SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Bab'eva IP & Chernov IY (1995) Geographical aspects of yeast ecology. Physiol Genet Biol Rev 9: 154.
  • Barnett JA, Payne RW & Yarrow D (2000) Yeast: Characteristics and Identification, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Bely M, Sablayrolles JM & Barre P (1990) Automatic detection of assimilable nitrogen deficiencies during alcoholic fermentation in oenological conditions. J Ferment Bioeng 70: 246252.
  • Comitini F & Ciani M (2006) Survival of inoculated Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain on wine grapes during two vintages. Lett Appl Microbiol 42: 248253.
  • Cubillos FA, Vásquez C, Faugerón S, Ganga A & Martínez C (2009) Self-fertilization is the main sexual reproduction mechanism in native wine yeast populations. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 67: 162170.
  • Fay JC & Benavides JA (2005) Evidence for domesticated and wild populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PloS Genet 1: e5.
  • Field D & Wills C (1998) Abundant microsatellite polymorphism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and the different distributions of microsatellite in eight prokaryotes and S. cerevisiae, result from strong mutation pressure and a variety of selective forces. P Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 16471652.
  • Fleet GH (2008) Wine yeast for the future. FEMS Yeast Res 8: 979995.
  • Francesca N, Chiurazzi M, Romano R, Aponte M, Settani L & Moschetti G (2010) Indigenous yeast communities in the environment of ‘Rovello bianco’ grape variety and their use in commercial white wine fermentation. World J Microb Biot 26: 337351.
  • Glushakova AM & Chernov IY (2007) Seasonal dynamic of the numbers of epiphytic yeasts. Microbiology 76: 590595.
  • Glushakova AM, Ivannikova VY, Naumova ES, Chernov IY & Naumov GI (2007) Massive isolation and identification of Saccharomyces paradoxus yeast from plant phyllosphere. Microbiology 76: 205210.
  • Goddard MR, Anfang N, Tang R, Gardner RC & Jun C (2010) A distinct population of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in New Zealand: evidence for local dispersal by insects and human-aided global dispersal in oak barrels. Environ Microbiol 12: 6373.
  • González-Techera A, Jubany S, Carrau FM & Caggero C (2001) Differentiation of industrial wine yeast strains using microsatellite markers. Lett Appl Microbiol 33: 7175.
  • Henschke P (2007) Yeast strains available for winemaking 2007–2008. Aust Wine Res Inst Technol Rev 171: 929.
  • Inácio J, Pereira P, de Carvalho M, Fonseca A, Amaral-Collaco MT & Spencer-Martins I (2002) Estimation and diversity of phylloplane mycrobiota on selected plants in a Mediterranean-type ecosystem in Portugal. Microb Ecol 44: 344353.
  • IUSS Working Group WRB 2007 World Reference Base for Soil Resources. World Soil Resources Reports No 103. FAO, Rome.
  • Lindow SE & Brandl MT (2003) Microbiology of the phyllosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 18751883.
  • Marques MJ, García-Muñoz S, Muñoz-Organero G & Bienes R (2010) Soil conservation beneath grass cover in hillside vineyards under mediterranean climatic conditions (Madrid, Spain). Land Degrad Dev 21: 122131.
  • Martini A (2003) Biotechnology of natural and winery-associated strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Int Microbiol 6: 207209.
  • Mortimer R & Polsinelli M (1999) On the origins of wine yeast. Res Microbiol 150: 199204.
  • Palková Z & Váchová L (2006) Life within a community: benefit to yeast long-term survival. FEMS Microbiol Rev 30: 806824.
  • Pretorius IS (2000) Tailoring wine yeast for the new millennium: novel approaches to the ancient art of winemaking. Yeast 16: 675729.
  • Pretorius IS & Hoj PB (2005) Grape and wine technology: challenges, opportunities and potential benefits. Aust J Grape Wine R 11: 83108.
  • Renouf V, Claisse O & Lonvaud-Funel A (2005) Understanding the microbial ecosystem on the grape berry surface through numeration and identification of yeast and bacteria. Aust J Grape Wine R 11: 316327.
  • Salinas F, Mandakovic D, Urzua U, Massera A, Miras S, Combina M, Ganga MA & Marínez C (2010) Genomic and phenotypic comparison between similar wine yeast strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae from different geographic origins. J Appl Microbiol 108: 18501858.
  • Sampaio JP & Gonçalves P (2008) Natural populations of Saccharomyces kudriavzeii in Portugal are associated with oak bark and are sympatric with S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus. Appl Environ Microb 74: 21442152.
  • Schuller D & Casal M (2005) The use of genetically modified Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains in the wine industry. Appl Microbiol Biot 68: 292304.
  • Schuller D, Alves H, Dequin S & Casal M (2005) Ecological survey of Saccharomyces strains from vineyards in the Vinho Verde region of Portugal. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 51: 167177.
  • Sláviková E, Vadkertiová R & Vránová D (2007) Yeasts colonizing the leaf surfaces. J Basic Microb 47: 344350.
  • (1999) Soil Taxonomy: a Basic System of Soil Classification for Making and Interpreting Soil Surveys, 2nd edn. USDA, Agriculture Handbook. Natural Resources Conservation Service No 436. Soil Survey Staff, Pittsburgh, PA. pp. 163260.
  • Valero E, Schuller D, Cambon B, Casal M & Dequin S (2005) Dissemination and survival of comercial wine yeast in the vineyard: a large scale, three-year study. FEMS Yeast Res 5: 959969.
  • Valero E, Cambon B, Schuller D, Casal M & Dequin S (2007) Biodiversity of Saccharomyces yeast strains from grape berries of wine-producing areas using starter commercial yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res 7: 317329.
  • Vaudano E & Garcia-Moruno E (2008) Discrimination of Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strains using microsatellite multiplex PCR and band pattern analysis. Food Microbiol 25: 5664.
  • Verstrepen KJ, Chambers PJ & Pretorius IS (2006) The development of superior yeast strains for the food and beverage industries: challenges, opportunities and potential benefits. Yeasts in Food and Beverages (QuerolA & FleetGH, eds), pp. 399444. Springer, Berlin.