SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Keywords:

  • mycoparasitism;
  • environmental opportunism;
  • chitinases;
  • cellulases;
  • small secreted cysteine-rich proteins;
  • proteases

Abstract

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. The Trichoderma secretome
  5. Concluding remarks
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. Statement
  8. References

Mycotrophic species of Trichoderma are among the most common fungi isolated from free soil, dead wood and as parasites on sporocarps of other fungi (mycoparasites). In addition, they undergo various other biotrophic associations ranging from rhizosphere colonization and endophytism up to facultative pathogenesis on such animals as roundworms and humans. Together with occurrence on a variety of less common substrata (marine invertebrates, artificial materials, indoor habitats), these lifestyles illustrate a wealthy opportunistic potential of the fungus. One tropical species, Trichoderma reesei, has become a prominent producer of cellulases and hemicellulases, whereas several other species are applied in agriculture for the biological control of phytopathogenic fungi. The sequencing of the complete genomes of the three species (T. reesei, T. virens, and T. atroviride) has led to a deepened understanding of Trichoderma lifestyle and its molecular physiology. In this review, we present the in silico predicted secretome of Trichoderma, and – in addition to the unique features of carbohydrate active enzymes – demonstrate the importance of such protein families as proteases, oxidative enzymes, and small cysteine-rich proteins, all of that received little attention in Trichoderma genetics so far. We also discuss the link between Trichoderma secretome and biology of the fungus.


Introduction

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. The Trichoderma secretome
  5. Concluding remarks
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. Statement
  8. References

Trichoderma1 (teleomorph Hypocrea, Ascomycota, Dikarya) species are among the most common fungi frequently isolated as saprotrophs from free soil, soil litter, dead wood and rhizhosphere. Most of Trichoderma species are mycotrophs as they grow on the mature sporophores of other fungi (necrotrophic mycoparasitism), yet some (e.g., H. jecorina/T. reesei) are also found on decaying wood, often in close proximity to other fungi (Druzhinina et al., 2011). In addition, they are found on a panopticon of other substrata, including xenobiotically infested soil, kerosene tanks in aircrafts, and indoor building walls (Klein et al., 1998). Finally, Trichoderma spp. undergo various biotrophic associations ranging from rhizosphere colonization and endophytism up to facultative pathogenesis on such animals as roundworms and humans (Druzhinina et al., 2011). This multitude of ecological niches illustrates the successful strategies for environmental opportunism and competition for habitats.

Two of these properties have brought Trichoderma into a broad interest: first, a single available wild-type strain of T. reesei has become the progenitor of a multitude of mutants that are contemporarily used in biotechnological industry for the production of cellulases and hemicellulases that are applied for food and feed, textile, and particularly for biofuel production (Kubicek, 2012a). Second, the ability to antagonize, parasitize on or even kill other fungi has initially been the reason for exploitation of some species (especially T. harzianum sensu lato, T. atroviride (H. atroviridis), T. virens (H. virens), T. asperellum, and T. asperelloides) for the biological control (biocontrol) of phytopathogenic fungi in the field (Harman et al., 2004). The more recent discovery that some of these fungi can also establish themselves in rhizosphere, stimulate plant growth, and elicit plant defense reactions led to an additional boost in research on the application of Trichoderma as biofertilizer (Harman, 2011).

All the above-mentioned ecological traits of Trichoderma require, among others, the secretion of proteins for breaking down the polymeric organic molecules into a form that can be absorbed. In addition, they also secrete proteins that can act as toxins or signals for communication with mutualistic partners. It is clear that the vital property of any opportunist including Trichoderma is a successful combination of a superior ability to degrade multiple polymers and to associate (in a broad sense) with other (micro)organisms. Therefore, the inventory of secretome of an organism may reveal its potential ecological adaptations.

Recently, the genomes of the three Trichoderma species (T. reesei, T. virens, and T. atroviride) have been sequenced by DOE JGI (Joint Genome Institute, http://genome.jgi.doe.gov, Grigoriev et al., 2011) and annotated (Martinez et al., 2008; Kubicek et al., 2011). In this review, we describe the composition and properties of the in silico predicted secretome of Trichoderma and explain how the respective findings add to our understanding of the molecular physiology and ecology of the fungus.

The Trichoderma secretome

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. The Trichoderma secretome
  5. Concluding remarks
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. Statement
  8. References

The secretome of an organism can be predicted from its protein sequences by in silico tools (e.g., SignalP Petersen et al., 2011; http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/) that screen for a signal sequence at the N-terminus used to move it into the endoplasmic reticulum for post-translational processing and ultimate secretion. Lists of such Trichoderma proteins can be retrieved from the Sordariomycetes page of the MycoCosm portal of DOE JGI (http://genome.jgi.doe.gov/sordariomycetes/sordariomycetes.info.html). When the probability of the signal peptide presence is setup for 95% (< 0.05), secretomes of T. reesei, T. atroviride, and T. virens are defined by 826, 1030, and 1096 putative proteins, respectively. However, not all of them are truly excreted into the medium, but may stay in the endoplasmic reticulum or are transferred to vacuole or plasma membranes. Therefore, we applied the TMHMM Server v2.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/) to predict transmembrane helices in proteins, ProtComp, v8.0 (http://linux1.softberry.com/) and WolfPsort (http://wolfpsort.org/) both designed to predict the subcellular localization for animal or fungal proteins to remove these proteins. So, 747, 968, and 947 proteins of T. reesei, T. atroviride, and T. virens, respectively, were predicted as secreted through the plasma membrane (Table 1). Enzymes acting on poly- and oligosaccharides (carbohydrate active enzymes or CAZymes), small secreted cysteine-rich proteins (SSCPs), and ‘unknown proteins’ (i.e., orthologs for which in other ascomycetes have no function identified yet) comprised > 60% of the secretome of all three species (as determined in July 2012). Enzymes with hydrolytic activity on other polymers (proteases, lipases, nucleases, and phosphatases) and orphan proteins (i.e., proteins that have either no orthologs or only in other Trichoderma species) were present in lower numbers (as for July 2012). Interestingly, a small number of proteins were identified as enzymes that require molecular oxygen as substrate (flavoprotein monooxygenases, copper radical oxidases, cytochrome P450 oxidoreductases) and enzymes acting on hydrogen peroxide and superoxide (Table 1).

Table 1. Composition of the predicted secretome of Trichoderma
  T. reesei T. atroviride T. virens
Total genes914311 86512 518
Genes with signal peptide82610301096
Extracellular proteins747968947
Glycosyl hydrolases (GH)114140139
Proteases618163
Oxidases243228
SSCPs174258250
Unknown genes213264253
Orphan genes507863
Other genes111115151

Oligonucleotide array data are so far available only for T. reesei, but a comparison of the predicted secretome with the genes expressed under a variety of conditions such as growth on cellulose and lactose or in presence/absence of light (Ivanova et al., 2012; Arvas et al., 2011; Tisch et al., 2012) reveals that 560 of the 672 genes that encode secretory proteins are indeed expressed. The nontranscribed 17% of genes of T. reesei are evenly distributed among all the groups described earlier (Table 1). Notably, proteomic studies related to cellulase and hemicellulase formation in T. reesei have so far described a much smaller number of secreted proteins (cf. Herpoël-Gimbert et al., 2009; Jun et al., 2011; Adav et al., 2011; for review see Kubicek, 2012a). In the most comprehensive analysis to date (Adav et al., 2011), 50 cellulases, hemicellulases, and cellulase-accessory proteins, respectively, were identified, which make up less than half of the 122 CAZymes that are predicted to be secreted. It is possible that many of these proteins are secreted under in vitro (but maybe also in vivo) only in low amounts so that they remain undetected by experimental methods, or that many of them are proteins that are either part of the cell wall or remain bound to it.

Adav et al. (2011) also detected the presence of several of the proteins that perform an oxidative attack on extracellular substrates (cytochrome P450 monooxygenases, FAD-dependent enzymes etc.).

Two proteomic studies (Jun et al., 2011; Adav et al., 2011) also detected several enzymes of intermediary metabolism (such as dehydrogenases) in the culture filtrate. While their presence could be due to autolysis or mycelial fragmentation (Kubicek, 2012a), several of such enzymes were also predicted as secreted. The biological role of their secretion, if it indeed occurs, remains unknown.

Degrading fungal cell wall polysaccharides

Trichoderma does not degrade lignin; thus, the majority of the polymers that it may target in its environment are polysaccharides. As a tribute to this, glycosyl hydrolases (GH) make up for about 15% of the Trichoderma secretome and comprise 122 of the 200 predicted CAZymes (Martinez et al., 2008). While similar trend is also seen in other fungi, a comparative analysis reveals the abundance of genes encoding chitin- and ß-glucan degrading enzymes, in which Trichoderma (particularly the vigorous mycoparasites T. virens and T. atroviride) outnumber other fungi (Fig. 1). A reason for this may be deduced when one considers that the structural scaffold of the fungal cell wall is composed of chitin – a β-(1,4)-linked N-acetylglucosamine polymer – and β-(1,3)-glucan, which are together embedded in the amorphous fraction of α-glucans, galactomannans, and other carbohydrate polymers (Latgé, 2007). The enhancement of the gene inventory for the degradation of these polymers is therefore in accordance with the mycotrophic nature of Trichoderma. This is also reflected in T. reesei, which is a weaker mycoparasite compared to T. atroviride or T. virens, although it is capable to attack other fungi (Druzhinina et al., 2010). The chitinases have recently been described in detail by Seidl (2008) and Gruber & Seidl-Seiboth (2012). Besides chitin, the second fibrillar polymer in fungal cell walls is β-(1,3)-glucan (Latgé, 2007). β-(1,3)-glucanases have so far been described for GH families 16, 55, 64, and 81. An increased numbers of GH enzymes from families 55 and 64 were also found in T. atroviride and T. virens compared to other filamentous fungi (Kubicek et al., 2011). Because some of the β-(1,3)-glucan also contains β-(1,6) branches, β-(1,6)-glucanases are also present. Their deduction from GH families is more difficult; however, they are found in GH5 and GH30, but members of both of these families have different activities ranging from mannosidases to cellulases and xylosidases (for details, see Carbohydrate-Active enZYmes Database at http://www.cazy.org).

image

Figure 1. Amplification of chitinases, chitosanases, and ß-glucanases in Trichoderma. The numbers indicate genes. Generic names for fungi are as follows: T. for Trichoderma, A. for Aspergillus, S. for Sclerotinia, B. for Botryotinia, M. for Magnaporthe, G. for Gibberella, N. for Neurospora, and P. for Podospora, respectively.

Download figure to PowerPoint

While an important role of chitinases and ß-glucanases appears logical in terms of the necessity of Trichoderma to break up the wall of other fungi in mycotrophy, it is remarkable that the corresponding genes are not induced during confrontation with Rhizoctonia solani (Thanatephorus spp.). Only the GH16 endo-ß-1,3/1,4-glucanases of Tatroviride is significantly upregulated during this process (L. Atanasova, C.P. Kubicek, I.S. Druzhinina, unpublished).

Proteases

Our analysis reveals that Trichoderma may have one of the largest sets of proteases among fungi (as predicted with use of the peptidase database MEROPS http://merops.sanger.ac.uk, Rawlings et al., 2012). Indeed, the total numbers of predicted proteases are 383 (4.2% of all predicted protein coding genes), 445 (3.75%), and 479 (3.85%) in T. reesei, T. atroviride, and T. virens, respectively. Roughly, around 20% of the deduced Trichoderma proteases possess a signal peptide and are therefore entering the secretory pathway. The dominant groups were aspartyl proteases, serine proteases, subtilisin-like proteases, dipeptidyl and tripeptidyl peptidases (Table 2). The number of representatives of most of the secreted protease families is nearly the same between the species, but several families, such as the subtilisin-like proteases of the S8 family, dipeptidyl (S9) and tripeptidyl peptidases (S33), are expanded in T. virens and T. atroviride compared to T. reesei (Kubicek et al., 2011). An interesting exception, however, was the alkaline serine proteases that are present in T. atroviride, of which only one had orthologs in T. reesei and T. virens.

Table 2. Proteolytic enzymes in the Trichoderma secretomea
Active amino acid residueNumberFamily A. fumigatus T. reesei T. atroviride T. virens
  1. a

    Where two numbers are given, the first number is based on intact MEROPS output and the number in brackets specifies those that remained after manual removal of doubtful predictions.

AspartateA1Aspartyl proteases717 (15)19 (16)17 (15)
CysteineC01APapain type  1 
C13Legumin family  11
GlutamateG1Aspergillopepsin3151
Metal ionM01Aminopeptidase N   1
M12ADAM family of metalloproteases2 11
M14Metallocarboxypeptidase1444
M18Aminopeptidase 1 type1111
M20AGlutamatecarboxypeptidase type3434
M24Methionyl aminopeptidase 13776
M28Aminopeptidase S5777
M35Deuterolysin2111
M36Fungalysin1111
M38Isoaspartyl dipeptidase  1 
M43Cytophagalysin family1 1 
SerineS01AChymotrypsin 112
S8Subtilisin211 (10)15 (13)15 (13)
S9BDipeptidyl peptidase412 (9)14 (10)21 (15)
S10Carboxypeptidase Y11343
S12D-Ala-D-Ala-carboxypeptidase B 213
S33Prolyl aminopeptidase 5 (4)9 (5)10 (7)
S41Serine endopeptidase1   
S51Dipeptidase E 1 1
S53Sedolisin63117
ThreonineT03γ-glutamyl transferase 112

It is also striking that, despite the rather similar total number of protease families in the three Trichoderma spp., about 75% of them did not contain orthologs in the other two species and were thus unique. This phenomenon was most strongly reflected in the dipeptidyl peptidases, which shared no orthologs at all, and the least expressed in the aminopeptidases, which consisted of 80% orthologs.

A comparison of secreted proteases of Trichoderma with those of dermatophytic fungi (Burmester et al., 2011) shows the similarity in the enlargement of four M14 metallopeptidases and the S8 subtilisin family. In addition, the S33 serine proteases displayed in the Trichoderma secretome are mostly not secreted in other fungi.

This unique pattern of expanded and secreted protease families likely offers an advantage to opportunistic Trichoderma species. Thus, recent transcriptomic studies (Seidl et al., 2009) showed that the attack of R. solani (as a model prey) by T. reesei, T. atroviride, and T. virens was accompanied by the expression of various families of extracellular proteases and transporters for oligopeptides and amino acids. While some proteases from Trichoderma (mainly T. harzianum) had been implicated previously as involved in mycoparasitism (for review see Benítez et al., 2004), these mostly comprised aspartyl proteases, subtilisin-like proteases, and the alkaline protease Prl1 (the latter only in T. atroviride; see above). In contrast, transcriptomic analysis identified – besides the two mentioned groups – also the involvement of dipeptidyl- and tripeptidyl peptidases and metalloproteases (L Atanasova, CP Kubicek, IS Druzhinina, unpublished). We speculate that the diversity of these proteases may form a synergistic system for the efficient use of proteins by Trichoderma.

This amplified arsenal of proteases may not only be needed for the attack of other fungi, but also be involved in the interaction with nematodes and human tissues by respective species (T. longibrachiatum and its close genetic neighbors). Sharon et al. (2001) demonstrated improved nematode antagonism in a T. cf. harzianum strain, in which the alkaline protease gene PLR1 has been overexpressed. A ‘serine protease’ from T. pseudokoningii SMF2 was recently shown to have nematocidal activity killing juveniles and inhibiting egg hatching of the plant parasitic nematode Meloidogyne incognita (Chen et al., 2009). Similarly, proteases are the key virulence determinants produced by entomopathogenic fungi Metarhizium anisopliae and Beauveria bassiana (Cordyceps bassiana) during pathogenesis, and strains overexpressing protease Pr1A are being developed as alternatives to chemical insecticides (Schrank & Vainstein, 2010). In addition, various proteases have been implicated in virulence by fungi pathogenic to warm-blooded animals including humans such as Aspergillus fumigatus (Neosartorya fumigate), Candida albicans, or Microsporum canis, although the results are still controversial (Monod et al., 2002; Monod, 2008; Burmester et al., 2011). In the amphibian pathogenic chytrid, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, significant lineage-specific expansions in three protease families (metallo-, serine-type, and aspartyl proteases) were found to have occurred during transition from its nonpathogenic ancestor (Joneson et al., 2011).

Degradation of plant biomass

Trichoderma reesei QM 6a, a fungus originally isolated as ‘Trichoderma viride’ during World War II at Guadalcanal on the Solomon Islands, is the progenitor of a plethora of high cellulases producing mutant strains. Nevertheless, the leading position of Treesei in cellulase production has recently been questioned by the findings that its genome contains only a small repertoire of genes encoding cellulases and hemicellulases (Martinez et al., 2008) when compared to several other fungi. Yet, a more detailed comparison with inclusion of the two other Trichoderma spp. shows that this generalization is only partially true (Table 3): the number of different cellulase components including the class 1 cellulose binding domains (CBM1) in Trichoderma is in the same range as found in other Pezizomycotina. Trichoderma spp., however, have much less GH61 polysaccharide monooxygenases. They dramatically increase cellulose hydrolysis by cellulase mixtures in a metal-ion-dependent way (Harris et al., 2010). Phillips et al. (2011) showed that the N. crassa polysaccharide monooxygenases display different regiospecificities on the cellulose chain resulting in oxidized products modified at either the reducing or nonreducing end of the glucan chain. In Ncrassa, the electron transfer necessary for their action comes from cellobiose dehydrogenase. This is interesting because Trichoderma – while showing the enhancement of cellulase hydrolysis by the addition of the GH61 proteins (Harris et al., 2010) has no obvious ortholog of cellobiose dehydrogenase (C.P. Kubicek, unpublished data). Yet, Treesei culture filtrates can oxidize cellulose (Szakmary et al., 1991), and it must therefore possess alternative systems for electron transfer, identification of which is clearly a point for further studies.

Table 3. Members of CAZymes families containing cellulases, cellulose monooxygenase, and cellulose binding proteins in Trichoderma spp. and other Pezizomycotinaa
 GH1GH3GH5GH6GH7GH12GH45GH61CBM1Total
  1. a

    Enzymes occurring in the listed GH families include the following: GH1, GH3: various ß-glycosidases, including ß-glucosidases, ß-mannosidases and ß-xylosidases; GH5: endo-ß-glycanases including endo-glucanases and endo-mannanases; GH6: cellobiohydrolase CEL6A; GH7: cellobiohydrolase, CEL7A and endo-ß-1,4-glucanase CEL7B; GH12, GH45: endo-ß-1,4-glucanases; GH61, cellulose monooxygenase; CBM1: cellulose binding domain type 1.

Trichoderma reesei 21311122131550
Trichoderma virens 21716124232370
Trichoderma atroviride 41414123131961
Gibberella zeae 322151241151275
Magnaporthe grisea 219133631172286
Neurospora crassa 1973511141960
Aspergillus nidulans 3211623119763
Aspergillus niger 3171022407853
Podospora anserina 1111546223328102
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum 31314135291969
Botryotinia fuckeliana 31615124291870

A comparison of the hemicellulase diversity also contradicts the generalization of the ‘poor enzyme inventory’: when again compared to other fungi, all three Trichoderma spp. are enriched in several hemicellulolytic components, such as GH27 α-galactosidases, GH54 α-arabinofuranosidases/ß-xylosidases, GH67 and GH79 α-methyl-glucuronidases, GH95 α-fucosidases, and GH30 glucuronyl-xylanases. However, it is also clear that Trichoderma is short in enzymes degrading arabinan and ß-mannan and most strikingly in enzymes degrading pectin: while all three Trichoderma spp. have GH28 pectin hydrolases and GH78 rhamnogalacturonases, they completely lack pectin, pectate, and rhamnogalacturonan hydrolases, and also – except for CE8 pectin methylesterases – lack all esterases acting on pectin. In most of these cases, T. reesei shows a tendency of having one or more genes less than T. atroviride and T. virens. This can be partially referred to the operation of repeat-induced point mutation (RIP), a gene silencing mechanism that occurs in sexually reproducing fungi (Selker, 1990; Kubicek et al., 2011).

What do these differences between Trichoderma and other fungi tell about the biology of the fungus? The inventory of cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic enzymes described earlier is consistent with an organism that does not directly attack lignocellulose, but rather feeds on the predigested cellulose and particular hemicelluloses (xylan, arabinan, galactan). The expanded GHs are particularly necessary to cleave bonds to side chain substituents within XXGG-type xyloglucans, rhamnogalacturonan I, cereal arabinoxylans, and hardwood glucuronoxylans – polymers that surround the cellulose in the plant cell wall (Kubicek, 2012b). Interestingly, we have recently observed that the tropical Treesei enhances the induction of its whole cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic arsenal when facing a temperate Rsolani that is a very unlikely prey/host for this species in nature, whereas such response is not observed with Tatroviride or Tvirens (L. Atanasova, C.P. Kubicek, I.S. Druzhinina, unpublished). The presence of a basidiomycete fungus may thus signal the availability of predigested plant biomass to Treesei, a finding fully in accordance with the hypothesis that this species became a saprotroph by following basidiomycetes into their habitat (Rossmann et al., 1999).

Yet, the Trichoderma secretome also contains a number of oxidative enzymes, whose function has not yet been investigated, but may contribute to plant biomass degradation. These include glucose oxidases, multicopper oxidases (including laccases), and copper radical oxidases (glycolate oxidases). The presence of these enzymes is typical for white rot fungi, where they participate in lignin degradation (Kersten & Cullen, 2007; Hammel & Cullen, 2008). However, in brown rot fungi such as Postia placenta, they aid in the degradation of cellulose by Fenton chemistry (Martinez et al., 2009). Could such a mechanism also operate in Trichoderma? One of the possible mechanisms working in brown rot fungi involves extracellular quinone redox cycling, quinate transporter, phenylalanine ammonia lyase, and laccase (Cohen et al., 2004). It is interesting that all these genes are in fact expressed in T. reesei in the presence of cellulose (R. Bischof, B. Seiboth & C.P. Kubicek, unpublished data). In addition, the elevated expression of iron-uptake system and ferrooxidoreductases may be necessary to avoid the formation of Fe3+-trioxalate chelates that are poorly reducible by hydroquinones (Jensen et al., 2001). The secretome of Trichoderma spp. also contains several oxaloacetate decarboxylases, of which one is induced on cellulose (R. Bischof, B. Seiboth & C.P. Kubicek, unpublished data). It can contribute to the detoxification of the wood predegraded by brown rot fungi that secrete oxalic acid into the medium (Micales & Highley, 1991).

Detoxification

Trichoderma secretome also contains a considerable number of cytochromes P450 proteins. They represent a superfamily of sequence-related heme oxygenases, which are found in most organisms, and whose roles range from carbon-source degradation and the elaboration of metabolites in prokaryotes, lower eukaryotes and plants, to detoxification of xenobiotic compounds in insects and mammals including humans (Kelly et al., 2006; Singh et al., 2011). However, they play the major role in the extracellular inactivation of hazardous materials (Roelofs et al., 2012; Syed & Yadav, 2012). The detection of cytochrome P450 monooxygenases in Trichoderma secretome may explain the ability to grow and develop even in highly polluted habitats or in kerosene tanks (Klein et al., 1998). These enzymes may therefore be also important for Trichoderma's opportunism.

Small secreted cysteine-rich proteins (SSCPs)

Finally, one of the largest groups of proteins secreted by Trichoderma is the small secreted cysteine-rich proteins (SSCPs). They were identified by the criteria that their Mr should be ≤300 amino acids long (as recommended by Martin et al., 2008) and containing four or more cysteine residues (Kubicek et al., 2011). Sequence similarity search tools and phylogenetic analyses allow their further subdivision into four groups: (i) hydrophobins and hydrophobin-like proteins; (ii) elicitor-like proteins; (iii) proteins with similarity to MRSP1 (MAP kinase repressed secreted protein 1), a 16-kDa protein that was identified to be strongly overexpressed in a delta-tmk1 (a MAPK) mutant of T. virens and which bears the conserved four-cysteine pattern C-X29-C[P/G]C-X31-C; and (iv) SSCPs with no attribution to any functional category (Kubicek et al., 2011).

Hydrophobins, probably the best known SSCPs, are characterized by the presence of eight positionally conserved cysteine residues of which four occur in doubles. They are found on the outer surfaces of cell walls of hyphae and conidia, where they mediate interactions between the fungus and the environment. Hydrophobins are conventionally grouped into two classes (classes I and II) according to their solubility in solvents, hydropathy profiles and spacing between the conserved cysteines. Trichoderma is known to have the largest abundance of class II hydrophobins (Kubicek et al., 2008). Trichoderma atroviride and T. virens – but not T. reesei – also have class I-like hydrophobins, which however deviate from the class I hydrophobins of other fungi in several aspects and form separate clades within ascomycete-wide phylogenetic analysis (Seidl-Seiboth et al., 2011). Hydrophobins are also involved in the attachment of Trichoderma hyphae to roots (Viterbo & Chet, 2006).

A second, emerging SSCP group, are the elicitor-like proteins. One of them, T. virens Sm1 (ortholog T. atroviride EPL1; Seidl et al., 2006) has also been studied in some detail, because it induces systemic disease resistance in the dicotyledon cotton (Gossypium hirsutum; Djonovic et al., 2007). Also, Sm1 is necessary for the induction of systemic protection of maize (Zea mays) via the jasmonic acid pathway (Djonovic et al., 2007). It is therefore likely that this group of SSCPs aids in the interaction of Trichoderma with plants. In fact, SSCPs with this action are known from several plant pathogenic fungi (Rep, 2005). However, in ectomycorrhizal basidiomycetes, SSCPs appear to be rather important in symbiotic interactions (Martin et al., 2008). One of the most strongly expressed SSCP genes of Laccaria bicolor (miSSP7) is necessary for the establishment of ectomycorrhizae (Plett et al., 2011; Plett & Martin, 2012).

The function of the proteins belonging to the largest and unique group of Trichoderma (iv) SSCPs cannot be predicted at present. Interestingly, however, some members of this cluster contain CFEM domains or consensus sequences for glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI anchors). Conservation of these genes suggests that they may encode cell surface proteins with important roles in the interaction with other organisms, as in C. albicans (Pérez et al., 2011).

Concluding remarks

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. The Trichoderma secretome
  5. Concluding remarks
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. Statement
  8. References

Although the availability of both genome sequences and bioinformatic tools makes the prediction of potentially secreted proteins relatively straightforward, it is interesting that this approach has so far only scarcely been used in fungal ecology. In this review, we have shown how such information can be used to detect new or overlooked physiological properties. The inventory of Trichoderma poly- and oligosaccharide hydrolytic and modifying enzymes was already well known. However, the richness of its proteolytic arsenal was shown for the first time. In addition, the presence of several types of oxidative enzymes (and their expression during growth on cellulose) offers the possibility of alternative modes for degradation of lignocelluloses. Probably, the most remarkable aspect is the high number of SSCPs and unknown and orphan proteins, which together accounted for about 50% of the secretome and even exceeded this value in the secretome expressed on cellulose. Such proteins could include key effectors that control recognition of macromolecules and/or recognition of Trichoderma partner organisms in native habitat. The fact that these proteins have hardly been described in proteomic analyses of Treesei culture filtrates may be due to their small size, which may have led to their escape from the 2D gels. Given the fact that many enzyme preparations from Treesei are manufactured with only little purification steps, it would be worthwhile to know about the action and properties of these proteins.

Acknowledgements

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. The Trichoderma secretome
  5. Concluding remarks
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. Statement
  8. References

The work of I.S.D. and C.P.K. was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) project numbers P-17859-B06, P-19340, and P-21266. Genome sequencing and analysis was conducted by the US Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute and supported by the Office of Science of the US Department of Energy under contract number DE-AC02-05CH11231. The authors have no conflict of interest related to this manuscript to declare.

  1. 1

    In this review we accommodate the changes proposed at the International Botanical Congress in July 2011 for the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature. The ongoing discussion on the future single taxon name for Hypocrea/Trichoderma that may be followed at the website of the IUMS International Subcommission on Trichoderma taxonomy at http://www.isth.info/content.php?page_id=102. Therefore we use the single generic name Trichoderma not only for asexual species but also for holomorphs when the sexual stage is described. However at first mention of holomorphic species both teleomorph (Hypocrea) and anamorph (Trichoderma) names are given. When the whole genus is considered, the name Trichoderma is applied.

References

  1. Top of page
  2. Abstract
  3. Introduction
  4. The Trichoderma secretome
  5. Concluding remarks
  6. Acknowledgements
  7. Statement
  8. References
  • Adav SS, Ravindran A, Chao LT, Tan L, Singh S & Sze SK (2011) Proteomic analysis of pH and strains dependent protein secretion of Trichoderma reesei. J Proteome Res 10: 45794596.
  • Arvas M, Pakula T, Smit B, Rautio J, Koivistoinen H, Jouhten P, Lindfors E, Wiebe M, Penttilä M & Saloheimo M (2011) Correlation of gene expression and protein production rate – a system wide study. BMC Genomics 12: 616.
  • Benítez T, Rincón AM, Limón MC & Codón AC (2004) Biocontrol mechanisms of Trichoderma strains. Int Microbiol 7: 249260.
  • Burmester A, Shelest E, Glöckner G et al. (2011) Comparative and functional genomics provide insights into the pathogenicity of dermatophytic fungi. Genome Biol 12: R7.
  • Chen LL, Liu LJ, Shi M, Song XY, Zheng CY, Chen XL & Zhang YZ (2009) Characterization and gene cloning of a novel serine protease with nematicidal activity from Trichoderma pseudokoningii SMF2. FEMS Microbiol Lett 299: 135142.
  • Cohen R, Suzuki MR & Hammel KE (2004) Differential stress-induced regulation of two quinone reductases in the brown rot basidiomycete Gloeophyllum trabeum. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 324331.
  • Djonovic S, Vargas WA, Kolomiets MV, Horndeski M, Wiest A & Kenerley CM (2007) A proteinaceous elicitor Sm1 from the beneficial fungus Trichoderma virens is required for induced systemic resistance in maize. Plant Physiol 145: 885889.
  • Druzhinina IS, Komoń-Zelazowska M, Atanasova L, Seidl V & Kubicek CP (2010) Evolution and ecophysiology of the industrial producer Hypocrea jecorina (Anamorph Trichoderma reesei) and a new sympatric agamospecies related to it. PLoS ONE 5: e9191.
  • Druzhinina IS, Seidl-Seiboth V, Herrera-Estrella A, Horwitz BA, Kenerley CM, Monte E, Mukherjee PK, Zeilinger S, Grigoriev IV & Kubicek CP (2011) Trichoderma: the genomics of opportunistic success. Nature Rev Microbiol 16: 749759.
  • Grigoriev IV, Nordberg H, Shabalov I et al. (2011) The genome portal of the Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute. Nucleic Acid Res 40: D2632.
  • Gruber S & Seidl-Seiboth V (2012) Self versus non-self: fungal cell wall degradation in Trichoderma. Microbiology 158: 2634.
  • Hammel KE & Cullen D (2008) Role of fungal peroxidases in biological ligninolysis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11: 349355.
  • Harman GE (2011) Multifunctional fungal plant symbionts: new tools to enhance plant growth and productivity. New Phytol 189: 647649.
  • Harman GE, Howell CR, Viterbo A, Chet I & Lorito M (2004) Trichoderma species – opportunistic, avirulent plant symbionts. Nature Rev Microbiol 2: 4356.
  • Harris PV, Welner D, McFarland KC et al. (2010) Stimulation of lignocellulosic biomass hydrolysis by proteins of glycoside hydrolase family 61: structure and function of a large, enigmatic family. Biochemistry 49: 33053316.
  • Herpoël-Gimbert I, Margeot A, Dolla A, Jan G, Mollé D, Lignon S, Mathis H, Sigoillot JC, Monot F & Asther M (2009) Comparative secretome analyses of two Trichoderma reesei RUT-C30 and CL847 hypersecretory strains. Biotechnol Biofuels 1: 18.
  • Ivanova C, Bååth JA, Seiboth B & Kubicek CP (2012) Lactose induces all genes related to plant biomass hydrolysis and corresponding mono- and oligosaccharide transporters in Trichoderma reesei. ECFG 11, book of abstracts, abstract 605. Marburg, Germany.
  • Jensen KA Jr, Houtman CJ, Ryan ZC & Hammel KE (2001) Pathways for extracellular Fenton chemistry in the brown rot basidiomycete Gloeophyllum trabeum. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 27052711.
  • Joneson S, Stajich JE, Shiu SH & Rosenblum EB (2011) Genomic transition to pathogenicity in chytrid fungi. PLoS Pathog 7: e1002338.
  • Jun H, Kieselbach T & Jönsson LJ (2011) Enzyme production by filamentous fungi: analysis of the secretome of Trichoderma reesei grown on unconventional carbon source. Microb Cell Fact 10: 68.
  • Kelly SL, Lamb DC & Kelly DE (2006) Cytochrome P450 biodiversity and biotechnology. Biochem Soc Trans 34: 11591160.
  • Kersten P & Cullen D (2007) Extracellular oxidative systems of the lignin-degrading Basidiomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Fungal Genet Biol 44: 7787.
  • Klein D & Eveleigh DE (1998) Ecology of Trichoderma. Trichoderma and Gliocladium, Vol. 1 (Kubicek CP & Harman GE, eds), pp. 5769. Taylor and Francis, London.
  • Kubicek CP (2012a) Systems biological approaches towards understanding cellulase production by Trichoderma reesei. J Biotechnol, in press.
  • Kubicek CP (2012b) Fungi and Lignocellulose Biomass. Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ.
  • Kubicek CP, Baker S, Gamauf C, Kenerley CM & Druzhinina IS (2008) Purifying selection and birth-and-death evolution in the class II hydrophobin gene families of the ascomycete Trichoderma/Hypocrea. BMC Evol Biol 8: 4.
  • Kubicek CP, Herrera-Estrella A, Seidl-Seiboth V et al. (2011) Comparative genome sequence analysis underscores mycoparasitism as the ancestral life style of Trichoderma. Genome Biol 12: R40.
  • Latgé JP (2007) The cell wall: a carbohydrate armor for the fungal cell. Mol Microbiol 66: 279290.
  • Martin F, Aerts A, Ahrén D et al. (2008) The genome of Laccaria bicolor provides insights into mycorrhizal symbiosis. Nature 452: 8892.
  • Martinez D, Berka RM, Henrissat B et al. (2008) Genome sequence analysis of the cellulolytic fungus Trichoderma reesei (syn. Hypocrea jecorina) reveals a surprisingly limited inventory of carbohydrate active enzymes. Nat Biotechnol 26: 553560.
  • Martinez D, Challacombe J, Morgenstern I et al. (2009) Genome, transcriptome, and secretome analysis of wood decay fungus Postia placenta supports unique mechanisms of lignocellulose conversion. P Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 19541959.
  • Micales JA & Highley TL (1991) Factors associated with decay capacity of the brown-rot fungus Postia placenta. Biodeterioration Research III (Llewllyn GG & O'Rear CE, eds), pp. 285302. Plenum, New York, NY.
  • Monod M (2008) Secreted proteases from dermatophytes. Mycopathologia 166: 285294.
  • Monod M, Capoccia S, Léchenne B, Zaugg C, Holdom M & Jousson, (2002) Secreted proteases from pathogenic fungi. Int J Med Microbiol 292: 405419.
  • Pérez A, Ramage G, Blanes R, Murgui A, Casanova M & Martínez JP (2011) Some biological features of Candida albicans mutants for genes coding fungal proteins containing the CFEM domain. FEMS Yeast Res 11: 273284.
  • Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G & Nielsen H (2011) SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods 29: 785786.
  • Phillips CM, Beeson WT, Cate JH & Marletta MA (2011) Cellobiose dehydrogenase and a copper-dependent polysaccharide monooxygenase potentiate cellulose degradation by Neurospora crassa. ACS Chem Biol 6: 13991406.
  • Plett JM & Martin F (2012) Poplar root exudates contain compounds that induce the expression of MiSSP7 in Laccaria bicolor. Plant Signal Behav 7: 1215.
  • Plett JM, Kemppainen M, Kale SD, Kohler A, Legué V, Brun A, Tyler BM, Pardo AG & Martin F (2011) A secreted effector protein of Laccaria bicolor is required for symbiosis development. Curr Biol 21: 11971203.
  • Rawlings ND, Barrett AJ & Bateman A (2012) MEROPS: the database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D343D350.
  • Rep M (2005) Small proteins of plant-pathogenic fungi secreted during host colonization. FEMS Microbiol Lett 253: 1927.
  • Roelofs D, de Boer M, Agamennone V, Bouchier P, Legler J & van Straalen N (2012) Functional environmental genomics of a municipal landfill soil. Front Genet 3: 85.
  • Rossmann AY, Samuels GJ, Rogerson CT & Lowen R (1999) Genera of Bionectriaceae, Hypocreaceae and Nectriaceae (Hypocreales, Ascomycetes). Stud Mycol 42: 183.
  • Schrank A & Vainstein MH (2010) Metarhizium anisopliae enzymes and toxins. Toxicon 56: 12671274.
  • Seidl V (2008) Chitinases of filamentous fungi: a large group of diverse proteins with multiple physiological functions. Fungal Biol Rev 22: 3642.
  • Seidl V, Marchetti M, Schandl R, Allmaier G & Kubicek CP (2006) Epl1, the major secreted protein of Hypocrea atroviridis on glucose, is a member of a strongly conserved protein family comprising plant defense response elicitors. FEBS J 273: 43464359.
  • Seidl V, Song LF, Lindquist EA et al. (2009) Transcriptomic response of the mycoparasitic fungus Trichoderma atroviride to the close presence of a fungal prey. BMC Genomics 10: 567.
  • Seidl-Seiboth V, Gruber S, Sezerman U, Schwecke T, Albayrak A, Neuhof T, von öhren H, Baker SE & Kubicek CP (2011) Novel hydrophobins from Trichoderma define a new hydrophobin subclass: protein properties, evolution, regulation, and processing. J Mol Evol 72: 339351.
  • Selker EU (1990) Premeiotic instability of repeated sequences in Neurospora crassa. Annu Rev Genet 24: 579613.
  • Sharon E, Bar-Eyal M, Chet I, Herrera-Estrella A, Kleifeld O & Spiegel Y (2001) Biological control of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica by Trichoderma harzianum. Phytopathology 91: 687693.
  • Singh D, Kashyap A, Pandey RV & Saini KS (2011) Novel advances in cytochrome P450 research. Drug Discov Today 16: 793799.
  • Syed K & Yadav JS (2012) P450 monooxygenases (P450ome) of the model white rot fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium. CRC Crit Rev Microbiol, doi:10.3109/1040841X.2012.682050.
  • Szakmary K, Wottawa A & Kubicek CP (1991) Origin of oxidized cellulose degradation products and mechanism of their promotion of cellobiohydrolase I biosynthesis in Trichoderma reesei. J Gen Microbiol 137: 28732878.
  • Tisch D, Kubicek CP & Schmoll M (2012) The phosducin-like protein PhLP1 impacts regulation of glycoside hydrolases and light response in Trichoderma reesei. BMC Genomics 12: 613.
  • Viterbo A & Chet I (2006) TasHyd1, a new hydrophobin gene from the biocontrol agent Trichoderma asperellum, is involved in plant root colonization. Mol Plant Pathol 7: 249258.