp. AUS16, Rhyizophlyctis rosa AUS13 and Spizellomyces sp. Mar Ad 2-0) and one isolate from the family Olipidiaceae (Powellomyces sp. AUS16).

Table 1.   PCR primer validation with various microbial DNA templates
Template DNABacterialFungalRuminococcus flavefaciensFibrobacter succinogenes
Neocallimastix sp. CX+
Neocallimastix sp. LM1+
Neocallimastix sp. PN1+
Neocallimastix sp. TBT2+
Orpinomyces sp. F9+
Orpinomyces sp. F11+
Piromyces sp. KS13+
Piromyces sp. TGB1+
Piromyces sp. TNL1+
Allomyces arbuscula Allo Mar CW16
Catenaria sp. Poly Ad-20
Catenophlyctis sp. CC 4-10Z
Cladochytrium sp. AUS11
Powellomyces sp. AUS17
Rhyizophlyctis sp. AUS16
Rhyizophlyctis rosea AUS13
Rhizophydium sp. AUS7
Spizellomyces sp. Mar Ad 2-0
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens (AcTF2)+
Escherichia coli K12+
Prevotella ruminocola (23)+
Ruminococcus albus (AR67)+
Selenomonas ruminantium (AR56)+
Streptococcus bovis+
Ruminococcus flavefaciens (R13e2)++
Ruminococcus flavefaciens (Y1)++
Fibrobacter succinogenes (S85)++
Fibrobacter succinogenes (BL2)++
Fibrobacter succinogenes (HM2)++
Fibrobacter succinogenes (REH9-1)++
Rumen++++
Soil+NDND
Grass+NDND

Fungal growth curves

Two monocentric fungi, Neocallimastix sp. CX and Piromyces sp. TGB1, and a polycentric isolate, Orpinomyces sp. F11, were inoculated individually into six 10-mL anaerobic culture media tubes and grown at 39°C. At 6-h time intervals, three tubes for each fungus were harvested by centrifugation at 10 000 g for 10 min. The fungal cell pellet was transferred to a preweighed tube and freeze dried for 24 h. The dried fungal biomass was then weighed to determine the total amount of dry weight fungal biomass at each time point.

A quantity of known biomass from each time point was then used to determine the percentage nitrogen. A weighed aliquot was placed into a sample boat and combusted at 1100°C using a LECO CNS-2000 Combustion Analyser. Total nitrogen was measured using a thermal conductivity detector with EDTA as a calibration standard (Analytical Services, School of Land and Food, The University of Queensland, Qld., Australia). Crude protein values were calculated by multiplying the nitrogen value by 6.25.

DNA was extracted at each time point from a known quantity of dry weight fungal biomass using the methods described below.

Rumen sampling

Samples of rumen fluid and digesta were extracted from four fistulated Brahman crossbred steers [212±4.2 kg liveweight (mean±SEM)] which were fed a basal diet of Angleton grass (Dicanthium aristatum) which was deficient in sulphur, nitrogen and phosphorus. Urea/phosphoric acid supplement solution (urea, 447.4 g L−1; 85% w/w orthophosphoric acid, 98.5 g L−1) was sprinkled on the feed (34.4 mL kg−1) to increase the nitrogen and phosphorus content to 1.2% and 0.27%, respectively, on a dry weight basis. The nitrogen to sulphur ratio in the feed was 0.055 and was considered to be sulphur deficient. Digesta samples were directly taken from three sites within the central portion of the rumen (anterior, central and posterior) with initial course filtration through an insect screen with a medium mesh size (2 × 1.5 mm). The pooled filtrate, in excess of 500 mL per sampling, contained digesta plant particles and rumen fluid, and was used for DNA extraction. Samples were taken just prior to feeding and at 4, 8, 12 and 24 h after feeding.

DNA extraction

Total genomic DNA was isolated from pure bacterial and fungal species, grass and soil samples collected from a nongrazing pasture and rumen samples using the FastDNA Kit and FastPrep Instrument (Q-BIO gene, QC, Canada). For rumen samples, a 1.5-mL aliquot was taken from the 500-mL sample using a wide-bore pipette, so as to ensure that a homogeneous sample containing plant particles and liquid was obtained. For soil and grass samples, 100 mg of material was used per extraction. For pure cultures, a known quantity of dry weight fungal biomass was used. All samples were placed in the supplied screw cap microcentrifuge tube containing irregularly shaped garnet particles and a single 0.25-in ceramic sphere. One millilitre of supplied lysis buffer was then added and the tubes were placed in the Fast Prep Instrument and processed (bead beat) at a setting of 5 for 2 min. Following this, the samples were incubated at 70°C for 10 min and then centrifuged for 15 min at 14 000 g at 4°C. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube where an equal volume of the supplied glass milk was added and the DNA was allowed to bind. The glass milk solution was centrifuged and then washed before the DNA was eluted with 100 μL of sterile water.

Real-time PCR primer design and assay conditions

The designed primers used for the real-time PCR are described in Table 2. The primers for detecting total bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences were designed by firstly modifying the existing universal bacterial primer 1114f (Lane, 1991) to increase the melting temperature (Tm) to 60°C. The reverse primer was designed at a distance of 130 bp 3′ of the forward primer based on the ARB 16S ribosomal sequence multiple alignments downloaded from the ribosomal database project (RDP II). Primers were analysed using primer express (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and designed for an optimal Tm of 60°C. Primers were then compared with sequences available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) via a blast search to ascertain primer specificity (Altschul et al., 1990), and against the RDP II and ARB databases using the probe match analysis function (Cole et al., 2003; Ludwig et al., 2004). A similar regime was followed for the design of the two fibrolytic bacterial primer sets to target F. succinogenes and R. flavefaciens species. The general anaerobic fungal primer set was designed from multiple alignments of fungal 18S ribosomal and ITS1 gene sequences, which included all available anaerobic fungal sequences and representatives of closely and distantly related fungal species.

Table 2.   PCR primers for real-time PCR assay
Target speciesForward primerReverse primerSize (bp)
  • *

    Modified from Lane (1991).

  • Numbers in parentheses represent Escherichia coli numbering positions.

General bacteriaCGGCAACGAGCGCAACCC* (1114)CCATTGTAGCACGTGTGTAGCC (1275)130
General anaerobic fungiGAGGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGGTTTCCAAATTCACAAAGGGTAGGATGATT120
Fibrobacter succinogenesGTTCGGAATTACTGGGCGTAAA (586)CGCCTGCCCCTGAACTATC (706)121
Ruminococcus flavefaciensCGAACGGAGATAATTTGAGTTTACTTAGG (96)CGGTCTCTGTATGTTATGAGGTATTACC (220)132

Conventional PCRs for the validation of the specificity of the designed primers against target genes were performed in 30-μL reactions with the addition of 2.5 mM MgCl2 and employing Platinum Taq (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Reactions were performed using a Bio-Rad iCycler thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) under the following conditions: one cycle at 94°C for 2 min, and 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 60°C for 15 s and 68°C for 1 min. The PCR products were analysed by running on 2% agarose gels containing ethidium bromide and visualizing for a single specific band and the absence of primer dimer products.

Real-time PCR assays were performed on an ABI PRISM 7900HT Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). Assays were set up using the Platinum SYBR Green qPCR SuperMix-UDG (Invitrogen). Optimization of assay conditions was performed for primer, template DNA and MgCl2 concentrations. An optimal primer concentration of 300 nm and a final MgCl2 concentration of 3 mM were finally chosen for the assay under the following cycle conditions: one cycle of 50°C for 2 min and 95°C for 2 min for initial denaturation, and 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min for primer annealing and product elongation. Fluorescence detection was performed at the end of each denaturation and extension step. Amplicon specificity was performed via dissociation curve analysis of PCR end products by increasing the temperature at a rate of 1°C every 30 s from 60 to 95°C. Total microbial rumen DNA was diluted to 1 : 10 prior to use in real-time PCR assays to reduce inhibition.

Real-time PCR calibrations

Standard curves for the absolute quantification of F. succinogenes and R. flavefaciens were obtained using DNA from F. succinogenes S85 and R. flavefaciens Y1 grown overnight in culture at 39°C. Cultures were centrifuged and the cells were resuspended in clarified rumen fluid. The numbers of bacterial cells were determined using a Helber counting chamber (Weber Scientific Instruments, West Sussex, UK) at × 400 magnification. DNA was then extracted from a known number of cells and used in a 6 log dilution series.

Standard curves for anaerobic fungi were obtained using DNA from two monocentric fungi, Neocallimastix sp. CX and Piromyces sp. TGB1, and a polycentric isolate, Orpinomyces sp. F11, from 30-h cultures. The dry weight biomass was calculated for each fungal isolate and resuspended in clarified rumen fluid prior to DNA extraction as described above. DNA was then diluted to generate six concentrations over a 3 log range. Standard curves were also generated for each fungus separately.

Statistics

Statistical analysis of the data was performed by anova, with differences determined by the method of least significant differences at the 5% level (P<0.05). All statistical analyses were run with Statistica 6 (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK).

Results

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References

Anaerobic fungal growth curves

The polycentric isolate Orpinomyces sp. F11 was observed to generate significantly greater biomass across all time points after 12 h of growth compared with the monocentric isolates. The final dry weight biomass for Orpinomyces sp. F11 was 12.9 mg at 36 h for a 10-mL culture, whereas the average of the monocentric fungal isolates was 2.4 mg (Fig. 1). Crude protein estimations per milligram of biomass, performed at each time point, revealed that both the monocentric and polycentric isolates possessed similar crude protein levels of 40.5% and 41%, respectively. Across the growth period, the crude protein coefficient of variance was 0.8% for the polycentric fungal isolate and 3.8% for the monocentric fungi.

image

Figure 1.  Growth curves showing biomass gain for the polycentric isolate Orpinomyces sp. F11 (▵) and the average for the monocentric isolates Neocallimastix patriciarum CX and Piromyces sp. TGB1 (□). The DNA content per milligram of biomass is represented as filled symbols for the respective isolates.

Download figure to PowerPoint

DNA was extracted from a known quantity of biomass at each time point to ascertain the ratio of DNA to fungal biomass. The monocentric fungi exhibited similar values at all time points, with an average of 9.7±0.45 μg mg−1 (mean±SEM) and with a variance of 1.2%. The polycentric fungus, however, showed higher values within the first 18 h, with a mean of 26.6±0.37 μg mg−1 (mean±SEM), whereas, in the later stages of growth, the DNA content was, on average, 19.02±1.49 μg mg−1 (mean±SEM; Fig. 1). The coefficient of variance across the entire growth period was 20.2%, compared with 0.4% for the first 18 h and 6.7% for the remaining 18 h of growth.

Real-time PCR performed on 10 ng of fungal genomic DNA at each time point produced a consistent cycle threshold (Ct) value of 13.82±0.09 (mean±SEM) for the polycentric isolate and 14.74±0.27 (mean±SEM) for the monocentric isolates.

PCR primer design and validation

The general anaerobic fungal forward primer was designed against conserved regions of the 3′ end of the 18S ribosomal gene, whereas the reverse primer was designed within the 5′ region of the ITS1 using multiple alignments of this region (Brookman et al., 2000). The amplicon size for the anaerobic fungal primers was c. 120 bp. Amplicons were only observed for DNA extracted from the nine anaerobic fungal strains and from total rumen microbial DNA. PCR amplification of rumen microbial DNA using the anaerobic fungal primers produced fungal-specific amplicons of the expected size. Cloning and sequencing of these amplicons revealed that all products examined aligned with anaerobic rumen fungal sequences (data not shown). No product was observed for samples extracted from nine other closely related aerobic chytrid fungi (Table 1).

The primer sets designed to detect the two fibrolytic anaerobic rumen bacterial species Fibrobacter succinogenes and Ruminococcus flavefaciens were designed to target their respective 16S ribosomal gene. Results from probe match analysis at RDP II and within ARB both showed the primers to be specific for their respective targets. Because of the need to limit the amplicon size, the forward primer in the design of the F. succinogenes primers was found to be incompletely target specific; specificity for the target was achieved through the reverse primer sequence site. The reverse primer sequence was found to be highly specific for F. succinogenes when tested against the NCBI, RDP II and ARB databases. When tested against DNA from pure bacterial cultures, the F. succinogenes primer set was observed to be target specific (Table 1). In addition, the F. succinogenes primer set was shown to be capable of amplifying strains from all three F. succinogenes subgroups through the amplification of subgroup representative strains BL2, S85, HM2 and REH9-1 (Lin et al., 1994). PCR amplification of cattle rumen microbial DNA using the specific bacterial primer sets produced amplicons of the expected size. Cloning and limited sequencing of these amplicons revealed that all products examined aligned with F. succinogenes and R. flavefaciens sequences with respect to the primers used.

The general 16S ribosomal bacterial primer set was designed as a modified version of an existing 16S universal primer (Lane, 1991); the second primer was designed at a distance of up to 200 bp from the universal primer. When considering the design of the second primer, multiple alignments of representative 16S rumen bacteria and those obtained from RDP II (Cole et al., 2003) were analysed in the ARB software environment for sequence database handling and data analysis (Ludwig et al., 2004). Final primer sequences were tested against the RDP II and ARB multiple alignment using the probe match analysis functions in the respective databases. When limiting searches to near-complete sequence lengths and allowing for up to two mismatches, c. 95% of all sequences were detected. The amplicon size for the primer set was c. 130 bp.

Validation of real-time PCR assay

Dissociation curve analysis to ascertain the Tm of amplicons is an essential element for determining the specificity of a SYBR Green assay. Dissociation analysis of amplicons was performed for all primer sets using DNA from pure cultures and total rumen microbial DNA. The primers for R. flavefaciens, when used with DNA from strain Y1, produced a dissociation curve peak at c. 82°C; an identical peak was observed when using rumen microbial DNA. A dissociation curve peak of 86°C was observed for the F. succinogenes primer set when either the pure DNA from strain S85 or rumen microbial DNA was used. When using the general bacterial primer set with total rumen microbial DNA, a broad dissociation curve was observed at 82–89°C. The general anaerobic fungal primers were designed to target a highly conserved region, thus producing amplicons of similar sequence composition across target species, resulting in a more defined dissociation peak. The general rumen fungal primers, when used with either pure anaerobic fungal DNA or rumen microbial DNA, produced dissociation curves at 76°C.

Standard curve generation

Standard curves for the two bacterial targets were generated by plotting the observed Ct values against the logarithm of the cell number per millilitre. Standard curves from the various pure cultures of anaerobic fungi produced similar slopes, but resulted in different y-intercepts, with the polycentric isolate having a lower intercept. The difference in these intercepts divided by the slope (0.34) estimates the target gene to be double in the polycentric isolate than in the monocentric isolate. In addition, when 10 ng of DNA from pure cultures taken throughout the growth study was used in the real-time PCR assay, the average difference in Ct values between the polycentric and monocentric isolates across all time points was 0.91±0.18 (mean±SEM). This also equates to a difference of approximately twofold between the isolates. Therefore, standard curves of anaerobic fungi were generated by plotting the observed Ct values against the logarithm of the number of micrograms of a mixed fungal DNA dilution. Standard curve slopes are presented in Table 3, revealing that all primer sets, regardless of DNA template, from pure cultures, mixed cultures or rumen samples produced PCR efficiencies approaching 100%. To convert DNA values to fungal biomass, an average DNA content of 13 μg for every milligram of total rumen fungal biomass was used.

Table 3.   Standard curve line fit and slope values calculated using real-time PCR
 R2Slope
  1. Values for each bacterial primer set are for total microbial rumen DNA template (top row) and the respective pure culture (bottom row). Fungal DNA template was as follows for top row: total microbial rumen DNA template, Orpinomyces sp. F11, Piromyces sp. TGB1, Neocallimastix sp. CX and an equal mix of all three fungal templates.

Fibrobacter succinogenes0.999−3.386
0.999−3.467
Ruminococcus flavefaciens0.997−3.340
0.995−3.370
General anaerobic fungi0.996−3.384
0.993−3.354
0.998−3.233
0.997−3.285
0.991−3.292
General bacteria0.999−3.327

Real-time PCR monitoring of microbial populations within the rumen

Using absolute quantification, R. flavefaciens was observed to be present at a consistent level of (1.15 × 108)±(0.29 × 108) cells mL−1 (mean±SEM), and was not observed to be significantly different at any sampling time (Fig. 2). Monitoring of the F. succinogenes population over the 24-h sampling period showed significant changes from each sampling point, with a general increase in detection to (7.91 × 109)±(2.04 × 109) cells mL−1 (mean±SEM) at 12 h after feeding (Fig. 2). Fibrobacter succinogenes was observed to increase significantly by 3.13-fold (P<0.01) from 4 to 8 h, with a further increase of 1.16-fold for the 12-h sampling time. A similar diurnal pattern for the general anaerobic fungal population was revealed, with a significant increase from 4 to 8 h of 2.15-fold (P<0.01), and then a further increase of 1.10-fold to the 12-h sampling time (Fig. 2). The fungi reached a maximum of 22.03±2.74 μg of biomass mL−1 (mean±SEM) at 12 h after feeding. This equates to a crude protein value of 8.98±1.12 μg mL−1 (mean±SEM).

image

Figure 2.  Real-time PCR data representing specific targets: (a) Fibrobacter succinogenes (▪) and Ruminococcus flavefaciens (○); (b) total anaerobic fungi (▴). Points represent the mean of four animal samples; error bars are standard errors of the mean. Time represents hours at which samples were collected after feeding.

Download figure to PowerPoint

A second method of monitoring the population changes was also investigated: through the use of a relative quantification assay. In this instance, the total 16S rRNA gene amplified by the total bacterial primer set was used as a ‘housekeeping gene’ for normalization of the data. As the two quantification methods result in different values, the differences between consecutive time points (calculated by each method) for each population were used to investigate any significant difference between the methods. There was no observed significant difference between the methods for any of the populations (Table 4). Only when using Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) calculations to overcome a nonsignificant F-test was R. flavefaciens observed to be significantly different (P<0.05) between the methods for the 12–24-h period. Further analysis by comparing the difference between the two fibrolytic bacterial populations at each time point did not show any significant difference between the methods (Fig. 3).

Table 4.   Comparison of population changes between time points using absolute or relative quantification calculations
 0–4 h4–8 h8–12 h12–24 h
  • *

    Significant difference using Tukey HSD calculations.

  • Values show the mean fold difference ± SEM in the target detected between the time points indicated. Top row values were calculated using a relative quantification assay with total bacterial values for normalization. Bottom row values were calculated as absolute values from standard curve generation.

F. succinogenes1.8 ± 0.524.26 ± 0.751.19 ± 0.150.43 ± 0.03
1.69 ± 0.272.83 ± 0.451.06 ± 0.200.31 ± 0.06
R. flavefaciens1.13 ± 0.210.83 ± 0.090.67 ± 0.072.20 ± 0.42*
1.14 ± 0.050.64 ± 0.090.49 ± 0.031.34 ± 0.13*
Fungi2.53 ± 1.342.96 ± 0.361.29 ± 0.070.50 ± 0.08
2.25 ± 0.942.18 ± 0.301.17 ± 0.230.31 ± 0.06
image

Figure 3.  Comparison of fold difference between Fibrobacter succinogenes and Ruminococcus flavefaciens at the indicated time points after feeding using relative (inline image) or absolute (inline image) quantification calculations.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Discussion

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References

Anaerobic rumen filamentous fungi form extensive interlocking rhizoidal systems. Accurate enumeration and identification within these masses by direct count using a microscope is not practical, especially when considering that environmental samples contain both polycentric and monocentric species. Counting zoospores or thallus structures alone is not entirely accurate, particularly when polycentric fungi can form colonies from fragments of rhizomycelium in addition to zoospores (Dehority & Orpin, 1997). An MPN method was developed (Theodorou et al., 1990; Obispo & Dehority, 1992) that consistently yielded higher fungal counts when compared with direct microscopy counts (Dehority & Orpin, 1997). A drawback of this method is that the fungi grow as a nonhomogeneous culture in liquid media and therefore cannot be accurately serially diluted. In particular, some polycentric fungal isolates form a thick pellicle structure when grown in vitro which is difficult to disrupt (personal observations).

To overcome this, data are presented with respect to fungal biomass or crude protein per millilitre. In order for this to be valid, an understanding of DNA and crude protein content from representatives of both polycentric and monocentric anaerobic fungi during various growth stages is required. Although the monocentric pure cultures showed no significant difference in the proportion of DNA to fungal biomass, the polycentric isolate clearly possessed a higher DNA content in the earlier stages of growth than in the later stages. This coincides with the growth characteristics of Orpinomyces spp. in that, during the initial stages of growth, an extensive polynucleated rhizomycelium is evident (Breton et al., 1989). The decline in the DNA to biomass ratio suggests that, in the later stages of growth, enlargement of the rhizomycelium occurs without any major nuclear division.

The cattle rumen is known to possess both polycentric and monocentric species, and therefore a mean value of 13 μg mL−1 of biomass was employed for converting DNA content to biomass and then to fungal nitrogen or crude protein values. This value was chosen as the average DNA content for the various fungal species during active growth, so as to allow for the observed differences across the fungal growth stages and between the two major forms. In systems in which only monocentric species are present, a lower value of c. 10 μg mL−1 of biomass should be employed, whereas, in environments predominantly inhabited by polycentric species, a higher value approaching 20 μg mL−1 of biomass is required. There was no significant difference in nitrogen values between polycentric and monocentric fungi, and they were similar at various stages of fungal growth; an average value of 6.5% was used. This value is similar to that mentioned previously for anaerobic fungi of 5.9% nitrogen (Faichney et al., 1997).

The general fungal primer set was found to amplify all anaerobic fungal DNA across the three genera tested, but did not amplify any of the aerobic fungal isolates. None of the four representatives from the Spizellomycetales order, which is the most closely related order to the anaerobic fungi (Bowman et al., 1992), or of the representatives of the other related orders that were tested, produced an amplicon when using the anaerobic fungal-specific primer set. The aerobic chytrid fungi are commonly found and cultured from soils (Sparrow, 1960), and are particularly prevalent in soils subjected to agriculture and horticultural practices (Weber & Webster, 2000). It is most likely that these fungi would be ingested by grazing animals and could therefore be present within samples from grazing animals. Soil and grass samples collected from a nongrazing site did not produce an amplification product. A nongrazing site was chosen in order to reduce potential interference from any aero-tolerant survival stage of the anaerobic fungal strains (Davies et al., 1993).

Earlier studies estimating fungal biomass in the rumen using chitinase postulated the fungal biomass to be around 8% of the biomass (Orpin & Joblin, 1988). The authors pointed out that this assay is susceptible to a large amount of error, and there is likely to be interference from feedstuffs and aerobic fungal contamination. Fungal abundance calculated by various counting methods is usually within the range 103–107 mL−1 as zoospores or TFUs (Theodorou, 1990; Orpin & Joblin, 1997). In sheep fed an orchard grass diet, Faichney et al. (1997) used an rRNA-based probing method to calculate the fungal contribution to be between 1.1% and 3.5% of microbial nitrogen. Studies employing rRNA quantification are susceptible to error because of changes in the rRNA content throughout the cell growth stages (Raskin et al., 1997). The rDNA content, however, remains more constant, as was observed here, with no significant changes in target values over the growth cycle of the various fungal isolates. Similar observations have been reported, supporting the view that rDNA is a more robust target (Blomberg et al., 1997; Sylvester et al., 2004). In this study, the estimation of rumen microbial nitrogen based on total purine analysis, organic dry matter digestibility and rumen turnover rate was 14.9 g nitrogen kg−1 (P. Kennedy, CSIRO, Rockhampton, Qld, Australia, unpublished data). This then equates the rumen fungal contribution to total microbial nitrogen at 0.5% in these animals 12 h after feeding. With these animals on a low-quality diet, which was also deficient in sulphur, it is likely that the fungal population would be lower than on better quality diets such as orchard grass. Rumen fungal numbers have previously been observed to increase in response to sulphur supplementation of sheep fed a deficient diet of spear grass (Heteropogon contortus) (Morrison et al., 1990).

The primer sets selected to monitor the fibrolytic bacterial species Ruminococcus flavefaciens and Fibrobacter succinogenes in this trial were specific for the respective targets and produced no cross-reactivity with the other species tested. Dissociation curve profiles for both F. succinogenes and R. flavefaciens products were tight, suggesting a high level of specificity. These primers are designed within variable regions in the 16S ribosomal gene and, therefore, any nonspecific amplification from other rumen microbial populations would result in erroneous dissociation curves. In order to overcome any potential inhibitory compounds from rumen fluid, which have been observed previously to affect standard curve generation (Ouwerkerk et al., 2002), standard curves were generated from harvested cells that were first resuspended in clarified rumen fluid prior to DNA extraction. The F. succinogenes primer set described here produces a smaller amplicon (121 bp) than that previously described (445 bp) (Tajima et al., 2001). Similarly, the primer set described here for R. flavefaciens was reduced to an amplicon size of 132 bp to maintain amplification efficiency. The amplicon size should be kept to a minimum, thus overcoming amplification problems associated with larger fragments. The F. succinogenes 16S rRNA gene was observed by Tajima et al. (2001) to be the least efficiently amplified of the rumen bacteria when the entire 16S gene was amplified.

Previous studies monitoring fibrolytic bacterial populations within the rumen through various molecular-based methods have indicated that F. succinogenes is present as the predominant fibrolytic species at c. 2% of the population (range, 0.1–6%) with respect to the total microbial rRNA signal (Stahl et al., 1988; Briesacher et al., 1992; Lin et al., 1994; Krause et al., 1999; Tajima et al., 2001; Koike et al., 2003). Similarly, the data gathered here suggest that F. succinogenes is present at high numbers within the rumen and significantly increases to a maximum at 12 h after feeding. The use of these primers to track these populations and their responses to diet changes has not been performed here, and so little comparison can be undertaken in the context of this paper, other than to recognize that F. succinogenes was present at 2 log10 numbers greater than R. flavefaciens. It was also observed that, although R. flavefaciens was not significantly different at any time point, it was detected at its lowest value when F. succinogenes was observed to be present at its highest level.

In addition to absolute quantification, a relative quantification assay was performed on the same samples, in which the samples were normalized against a total 16S ribosomal target so as to account for any difference in sample processing. This is akin to relative quantification of target genes in gene expression studies. This means that only the difference between treatments can be observed or, in this case, species shifts between time intervals. When comparing the calculated fold differences detected for the target species for the two methods, the relative quantification was observed to generally produce higher values, but was not observed to be significantly different from the absolute quantification methods. The relative quantification assay may be of use in applications in which the tracking of multiple targets within many samples and the running of multiple standard curves with each assay become prohibitive. This type of assay can only show population changes with respect to samples and cannot provide absolute cell numbers.

The development of the anaerobic fungal real-time PCR assay allows researchers, for the first time, to more rapidly and accurately monitor total anaerobic fungal populations within the rumen. It is envisaged that, in future studies, it will be possible to monitor specific subpopulations using species-specific primers from signature sequences recently elucidated (Tuckwell et al., 2005).

Acknowledgements

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References

This work was partially supported by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research. Peter Kennedy is thanked for calculations of the rumen flow rates and microbial nitrogen. Carl Davis is thanked for help with real-time PCR data collection. Laurie Conlan and Dean Gibson are thanked for their technical assistance in collecting the rumen samples.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results
  6. Discussion
  7. Acknowledgements
  8. References
  • Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW & Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215: 403410.
  • Blomberg P, Randolph C, Yao CH & Yao MC (1997) Regulatory sequences for the amplification and replication of the ribosomal DNA minichromosome in Tetrahymena thermophila. Mol Cell Biol 17: 72377247.
  • Bowman BH, Taylor JW, Brownlee AG, Lee J, Lu SD & White TJ (1992) Molecular evolution of the fungi: relationship of the basidiomycetes, ascomycetes, and chytridiomycetes. Mol Biol Evol 9: 285296.
  • Breton A, Bernalier A, Bonnemoy F, Fonty G, Gaillard B & Gouet P (1989) Morphological and metabolic characterization of a new species of strictly anaerobic rumen fungus: Neocallimastix joyonii. FEMS Microbiol Lett 49: 309314.
  • Briesacher SL, May T, Grigsby KN, Kerley MS, Anthony RV & Paterson JA (1992) Use of DNA probes to monitor nutritional effects on ruminal prokaryotes and Fibrobacter succinogenes S85. J Anim Sci 70: 289295.
  • Brookman JL, Mennim G, Trinci AP, Theodorou MK & Tuckwell DS (2000) Identification and characterization of anaerobic gut fungi using molecular methodologies based on ribosomal ITS1 and 18S rRNA. Microbiology 146: 393403.
  • Caldwell DR & Bryant MP (1966) Medium without rumen fluid for nonselective enumeration and isolation of rumen bacteria. Appl Microbiol 14: 794801.
  • Cole JR, Chai B, Marsh TL et al. (2003) The ribosomal database project (RDP-II): previewing a new autoaligner that allows regular updates and the new prokaryotic taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res 31: 442443.
  • Davies DR, Theodorou MK, Lawrence MI & Trinci AP (1993) Distribution of anaerobic fungi in the digestive tract of cattle and their survival in faeces. J Gen Microbiol 139: 13951400.
  • Dehority BA & Orpin CG (1997) Development of, and natural fluctuations in, rumen microbial populations. The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem (HobsonPN & StewartCS, eds), pp. 196245. Elsevier, London.
  • Dore J, Brownlee AG, Millet L, Virlogeux I, Saigne M, Fonty G & Gouet P (1993) Ribosomal DNA-targeted hybridisation probes for the detection, identification and quantitation of anaerobic rumen fungi. Proc Nutr Soc 52: 176A.
  • Faichney GJ, Poncet C, Lassalas B, Jouany JP, Millet L, Doré J & Brownlee AG (1997) Effect of concentrates in a hay diet on the contribution of anaerobic fungi, protozoa and bacteria to nitrogen in rumen and duodenal digesta in sheep. Anim Feed Sci Technol 64: 193213.
  • Freeman WM, Walker SJ & Vrana KE (1999) Quantitative RT-PCR: pitfalls and potential. Biotechniques 26: 112125.
  • Hespell RB, Akin DE & Dehority BA (1997) Bacteria, fungi, and protozoa of the rumen. Gastrointestinal Microbiology, Vol. 2 (MackieRI, WhiteBA & IsaacsonRE, eds), pp. 591. Chapman and Hall, New York.
  • HungateRE (1966), (ed), pp. 1533. Academic Press, New York.
  • Klieve AV, Hennessy D, Ouwerkerk D, Forster RJ, Mackie RI & Attwood GT (2003) Establishing populations of Megasphaera elsdenii YE 34 and Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens YE 44 in the rumen of cattle fed high grain diets. J Appl Microbiol 95: 621630.
  • Krause DO, Dalrymple BP, Smith WJ, Mackie RI & McSweeney CS (1999) 16S rDNA sequencing of Ruminococcus albus and Ruminococcus flavefaciens: design of a signature probe and its application in adult sheep. Microbiology 145: 17971807.
  • Krause DO, Denman SE, Mackie RI, Morrison M, Rae AL, Attwood GT & McSweeney CS (2003) Opportunities to improve fiber degradation in the rumen: microbiology, ecology, and genomics. FEMS Microbiol Rev 27: 663693.
  • Lane DJ (1991) 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics (StackebrandtE & GoodfellowM, eds), pp. 115175. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Leedle JA, Bryant MP & Hespell RB (1982) Diurnal variations in bacterial numbers and fluid parameters in ruminal contents of animals fed low- or high-forage diets. Appl Environ Microbiol 44: 402412.
  • Li JL & Heath IB (1992) The phylogenetic-relationships of the anaerobic chytridiomycetous gut fungi (neocallimasticaceae) and the chytridiomycota .1. Cladistic-analysis of ribosomal-RNA sequences. Can J Bot 70: 17381746.
  • Lin CZ, Flesher B, Capman WC, Amann RI & Stahl DA (1994) Taxon specific hybridization probes for fiber-digesting bacteria suggest novel gut-associated Fibrobacter. Syst Appl Microbiol 17: 418424.
  • Ludwig W, Strunk O, Westram R et al. (2004) ARB: a software environment for sequence data. Nucleic Acids Res 32: 13631371.
  • Mackie RI (1997) Gut environment and evolution of mutualistic fermentative digestion. Gastrointestinal Microbiology, Vol. 1 (MackieRI & WhiteBA, eds), pp. 1335. Chapman & Hall, New York.
  • McSweeney CS, Dulieu A, Katayama Y & Lowry JB (1994) Solubilization of lignin by the ruminal anaerobic fungus Neocallimastix patriciarum. Appl Environ Microbiol 60: 29852989.
  • Morrison M, Murray RM & Boniface AN (1990) Nutrient metabolism and rumen micro-organisms in sheep fed a poor-quality tropical grass hay supplemented with sulphate. J Agric Sci 115: 269275.
  • Obispo NE & Dehority BA (1992) A most probable number method for enumeration of rumen fungi with studies on factors affecting their concentration in the rumen. J Microbiol Methods 16: 259270.
  • Orpin CG (1975) Studies on the rumen flagellate Neocallimastix frontalis. J Gen Microbiol 91: 249262.
  • Orpin CG (1994) Anaerobic fungi: taxonomy, biology, and distribution in nature. Anaerobic Fungi: Biology, Ecology and Function, Vol. 12. Mycology Series OrpinCG & MountfortDO, eds), pp. 145. Marcel Dekker, New York.
  • Orpin CG & Joblin KN (1988) The rumen anaerobic fungi. The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem (HobsonPN, ed), pp. 129150. Elsevier, London.
  • Orpin CG & Joblin KN (1997) The rumen anaerobic fungi. The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem (HobsonPN & StewartCS, eds), pp. 140195. Elsevier, London.
  • Ouwerkerk D, Klieve AV & Forster RJ (2002) Enumeration of Megasphaera elsdenii in rumen contents by real-time Taq nuclease assay. J Appl Microbiol 92: 753758.
  • Raskin L, Capman WC, Sharp R, Poulsen LK & Stahl DA (1997) Molecular ecology of gastrointestinal ecosystems. Gastrointestinal Microbiology, Vol. 2. Gastrointestinal Microbes and Host Interactions (MackieRI, WhiteBA & IsaacsonRE, eds), pp. 243298. Chapman & Hall, New York.
  • Sparrow FK Jr (1960) Aquatic Phycomycetes, 2nd edn. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Stahl DA, Flesher B, Mansfield HR & Montgomery L (1988) Use of phylogenetically based hybridization probes for studies of ruminal microbial ecology. Appl Environ Microbiol 54: 10791084.
  • Sylvester JT, Karnati SK, Yu Z, Morrison M & Firkins JL (2004) Development of an assay to quantify rumen ciliate protozoal biomass in cows using real-time PCR. J Nutr 134: 33783384.
  • Tajima K, Aminov RI, Nagamine T, Matsui H, Nakamura M & Benno Y (2001) Diet-dependent shifts in the bacterial population of the rumen revealed with real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 27662774.
  • Tuckwell DS, Nicholson MJ, McSweeney CS, Theodorou MK & Brookman JL (2005) The rapid assignment of ruminal fungi to presumptive genera using ITS1 and ITS2 RNA secondary structures to produce group-specific fingerprints. Microbiology 151: 15571567.
  • Weber RWS & Webster J (2000) Teaching techniques for mycology: 9. Olpidium and Rhizophlyctis (Chytridiomycetes). Mycologist 14: 1720.