Editor: Craig Winstanley
Identification of Salmonella enterica subspecies I, Salmonella enterica serovars Typhimurium, Enteritidis and Typhi using multiplex PCR
Article first published online: 3 OCT 2009
© 2009 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved
FEMS Microbiology Letters
Volume 301, Issue 1, pages 137–146, December 2009
How to Cite
Park, S. H., Kim, H. J., Cho, W. H., Kim, J. H., Oh, M. H., Kim, S. H., Lee, B. K., Ricke, S. C. and Kim, H. Y. (2009), Identification of Salmonella enterica subspecies I, Salmonella enterica serovars Typhimurium, Enteritidis and Typhi using multiplex PCR. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 301: 137–146. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01809.x
Present address: Si Hong Park, Department of Food Science, Center for Food Safety, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704-5690, USA.
- Issue published online: 2 NOV 2009
- Article first published online: 3 OCT 2009
- Received 13 May 2009; accepted 24 September 2009.Final version published online 16 October 2009.
- Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi;
- Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium;
- mutiplex PCR;
- comparative genomics
This study was designed to develop a multiplex PCR method with five specific primer pairs for the detection of Salmonella spp., Salmonella subspecies I, Salmonella enterica serovars Typhimurium, Typhi and Enteritidis. A multiplex PCR was constructed with five primer pairs for the detection of Salmonella and pathogenic Salmonella serovars, including a specific primer pair for Salmonella Typhi, based on the sequence comparison between genomic DNA sequences of 12 Salmonella strains. Each primer pair was specifically targeted to Salmonella spp., Salmonella subspecies I, Salmonella Typhimurium, Typhi and Enteritidis. This multiplex PCR was evaluated with various DNAs of Salmonella serovars that yielded high specificity for amplifying the expected PCR products of Salmonella serovars. Using this primer pair, a set of multiplex PCR was performed for the rapid identification of salmonellae and major pathogenic Salmonella serovars. Although this multiplex PCR method will need to be evaluated for a wide range of Salmonella serovars among multilaboratories, it should be useful for identifying clinically significant strains of Salmonella serovars rapidly and accurately without the need for serological testing.
Salmonella is classified into >2500 serovars based on the Kauffmann–White scheme (Popoff et al., 2003). Among the >2500 Salmonella serovars, several serovars have been identified as major pathogens to humans and domestic animals, including Salmonella Typhimurium, Enteritidis, Typhi, Newport, Heidelberg and Paratyphi A. Salmonellae are divided taxonomically into two species: Salmonella enterica and Salmonella bongori (subspecies V). Salmonella enterica is comprised of six subspecies, which include S. enterica ssp. enterica (I), S. enterica ssp. salamae (II), S. enterica ssp. arizonae (IIIa), S. enterica ssp. diarizonae (IIIb), S. enterica ssp. houtenae (IV) and S. enterica ssp. indica (VI). Salmonella subspecies I, which causes most infections in warm-blooded animals, consists of almost 1500 serovars (Popoff, 2001). Among subspecies I, Salmonella serovars Typhimurium, Enteritidis, Newport, Typhi, Paratyphi A, Paratyphi C and Choleraesuis account for most human and domestic animal Salmonella infections (Porwollik et al., 2002, 2004; Chan et al., 2003), and different serovars belonging to subspecies I have different host ranges, diseases and virulence potentials (Bäumler et al., 1998; Edwards et al., 2002). These distinguishable characteristics are caused by genetic differences in each of the Salmonella serovars.
To date, numerous identification methods have been suggested to replace or complement traditional serotyping. These methods comprise ribotyping (Esteban et et al., 1993), random-amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)-PCR, real-time PCR (Hoorfar et al., 2000), PCR-single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis (Nair et al., 2002), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) (Torpdahl & Ahrens, 2004), DNA sequence analysis (Mortimer et al., 2004), DNA arrays (Chan et al., 2003) and protein arrays (Cai et al., 2005). The problems associated with these methods include reproducibility of results between different laboratories for AFLP, RAPD-PCR and PCR-SSCP analysis, the requirement of specialized equipment, high analysis costs per sample and the need for well-trained personnel for DNA sequencing, real-time PCR, and DNA and protein microarrays. Therefore, the evaluation of specific primers with various Salmonella serovars is necessary for rapid and accurate detection of Salmonella spp. using multiplex PCR in the food industry and epidemiology.
Salmonella Typhi causes typhoid fever in humans and thus remains a serious public health problem in many developing countries (Parkhill et al., 2001; Edwards et al., 2002; Hirose et al., 2002; McClelland et al., 2004). Many studies have reported on the identification of S. Typhi using PCR targeted for the fliC gene (Song et al., 1993), the ViaB region (Hashimoto et al., 1995). Hirose et al. (2002) have also demonstrated the identification of S. Typhi using PCR targeted for the fliC gene, the ViaB region, rfbE and rfbS. However, these studies showed that each primer pair was not specific only to S. Typhi and that multiplex PCR using several targeted genes was needed for the specific detection of S. Typhi.
In this present study, the multiplex PCR method was developed for the specific detection of Salmonella spp., Salmonella subspecies I, S. Typhimurium, Typhi and Enteritidis in a single reaction. An S. Typhi-specific primer pair was prepared using comparative genomics along with other primer pairs used in previous studies (Wang & Yeh, 2002; Kim et al., 2006a). This multiplex PCR was evaluated with various genomic DNAs of Salmonella serovars for the rapid identification of Salmonella spp. and major pathogenic Salmonella serovars of Salmonella subspecies I.
Materials and methods
Salmonella strains used in this study were collected from Korea KCPB, KCDC, Germany (Malorny et al., 2003) and the United States (Seo et al., 2004) and are listed in Table 1. Non-Salmonella strains including foodborne pathogens and Enterobacteriaceae were collected from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD).
|Salmonella subspecies and serovars (no.)||Serogroup||Source||Multiplex PCR results|
|STM3098-f2, r2||STM4057-f, r||STM4497M2-f, r||STY1599-f, r||IE 2L, 3R||IAC|
|S. enterica subspecies I|
|Agona (3)||B||BFR, KCPB||+||+||−||−||−||+|
|Bredeney (2)||B||BFR, FDA||+||+||−||−||−||+|
|Derby (2)||B||BFR, FDA||+||+||−||−||−||+|
|Enteritidis (25)||D1||BFR, FDA, KCPB||+||+||−||−||+||+|
|Hadar (2)||C2–C3||BFR, KCPB||+||+||−||−||−||+|
|Heidelberg (3)||B||BFR, FDA||+||+||−||−||−||+|
|Infantis (3)||C1||BFR, FDA, KCPB||+||+||−||−||−||+|
|Litchfield (2)||C2–C3||BFR, FDA||+||+||−||−||−||+|
|Montevideo (2)||C1||BFR, FDA||+||+||−||−||−||+|
|Paratyphi B||B||ATCC 10719||+||+||−||−||−||+|
|Paratyphi C||C1||ATCC 13428||+||+||−||−||−||+|
|Typhimurium (6)||B||BFR, FDA, KCPB||+||+||+||−||−||+|
|S. enterica subspecies IIIa|
|S. enterica ssp. arizonae||ATCC 13314||+||−||−||−||−||+|
|S. enterica subspecies IIIb|
|S. enterica ssp. diarizonae||ATCC 43973||+||−||−||−||−||+|
|47 : l,v:z||X||BFR||+||−||−||−||−||+|
|S. enterica subspecies IV|
|S. enterica ssp. houtenae||ATCC 43974||+||−||−||−||−||+|
|S. enterica subspecies VI|
|S. enterica ssp. indica||ATCC 43976||+||−||−||−||−||+|
|S. bongori (V)|
|S. bongori||ATCC 43975||+||−||−||−||−||+|
|Bacillus anthracis||ATCC 14578||−||−||−||−||−|
|Bacillus cereus (3)||ATCC 10876, 11778, 14579||−||−||−||−||−|
|Bacillus mycoides||ATCC 6462||−||−||−||−||−|
|Bacillus subtilis (2)||ATCC 6051, 6633||−||−||−||−||−|
|Bacillus thuringiensis (2)||ATCC 10792, 35646||−||−||−||−||−|
|Campylobacter jejuni||ATCC 33560||−||−||−||−||−|
|Citrobacter freundii||ATCC 8090||−||−||−||−||−|
|Clostrdium perfringens||ATCC 13124||−||−||−||−||−|
|Escherichia coli (4)||ATCC 11775, 23736, 25922, 27325||−||−||−||−||−|
|Escherichia coli O157:H7||ATCC 43894||−||−||−||−||−|
|Hafnia alvei||ATCC 9760||−||−||−||−||−|
|Listeria monocytogenes (2)||ATCC 19111, 19113||−||−||−||−||−|
|Listeria ivanovii||ATCC 19119||−||−||−||−||−|
|Listeria innocua||ATCC 33090||−||−||−||−||−|
|Listeria grayi (2)||ATCC 19120, 25401||−||−||−||−||−|
|Proteus mirabilis||ATCC 9921||−||−||−||−||−|
|Proteus vulgaris||ATCC 6380||−||−||−||−||−|
|Shigella flexneri||ATCC 12022||−||−||−||−||−|
|Shigella boydii||ATCC 8700||−||−||−||−||−|
|Shigella sonnei||ATCC 25931||−||−||−||−||−|
|Staphylococcus aureus (3)||ATCC 6538, 25923, 29737||−||−||−||−||−|
|Staphylococcus epidermidis||ATCC 12228||−||−||−||−||−|
|Staphylococcus haemolyticus||ATCC 29970||−||−||−||−||−|
|Vibrio parahaemolyticus (2)||ATCC 17802, 33844||−||−||−||−||−|
|Yersinia enterocolitica||ATCC 23715||−||−||−||−||−|
Genomic DNA extraction
The Salmonella strains were inoculated in Luria–Bertani broth and cultured at 37 °C, with vigorous shaking at 230 r.p.m. Genomic DNAs of the Salmonella strains were extracted using the DNeasy Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instruction. DNA concentrations were measured using a UV-spectrophotometer (Model UV-1700, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan), and genomic DNA exhibiting a spectrophotometric ratio of 1.8–2 (A260 nm/A280 nm) was used. Genomic DNA of Salmonella strains were diluted in distilled water to 25 ng μL−1.
Genome sequences of Salmonella species
Genome sequences and the sources of the Salmonella strains used in this study have been listed in previous reports (Kim et al., 2006a), and a total of 29 Salmonella genome sequences were used for the current study. Genome-sequencing projects for S. Typhi CT18 (AL513382), S. Typhimurium LT2 (AE006468), S. Typhi Ty2 (AE014613), S. Gallinarum 287/91 (AM933173) and S. Paratyphi A ATCC 9150 (CP000026) have been completed (McClelland et al., 2001, 2004; Parkhill et al., 2001; Deng et al., 2003) and their genomic sequences were obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Additional 24 genome-sequencing projects of Salmonella strains were not yet completed when the study was conducted, but raw sequence data were obtained from the Sanger Institute (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Projects/Salmonella/), Washington University (St. Louis, MO) and the University of Illinois (Champaign, IL). Genome sequences for S. Typhimurium DT104, Typhimurium SL1344, Typhi 17 isolates (Holt et al., 2008), Enteritidis PT4 and S. Bongori 12419 were obtained from the Sanger Institute (Hinxton, Cambridge, UK), Salmonella Dublin, Pullorum were obtained from the University of Illinois (http://www.salmonella.org/genomics/) and Salmonella Diarizonae serovar 61:1,v:1,5,(7) was obtained from the Genome Sequencing Center of the Washington University (http://genome.wustl.edu/genomes/p170).
Comparative genomics of S. Typhi CT18 among Salmonella serovars
A total of 4395 gene sequences (NC_003198.ffn) of S. Typhi CT18 were submitted to the nonredundant(nr) DNA sequence database of the NCBI using the blast program (version 2.2.5) (Altschul et al., 1997). blast outputs that matched the Salmonella genus were eliminated and the highest scored output for each of the 4395 gene sequences was selected. Based on the blast outputs, Salmonella specific-expected genes that had an nr database match score of <40.14 and a matched length of <21 bp were selected and compared with the genomic sequences of 11 Salmonella strains using the blastn program. Specific-expected genes of Typhi were selected based on the comparison pattern.
Primer construction and PCR conditions
A total of 14 primer pairs (Bionics, Seoul, Korea) expected to be specific for S. Typhi were constructed. These primer pairs were used for each genomic DNA from the various Salmonella serovars and 25-μL PCR mixtures were reacted with one sample containing 1 × Ex Taq™ buffer (Mg2+ plus), 0.4 μmol L−1 of each primer, 200 μmol L−1 of dNTP, 0.5 U of Ex Taq DNA polymerase (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan) and 25 ng μL−1 of template DNA. PCR amplification was performed in a thermocycler (Model PC 808, ASTEC, Fukuoka, Japan) with an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for 45 s, annealing temperature according to each primer pair for 30 s, 72 °C for 30 s and finishing with a final extension at 72 °C for 3 min. Amplified products were run on a 1.5% agarose electrophoresis gel in 0.5 × Tris-acetate–EDTA buffer, stained with 0.5 μg mL−1 of ethidium bromide, visualized under UV-irradiation and photographed using a digital camera (COOLPIX 4300, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).
Construction of the internal amplification control (IAC)
The IAC was constructed using the STM3098 gene for the primer pair STM3098-f2, r2 which has been used to detect Salmonella species. The 100-bp artificial oligonucleotide including STM3098-f2, r2 primer sequences was synthesized, and then amplified using PCR for subsequent cloning in the pGEM-T easy vector (Promega, Mannheim, Germany). The sequence of cloned IAC, comprised of the STM3098 gene for specific Salmonella spp., was confirmed by a blast program.
Multiplex PCR of Salmonella
Multiplex PCR was performed using five pairs of primers, which were targeted for Salmonella spp., Salmonella subspecies I, S. Typhimurium, Typhi and Enteritidis, and the design and sequences of the primer pairs are shown in Table 2. The concentrations of reagents in the multiplex PCR for one sample were the same as those mentioned in the previous section, except for the Ex Taq DNA polymerase and primer concentrations: Ex Taq DNA polymerase (1 U), STM3098-f2, r2 (0.1 μmol L−1), STM4057-f, r (0.04 μmol L−1), STM4497M2-f, r (0.6 μmol L−1), STY1599-f, r (0.064 μmol L−1) and IE 2L, 3R (0.32 μmol L−1). PCR mixtures were heated at 94 °C for 3 min and subsequently amplified for 30 cycles, each cycle consisting of 94 °C for 45 s, 67 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s; the 3-min final extension step at 72 °C was followed by holding the mixture at 4 °C using a thermocycler (Model PC 808, ASTEC).
|Primer||Target gene (synonym)||Target||PCR product size (bp)||Primer concentration (μmol L−1)||Sequences||Reference (source)|
|STY1599-f||STY1599||Salmonella Typhi||203||0.064||5′-TTACC CCACA GGAAG CACGC-3′||In this study|
|STY1599-r||5′-CTCGT TCTCT GCCGT GTGGG-3′|
|STM4497M2-f||STM4497||Salmonella Typhimurium||310||0.6||5′-AACAA CGGCT CCGGT AATGA GATTG-3′||In this study|
|STM4497M2-r||5′-ATGAC AAACT CTTGA TTCTG AAGAT CG-3′|
|IE 2L||Salmonella Enteritidis||559||0.32||5′-GGATA AGGGA TCGAT AATTG CTCAC-3′||Wang & Yeh (2002)|
|IE 3R||5′-GGACT TCCAG TTATA GTAGG TGGCC-3′|
|STM4057-f||STM4057||Salmonella subspecies I||137||0.04||5′-GGTGG CCTCG ATGAT TCCCG-3′||Kim et al. (2006a)|
|STM4057-r||5′-CCCAC TTGTA GCGAG CGCCG-3′|
|STM3098-f2||STM3098||Salmonella spp.||423||0.1||5′-TTTGG CGGCG CAGGC GATTC-3′||Kim et al. (2006a)|
|STM3098-r2||5′-GCCTC CGCCT CATCA ATCCG-3′|
Specific gene screening of S. Typhi CT18 using genomic sequence comparison
Among the 4395 genes of serovar Typhi CT18, 195 genes matching a score of <40.14 and a length <21 bp of nucleotides using the nr database based on blast results were selected to screen for the genes that were present only in Salmonella (data not shown). These 195 genes were compared with the previously reported list of S. Typhi genes, which are not present in Escherichia coli (Parkhill et al., 2001), and 172 of the 195 genes (88%) were overlapping.
The 195 selected genes were compared with each genome sequence from 28 Salmonella strains using the blast program, and 35 genes that were expected to be specific to S. Typhi were selected. These 35 genes have been included in previously reported results, and were considered unique to S. Typhi CT18 (Parkhill et al., 2001; Porwollik et al., 2004). Among the 35 genes in this study, 15 genes were included in the Typhi-specific region as reported previously. Among the 195 genes, the STY2042 and STY2046 genes exhibited a Typhi CT18-specific pattern when the Salmonella genomic DNA sequences were compared.
Specific PCR results with S. Typhi
Among the 35 selected genes, 14 primer pairs were constructed and evaluated with various genomic DNAs of Salmonella serovars. The constructed primer pairs did not amplify with non-Salmonella strains, with the exception of the STY4675 primer pairs (data not shown). Most of the constructed primer pairs revealed positive results for S. Typhi, including several Salmonella serovars. In particular, primer pairs for STY1594, STY1599 and STY2020 yielded highly specific amplified results with S. Typhi (Fig. 1; PCR results of STY1594 and STY2020 are not shown). Therefore, in this study, S. Typhi-specific primer pairs were chosen based on their potential utility for the detection and identification of S. Typhi. The results of selected primer pairs showed a relatively high specificity for S. Typhi, Paratyphi C, Paratyphi A and Choleraesuis. These results further confirmed the close genetic proximity between Typhi and Paratyphi A, as reported previously (Chan et al., 2003; McClelland et al., 2004; Porwollik et al., 2004; Liu et al., 2009).
To verify the false-negative PCR results, an IAC was constructed with the primer pair of STM3098-f2, r2. The IAC was coamplified with the target gene using STM3098-f2, r2 primers, resulting in 100-bp (IAC) and 423-bp (target gene) products. We performed the PCR using anywhere from 30 to 300 000 copy numbers of IAC with 25 ng of the target gene to determine the detection limit. The detection limit was achieved at 300 000 copies of IAC for 25 ng of Salmonella genomic DNA (30 cycles of amplification).
Multiplex PCR for Salmonella identification was designed using five primer pairs for Salmonella spp., Salmonella subspecies I, S. Typhimurium, Typhi and Enteritidis as described in Table 2, which includes the primer sequences and products' size. Each primer pair for STM3098-f2, r2, STM4057-f, r, and STM4497M2-f, r, was independently specific to the Salmonella genus, Salmonella subspecies I and S. Typhimurium, respectively, as modified from previous reports (Kim et al., 2006a, b). The primer pair for STY1599 was used as a specific primer for S. Typhi. Sequences of specific primer pairs for S. Enteritidis were obtained from a previous report (Wang & Yeh, 2002). However, this primer pair was also positive for S. Dublin, as shown in Table 1, and consequently might be nonspecific to S. Dublin.
We performed a singlet PCR to confirm the specificity of five primers using various foodborne microorganisms including Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus and others as listed in Table 1. None of these microorganisms yielded a positive response. Before performing the multiplex PCR, single PCRs of each primer pair with S. Typhimurium, Typhi and Enteritidis were conducted (Fig. 2; lanes 1–9) and specific PCR products were obtained. Also, multiplex PCR was reacted with the mixed genomic DNA of Salmonella serovars to evaluate the amplification of five PCR products (Fig. 2; lanes 10–12). Six amplified products are shown with the mixed genomic DNA of S. Typhimurium, Typhi and Enteritidis (Fig. 2; lane 13). The amplified PCR product sizes were 423 bp for Salmonella spp.-specific, 137 bp for Salmonella subspecies I-specific, 310 bp for S. Typhimurium-specific, 203 bp for Typhi-specific, 559 bp for Enteritidis-specific and 100 bp for IAC products.
Multiplex PCR was evaluated with various genomic DNAs from Salmonella including Salmonella subspecies I–VI (Fig. 3 and Table 1). Amplification with the STM3098-f2, r2 primer pair yielded a PCR product of 423 bp size with all Salmonella spp. including subspecies I–VI in lanes 1–14 (Fig. 3). The primer pair for STM4057-f, r yielded only an amplified PCR product of 137 bp with Salmonella subspecies I in lanes 1–8. The primer pairs for STM4497M2-f, r and STY1599-f, r yielded amplified specific PCR products of 310 and 203 bp with Typhimurium and Typhi, respectively (Fig. 3; lanes 1–4). The primer pair for IE 2L, 3R produced an amplified PCR product of 559 bp with Enteritidis (Fig. 3; lane 7).
Identification of S. Typhi using PCR has been reported previously (Song et al., 1993; Hashimoto et al., 1995; Hirose et al., 2002). Primer pairs used in these studies were constructed based on the flagellin gene and the Vi antigen gene of S. Typhi. However, these primers are limited in their ability for the specific detection of S. Typhi because of their sequence similarity between Salmonella serovars. In a previous report, a specific primer pair for S. Typhimurium was obtained using a genomic DNA comparison approach (Kim et al., 2006b). Also, in this study, specific-expected genes of S. Typhi were suggested using genomic sequence comparisons. Using this information, 14 primer pairs were constructed and three primer pairs (STY1594, STY1599 and STY2020) were suggested as specific primers for S. Typhi. The three primer pairs yielded positive reactions for S. Typhi and negative results with other serovars.
A multiplex PCR-based method with three or more pairs of primers has been developed for the simultaneous detection and identification of S. Typhimurium (Lim et al., 2003) and Typhi (Hirose et al., 2002). Until now, these methods were designed to identify a single Salmonella serovar using multiplex PCR. However, in these studies, each primer pair of multiplex PCR was not specific enough to target a Salmonella serovar. Therefore, target Salmonella serovars could only be distinguished based on the pattern of positive and negative results from all primer pairs with multiplex PCR. Also, only relatively few serovars of Salmonella have been used to test the specificity of the primers. In a study by Kim et al. (2006a), a multiplex PCR method including five primer pairs was designed and each of the primer pairs displayed specificity to its own target for Salmonella spp., Salmonella subspecies I, S. Typhimurium, Typhi and Enteritidis (Kim et al., 2006a). These five primer pairs identified Salmonella in stages. First, two primer pairs (STM3098-f2, r2 and STM4057-f, r) yielded a high specificity for Salmonella spp. and Salmonella subspecies I. Next, the other three primer pairs (STM4497M2-f, r, STY1599-f, r and IE 2L, 3R) identified the major pathogenic Salmonella serovars, including Typhimurium, Typhi and Enteritidis. If an unknown sample resulted in two bands at 423 bp (STM3098-f2, r2) and 137 bp (STM4057-f, r) after multiplex PCR, the unknown sample would be identified as Salmonella subspecies I. Therefore, an unknown sample identified by this approach has the potential of being a pathogen for humans and warm-blooded animals. If an unknown sample resulted in three bands at 423, 137 and 203 bp (STY1599-f, r) after multiplex PCR, the unknown sample would be identified as S. Typhi. However, this multiplex PCR method for Salmonella identification needs to be further evaluated with a greater variety of Salmonella serovars in conjunction with other laboratories to demonstrate the accuracy of Salmonella identification in epidemiological and taxonomical studies.
In previous reports, specific primer pairs for S. Typhimurium were suggested and evaluated using a genome sequence comparison approach (Kim et al., 2006b). These results demonstrated that the genome sequence comparison approach is a highly useful tool for identifying for target genes and characterizing the genomic contents of bacteria among closely related bacterial species. Genotyping results and a new identification scheme for Salmonella based on PCR have been suggested (Kim et al., 2006a). Recently, virulotyping and serotype array have also been applied to the identification of Salmonella. Virulotyping can be performed with a 20 virulence-associated genes profile in S. enterica that enables rapid monitoring of emerging pathogenic Salmonella spp. (Khoo et al., 2009). An antibody microarray-based assay that allows parallel analysis of multiple antigens has also been investigated for Salmonella serotyping (Cai et al., 2005). Both methods would contribute to the more rapid and comprehensive identification of Salmonella serovars.
In this study, new target genes specific to S. Typhi were sought using the genomic DNA sequence comparison of Salmonella, and the specificity of these selected target genes was demonstrated using the PCR methodology. Also, a Salmonella identification system including major Salmonella pathogens was designed using a multiplex PCR approach with five primer pairs and evaluated with various Salmonella serovars for the identification of Salmonella spp., Salmonella subspecies I, S. Typhimurium, Typhi and Enteritidis as suggested in identification schemes from previous reports. Salmonella spp. is regarded as a human pathogen and also in domestic animals in both the public and the food industry sectors, and this multiplex PCR method would allow for a rapid and convenient alternative for the identification of Salmonella spp. and major Salmonella pathogens, in these settings, as it can be conducted by nonspecialized laboratories. Also, these results suggest the possibility for a new screening method for specific marker genes and probes using comparative genomic analysis for the detection of pathogens.
We thank Dr Reiner Helmuth and Dr Burkhard Malorny of the Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BFR, Molecular Biology, National Salmonella Reference Laboratory, Germany) and Dr K.H. Seo of US Food and Drug of Administration (FDA, CFSAN/OPDFB) for the kind donation of Salmonella strains.
- 1997) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 3389–3402. , , , , , & (
- 1998) Evolution of host adaptation in Salmonella enterica. Infect Immun 66: 4579–4587. , , & (
- 2005) Development of a novel protein microarray method for serotyping Salmonella enterica strains. J Clin Microbiol 43: 3427–3430. , , , & (
- 2003) Genomic comparison of Salmonella enterica serovars and Salmonella bongori by use of an S. enterica serovar Typhimurium DNA microarray. J Bacteriol 185: 553–563. , , , , & (
- 2003) Prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility of Salmonella isolated from foods in Korea from 1993 to 2001. J Food Protect 66: 1154–1157. , & (
- 2003) Comparative genomics of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi strains Ty2 and CT18. J Bacteriol 185: 2330–2337. , , , , , , , & (
- 2002) Comparative genomics of closely related salmonellae. Trends Microbiol 10: 94–99. , & (
- 1993) Use of ribotyping for characterization of Salmonella serotypes. J Clin Microbiol 31: 233–237. , , , & (
- 1995) Development of nested PCR based on the ViaB sequence to detect Salmonella typhi. J Clin Microbiol 33: 775–777. , , , , , , , & (
- 2002) Selective amplification of tyv (rfbE), prt (rfbS), viaB, and fliC genes by multiplex PCR for identification of Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi and Paratyphi A. J Clin Microbiol 40: 633–636. , , , , , , , , & (
- 2008) High-throughput sequencing provides insights into genome variation and evolution in Salmonella Typhi. Nature Genet 40: 987–993. , , et al. (
- 2000) Automated 5′ nuclease PCR assay for identification of Salmonella enterica. J Clin Microbiol 38: 3429–3435. , & (
- 2009) Virulotyping of Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica isolated from indigenous vegetables and poultry meat in Malaysia using multiplex-PCR. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek DOI: DOI: 10.1007/s10482-009-9358-z. , , , , , , & (
- 2006a) Genomic sequence comparison of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2 with Salmonella genomic sequences, and genotyping of salmonellae using PCR. Appl Environ Microb 72: 6142–6151. , & (
- 2006b) Identification of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium using specific PCR primers obtained by comparative genomics in Salmonella serovars. J Food Protect 69: 1653–1661. , , , , , & (
- 2003) Multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for selective detection of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Jpn J Infect Dis 56: 151–155. , , , , , , , , & (
- 2009) Salmonella paratyphi C: genetic divergence from Salmonella choleraesuis and pathogenic convergence with Salmonella typhi. PLoS ONE 4: e4510. DOI: DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004510. , , et al. (
- 2003) Multicenter validation of the analytical accuracy of Salmonella PCR: towards an international standard. Appl Environ Microb 69: 290–296. , , & (
- 2001) Complete genome sequence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2. Nature 413: 852–856. , , et al. (
- 2004) Comparison of genome degradation in Paratyphi A and Typhi, human-restricted serovars of Salmonella enterica that cause typhoid. Nat Genet 36: 1268–1274. , , et al. (
- 2004) Towards the development of a DNA-sequence based approach to serotyping of Salmonella enterica. BMC Microbiol 4: 31. , , , & (
- 2002) Characterization of Salmonella serovars by PCR-single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. J Clin Microbiol 40: 2346–2351. , , & (
- 2001) Complete genome sequence of a multiple drug resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi CT18. Nature 413: 848–852. , , et al. (
- 2001) Antigenic Formulas of the Salmonella Serovars, 8th Revision. WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Salmonella. Institute Pasteur, Paris, France. (
- 2003) Supplement 2001 (no. 45) to the Kauffmann–White scheme. Res Microbiol 154: 173–174. , & (
- 2002) Evolutionary genomics of Salmonella: gene acquisitions revealed by microarray analysis. P Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 8956–8961. , & (
- 2004) Characterization of Salmonella enterica subspecies I genovers by use of microarrays. J Bacteriol 186: 5883–5898. , , , , , & (
- 2004) Rapid, specific detection of Salmonella enteritidis in pooled eggs by real-time PCR. J Food Protect 67: 864–869. , , & (
- 1993) Detection of Salmonella typhi in the blood of patients with typhoid fever by polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 31: 1439–1443. , , , , & (
- 2004) Population structure of Salmonella investigated by amplified fragment length polymorphism. J Appl Microbiol 97: 566–573. & (
- 2002) Designing of polymerase chain reaction primers for the detection of Salmonella enteritidis in foods and faecal samples. Lett Appl Microbiol 34: 422–427. & (