• signature-tagged-mutagenesis;
  • Erwinia-amylovora;
  • colonization


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results and discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References

To identify genes that contribute to the virulence of Erwinia amylovora in plants, 1892 mutants were created and screened in pools of ≤96 mutants using signature-tagged mutagenesis. Nineteen mutants were not recovered from apple shoots following inoculation, which suggested that the insertions in these mutants affected genes important for bacterial survival in planta. DNA flanking the Tn5 insertions in the 19 mutants was sequenced and analysed by blast. One mutant had a Tn5 insertion in amsE, a gene involved in the biosynthesis of exopolysaccaride (EPS). Fourteen mutants had insertions in loci that were implicated in biosynthesis or transport of particular amino acids or nucleotides, a site-specific recombinase active during cell division and several putative proteins of unknown function; the flanking DNA of the remaining four mutants lacked significant homology with any DNA in the database. When inoculated individually to hosts, 10 of the 19 mutants caused significantly less disease and multiplied less, as compared with the wild-type strain.


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results and discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References

Erwinia amylovora, a member of the Enterobacteriaceae, causes fire blight on pear, apple and other plants of the Rosaceae (Eastgate, 2000). The bacterium often infects open blossoms, young shoots or leaves through natural openings or wounds. Once inside host tissue, bacteria migrate to other tissues via xylem vessels, initially causing wilting and water-soaked lesions, followed by rapid necrosis (Bogs et al., 1998). How Erwinia amylovora survives and causes disease in hosts is still poorly understood. Since the 1980s, the use of molecular tools has facilitated identification of genes needed for or involved in disease development (Oh & Beer, 2005). These include genes involved in the biosynthesis of exopolysaccaride (EPS) (Bellemann & Geider, 1992; Bernhard et al., 1993; Geier & Geider, 1993; Bugert & Geider, 1995, 1997), genes encoding the type III secretion apparatus and proteins secreted via this pathway (Wei et al., 1992, 2000; Wei & Beer, 1993, 1995; Bogdanove et al., 1996; 1998; Gaudriault et al., 1997; Kim & Beer, 1998; Oh et al., 2005), metabolic genes contributing to bacterial virulence including those that protect bacteria from host defenses or antagonistic microorganisms (Zhang et al., 1999; Venisse et al., 2002; Burse et al., 2004).

Here, we report the use of a high-throughput technique, signature-tagged mutagenesis (STM), to identify genes that are likely involved in the infection process by Erwinia amylovora. STM has been applied successfully to bacterial pathogens of animals, including Salmonella typhimurium, Yersinia enterocolitica and Escherichia coli (Mecsas, 2002; Saenz & Dehio, 2005). Mutants generated by uniquely tagged transposons are pooled and used as an inoculum for a susceptible host. If a mutant does not survive in the host or compete with fully virulent mutants during pathogenesis, it will not be recovered following inoculation and incubation. Therefore, in theory, any mutant that does not grow as vigorously in the host as the wild-type strain will be identified as a candidate virulence mutant. Mutants of Erwinia amylovora were created with a pool of uniquely tagged transposons, and then inoculated to shoots of apple trees and incubated; recovery of the mutants was attempted from the symptomatic tissues. Mutants not recovered were considered mutated in putative virulence genes, and their insertion sites were characterized. Although widely used to identify virulence genes in bacteria pathogenic to animals (Mecsas, 2002; Saenz & Dehio, 2005), to our knowledge, STM has not been applied in studies of plant pathogenic bacteria.

Materials and methods

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results and discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References

Bacterial strains, plasmids, media and growth conditions

A pool of DNA sequence-tagged pUTmini-Tn5Km2 plasmids, Escherichia coli strains CC118 λpir and S17-1 λpir and protocols for STM were kindly provided by D.W. Holden. Escherichia coli and Erwinia amylovora strains were cultured in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium (Sambrook et al., 1989) with appropriate antibiotics at 37°C and 28°C, respectively. MM2Cu was used as a minimal and selective medium for Erwinia amylovora (Bereswill et al., 1998). The concentrations of antibiotics used in media were as follows: ampicillin (Ap), 100 μg mL−1; carbenicillin (Cb), 400 μg mL−1; kanamycin (Km), 50 μg mL−1; and rifampicin (Rp), 50 μg mL−1.

Generation of unique-tag marked library of mutants of E. amylovora

Each individual pUTmini-Tn5Km2 plasmid carries an 80-bp DNA sequence tag comprised of a 40-bp variable central region, which is used to differentiate each plasmid from the others, and two flanking 20-bp invariant ‘arms’ that serve as primer-binding sites for generating probes by PCR (Fig. 1a). The pool of tagged pUTmini-Tn5Km2 vectors, which confer resistance to both ampicillin (Ap) and kanamycin (Km), in Escherichia coli CC118 λpir was conjugated with Erwinia amylovora Ea273, which is resistant to rifampicin (Rp) (Bauer, 1990). Individual transconjugant colonies were checked on MM2Cu and LB plates with Cb (Bereswill et al., 1998). Because Erwinia amylovora mutates to Ap resistance spontaneously, Cb was used to select cells of Erwinia amylovora that harboured the pUT vector. One thousand eight hundred ninety two individual Cb-sensitive, but Km- and Rp-resistant colonies were selected and stored at −80°C in 15% glycerol in 96-well microtitre plates.


Figure 1.  Overview of the STM procedure for identifying virulence genes of Erwinia amylovora. (a) DNA sequence tags. Each tag contains a particular 40-bp variable central region and two 20-bp invariant flanking arms. The variable sequences were designed with a semi-random format, which almost ensures that the same tag sequence occurs only once in a pool of 96 mutants. The two arms bind primers for PCR amplification of the tags for hybridizations. (b) Genomic DNA was isolated from either a mixture of all the mutants stored in one microtiter plate (Input Pool) or bacterial mixtures isolated from apple, which had been inoculated with the same Input Pool of bacteria. The probes were amplified by PCR using primers P2 and P4, and the two arms were released by digestion with HindIII. Two membranes with colonies duplicated from the stored plate were hybridized with probes generated from the Input Pool and the Output Pool, respectively. The mutants showing reduced signals in the Output Pool, as compared with the Input Pool, are candidate virulence mutants. To reduce the number of false-positive candidates, a second round of screening was performed. Hybridization for each pool was repeated at least twice.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Colony blots

The overnight cultures of mutants in each plate were transferred onto two nylon membranes (Nalge Nunc International, Naperville, IL) using the CloneMaster™ 96-pin replicator (Immusine Laboratories Inc., obtained from Fisher Scientific Co., Springfield, NJ). The plates holding the membranes were incubated at 28°C overnight. The membranes were then treated as recommended by the supplier and stored at room temperature (24±4°C).

Screening the mutant library

Three rounds of PCR were performed to generate a probe representative of each ‘Input Pool’, defined as the culture mixture of all the mutants stored in one microtitre plate (Fig. 1b). The first PCR provided specific templates for generating probe DNA. The second PCR generated enough templates for amplifying probes. The third PCR amplified enough DNA for probe labelling. The primers used for all three PCRs were P2 (5′-TACCTACAACCTCAAGCT-3′) and P4 (5′-TACCCATTCTAACCAAGC-3′) (Hensel et al., 1995). During the first PCR, genomic DNA of the Input Pool was used as a template. The 80-bp band from the first PCR was cut out from a 0.8% (w/v) low-melting agarose gel and used directly as a template for the second PCR. The second PCR product was used directly as a template for the third PCR. After digestion of the third PCR reaction mixtures with HindIII, the 40-bp probe DNA was purified from a 1.6% (w/v) low-melting agarose gel using the QIAEXII Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA). The probe DNA was end-labelled with [γ-32P] ATP (Sp. Act. 3000 Ci mmol−1; 10 μCi μL−1) and the hybridizations were performed as described by Sambrook et al. (1989).

The ‘Output Pool’ is defined as the bacterial mixture recovered from apple, which had been inoculated with a single Input Pool (Fig. 1b). To produce the Output Pools, the overnight culture of individual Input Pools was adjusted to OD600 nm=0.2 (c. 2 × 108 CFU mL−1) before inoculating shoots on container-grown apple trees. One-year-old Gala apple trees on M.9 rootstocks were grown in a greenhouse at c. 28°C and 30–40% relative humidity, until the new shoots were 20–30 cm long. The apical two or three largest folded leaves of each young shoot were cut with scissors, which had been dipped previously in the bacterial suspension of the Input Pool. Three days after inoculation, bacteria were recovered from the first leaf showing necrosis other than the inoculated leaves. The remaining steps for generating the Output Pool probe DNA and its hybridization were the same as those used for the Input Pool (Fig. 1b).

Virulence and growth assay in immature pear fruits and apple shoots

The virulence assay in immature Bartlett pear fruits was as used by Steinberger & Beer (1988). The inoculation procedure for virulence assay in apple trees was as described for screening the pools. The growth assay was similar, except that inoculation was performed with a florist's frog (Bonasera et al., 2006). The latter inoculation procedure allowed for punching out discs from the same leaf for assays at different times. This tended to minimize the variation in the bacterial populations recovered from different apple leaves. The necrosis of the leaves and the length of lesions in the stems were rated to derive a disease index for each shoot.

Sequence analysis of attenuated mutants

The DNA sequences flanking the Tn5 insertions in the mutants were determined by inverse PCR (Fuller et al., 2000). The sequencing was performed at the Cornell University Biotechnology Sequencing Center. The DNA sequences were edited using dnastar software (dnastar Inc., Madison, WI), and blast programs, tblastx and blastn, were used for homologous sequence searches.

Results and discussion

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results and discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References

Nineteen candidate mutants were identified after two-round screenings

Hybridizations were performed for each of 20 pools, which together contained 1892 Tn5 insertion mutants, with probes generated from the Input Pool and the Output Pool, respectively. Mutants that showed reduced signals in the Output Pool were picked. To reduce the number of false-positive candidates, a second round of screening was performed (Darwin & Miller, 1999) with newly picked mutants. The number of candidate mutants with attenuated signals in the Output Pool was reduced to 19. Southern hybridization results with the 19 mutants, using a probe within the mini-Tn5Km2 sequence, revealed that all mutants have single transposon insertions, which are located throughout the genome (data not shown).

The hybridization results of both Input Pool and Output Pool were compared for a pool of 96 mutant strains (Fig. 2). The signals of mutants D11 and F2 were reduced in the Output Pool compared with those of the Input Pool. The two mutants were tested individually on immature pear fruits for virulence. D11 did not cause disease, while F2 caused similar symptoms and signs as the parent strain (data not shown). The blast result for D11, renamed STM6, indicated that it has an insertion in amsE, which is involved in the biosynthesis of amylovoran, a major virulence factor of Erwinia amylovora (Table 1; Bugert & Geider, 1995). Meanwhile, B2, B3 and G4 showed weak signals in both pools (Fig. 2). As the colonies grew normally on medium containing kanamycin, the transposon apparently was stable in these three mutants. This result might be due to the loss of tag DNA from the transposon, or inefficient amplification or labelling (D.W. Holden, pers. commun.). B9 and F12 showed weak signals in the Input Pool but not in the Output Pool (Fig. 2), suggesting inefficient labeling of the Input Pool probe.


Figure 2.  Hybridizations of 96 mutant colonies of Erwinia amylovora with transposon tags cloned from the mutants in the Input Pool and the corresponding Output Pool. Reduced signals of colonies in the Output Pool relative to the signal in the Input Pool correspond to reduced growth of the mutant in the host, when inoculated together with the other 95 mutants. The signals of D11 (STM6) and F2 were reduced significantly in the Output Pool, as compared with their intensity in the Input Pool. The signals of B9 and F12 were stronger in the Output Pool than in the Input Pool. B2, B3 and G4 showed similar weak signals in both hybridizations. The blank spot of D6 in the hybridization of the Output Pool resulted from the absence of bacterial cells on the membrane. The other mutant strains gave consistently strong signals in both hybridizations.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Table 1.   Predicted function of genes of Erwinia amylovora putatively altered by 19 signature-tagged transposons
MutantGenBank access numberShotgun sequence numbers from the genome of E. amylovora Ea273Homolog (organism, NCBI access number)Putative functione-value
  • *

    The results from tblastx were not significant. The homolog shown here was from blastn.

  • e-value is a statistical way to show homology. If the e-value for a homolog is >e−03, this match was considered nonsignificant (Jones et al., 2000).

(1) Gene involved in known function
STM6DX936507amy585c07.q1kaamsE (E. amylovora, Q46635)Glycosyl transferase in amylovoran biosynthesis1e−49
(2) Genes involved in amino acid and nucleotide biosynthesis
STM7DX936508amy250g09.p1k amy61g11.q1ka amy172e05.p1kcysB (E. coli, X60293)Positive transcriptional regulator for cysteine regulon2e−15
STM9DX936510amy124c01.p1kstr1199 (Streptococcus thermophilus, CP000024)Conserved hypothetical protein3e−34
STM10DX936511amy408h07.p1kpheA (Pantoea agglomerans, M74133)Chorismate mutase in the biosynthesis of phenylalanine and tyrosine4e−60
STM4DX936505amy319b07.q1k amy51h11.q1kpyrD (Salmonella typhimurium, NP_460032)Dihydroorotate oxidase in pyrimidine biosynthesis9e−109
STM8DX936509amy380d05.p1kpyrB (P. agglomerans, AAF01338)Aspartate transcarbamylase catalytic subunit in pyrimidine biosynthesis7e−105
STM25DX936520amy402d03.q1kcarB (E. coli, NP_751995)Carbamoyl-phosphate synthase large chain in pyrimidine and arginine biosynthesis4e−33
STM29DX936521amy536b12.p1kpurN (E. coli, AAG14580)Phosphoribosylglycinamide formyltransferase 1 in purine biosynthesis6e−53
(3) Genes involved in nutrient transportation
STM17DX936516amy137g08.p1kuraA (S. typhimurium, NP_461432)Uracil permease3e−05
STM20DX936517amy10e02.q1k amy580f05.q1kyieG (Yersinia pestis, AJ414160)Xanthine/uracil permease family protein2e−118
(4) Genes involved in other functions
STM1DX936504amy441c02.p1kxerC (Pseudomonas fluorescens, Q8VS06)Site-specific recombinase in cell division2e−45
STM5DX936506amy27b03.p1kSTM1864 (S. typhimurium, NP_460820)Putative inner membrane protein1e−08
STM14DX936513amy512f01.p1ka01_ColBM_86 (E. coli, DQ381420)Putative aminotranferase5e−16
STM15DX936514amy88a09.p1kXC2400 (Xanthomonas campestris, CP000050)DNA helicase related protein3e−07
STM22DX936518amy523d06.q1ka amy36f12.p1kNext to ycfAB in E. amylovora (AJ289879)*Function unknown0
STM23DX936519amy549b03.p1k amy23f09.q1kNo homology  
STM12DX936512amy124h02.q1kNo homology  
STM16DX936515amy227f05.q1kNo homology  
STM36DX936522amy393b07.q1kNo homology  

Virulence assay and growth in planta

To determine the effect on the virulence of each mutated gene, the 19 mutants were tested individually for virulence in immature pear fruits. Ten of the mutants showed either no symptoms (STM5, 6, 9, 10, 25) or slower development of disease and reduced symptoms (STM4, 7, 8, 22, 29) 2 days after inoculation (data not shown). Three days later, all mutants, except for STM6 and STM25, which never initiated disease, caused similar symptoms in pears as the wild-type strain Ea273 (data not shown).

To further confirm their attenuated virulence, the ten mutants that had shown reduced symptoms in immature pear fruits were inoculated to apple shoots. Symptoms started to appear 5 days after inoculation and lesions stopped extending c. 2 weeks after inoculation. Shoots that had been inoculated with the wild-type strain showed obvious symptoms and signs of disease with a disease index 5.83±0.4 (Table 2). STM29 showed disease symptoms and lesions similar to, but slightly less severe (disease index=4.17±1.01), than those of the wild-type control (Table 2). In contrast, STM7 caused much less severe disease than the wild-type strain, with a disease index of 1.83±0.7 (Table 2). No obvious disease symptoms or signs resulted from inoculation with the other mutants (Table 2).

Table 2.   Virulence of 10 STM mutants of Erwinia amylovora assayed on apple shoots on trees growing in a greenhouse
Strain or STM testedDisease activity index*
  • *

    Disease activity index is the mean rating of six inoculated shoots as follows: no symptoms, 0; 1 or 2 necrotic leaves, 1; 3 or 4 necrotic leaves, 2; stem lesion<2 cm long, 3; stem lesion 2–4 cm long, 4; stem lesion >4 cm long, 5.

Ea2735.83 ± 0.40
STM71.83 ± 0.70
STM294.17 ± 1.01

STM mutants were selected for loss of capacity to survive in a given host when inoculated together with a group of other mutants. Therefore, genes identified by STM should be required for either independent or competitive survival in hosts (Autret & Charbit, 2005). To test whether the growth of the 10 mutant strains is compromised in apple tissue, bacterial populations in inoculated leaves were analyzed immediately and 3 days after inoculation. Immediately after inoculation, all the strains were present in the tissues in similar numbers (Fig. 3). Three days after inoculation, the wild-type strain, Ea273, had multiplied at least four orders of magnitude; no living cells were detected in shoots inoculated with STM6 and 25, which is consistent with their failure to cause disease in immature pear fruits and apple shoots. The growth of STM4 was only slightly reduced in apple tissues. The growth of STM5, 22 and 29 was also close to the wild-type level, indicating that the genes disrupted by these mutations contribute less to the survival of Erwinia amylovora in hosts. The growth rate of the other mutants was significantly lower than that of Ea273 (Fig. 3).


Figure 3.  Populations of 10 STM mutants recovered from apple shoots. Each strain was introduced into three different leaves on separate shoots. Bacterial populations recovered from the inoculated leaves immediately after inoculation (0 day) and 3 days after inoculation (3 days) were determined by plating homogenates of the leaves on media with antibiotics. ‘wt’ represents Ea273. ‘buffer’ represents 5 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH=6.5) used for preparing the bacterial suspensions. The results indicate that STM6 and STM25 could not be recovered from the apple leaf tissue 3 days after inoculation, while the population of the remaining nine strains was reduced to various levels. Values are the means from three independent experiments; the bars represent standard errors.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Sequence analysis of candidate mutants

The DNA flanking the Tn5 insertions in the 19 mutants were classified into four groups based on their possible functions as ascertained by reference to Genbank (Table 1).

  • 1
    Known virulence gene.

The insertion in STM6 affects amsE, which had been characterized previously as encoding glycosyl transferase, which functions in the biosynthesis of amylovoran (Bugert & Geider, 1995).

  • 2
    Genes involved in amino acid and nucleotide biosynthesis.

The insertions in STM7, 10 and 25 are in loci that likely affect the biosynthesis of amino acids. The interrupted locus of STM7 encodes a protein that is homologous to a positive transcriptional regulator of the cysteine regulon. The homologue of the interrupted locus of STM10 encodes a chorismate mutase, which functions in the biosynthesis of phenylalanine and tyrosine. In STM25, the Tn5 was inserted into a locus homologous to the large chain of carbamoyl-phosphate synthase that functions in the biosynthesis of arginine and pyrimidine.

STM4 and STM8 have transposon insertions in loci that encode proteins homologous to dihydroorotate dehydrogenase and the catalytic subunit of aspartate transcarbamylase, respectively. Both enzymes function in the de novo biosynthesis of pyrimidine. The factor affected by mutant STM29 is homolgous to phosphoribosylglycinamide formyltransferase, an enzyme functioning in the de novo biosynthesis of purine.

As all of the above mutations affected virulence in host plant tissues, we conclude that certain amino acids and nucleotides are critical to the infection process of Erwinia amylovora, and these amino acids are not present or available to Erwinia amylovora from hosts.

  • 3
    Genes involved in nutrient transport.

The mutations in STM17 and STM20 may interrupt the transport of nutrients into cells of Erwinia amylovora. The interrupted gene in STM17 is similar to uraA of S. typhimurium, which encodes a uracil transport enzyme that functions in the uptake of uracil. UraA may help Erwinia amylovora utilize uracil from hosts to synthesize pyrimidines through a salvage pathway. The Tn5 insertion in STM20 may affect a factor homologous to yieG of Yersinia pestis, which may be associated with transport. These results suggested that membrane transporters also play a role in the infection process by Erwinia amylovora.

  • 4
    Genes involved in other functions.

blast results showed that the sequences of STM1, 5, 14, 15 and 22 correspond to genes in other organisms, whereas the remaining four mutants lack significant homology for identification. The Tn5 insertion in STM1 is in a gene similar to xerC of Pseudomonas fluorescens. Mutation of xerC reportedly resulted in reduced root colonization when the mutant was inoculated together with its parent strain, whereas it grew comparably to the parent strain when it was tested individually (Dekkers et al., 1998). This implies that perhaps STM1 does not competitively colonize inoculated apple shoots as effectively as Ea273.

The available Tn5 flanking sequence of STM22 has substantial similarity to AJ289879, a known DNA sequence of Erwinia amylovora in Genbank, which contains genes ycfA and ycfB that are responsible for the yellow colony color of Erwinia amylovora on MM2Cu medium (Zhang et al., 2000). The color of STM22 colonies was white, rather than yellow, when tested on MM2Cu (data not shown). However, it is unlikely that STM22 controls the formation of the yellow pigment through ycfAB as Tn5 appears to be inserted 424-bp downstream of ycfAB. It may affect another gene that encodes a protein functioning in the same pathway for synthesis of YcfAB. Zhang et al. (2000) showed that the yellow pigment produced by Erwinia amylovora on MM2Cu may be related to a low-molecular-weight compound, termed CP340, which has an absorption maximum at 340 nm; however, they did not provide evidence that the yellow pigment contributes to virulence. In the present study, we showed that the STM22 mutation affects both virulence and yellow color formation on MM2Cu. Further investigation is needed to determine just how the loci affected by the STM22 insertion affects colony colorization.

The flanking sequences of the mutations in STM5, 14 and 15 are homologous to putative ORFs in S. typhimurium, Escherichia coli and Xanthomonas campestris, which encode a putative inner membrane protein, a putative aminotransferase and a DNA helicase-related protein, respectively.

Interestingly and rather surprisingly, we identified no known genes of the type III secretion system by STM. We consider that the product from one mutant in the same inoculation pool may have complemented the function of a second mutant and helped it survive in the host, effectively masking the phenotype of the mutant. HrpL is the transcriptional activator of genes encoding the type III secretion system, and a strain with impaired HrpL could not survive in the host (Wei & Beer, 1995). However, Jock and her colleagues recovered equal numbers of both strains in the recovered population after coinoculating immature pear fruits with an hrpL-deficient strain and a wild-type strain of Erwinia amylovora at different ratios (Jock et al., 2003). Thus, a strain mutated in genes encoding a component of the type III secretion system may be difficult or impossible to recover from STM screenings. However, as genes encoding the type III secretion apparatus were identified when STM was applied to S. typhimurium (Hensel et al., 1995; Shea et al., 1996), perhaps, we screened too few mutants.

Recently, Zhao et al. (2005) identified 394 putative virulence genes of Erwinia amylovora based on screening 19 200 clones on immature pear fruit disks using in vivo expression technology (IVET). The IVET results identified several types of genes previously known to be involved in the pathogenicity of Erwinia amylovora and others, previously unknown, which could be considered candidate virulence genes. The genes identified by IVET actually are genes, whose expression is enhanced by inoculation of host plant tissue (immature pear fruit). Genes with enhanced expression may function in virulence, or perhaps their expression may be enhanced coincidentally. IVET was efficient for identifying virulence genes of Erwinia amylovora, as 2% of the clones screened were identified. Here, we report the use of STM, another high-throughput technique, for identifying genes involved in the infection process by Erwinia amylovora; 1% of the screened mutants were identified as having disrupted genes that function in amylovoran biosynthesis, metabolism, metabolite transport and colonization, including the genes amsE, pheA, uraA and xerC. In contrast to the IVET work, the STM approach involved inoculation of apple shoots on trees growing in a greenhouse as the host screening system. Shoot infection often accounts for the devastating damage caused by fire blight in orchards under natural conditions (van der Zwet & Beer, 1999). Thus, the genes identified by STM perhaps are more likely to be involved in the natural infection process of Erwinia amylovora than at least some of those identified by IVET.

In conclusion, STM was effective in Erwinia amylovora in identifying one well-known virulence gene, amsE, and nine new loci that resulted in reduced virulence, relative to the wild-type parent, when the mutated strains were inoculated to hosts. However, the STM approach was somewhat disappointing, as it did not identify more of the genes known previously as involved in the virulence, and it required considerable technical expertise, the use of radioactive nuclides and host material that was rather difficult to maintain. A recent report (Shah et al., 2005) of the use of PCR-based STM with Salmonella gallinarum suggests that this modification makes STM easier to pursue and quite effective in identifying genes involved in virulence. To our knowledge, the present study is the first instance in which STM has been used to identify virulence genes of a plant pathogen. Further study of the genes identified by STM may promote a better understanding of the pathogenic process initiated by Erwinia amylovora in hosts.


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results and discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References

We thank David W. Holden (Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK) for generously providing the materials and protocols. We thank John D. Helmann, Stephen C. Winans (Department of Microbiology, Cornell University) and Philip Bronstein (Department of Plant Pathology, Cornell University) for their helpful suggestions and critical reviews. We are grateful to Jean M. Bonasera, Abby Jane Golash and Ana Maria Bocsanczy for technical help with assays of the mutant phenotypes. We thank Jacqueline F. Nock and Christopher B. Watkins (Department of Horticulture, Cornell University) for storing the immature pear fruits used in this study in controlled atmospheres. This work was supported, in part, by USDA-CSREES Special Grants for research on fire blight of apple and royalty funds of Eden Biosciences Corporation.


  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results and discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References
  • Autret N & Charbit A (2005) Lessons from signature-tagged mutagenesis on the infectious mechanisms of pathogenic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29: 703717.
  • Bauer DW (1990) Molecular genetics of pathogenicity of Erwinia amylovora: techniques, tools and their applications. Ph.D Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York: 66–69.
  • Bellemann P & Geider K (1992) Localization of transposon insertions in pathogenicity mutants of Erwinia amylovora and their biochemical characterization. J Gen Microbiol 138: 931940.
  • Bereswill S, Jock S, Bellemann P & Geider K (1998) Erwinia amylovora by growth morphology on agar containing copper sulfate and by capsule staining with Lectin. Plant Dis 82: 158164.
  • Bernhard F, Coplin DL & Geider K (1993) A gene cluster for amylovoran synthesis in Erwinia amylovora: characterization and relationship to cps genes in Erwinia stewartii. Mol Gen Genet 239: 158168.
  • Bogdanove AJ, Wei Z, Zhao L & Beer SV (1996) Erwinia amylovora secrets harpin via a type III pathway and contains a homolog of YopN of Yersinia. J Bacteriol 178: 17201730.
  • Bogdanove AJ, Kim JF, Wei Z, Kolchinsky P, Charkowski AO, Conlin AK, Collmer A & Beer SV (1998) Homology and functional similarity of an hrp-linked pathogenicity locus, dspEF, of Erwinia amylovora and the avirulence locus avrE of Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 13251330.
  • Bogs J, Bruchmüller I, Erbar C & Geider K (1998) Colonization of host plants by the fire blight pathogen Erwinia amylovora, labeled with genes for bioluminescence and fluorescence. Phytopathology 88: 416421.
  • Bonasera JM, Kim JF & Beer SV (2006) PR genes of apple: identification and expression in response to elicitors and inoculation with Erwinia amylovora. BMC Plant Biol (in press).
  • Bugert P & Geider K (1995) Molecular analysis of the ams operon required for exopolysaccharide synthesis of Erwinia amylovora. Mol Microbiol 15: 917933.
  • Bugert P & Geider K (1997) Characterization of the amsI gene product as a low molecular weight acid phosphatase controlling exopolysaccharide synthesis of Erwinia amylovora. FEBS Lett 400: 252256.
  • Burse A, Weingart H & Ullrich MS (2004) The phytoalexin-inducible multidrug efflux pump AcrAB contributes to virulence in the fire blight pathogen, Erwinia amylovora. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 17: 4354.
  • Darwin AJ & Miller VL (1999) Identification of Yersinia enterocolitica genes affecting survival in an animal host using signature-tagged transposon mutagenesis. Mol Microbiol 32: 5162.
  • Dekkers LC, Phoelich CC, Van Der Fits L & Lugtenberg BJJ (1998) A site-specific recombinase is required for competitive root colonization by Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS365. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 70517056.
  • Eastgate JA (2000) Erwinia amylovora: the molecular basis of fireblight disease. Mol plant pathol 1: 325329.
  • Fuller TE, Kennedy MJ & Lowery DE (2000) Identification of Pasteurella multocida virulence genes in a septicemic mouse model using signature-tagged mutagenesis. Microb Pathog 29: 2538.
  • Gaudriault S, Malandrin L, Paulin JP & Barny MA (1997) DspA, an essential pathogenicity factor of Erwinia amylovora showing homology with AvrE of Pseudomonas syringae, is secreted via the Hrp secretion pathway in a DspB-dependent way. Mol Microbiol 26: 10571069.
  • Geier G & Geider K (1993) Characterization and influence on virulence of the levansucrase gene from the fireblight pathogen Erwinia amylovora. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 42: 387404.
  • Hensel M, Shea JE, Gleeson C, Jones MD, Dalton E & Holden DW (1995) Simultaneous identification of bacterial virulence genes by negative selection. Science 269: 400403.
  • Jock S, Kim W, Barny M & Geider K (2003) Molecular characterization of natural Erwinia pyrifoliae strains deficient in Hypersensitive Response. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 679682.
  • Jones AL, Knoll KM & Rubens CE (2000) Identification of Streptococcus agalactiae virulence genes in the neonatal rat sepsis model using signature-tagged mutagenesis. Mol Microbiol 37: 14441455.
  • Kim JF & Beer SV (1998) HrpW of Erwinia amylovora, a new harpin that contains a domain homologous to pectate lyases of a distinct class. J Bacteriol 180: 52035210.
  • Mecsas J (2002) Use of signature-tagged mutagenesis in pathogenesis studies. Curr Opin Microbiol 5: 3337.
  • Oh CS & Beer SV (2005) Molecular genetics of Erwinia amylovora involved in the development of fire blight. FEMS Microbiol Lett 253: 185192.
  • Oh CS, Kim JK & Beer SV (2005) The Hrp pathogenicity island of Erwinia amylovora and identification of three novel genes required for systemic infection. Mol Plant Pathol 6: 125138.
  • Saenz HL & Dehio C (2005) Signature-tagged mutagenesis: technical advances in a negative selection method for virulence gene identification. Curr Opin Microbiol 8: 612619.
  • Sambrook J, Fritsch E & Maniatis T (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
  • Shah DH, Lee MJ, Park JH, Lee JH, Eo SK, Kwon JT & Chae JS (2005) Identification of Salmonella gallinarum virulence genes in a chicken infection model using PCR-based signature-tagged mutagenesis. Microbiology 151: (Pt 12): 39573968.
  • Shea JE, Hensel M, Gleeson C & Holden DW (1996) Identification of a virulence locus encoding a second type III secretion system in Salmonella typhimurium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 259397.
  • Steinberger EM & Beer SV (1988) Creation and complementation of pathogenicity mutants of Erwinia amylovora. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 1: 135144.
  • Van Der Zwet T & Beer SV (1999) Fire Blight–Its Nature, Prevention and Control: A Practical Guide to Integrated Disease Management, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, 95pp.
  • Venisse JS, Malnoy M, Faize M, Paulin JP & Brisset MN (2002) Modulation of defense responses of Malus spp. during compatible and incompatible interactions with Erwinia amylovora. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 15: 12041212.
  • Wei Z & Beer SV (1993) HrpI of Erwinia amylovora functions in secretion of harpin and is a member of a new protein family. J Bacteriol 175: 79587967.
  • Wei Z & Beer SV (1995) HrpL activates Erwinia amylovorahrp gene transcription and is a member of the ECF subfamily of σ factors. J Bacteriol 177: 62016210.
  • Wei Z, Laby RJ, Zumoff CH, Bauer DW, He SY, Collmer A & Beer SV (1992) Harpin, elicitor of the hypersensitive response produced by the plant pathogen Erwinia amylovora. Science 257: 8588.
  • Wei Z, Kim JF & Beer SV (2000) Regulation of hrp genes and type III protein secretion in Erwinia amylovora by HrpX/HrpY, a novel two-component system, and HrpS. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 13: 12511262.
  • Zhang Y, Bak DD, Heid H & Geider K (1999) Molecular characterization of a protease secreted by Erwinia amylovora. J Mol Biol 289: 12391251.
  • Zhang Y, Jock S & Geider K (2000) Genes of Erwinia amylovora involved in yellow color formation and release of a low-molecular-weight compound during growth in the presence of copper ions. Mol Gen Genet 264: 233240.
  • Zhao Y, Blumer SE & Sundin GW (2005) Identification of Erwinia amylovora genes induced during infection of immature pear tissue. J Bacteriol 187: 80888103.