SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • ammonia-oxidizing bacteria;
  • Nitrosospira sp.;
  • nitrite reductase;
  • nitric oxide reductase;
  • nitrifier-denitrification

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Material and methods
  5. Results and discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References

Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria are believed to be an important source of the climatically important trace gas nitrous oxide (N2O). The genes for nitrite reductase (nirK) and nitric oxide reductase (norB), putatively responsible for nitrous oxide production, have been identified in several ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, but not in Nitrosospira strains that may dominate ammonia-oxidizing communities in soil. In this study, sequences from nirK and norB genes were detected in several cultured Nitrosospira species and the diversity and phylogeny of these genes were compared with those in other ammoniaoxidizing bacteria and in classical denitrifiers. The nirK and norB gene sequences obtained from Nitrosospira spp. were diverse and appeared to be less conserved than 16S rRNA genes and functional ammonia monooxygenase (amoA) genes. The nirK and norB genes from some Nitrosospira spp. were not phylogenetically distinct from those of denitrifiers, and phylogenetic analysis suggests that the nirK and norB genes in ammonia-oxidizing bacteria have been subject to lateral transfer.


Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Material and methods
  5. Results and discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References

Autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) are responsible for the oxidation of ammonia to nitrite and consequently play an important role in the nitrogen cycles of diverse ecosystems (Prosser, 1989). Ammonia oxidation is accompanied by production of the greenhouse gases nitric oxide (NO) and nitrous oxide (N2O), which are of great environmental concern due to their roles in global warming and destruction of the stratospheric ozone layer (Dickinson & Cicerone, 1986). These gases are produced in soil through several microbial processes, including denitrification, nitrification and nitrifier denitrification, the latter two being carried out by autotrophic AOB (Webster & Hopkins, 1996; Kester et al., 1997; Jiang & Bakken, 1999; Colliver & Stephenson, 2000; Dundee & Hopkins, 2001; Wrage et al., 2001, 2005; Shaw et al., 2006). Nitrifier denitrification, whereby AOB reduce NO2 to N2O and possibly further to N2, appears to be a universal trait in betaproteobacterial ammonia oxidizers (Shaw et al., 2006) and a greater understanding of the factors controlling this process is required for predictions of NO and N2O emission rates.

The probable enzymes involved in nitrifier denitrification are ammonia monooxygenase, hydroxylamine oxidoreductase, nitrite reductase, nitric oxide reductase and nitrous oxide reductase (Wrage et al., 2001). Nitrite reductase reduces nitrite to NO and is encoded by two structurally different genes: nirK, encoding a copper-containing enzyme, and nirS, encoding cytochrome cd1. These genes are functionally and physiologically equivalent and appear to be mutually exclusive (Braker et al., 1998). Nitric oxide reductase is encoded by the norB gene and catalyzes the reduction of NO to N2O. Genes encoding both the small and large subunits of nitric oxide reductase, norC and norB, have been retrieved from denitrifying bacteria (Braker & Tiedje, 2003) and cultured AOB, including Nitrosomonas and Nitrosococcus spp. (Casciotti & Ward, 2005), but homologous sequences have not been obtained from Nitrosospira. The functional genes involved in denitrification have been detected in a variety of phylogenetically unrelated microorganisms, suggesting acquisition by lateral gene transfer, which is supported by phylogenetic analysis of nir and nor gene sequences (Philippot, 2002). Many questions regarding the genes involved in the nitrifier denitrification pathway remain open. Additional nirK and norB sequence information, in particular from the Nitrosospira lineage, can help in understanding the evolution of AOB and whether these functional genes have been acquired or distributed through lateral gene transfer.

Autotrophic AOB detected in the soil, by both cultivation-based and molecular techniques, belong to two genera within the Betaproteobacteria, Nitrosospira and Nitrosomonas, with at least seven lineages based on 16S rRNA gene sequences (Stephen et al., 1996; Purkhold et al., 2003). Although most information on AOB physiology, biochemistry and molecular biology has been obtained from studies of Nitrosomonas, particularly Nitrosomonas europaea (Taylor & Bottomley, 2006), Nitrosospira spp. appear to dominate most natural soil populations (Kowalchuk et al., 1997, Stephen et al., 1998; Okano et al., 2004), although Nitrosomonas spp. can be prevalent in soils that have received high N inputs (Oved et al., 2001; Briones et al., 2002).

The aim of this study was to determine the diversity and relationships of nirK and norB genes in Nitrosospira spp., Nitrosomonas spp. and denitrifying bacteria and to compare the phylogenies of nirK and norB genes in AOB with those based on ammonia monooxygenase (amoA) and 16S rRNA genes.

Material and methods

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Material and methods
  5. Results and discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References

Bacterial isolates and growth conditions

The betaproteobacterial AOB strains studied (Table 1) were grown in static liquid batch culture at 28oC, as described by Keen & Prosser (1987) in modified Skinner and Walker medium (Powell & Prosser, 1986). All cultures were checked for heterotrophic bacterial contamination by plating on nutrient agar and by PCR amplification and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis.

Table 1.   Strains of ammonia oxidizing bacteria used in this study
Ammonia oxidizer strainsPhylogenetic cluster/lineageOrigin
Nitrosospira briensis strain128Nitrosospira lineage, cluster 3Soil, Crete
Nitrosospira multiformis ATCC25196Nitrosospira lineage, cluster 3Soil, Surinam, South America
Nitrosospira tenuis strain NV12Nitrosospira lineage, cluster 3Soil, Hawaii
Nitrosospira sp. strain 40KINitrosospira lineage, cluster 4Clay loam soil (pH 6.5), Norway
Nitrosospira sp. strain B6Nitrosospira lineage, cluster 2Pebbles (pH 6.3), nitrifying reactor, Norway
Nitrosospira sp. strain En13Nitrosospira lineage, cluster 3Craibstone soil (pH 4.5), Aberdeen, UK
Nitrosospira sp. strain NpAVNitrosospira lineage, cluster 3Soil, Minnesota
Nitrosospira sp. strain AFNitrosospira lineage, cluster 3Sandi soil (pH 4), Zambia
Nitrosomonas europaea ATCC19718Nitrosomonas europaea lineageSoil

Cell lysis and PCR amplification

Approximately 1 mL of a stationary-phase AOB culture was centrifuged at 13 000 g for 5 min. The pellet was resuspended in 50 μL of 5% sterile Chelex® 100 Resin (BioRad, Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, UK) by light vortexing, boiled (100°C for 10 min) and frozen (−20°C for 10 min) and thawed twice. After centrifugation for 2 min at 13 000 g, 1 μL of supernatant was used for PCR amplification. The PCR primers are presented in Table 2, and PCR amplification was carried out with 50 μL reaction mixtures containing 1.25 U of Taq polymerase (BIOTAQ™ DNA Polymerase, Bioline, London, UK) with 1 × manufacturer's reaction buffer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 μM of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate (Bioline), 50 pmol of each primer and 400 ng of bovine serum albumin.

Table 2.   Primers used in this study
Primer nameSequence 5′–3′PCR product sizeAnnealing temperatureReference
NirK1FGG(R)ATGGT(Y)CC(S)TGGCA514 bp57°CBraker et al. (1998)
NirK5RGAACTTGCCGGT(V)G(Y)CCAGAC   
Cunir3CGTCTA(Y)CA(Y)TGCGC(V)CC540 bp45°CCasciotti & Ward (2001)
Cunir4GCCTCGATGAG(R)TTGTGGTT   
F1aCuATCATGGT(S)CTGCCGCG473 bp57°CHallin & Lindgren (1999)
R3CuGCCTCGATCAG(R)TTGTGGTT   
norB1fCG(N)GA(R)TT(Y)CT(S)GA(R)CA(R)CC669 bp55°CCasciotti & Ward (2005)
norB8rC(R)TA(D)GC(V)CCR(W)AGAA(V)GC   

The program used to amplify the norB gene (norB1f-norB8r primer set) was: denaturation at 94°C for 4 min, 30 cycles at 94°C for 30 s; 55°C for 45 s, 72°C for 45 s and a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. For amplification of the nirK gene with the primer set F1aCu-R3Cu, the thermal cycling conditions were: denaturation at 94°C for 3 min, 35 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 57°C for 1 min, 72°C for 1 min and a final extension at 72°C for 7 min. The nirK gene was amplified with primer sets nirK1F-nirK5R and Cunir3-Cunir4 using the PCR conditions described by Braker et al. (1998) and Casciotti & Ward (2001), respectively. PCR products were analyzed by electrophoresis of 5 μL aliquots of the reaction mixtures on 1.0% agarose gel using Bioline Hyperladder DNA fragment size markers (Bioline).

Cloning and sequencing

PCR products were purified by precipitation with 50 μL of 20% PEG/2.5 M NaCl (incubated for 15 min at 37°C), washed twice with 125 μL ice-cold 80% ethanol, cloned using the pGEM-T Easy vector system (Promega Ltd, Southampton, UK), according to the manufacturer's instructions, and transformed into XL-Blue MRF Kan supercompetent Escherichia coli cells (Stratagene Inc., Cambridge, UK). White colonies were selected for amplification with vector primers M13f-M13r (Promega), and PCR products were purified as described above. Clones with the correct insert (as judged by size) were subjected to sequencing with universal SP6 or T7 vector primers (Promega) with a PE Biosystems 377 DNA sequencer, using the sequencing service of the University of Dundee.

Phylogenetic analysis

The sequences obtained were compared against database sequences using tblastx provided by NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and were aligned and clustered using clustal-w. Maximum likelihood analyses were performed on this alignment using tree-puzzle (version 5.2) with the JTT model of substitution and gamma distribution for rate of heterogeneity among sites. Phylogenetic trees of nirK and norB genes were constructed from the same aligned amino acid sequences using seqboot, prodist, kitsch and consense in the phylip programs and the JTT rate matrix, and were visualized using treeview software, version 1.6.6. Phylogenetic trees comparing 16S rRNA, amoA, nirK and norB genes were constructed with treecon for Windows (version 1.3b Yves van de Peer, Ghent, Belgium) with the neighbor-joining algorithm using the BLOSUM 62 substitution matrix.

The sequences generated in this study have been deposited in NCBI GenBank under accession numbers DQ840420DQ840426 and DQ846875DQ846880.

Results and discussion

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Material and methods
  5. Results and discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References

Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of nirK genes

NirK genes were amplified using three primer sets (Table 2). Amplification with the primer set Cunir3-Cunir4 (Casciotti & Ward, 2001) generated multiple, nonspecific PCR products with all the tested AOB strains. Primer set nirK1-nirK5R, which is commonly used to survey nirK gene diversity in environmental samples (Braker et al., 1998; Thröback et al., 2004), generated products from all AOB strains tested but sequences showed no significant similarity to database nirK genes. The closest relationships were 59% similarity to a conserved hypothetical protein, 61% to methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and 57% similarity to the amoC gene. The most successful amplification of nirK genes was obtained with the F1aCu-R3Cu primer set (Hallin & Lindgren, 1999), which generated sequences from Nitrosospira strains with 91–96% similarity to nirK genes from Nitrosomonas strains deposited in the NSBI database by Casciotti & Ward (2001).

Only sequences obtained from PCR products amplified with the F1aCu-R3Cu primer set were used for further phylogenetic study, and analysis of predicted amino acid sequences of 14 AOB and seven representatives of classical denitrifiers yielded the tree in Fig. 1. This analysis grouped four Nitrosospira strains (Nitrosospira sp. AF; Nitrosospira sp. En13; Nitrosospira sp. NpAV and Nitrosospira briensis) in a distinct cluster (I), supported by high bootstrap values (>90), together with five Nitrosomonas spp. obtained previously by Casciotti & Ward (2001). Interestingly, the nirK sequences from Nitrosospira sp. 40KI, Nitrosospira sp. B6 and Nitrosospira tenuis NV12 grouped with Nitrosomonas sp. TA-921i-NH4, and fell within the denitrifier cluster (II) with well-supported bootstrap values. This indicates that nirK sequences from some AOB are not phylogenetically distinct from those of denitrifiers. In contrast, nirK sequences from Nitrosospira multiformis were phylogenetically distinct from all other AOB and did not fall within the two main clusters. The nirK sequence from Nitrosomonas europaea was different from all other nirK sequences, fell outside the main clusters and was not included in this phylogenetic tree.

image

Figure 1.  Phylogenetic tree of partial nirK gene fragments (133 amino acids). Bootstrap values (>70) based on 100 replicates are indicated for the major branches. The partial nirK sequence from Neisseria gonorrhoeae (M97926) was used as an outgroup. Sequences from Nitrosospira sp. homologues to nirK gene obtained in this work are presented in bold. The nirK sequence for Nitrosospira multiformis was obtained from NCBI accession number CP0103.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Cluster (II) includes several known denitrifiers representative of Alpha- and Betaproteobacteria that grouped together, despite differences in their 16S rRNA gene phylogeny. Similar results have been observed in other studies of nirK phylogeny, indicating that lateral gene transfer has occurred (Zumft, 1997; Casciotti & Ward, 2001; Avrahami et al., 2002; Philippot, 2002; Song & Ward, 2003).

Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of the norB gene

All tested AOB, except Nitrosospira multiformis and Nitrosospira sp. B6, yielded norB PCR products of the expected size of c. 669 bp. Two isolates, Nitrosospira tenuis and Nitrosospira briensis, yielded an additional nonspecific PCR band. tblastx analysis revealed that sequences obtained from Nitrosospira strains had 73–86% similarity to the norB genes from a variety of denitrifying bacteria. For example, sequences from Nitrosospira sp. AF showed 77% similarity to the norB genes from Sinorhizobium meliloti and Silicibacter pomeroyi; Nitrosospira briensis showed 78% similarity to norB gene from Roseobacter denitrificans; and Nitrosospira sp. NpAV showed 73% similarity to norB genes from Paracoccus halodenitrificans. Interestingly, the norB genes amplified from Nitrosospira strains showed a higher similarity to norB genes from classical denitrifiers than to norB genes from Nitrosomonas strains available in the NCBI database, suggesting different evolutionary origins for norB genes of these two genera.

Phylogenetic analysis of norB-deduced, 116-amino acid sequences from eight AOB strains obtained in this study and 16 norB sequences selected from the NCBI database generated the tree presented in Fig. 2. While the norB sequences from Nitrosomonas spp. grouped together in one cluster (II), separate from denitrifier sequences, the Nitrosospira sequences obtained in this study mainly grouped with cluster (I) denitrifiers. The norB sequences obtained from Nitrosospira spp. AF, En13, NpAV, Nitrosospira tenuis and Nitrososipra briensis grouped in cluster (I) with alphaproteobacterial denitrifiers, such as Roseobacter denitrificans, Paracoccus denitrificans, Rhodopseudomonas palustris and Sinorhizobium meliloti. This cluster formed two subclusters, containing norB sequences from AOB and denitrifiers, respectively, each with well-supported bootstrap values. NorB gene sequences of Nitrosospira multiformis (obtained from NCBI as no PCR product was obtained), were phylogenetically distinct from all other AOB, as for nirK genes. One norB sequence obtained from Nitrosospira spp. 40KI grouped with Silicibacter pomeroyi with high bootstrap support and formed a separate cluster (III) with norB genes from Alcaligenes faecalis and Nitrosospira multiformis.

image

Figure 2.  Phylogenetic analysis of partial norB gene fragments (116 amino acids). Bootstrap values (>70) based on 100 replicates are indicated for the major branches. The partial norB sequence from Pseudomonas stutzeri (Z28384) was used as an outgroup. Sequences from Nitrosospira sp. obtained in this work are presented in bold. The norB sequence for Nitrosospira multiformis was obtained from NCBI accession number CP0103.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Braker & Tiedje (2003) showed that norB genes from traditional denitrifiers did not cluster strictly according to the 16S rRNA gene-based phylogeny or to nitrite reductase genes, and an incongruence between norB and 16S rRNA gene phylogenies has also been reported by Casciotti & Ward (2005) and Philippot (2002).

Comparative phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA, amoA, nirK and norB genes

The phylogenies of nirK and norB genes obtained from AOB in this study were compared with those based on ammonia monooxygenase (amoA) and 16S rRNA genes (Fig. 3). For each phylogenetic tree, corresponding sequences from Nitrosomonas europaea were used as outgroups, as this species differs significantly from all other AOB (Casciotti & Ward, 2001). The phylogeny of AOB based on 16S rRNA gene sequences is generally believed to reflect the evolutionary history of AOB well, as it is highly consistent with species identities (Aakra et al., 2001). The phylogenies of 16S rRNA genes and amoA genes were very similar, but differed greatly from those generated using nirK and norB gene sequences (Fig. 3). For example, phylogenetic analysis based on the nirK gene clearly differentiated Nitrosospira tenuis and Nitrosospira briensis, which were phylogenetically very close in terms of 16S rRNA, amoA and norB genes. Phylogenetic analysis based on the norB gene of Nitrosospira sp. 40KI was very different from that of all other Nitrosospira spp. included in this study, and from 16S rRNA, amoA and nirK gene phylogenies. Overall, the functional nirK and norB genes appeared to be less well conserved than the 16S rRNA genes and functional amoA genes.

image

Figure 3.  Comparative phylogenetic analysis of (a) 16S rRNA genes, (b) amoA genes, (c) nirK genes and (d) norB genes performed with aligned amino acids sequences. Sequences from Nitrosomonas europaea obtained from GenBank database (AF058692) were used as an outgroup. Bootstrap values greater than 50% are shown for each branch.

Download figure to PowerPoint

Phylogenetic analyses based on 16S rRNA, amoA, nirK and norB genes revealed the phylogeny of Nitrosospira multiformis to be very different from all other AOB examined here, despite belonging to the same genera and performing the same function in soils. The nitrite and nitric oxide reductases are traditionally thought to be genetically linked (Zumft, 1997). However, our results indicate that the norB and nirK gene phylogenies for AOB are not congruent. The results obtained here therefore provide strong evidence that denitrification genes were acquired or distributed through lateral gene transfer. They suggest that the nirK and norB genes, putatively involved in the nitrifier denitrification pathway, are commonly present in AOB, thereby supporting the findings of Beaumont et al. (2002) and Casciotti & Ward (2001; 2005).

All of the Nitrosospira strains used in this work were able to reduce nitrite to N2O and carry out nitrifier denitrification as shown previously by Shaw et al. (2006). The rate of N2O production varied between strains, but there was no correlation between production rate and norB and nirK gene diversity. Moreover, variation in N2O production may be due to variation in cell concentrations and/or the activity of different batches of cells (Shaw et al., 2006). To date, nirK and norB genes have been studied predominantly in heterotrophic denitrifying bacteria, where they are involved in the production of NO and N2O. The presence of the fragments of nirK and norB genes in cultured AOB does not necessarily confirm that they are functional, and the mechanisms of denitrification in AOB are still unclear (Beaumont et al., 2002; Casciotti & Ward, 2005). Schmidt et al. (2004) postulated a key role of nirK and norB genes in nitrifier denitrification as Nitrosomonas europaea ATCC 19718 nirK- and norB-deficient mutants were found to be incapable of nitrogen gas production. However, physiological evidence suggests that these bacteria might recruit nirK as a protection against nitrite toxicity resulting from ammonia oxidation, rather than functioning in a respiratory pathway (Stein & Arp, 1998; Beaumont et al., 2002).

More information regarding the mechanism and regulation of genes involved in the nitrifier denitrification pathway can be obtained from techniques such as whole-genome microarray (Cho et al., 2006). However, attempts to understand the genetics of nitrifier denitrification have included only one representative of AOB, Nitrosomonas europaea, which appears to be different from all other AOB, based on both structural and functional genes. In addition, the significance of the nirK and norB sequences obtained from Nitrosospira spp. for NO and N2O production during nitrifier denitrification requires further investigation.

Acknowledgements

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Material and methods
  5. Results and discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References

This work was funded by a Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, UK, grant (32/D19035) awarded to EMB and JIP. We thank Zena Smith for providing the Nitrosospira cultures.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Material and methods
  5. Results and discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References
  • Aakra A, Utåker JB & Nes IF (2001) Comparative phylogeny of the ammonia monooxygenase subunit A and 16S rRNA genes of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett 205: 237242.
  • Avrahami S, Conrad R & Braker G (2002) Effect of soil ammonium concentration on N2O release and on the community structure of ammonia oxidizers and denitrifiers. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 56855692.
  • Beaumont HJ, Hommes NG, Sayavedra-Soto LA, Arp DJ, Arciero DM, Hooper AB, Westerhoff HV & Van Spanning RJM (2002) Nitrite reductase of Nitrosomonas europaea is not essential for production of gaseous nitrogen oxides and confers tolerance to nitrite. J Bacteriol 184: 25572560.
  • Braker G & Tiedje JM (2003) Nitric oxide reductase (norB) genes from pure cultures and environmental samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 34763483.
  • Braker G, Fesefeldt A & Witzel K-P (1998) Development of PCR primer system for amplification of nitrite reductase genes (nirK and nirS) to detect denitrifying bacteria in environmental samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 37693775.
  • Briones AM, Okabe S, Umemiya Y, Ramsing N-B, Reichardt W & Okuyama H (2002) Influence of different cultivars on populations of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in the root environment of rice. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 30673075.
  • Casciotti KL & Ward BB (2001) Dissimilatory nitrite reductase genes from autotrophic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 22132221.
  • Casciotti KL & Ward BB (2005) Phylogenetic analysis of nitric oxide reductase gene homologues from aerobic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 52: 197205.
  • Cho CM-H, Yan T, Liu X, Wu L, Zhou J & Stein LY (2006) Transcriptome of Nitrosomonas europaea mutant with a disrupted nitrite reductase gene (nirK). Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 44504454.
  • Colliver BB & Stephenson T (2000) Production of nitrogen oxide and dinitrogen oxide by autotrophic nitrifiers. Biotechnol Adv 18: 219232.
  • Dickinson RE & Cicerone RJ (1986) Future global warming from atmospheric trace gases. Nature 319: 109115.
  • Dundee L & Hopkins DW (2001) Different sensitivities to oxygen of nitrous oxide production by Nitrosomonas europaea and Nitrosolobus multiformis. Soil Biol Biochem 33: 15631565.
  • Hallin S & Lindgren P-E (1999) PCR detection of genes encoding nitrite reductase in denitrifying bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 65: 16521657.
  • Jiang Q-Q & Bakken LR (1999) Nitrous oxide production and methane oxidation by different ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 65: 26792684.
  • Keen GA & Prosser JI (1987) Steady state and transient growth of autotrophic nitrifying bacteria. Arch Microbiol 147: 7379.
  • Kester RA, De Boer W & Laanbroek HJ (1997) Production of NO and N2O by pure cultures of nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria during changes in aeration. Appl Environ Microbiol 63: 38723877.
  • Kowalchuk GA, Stephen RJ, De Boer W, Prosser JI, Embley TM & Woldendorp JW (1997) Analysis of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria of the beta subdivision of the class proteobacteria in costal sand dunes by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and sequencing of 16S ribosomal DNA fragments. Appl Environ Microbiol 63: 14891497.
  • Okano Y, Hristova KR, Leutenegger CM, Jackson LE, Denison RF, Gebreyesus B, Lebauer D & Scow KM (2004) Application of real-time PCR to study effects of ammonium on population size of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 10081016.
  • Oved T, Shaviv A, Goldrath T, Mandelbaum RT & Minz D (2001) Influence of effluent irrigation on community composition and function of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 34263433.
  • Philippot L (2002) Denitrifying genes in bacterial and archaeal genomes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1577: 355378.
  • Powell SJ & Prosser JI (1986) Inhibition of ammonium oxidation by nitrapyrin in soil and liquid culture. Appl Environ Microbiol 52: 782787.
  • Prosser JI (1989) Autotrophic nitrification in bacteria. Adv Micro Physiol 30: 125181.
  • Purkhold U, Wagner M, Timmermann G, Pommerening-Röser A & Koops HP (2003) 16S rRNA and amoA-based phylogeny of 12 novel betaproteobacterial ammonia-oxidising isolates: extension of dataset and proposal of a new lineage within the nitrosomonads. Int J System Evol Microbiol 53: 14851494.
  • Schmidt I, Van Spanning RJM & Jetten MSM (2004) Denitrification and ammonia oxidation by Nitrosomonas europaea wild type and NirK- and NorB-deficient mutants. Microbiology 150: 41074114.
  • Shaw LJ, Nicol GW, Smith Z, Fear J, Prosser JI & Baggs EM (2006) Nitrosospira spp. can produce nitrous oxide via a nitrifier denitrification pathway. Environ Microbiol 8: 214222.
  • Song B & Ward BB (2003) Nitrite reductase genes in halobenzoate degrading denitrifying bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 43: 349357.
  • Stein LY & Arp DJ (1998) Loss of ammonia monooxygenase activity in Nitrosomonas europaea upon exposure to nitrite. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 40984102.
  • Stephen JR, McCaig AE, Smith Z, Prosser JI & Embley TM (1996) Molecular diversity of soil and marine 16S rRNA gene sequences related to β-subgroup ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 62: 41474154.
  • Stephen JR, Kowalchuk GA, Bruns MA, McCaig AE, Phillips CJ, Embley TM & Prosser JI (1998) Analysis of β–subgroup proteobacterial ammonia oxidizer populations in soil by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis and hierarchical phylogenetic probing. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 29582965.
  • Taylor AE & Bottomley PJ (2006) Nitrite production by Nitrosomonas europaea and Nitrosospira sp. AV in soils as different solution concentrations of ammonium. Soil Biol Biochem 38: 828836.
  • Thröback IN, Enwall K, Jarvis A & Hallin S (2004) Reassessing PCR primers targeting nirS, nirK and nosZ genes from community surveys of denitrifying bacteria with DGGE. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 49: 401417.
  • Webster EA & Hopkins DW (1996) Contribution from different microbial processes to N2O emissions from soil under different moisture regimes. Biol Fert Soil 22: 331335.
  • Wrage N, Velthof GL, Van Beusichem ML & Oenema O (2001) Role of nitrifier denitrification in the production of nitrous oxide. Soil Biol Biochem 33: 17231732.
  • Wrage N, Van Groeningen JW, Oenema O & Baggs EM (2005) Distinguishing between soil sources of N2O using a new 15N- and 18O-enrichment method. Rapid Comm Mass Spec 19: 32983306.
  • Zumft WG (1997) Cell biology and molecular basis of denitrification. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61: 533616.