Ericoid mycorrhizal fungi are common root inhabitants of non-Ericaceae plants in a south-eastern Australian sclerophyll forest


  • Editor: Christoph Tebbe

Correspondence: Susan M.Chambers, University of Western Sydney, Parramatta North Campus, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith Sth DC, NSW 1797, Australia. Tel.: +61 2 9685 9919; fax: +61 2 9685 9915; e-mail:


Fungi were isolated from the roots of 17 plant species from the families Apiaceae, Cunoniaceae, Cyperaceae, Droseraceae, Fabaceae-Mimosoideae, Lomandraceae, Myrtaceae, Pittosporaceae, Proteaceae and Stylidiaceae at a sclerophyll forest site in New South Wales, Australia. Internal transcribed spacer (ITS) restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and sequence comparisons indicated that the isolated fungi had affinities to a range of ascomycetes, basidiomycetes and zygomycetes. Four RFLP types had closest affinities to previously identified Helotiales ericoid mycorrhizal (ERM) or Oidiodendron spp. Isolates representing six RFLP types, which were variously isolated from all 17 plant species, formed ERM coils in hair root epidermal cells of Woollsia pungens (Ericaceae) under gnotobiotic conditions. Three of these isolates formed intercellular hyphae, intracellular hyphae and/or microsclerotia, which are typical of dark septate endophyte infection, in roots of Stylidium productum (Stylidiaceae), indicating an ability to form different types of association with roots of different hosts. Overall the data indicate that a broad range of plant taxa may act as repositories for ERM fungi in sclerophyll forest soil.


Numerous Ericaceae taxa form ericoid mycorrhizal (ERM) associations and this is viewed as important to their survival in a diverse array of habitats (Cairney & Meharg, 2003). The associations enhance the fitness of Ericaceae plant hosts in several ways that include enzymatic mobilization of nutrients from organic complexes (Leake & Read, 1997; Cairney & Burke, 1998) and adaptations to high concentrations of toxic metals and metalloids in the edaphic environment (Meharg & Cairney, 2000; Sharples et al., 2000).

Colonization of Ericaceae hair roots by ERM fungi may vary seasonally (e.g. Hutton et al., 1994; Kemp et al., 2003), but up to 90% of hair root length can display ERM colonization under some field conditions (Davies et al., 2003). Root systems of individual Ericaceae plants are typically colonized by multiple ERM fungal taxa simultaneously (Midgley et al., 2004; Bougoure & Cairney, 2005a, b); however, the relative importance of different taxa may vary with factors such as plant community structure (Bougoure et al., 2007). The fungi that form ERM associations include ascomycetes of the Rhizoscyphus ericae aggregate (Vrålstad et al., 2002a; Hambleton & Sigler, 2005), Oidiodendron spp. (Rice & Currah, 2006), Capronia-like fungi (Allen et al., 2003) and sterile mycelia that have rRNA gene internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequence affinity with several groups of unnamed Helotiales ascomycetes (e.g. Berch et al., 2002; Cairney & Ashford, 2002; Bougoure & Cairney, 2005a, b; Bougoure et al., 2007). Several Sebacinales, along with potentially other, basidiomycete taxa, may also form ERM with a range of Ericaceae (Allen et al., 2003; Bougoure et al., 2007; Selosse et al., 2007).

Despite previously being regarded as associating only with Ericaceae roots, there is increasing evidence that ERM ascomycetes may associate with roots of other plant taxa. Helotiales ascomycetes isolated from roots of the grass Deschampsia flexuosa have, for example, been shown to colonize roots and enhance nitrogen uptake by Calluna vulgaris (Ericaceae) seedlings and vice versa (Zijlstra et al., 2005). Although the nature of the infection was not reported in this case, a Helotiales ascomycete isolated from Quercus ilex roots was shown to form typical ERM coils in hair roots of Erica arborea (Ericaceae) (Bergero et al., 2000). Such observations suggest that roots of non-Ericaceae plant taxa may serve as repositories for Helotiales ERM fungi and that the fungi may form a beneficial association with non-Ericaceae hosts. Moreover, the fact that identical genotypes of a Helotiales ascomycete were isolated from roots of Q. ilex and E. arborea at a woodland site raises the possibility that these fungi may form hyphal links between the two plant taxa. This is supported by the observation that an R. ericae complex isolate simultaneously formed ERM with Vaccinium myrtillus (Ericaceae) and an ectomycorrhizal association with Pinus sylvestris under gnotobiotic conditions (Villarreal-Ruiz et al., 2004).

Several Ericaceae taxa, including Woollsia pungens and Epacris pulchella, occur as common understorey shrubs in some south-eastern Australian mixed sclerophyll forests (Robinson, 1991). Previous studies have revealed that these taxa form ERM associations with a range of typical ERM fungi which includes Oidiodendron sp. and unnamed Helotiales ascomycetes (Chambers et al., 2000; Midgley et al., 2004; Bougoure & Cairney, 2005a). In order to test the hypothesis that roots of non-Ericaceae plants act as repositories for ERM fungi, we have investigated fungal endophyte communities associated with roots of a broad taxonomic range of plant taxa at a sclerophyll forest site where W. pungens and E. pulchella form an important part of the plant community.

Materials and methods

Plant collection and fungal root endophyte isolation

Juvenile specimens of 17 plant species (including sedges, herbs, small shrubs, large shrubs, small trees and large trees) were collected from a sclerophyll forest at Lovers Jump Creek Reserve, Turramurra, NSW, Australia (33°44′S 151°06′E), between May 2005 and February 2006. Plants comprised species from the families Apiaceae (Xanthosia pilosa, Xanthosia tridentata), Cunoniaceae (Bauera rubioides, Callicoma serratifolia, Ceratopetalum gummiferum), Cyperaceae (Schoenus melanostachys), Droseraceae (Drosera spatulata), Fabaceae-Mimosoideae (Acacia terminalis), Lomandraceae (Lomandra longifolia), Myrtaceae (Leptospermum polygalifolium, Eucalyptus sp., Angophora costata), Pittosporaceae (Pittosporum undulatum), Proteaceae (Banksia spinulosa, Hakea sericea, Grevillea linearifolia) and Stylidiaceae (Stylidium productum). Plants, with adhering soil, were transported to the laboratory where soil was carefully removed by first soaking (if strongly adhered to roots) and then washing under gently running tap water for c. 15 min. Roots were excised from stems and then surface sterilized in 20% bleach (4.5% available chlorine) with 100 μL L−1 of the surfactant polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate (Tween 20, Sigma) for 30 s. Roots were then soaked in a solution containing 70% ethanol with 100 μL L−1 Tween 20 for 30 s. This was followed by 3 × 1 min rinses in sterile distilled water, before sterile roots were cut into 0.5 cm pieces and plated on 2% potato dextrose agar (PDA, Oxoid) containing streptomycin (15 mg L−1, Sigma), gentamycin (15 mg L−1, Sigma) and tetracycline (12 mg L−1, Sigma) (Pearson & Read, 1973) in 90-mm Petri dishes. Petri dishes were incubated at 20 °C in the dark and slow-growing fungi were subcultured on PDA. Cultures were maintained in the dark at 21 °C and were subcultured every 16 weeks. Cultures were grouped on the basis of morphology and a representative from each culture morphotype from each plant was selected for DNA extraction.

DNA extraction, ITS-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and sequence analysis

DNA was extracted from cultures using the FastDNA®Kit (Bio 101) following the manufacturer's instructions. The ITS region of DNA obtained from fungal endophyte cultures was amplified using 25 pmol of each of the primers ITS1 and ITS4 (White et al., 1990) in 50-μL reaction volumes following the protocol of Anderson et al. (1998). Cycling parameters were 30 cycles of 94 °C for one min, 50 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 1 min followed by a final 10 min extension. Amplification products were electrophoresed on 2% agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV light.

Approximately 1.0 μg of each PCR product was digested with the restriction enzymes HinfI, HaeIII or RsaI (Promega) at 37 °C for 3 h. Digestion products were electrophoresed on 3% agarose gels and visualized as above. Isolates were grouped based on their restriction digest patterns for all three enzymes. Representative isolates from each RFLP group were then chosen for sequencing. Direct sequencing of PCR products was conducted using the primer ITS1 or ITS4. PCR products were purified using the Wizard SV Gel and PCR Clean-up System (Promega) and sequenced using an ABI3730XL DNA analyzer using single primer extension. Sequencing was conducted under BigDye terminator cycling conditions. Sequences were analysed using the blastn program (Altschul et al., 1997) on the NCBI site ( Putative taxonomic affinities were assigned conservatively to RFLP types based on blastn expected values and identities of the closest several sequence matches obtained from the blastn searches as described by Bougoure & Cairney (2005a), as well as the blast distance tree of results.

Investigation of fungus : plant interactions under gnotobiotic conditions

Interactions between selected fungi and roots of W. pungens (Ericaceae) and S. productum (Stylidiaceae) were investigated under gnotobiotic conditions. Woollsia pungens was selected as a model Ericaceae host as it occurs commonly at the Lovers Jump Creek Reserve site, can be propagated under sterile conditions (D.S. Bougoure and J.W.G. Cairney, unpublished observations) and the fungi associated with its roots have been studied previously (Chambers et al., 2000; Midgley et al., 2002, 2004). Stylidium productum was selected as a non-Ericaceae plant with which to investigate infection by putative ERM fungi as it is a common herb at the Lovers Jump Creek Reserve site and can readily be propagated under sterile conditions.

Seeds of W. pungens and S. productum were collected from the Lovers Jump Creek Reserve site, surface sterilized for 1 min in a 20% bleach solution (4% available chlorine) containing Tween 20® and rinsed 3 × in sterile distilled water, before being soaked overnight in sterile distilled water. Seeds were then plated out in 9.0-cm-diameter Petri dishes on sterile, moist filter paper. Seeds were incubated at 22 °C for 16 h day : 8 h night period, and W. pungens seed started to germinate after c. 6 weeks, while S. productum seed germinated after 2 weeks. Seedlings were transferred to 70-mL polycarbonate vials containing c. 20 g peat/sand mixture (80% dry/wet sand, 20% dry/wet peat) and kept moist with sterile distilled water. Seedlings were incubated as above.

In preparation for seedling inoculation, plugs of fungus taken from the actively growing edges of cultures on 2% PDA were placed in liquid modified Melin Norkrans medium (MMN) (Marx & Bryan, 1975) in 9.0-cm-diameter Petri dishes and incubated in the dark at 22 °C for c. 4 weeks. Fungal mycelium was then rinsed in sterile MilliQ water and placed in screw-topped tubes containing Lysing matrix C (Bio 101), before being placed in a bead beater and shaken for 5 s at 4 m s−1. Macerated fungal mycelium (0.5 mL) was then inoculated into the root systems of 2–5-cm-tall W. pungens or S. productum plants in sterile peat/sand. Woollsia pungens seedlings were inoculated with a representative isolate of each RFLP type and S. productum seedlings with a representative isolate RFLP type that had closest sequence matches to fungi previously shown to form ERM associations with Ericaceae hosts (RFLP types 1, 3, 7, 14 and 22), along with RFLP types 11 and 23 that formed ERM coils with W. pungens roots in the gnotobiotic infection experiment.

Inoculated plants were incubated as above for 3 months before harvesting. Soil was washed from roots that were then cleared and stained following a method modified from McLean & Lawrie (1996). Roots were cleared in 10% KOH for 30 min at 90 °C, stained in 1.0% Trypan Blue (Sigma) at 90 °C for 90 min and then destained in a 1 : 1 : 1 mixture of lactic acid, glycerol and deionized water at room temperature for 25 min (Hutton et al., 1994). Roots were mounted in glycerol on slides and infection was assessed using a Leica DMRBE light microscope with spot advanced 3.4 software (Diagnostic Instruments Inc.).


Following grouping of morphologically identical isolates, a total of 197 culture morphotypes were obtained from roots of the 17 plant species, with 34 distinct RFLP types identified after ITS-RFLP and sequence analysis (Table 1). Most RFLP types (15) were identified as present from roots of only 1 plant species, whereas 12 were identified from roots of two or three plant species. The remaining eight RFLP types were obtained from the roots of six or more plant taxa, with RFLP type 1 being isolated from 15 of the 17 plant species studied (Table 1). Three to 12 RFLP types were obtained from the roots of each plant species, with the largest number being identified from roots of H. sericea (11 RFLP types) and Bauera rubioides (nine RFLP types). Fewest RFLP types (three) were obtained from roots of D. spatulata and G. linearifolia (Table 1).

Table 1.   Details of the plant species from which the 34 fungal RFLP types were isolated
Plant species
1B. rubioides, C. serratifolia, C. gummiferum, L. longifolia, X. pilosa, X. tridentata, L. polygalifolium, Eucalyptus sp., A. costata. B. spinulosa, H. sericea, G. linearifolia, S. melanostachys, P. undulatum, S. productum
2B. rubioides, D. spatulata, H. sericea
3C. serratifolia, L. longifolia, X. pilosa, X. tridentata, S. productum, A. terminalis
4L. longifolia, X. pilosa, X. tridentata, L.polygalifolium, H. sericea, G. linearifolia, S. productum, A. terminalis
5C. serratifolia, C. gummiferum, L. longifolia, X. tridentata, Eucalyptus sp., B. spinulosa, H. sericea, G. linearifolia, S. melanostachys, P. undulatum, S. productum, A. terminalis
6L. longifolia, S. melanostachys, A. terminalis
7C. serratifolia, C. gummiferum, X. pilosa, X. tridentata, L. polygalifolium, Eucalyptus sp., H. sericea, S. melanostachys, S. productum
8C. gummiferum, X. pilosa
9B. rubioides, Eucalyptus sp., A. costata
10B. rubioides
11B. rubioides, S. melanostachys
12B. rubioides, C. serratifolia, Eucalyptus sp., A. costata. B. spinulosa, S. melanostachys, P. undulatum
13B. rubioides
14B. rubioides, C. serratifolia, D. spatulata, L. longifolia, X. tridentata, L. polygalifolium, H. sericea, S. melanostachys, P. undulatum, S. productum, A. terminalis
15B. rubioides
16D. spatulata, X. tridentata
17X. tridentata, H. sericea
18L. polygalifolium
19L. polygalifolium
20A. terminalis
21A. terminalis
22B. spinulosa
23A. costata, B. spinulosa
24B. spinulosa
25B. spinulosa
26C. serratifolia, B. spinulosa
27C. serratifolia
28Eucalyptus sp., H. sericea
29A. costata, S. productum
30A. costata, H. sericea
31C. gummiferum
32H. sericea
33H. sericea
34S. productum

Sequence comparisons indicated that the 34 RFLP types had closest ITS sequence affinity to a broad range of ascomycetes, basidiomycetes and zygomycetes (Table 2). Four RFLP types (1, 7, 11 and 22) had closest affinities to previously identified Helotiales ERM endophytes, while RFLP type 3 was most similar to Oidiodendron spp. and RFLP type 12 to Cryptosporiopsis spp. Several RFLP types had closest ITS sequence identities to a variety of ascomycetes that have been isolated from roots of Australian Ericaceae, but for which the nature of the association with the plant host remains unclear (Table 2). Five RFLP types had closest affinity, albeit with low affinity, to basidiomycetes including ectomycorrhizal (Cortinarius sp.), saprotrophic (Panellus sp.) or pathogenic (Inonotus sp.) taxa (Table 2).

Table 2.   Putative taxonomic affinities of sequence types from root systems of 17 plant species inferred from blastn searches of ITS sequences in the GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ databases
Isolate closest matchPutative taxonomic affinityIdentity
  • *

    Indicates isolates that formed typical ERM structures in Woollsia pungens hair roots under gnotobiotic conditions in the present study.

  • Closest matches in bold indicate isolates that, in previous studies, produced ERM under gnotobiotic conditions.

1EU113182Epacris pulchella root-associated fungus EP50 (AY627812)Helotiales99494/495
2EU113183cf. Pseudocladosporium sp. CBS 115144 (DQ008141)Mitosporic Ascomycota96524/542
3*EU113184E. pulchella root-associated fungus EP 15 (AY627817)Oidiodendron99514/517
4*EU113185E. pulchella root-associated fungus EP20 (AY627824)Helotiales99536/541
5EU113186Uncultured soil fungus isolate RFLP56 (AF461617)Mucoromycotina99576/578
6EU113187Hemlock mycorrhizal fungal sp. pkc01e (AY394920)Coniochaetaceae99521/525
7*EU113188Woollsia mycorrhizal fungus VI (AY230776)Helotiales99520/523
8EU113189E. pulchella root-associated fungus EP23Hyaloscyphaceae96500/518
9EU113190Rhododendron lochiae root-associated fungus R47 (AY699691)Mitosporic Ascomycota99519/520
10EU113191cf. Pseudocladosporium sp. CBS 115144 (DQ008141)Mitosporic Ascomycota93513/546
11EU113192E. microphylla root-associated fungus 4 (AY268188)Ascomycota96508/525
12*EU113193Ascomycete sp. 51058 (DQ015709)Cryptosporiopsis sp.98515/522
13EU113194E. microphylla root-associated fungus 8 (AY268192)Xylariales97550/570
14*EU113195E. pulchella root-associated fungus EP22 (AY627826)Helotiales98508/514
15EU113196Tricholoma unifactum strainCBS296.64 (AF241514)Atheliales79345/433
16EU113197Foliar fungal endophyte isolate 9171 (EF419903)Xylariales95526/551
17EU113198Uncultured soil fungus clone N3_OTU126 (EF434036)Dermataceae94544/578
18EU113199Unidentified Basidiomycota sp. 12:2-27 (AF241323)Basidiomycota82609/741
19EU113200Phaeoacremonium sp. JD-115.1 (EF152422)Phaeoacremonium sp.99554/559
20EU113201Cortinarius nanceiensis var. bulbodius (AY669520)Basidiomycota75326/432
21EU113202E. pulchella root-associated fungus EP27 (AY627830)Mitosporic Mycosphaerellaceae99499/500
22EU113203Woollsia pungens ericoid mycorrhizal sp. D33 (AF072303)Ascomycota99522/525
23*EU113204Uncultured western hemlock ectomycorrhizal fungus clone SWUBC618 (DQ497943)Ascomycota97513/527
24EU113205Chryosporium carmichaelii (AB219227)Unidentified87473/538
25EU113206Dermea viburni (AF141163)Dermataceae95478/500
26EU113207Panellus stypticus#9029 (AF289067)Agaricales88594/668
27EU113208Unidentified Basidiomycota sp. 12:2-27 (AF241323)Basidiomycota78582/743
28EU113209R. lochiae fungal sp. R39 (AY699682)Chaetosphaeriales99517/519
29EU113210Xylaria sp. IP-38 (DQ780447)Xylaria sp.99489/490
30EU113211Uncultured fungus from Acaulospora colossica spore IVB.17 (AF133778)Mucorales99603/609
31EU113212Uncultured Helotiaceae clone 1S2.02.F05 (EF19696)Helotiales100508/508
32EU113213E. microphylla root-associated fungus 10 (AY268194)Ascomycota99488/492
33EU113214Uncultured E. pulchella fungus clone EP47 (AY627801)Basidiomycota98634/643
34EU113215Inonotus hispida (AY251309)Basidiomycota73527/719

While isolates of most RFLP types did not form ERM structures in roots of W. pungens, isolates of six RFLP types (3, 4, 7, 12, 14 and 23) formed typical ERM coils in hair root epidermal cells during three months in gnotobiotic culture with W. pungens seedlings (Table 3). In the case of RFLP type 14, the majority of hair root epidermal cells were infected by ERM coils (Fig. 1) whereas fewer epidermal cells were infected by RFLP types 3, 4, 7 and 23. RFLP type 12 formed coils only in occasional epidermal cells (Fig. 1). No infection of W. pungens hair roots was observed for RFLP types 11 and 22, whereas infection by RFLP type 1 was limited to inter- and intracellular hyphae, with no evidence of ERM coil formation (Table 3).

Table 3.   Interactions between isolates of seven RFLP types and Woollsia pungens or Stylidium productum seedlings assessed after 3 months in gnotobiotic culture
Woollsia pungensStylidium productum
1Extensive inter- and intracellular hyphaeExtensive inter- and intracellular hyphae
3Hyphae on root surface. Inter-and intracellular hyphae. Extensive ERM coilsHyphae on root surface. Intercellular hyphae
4Hyphae on root surface. Inter- and intracellular hyphae. ERM coilsNot screened
7Extensive intra- and intercellular hyphae. Extensive ERM coilsHyphae on root surface. Extensive inter- and intracellular hyphae. Microsclerotia
12Hyphae on root surface. Inter- and intracellular hyphae. ERM coilsNot screened
14Hyphae on root surface. Extensive intracellular and intercellular infection. Extensive ERM coilsHyphae on root surface. Inter- and intracellular hyphae. Microsclerotia
23Hyphae on root surface. Inter- and intracellular hyphae. ERM coilsNo infection observed
Figure 1.

 Light micrographs of roots of Woollsia pungens (Wp) and Stylidium productum (Sp) after 3 months in gnotobiotic culture with fungal endophyte RFLP types cultured from roots of 17 plant species. Scale bar=25 μm. (a) Extensive ERM infection of Wp root (RFLP type 14). (b) Wp root cell with ERM coil (RFLP type 14). (c) Wp root cell with ERM coil (RFLP type 12). (d) Wp root cells with intracellular hyphae and coil (RFLP type 7). (e) Wp root cells with intra- and intercellular colonization and ERM coil (RFLP type 4). (f) Sp root cell with intracellular hyphae (RFLP type 7). (h) Sp root cell with microsclerotium (RFLP type 7). (i) Sp root cell with microsclerotium (RFLP type 7).

No ERM-like structures were formed in S. productum roots by isolates of the seven RFLP type tested. Hyphae of RFLP types 3, 7 and 14 were observed on root surfaces, whereas production of intercellular hyphae, intracellular hyphae and/or microsclerotia was observed for RFLP types 1, 3, 7 and 14 (Table 3, Fig. 1). No hyphae of RFLP type 23 were observed within S. productum roots or on root surfaces (Table 3).


It has previously been demonstrated that ERM fungi occur in roots of ectomycorrhizal trees, with some isolates being capable of forming both ERM and ectomycorrhizal associations with different hosts (Bergero et al., 2000; Vrålstad et al., 2002b; Villarreal-Ruiz et al., 2004). The data presented here indicate that ERM fungi are common root associates of a diverse array of plant taxa across a range of life forms within a plant community. Thus, fungi capable of forming ERM-like structures in epidermal cells of W. pungens were isolated from roots of all 17 plant species examined. These comprised an understorey sedge (Schoenus melanostachys), a rush (L. longifolia), herbs (Stylidium productum and D. spatulata), small shrubs (B. rubioides, X. pilosa, X. tridentata), large shrubs (H. sericea, G. linearifolia, L. polygalifolium, Banksia spinulosa), small trees (A. terminalis, P. undulatum, Ceratopetalum gummiferum and Callicoma serratifolia) and canopy trees (A. costata and Eucalyptus sp.).

Fungi from a broad taxonomic range were isolated from the 17 plant species, with six RFLP types shown to form typical ERM coils in epidermal cells of W. pungens hair roots, suggesting that they probably represent ERM fungi. Of these, three RFLP types (1, 7 and 14) were identified as Helotiales ascomycetes, with strong ITS sequence similarity to fungi that have previously been isolated from the roots of Australian Ericaceae (Midgley et al., 2004; Bougoure & Cairney, 2005a). This observation is consistent with previous reports that a range of unnamed Helotiales ascomycetes are common ERM endophytes of Ericaceae worldwide (e.g. Berch et al., 2002; Cairney & Ashford, 2002; Bougoure & Cairney, 2005a, b; Bougoure et al., 2007). On the basis of ITS sequence similarity, RFLP type 3 was identified as an Oidiodendron species. Although Oidiodendron spp. appear to exist as saprotrophs, there are numerous reports that they form ERM associations with Ericaceae hosts (see Rice & Currah, 2006). Oidiodendron sp. has also previously been isolated from hair roots of Australian Ericaceae, including W. pungens at the Lovers Jump Creek field site (Chambers et al., 2000; Bougoure & Cairney, 2005a, b).

ITS sequence similarity indicated that RFLP type 12 is probably a Cryptosporiopsis species, and an isolate of this RFLP type formed dense ERM-like coils in occasional cells in W. pungens hair roots under gnotobiotic conditions. Cryptosporiopsis spp. are known root-inhabiting fungi, and Cryptosporiopsis rhizophila has been isolated from Ericaceae roots in The Netherlands and shown to colonize Ericaceae roots as an endophyte (Verkley et al., 2003). The nature of the infection was not, however, specified by the authors. Sigler et al. (2005) cultured Cryptosporiopsis ericae and Cryptosporiopsis brunnea from surface-sterilized roots of Canadian Ericaceae, but no ERM structures were formed between these fungi and Ericaceae hosts under gnotobiotic conditions. While more detailed structural investigation of the interaction between RFLP type 12 and W. pungens roots is clearly required, the fact that the fungus formed well-developed ERM-like hyphal coils in epidermal cells strongly suggests that this putative Cryptosporiopsis species has the potential to form an ERM association with this host.

Three of the fungal RFLP types (3, 7 and 14) that formed typical ERM coils in epidermal cells of W. pungens hair roots also formed inter- and/or intracellular infections, along with microsclerotia (RFLP types 7 and 14), in roots of S. productum. These structures are consistent with descriptions of dark septate endophyte (DSE) infection (Jumpponen & Trappe, 1998; Sieber & Grünig, 2006). DSE occur worldwide in a variety of habitats and often coexist with mycorrhizal fungi (Mandyam & Jumpponen, 2005), and have, for example, been identified in roots of a wide range of plants in a single woodland community (Menoyo et al., 2007). They are regarded as forming a continuum of associations with plant hosts that ranges from parasitism to mutualism (Jumpponen, 2001). Understanding the likely nature of their association with S. productum and the other non-Ericaceae plant taxa at the Lovers Jump Creek Reserve will therefore require further investigation.

The data presented here indicate that fungi represented by three RFLP types are capable of forming different types of association with roots of different hosts, viz ERM with W. pungens and DSE with S. productum. Importantly, because at least one of these RFLP types was isolated from each of the 17 plant taxa, fungi with this ability appear to be relatively common at Lovers Jump Creek Reserve. It has previously been reported that some ascomycete isolates from ectomycorrhizal tree roots can form ERM coils in Ericaceae roots (Bergero et al., 2000, 2003; Villarreal-Ruiz et al., 2004), whereas an isolate of the DSE Heteroconium chaetospira formed ERM structures in roots of Rhododendron obtusum (Usuki & Narisawa, 2005). Although the nature of the infection was not described, root endophytes from the grass Deschampsia flexuosa in Dutch heathland/forest were further shown to infect and enhance shoot nitrogen content of Calluna vulgaris and vice versa (Zijlstra et al., 2005).

While some ERM endophytes may persist in soil in habitats that lack ericaceous hosts, possibly as free-living saprotrophs (Bergero et al., 2003; Rice & Currah, 2006), it has been suggested that ectomycorrhizal roots of Q. ilex may act as a source of inoculum for ERM infection of establishing Ericaceae seedlings (Bergero et al., 2000). The observation from the present investigation, that fungi with the ability to form ERM associations with an Ericaceae host were present in roots of all plant taxa examined from a single plant community, indicates that a broad range of plant taxa may act as repositories for ERM fungi in, at least, the sclerophyll forest habitat that we investigated. As suggested by Bergero et al. (2000), this may be of particular importance in establishment of Ericaceae seedlings, especially following a disturbance such as fire in the sclerophyll forest habitat, where fire is a common natural phenomenon and can negatively impact Ericaceae abundance (Morrison, 2002).

Many questions remain regarding relationships between the fungi that form ERM and DSE associations (Girlanda et al., 2006; Schulz, 2006), particularly with regard to the benefits conferred upon plants by DSE infection (Jumpponen, 2001). The ability to infect multiple hosts raises the possibility that ERM structures in Ericaceae roots and DSE structures in non-Ericaceae roots might represent parts of a common mycelial network as has been proposed for ERM and ectomycorrhizal associations in certain forest habitats (Bergero et al., 2000; Bougoure et al., 2007). While direct evidence for such mycelial linkages is currently lacking, if demonstrated, this could influence our understanding of carbon and nutrient cycling in habitats such as the sclerophyll forest at Lovers Jump Creek Reserve, where Ericaceae represent common understorey plants.


We thank Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council for granting permission to collect plant specimens and seeds from Lovers Jump Creek Reserve and staff from the Plant Identification Counter at the National Herbarium of NSW for confirmation of plant species identification. This research was funded by an Australian Research Council Discovery Projects Grant to J.W.G.C.