SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • Mycobacterium ulcerans;
  • Buruli ulcer;
  • real-time PCR;
  • Ashanti region;
  • environmental samples;
  • small mammals

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results and discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References

This study reports the first successful application of real-time PCR for the detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans, the causative agent of Buruli ulcer (BU), in Ghana, a BU-endemic country. Environmental samples and organs of small mammals were analyzed. The real-time PCR assays confirmed the presence of M. ulcerans in a water sample collected in a BU-endemic village in the Ashanti Region.


Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results and discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References

Mycobacterium ulcerans is the causative agent of Buruli ulcer (BU), a severe disease of the skin (Portaels, 1995; Portaels et al., 2009). The disease is mainly endemic in Central and West Africa, where it affects mostly poor rural communities (Portaels, 1995; Debacker et al., 2004). Epidemiological evidence strongly associates BU with aquatic ecosystems and M. ulcerans is considered an environmental pathogen (Portaels, 1995; Stinear et al., 2007). However, its reservoir and mode(s) of transmission are not yet determined (Duker et al., 2006). Presently, detection of M. ulcerans in the environment is based on demonstrating by PCR the presence of IS2404 (Ross et al., 1997), an insertion sequence with >200 copies in M. ulcerans (Stinear et al., 2007). IS2404 has been identified in water, fish, aquatic insects, detritus, leeches, crustaceans, molluscs, and mosquitoes (Portaels et al., 1999; Eddyani et al., 2004; Kotlowski et al., 2004; Johnson et al., 2007), indicating that M. ulcerans is probably present in such samples. However, other closely related Mycobacterium species including Mycobacterium liflandii, Mycobacterium Pseudoshottsii, and mycolactone-producing Mycobacterium marinum strains (Stinear et al., 1999; Stragier et al., 2007) have been found to harbor IS2404. Thus, the conventional IS2404 PCR assay cannot be relied upon for the specific detection of M. ulcerans.

In order to increase specificity, facilitate rapid analysis of specimens, and to interpret the results of both environmental and clinical specimens with certainty, Fyfe et al. (2007) developed two TaqMan Multiplex real-time PCR assays targeting three independent repeated sequences in the M. ulcerans genome, two multicopy insertion sequences (IS2404, IS2606), and a multicopy sequence encoding the ketoreductase B domain (KR-B). These real-time PCR assays quantify the copy number of the targets, allowing the differentiation of M. ulcerans from other IS2404-containing mycobacteria. Moreover, the assay allows for the control of PCR inhibitors such as humic and fulvic acids, commonly present in environmental samples.

In spite of its advantages for the analysis of clinical and environmental samples (high throughput, high sensitivity and specificity, less prone to contamination, and inhibition control), facilities for real-time PCR are available only in a few research laboratories in West-African BU-endemic countries, including Ghana. However, swift analysis of environmental samples could be crucial in the search for the M. ulcerans reservoir. Therefore, the current study describes the first application of real-time PCR for the detection of M. ulcerans in environmental samples at the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research (NMIMR) in Accra, Ghana. Both the acquisition of these technologies through international technology transfer and their diffusion will foster effective technological change as follow-on innovation and adaptation occurs.

Materials and methods

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results and discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References

The real-time PCR assays were carried out as described by Fyfe et al. (2007). Briefly, IS2404/internal positive control (IPC) mixtures contained 1 μL of template DNA, 0.9 μM of each primer, 0.25 μM of the probe, 1 × TaqMan® Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA), and TaqMan exogenous IPC reagents (Applied Biosystems) in a total volume of 25 μL. IS2606/KR assays were preformed on IS2404-positive samples in a similar multiplex way without IPC. Detection was performed on a 7300 real-time PCR System (Applied Biosystems) using the following thermal profile: one cycle of 50 °C for 2 min, one cycle of 95 °C for 10 min, and 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min. Triplicate positive/negative PCR controls, positive/negative extraction controls, and fluorescence controls were included in each assay. A UNG enzyme step (50 °C for 2 min) ensured hydrolysis of all single-stranded and double-stranded contaminating PCR products. Cycle threshold (CT) values >40 cycles were considered negative.

The sensitivities of the IS2404/IPC and the IS2606/KR multiplex assays achieved in this setting were compared with the values described by Fyfe et al. (2007) by performing real-time PCR on serial dilutions of purified M. ulcerans DNA. Like Fyfe et al. (2007), our assays reliably detected two copies of IS2404, nine copies of IS2606, and 1.5 to three copies of KR. We studied the effects of postponing a run of a prepared reaction plate on assay sensitivities in a similar way by keeping prepared plates at 4–8 °C for a period of >12 h before real-time PCR analysis was carried out, simulating the effects of a possible power cut before analysis could be started. This delay in analysis did not alter the sensitivities of the assays in any way.

Results and discussion

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results and discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References

Pooled organs of 62 small mammals (36 Praomys spp., 10 Mastomys spp., five Lemniscomys spp., three Lophuromys spp., four Crocidura spp. and four Mus spp.) caught in houses and around water bodies of a BU-endemic village (Ananekrom, in the Ashanti Region of Ghana; Fig. 1) as described before (Durnez et al., 2008) were analyzed after DNA extraction using the modified Boom method (Boom et al., 1990; Durnez et al., 2009). Although none of the PCR reactions were inhibited, IS2404 was not detected in any of the specimens.

image

Figure 1.  The collection sites in the Ashanti Region, Ghana. Dukusen, Nshyieso, Serebouso, Ananekrom, and Bebouso are BU high endemic villages; Mageda and Pataban are BU nonendemic villages. The BU hospital is located in Agogo.

Download figure to PowerPoint

A total of 148 environmental samples (13 water samples, 45 detritus samples, 45 trunk biofilm, and 45 plant biofilm samples) collected from water bodies near five BU endemic villages (n=117) and two BU nonendemic villages (n=31) (Fig. 1) were also analyzed. Although the DNA extraction procedure included a purification step using diatomaceous earth, reactions in 50 of the 148 environmental specimens were inhibited as they had CT values of the IPC three cycles higher than the nontemplate controls. These inhibited samples were successfully reanalyzed with a newly developed environmental master mix adapted for real-time PCR-based detection in the presence of high levels of common environmental inhibitors (Applied Biosystems, TaqMan® Environmental Master Mix 2.0, ref. 4396838). Three samples (2.0%) were positive for IS2404, with CT values of 36.31, 38.45, and 37.95, respectively (Table 1). Of the three positive samples, only the water sample from Nshyieso also tested positive for IS2606 and KR, with a ΔCT (IS2606-IS2404) value of 1.96 (Table 1), suggesting that M. ulcerans DNA was detected and not DNA from other IS2404-containing mycobacteria that are known to have higher ΔCT values (Fyfe et al., 2007). The CT (IS2404) values of the other two IS2404-positive samples were higher than the sample that did contain IS2606 and KR, suggesting that the failure to detect KR and IS2606 was caused by a low DNA concentration, which is consistent with known differences in copy number per cell.

Table 1. CT values of environmental samples with positive real-time PCR results
LocalityBU endemicitySampleCT (IS2404)CT (IS2606)CT (KR-B)ΔCT (IS2606-IS2404)
  1. ND, not detected; NA, not applicable.

NshyiesoHighWater36.3138.2737.61.96
SerebousoHighTrunk biofilm38.45NDNDNA
PatabanLowPlant biofilm37.95NDNDNA

As such, we were only successful in showing that one sample (1/148; 0.6%) contained enough DNA to detect M. ulcerans. Our detection rate of M. ulcerans DNA differs considerably from the higher proportions described in a recent environmental study (Williamson et al., 2008) performed in Ghana. Possible reasons for these discrepant results are: differing collection sites, collection during dissimilar seasons, and the analysis of different specimen types. Besides these reasons, the possibility of cross-contamination should not be disregarded.

The development of a suite of assays targeting multiple regions in the M. ulcerans genome enables a more sensitive and specific detection of this pathogen. Furthermore, the use of real-time PCR assays in BU-endemic countries for the detection of M. ulcerans could potentially increase chances of cultivating this pathogen from the environment, which has been shown to be very difficult (Portaels et al., 2008), as PCR-positive samples can be cultured locally, without a loss in the viability of the organism because of transport to the country where analysis is performed. Additionally, environmental specimens can now be analyzed in a high-throughput approach with much greater confidence and with a reduced risk of false positives due to contamination. Furthermore, following the recent decline of real-time PCR consumable prices, the cost of real-time PCR analysis is comparable with that of conventional gel-based PCR.

However, the availability of basic laboratory facilities and a real-time thermocycler still remain prerequisites before application is feasible. Moreover, when applying this assay (as with all PCR-based assays), special care needs to be taken to avoid contamination, such as physical separation of pre- and post-PCR laboratories and extensive training of the laboratory staff.

In conclusion, the fluorescence-based real-time PCR assays for the detection of M. ulcerans were successfully adapted and applied at NMIMR. Although the reagents as well as the thermocycler used in the present study differed from those used by Fyfe et al. (2007), both studies achieved comparable sensitivities, even after a delay in the analysis of a prepared plate. The study also confirmed the presence of M. ulcerans in a water body in a BU-endemic area in the Ashanti region. The application of these real-time PCR assays in BU-endemic countries will thus contribute to improved studies on the environmental reservoir of M. ulcerans.

Acknowledgements

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results and discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References

This research was supported by the Flemish Interuniversity Council, the Directorate-General for Development Cooperation (Brussels, Belgium), and the UBS OPTIMUS Foundation ‘Stop Buruli’ project (Zurich, Switzerland). We are grateful to Dr Janet Fyfe and Dr Caroline Lavender (VIDRL) for hosting and assisting K.V. in Melbourne. We thank our laboratory staff for their excellent technical assistance, all field staff for their support during the field work, and the Virology Department of NMIMR for the use of the real-time PCR machine and laboratory facilities.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. Materials and methods
  5. Results and discussion
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. References
  • Boom R, Sol CJ, Salimans MM, Jansen CL, Wertheim-van Dillen PM & Van Der Noordaa J (1990) Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids. J Clin Microbiol 28: 495503.
  • Debacker M, Aguiar J, Steunou C et al. (2004) Mycobacterium ulcerans disease (Buruli ulcer) in rural hospital, Southern Benin, 1997–2001. Emerg Infect Dis 10: 13911398.
  • Duker AA, Portaels F & Hale M (2006) Pathways of Mycobacterium ulcerans infection: a review. Environ Int 32: 567573.
  • Durnez L, Eddyani M, Mgode GF et al. (2008) First detection of mycobacteria in African rodents and insectivores, using stratified pool screening. Appl Environ Microb 74: 768773.
  • Durnez L, Stragier P, Roebben K, Ablordey A, Leirs H & Portaels F (2009) A comparison of DNA extraction procedures for the detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans, the causative agent of Buruli ulcer, in clinical and environmental specimens. J Microbiol Meth 76: 152158.
  • Eddyani M, Ofori-Adjei D, Teugels G, De Weirdt D, Boakye D, Meyers WM & Portaels F (2004) Potential role for fish in transmission of Mycobacterium ulcerans disease (Buruli ulcer): an environmental study. Appl Environ Microb 70: 56795681.
  • Fyfe JA, Lavender CJ, Johnson PD, Globan M, Sievers A, Azuolas J & Stinear TP (2007) Development and application of two multiplex real-time PCR assays for the detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans in clinical and environmental samples. Appl Environ Microb 73: 47334740.
  • Johnson PD, Azuolas J, Lavender CJ et al. (2007) Mycobacterium ulcerans in mosquitoes captured during outbreak of Buruli ulcer, southeastern Australia. Emerg Infect Dis 13: 16531660.
  • Kotlowski R, Martin A, Ablordey A, Chemlal K, Fonteyne PA & Portaels F (2004) One-tube cell lysis and DNA extraction procedure for PCR-based detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans in aquatic insects, molluscs and fish. J Med Microbiol 53: 927933.
  • Portaels F (1995) Epidemiology of mycobacterial diseases. Mycobacterial Diseases of the Skin (SchusterM, ed), pp. 207222. Elsevier Science Inc., New York, NY.
  • Portaels F, Elsen P, Guimaraes-Peres A, Fonteyne PA & Meyers WM (1999) Insects in the transmission of Mycobacterium ulcerans infection. Lancet 353: 986.
  • Portaels F, Meyers WM, Ablordey A et al. (2008) First cultivation and characterization of Mycobacterium ulcerans from the environment. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2: e178.
  • Portaels F, Silva MT & Meyers WM (2009) Buruli ulcer. Clin Dermatol 27: 291305.
  • Ross BC, Marino L, Oppedisano F, Edwards R, Robins-Browne RM & Johnson PD (1997) Development of a PCR assay for rapid diagnosis of Mycobacterium ulcerans infection. J Clin Microbiol 35: 16961700.
  • Stinear T, Ross BC, Davies JK et al. (1999) Identification and characterization of IS2404 and IS2606: two distinct repeated sequences for detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans by PCR. J Clin Microbiol 37: 10181023.
  • Stinear TP, Seemann T, Pidot S et al. (2007) Reductive evolution and niche adaptation inferred from the genome of Mycobacterium ulcerans, the causative agent of Buruli ulcer. Genome Res 17: 192200.
  • Stragier P, Ablordey A, Durnez L & Portaels F (2007) VNTR analysis differentiates Mycobacterium ulcerans and IS2404 positive mycobacteria. Syst Appl Microbiol 30: 525530.
  • Williamson HR, Benbow ME, Nguyen KD et al. (2008) Distribution of Mycobacterium ulcerans in Buruli ulcer endemic and non-endemic aquatic sites in Ghana. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2: e205.