• Open Access

Transendocardial cell injection is not superior to intracoronary infusion in a porcine model of ischaemic cardiomyopathy: a study on delivery efficiency

Authors

  • Tycho I.G. van der Spoel,

    Corresponding author
    1. Division Heart and Lungs, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
    • Correspondence to: T.I.G. van der SPOEL, M.D.

      Division Heart and Lungs, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Rm E03.511, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands

      Tel.: +31-(88)-7553376

      Fax: +31-(30)-2516396

      E-mail: tspoel@umcutrecht.nl

    Search for more papers by this author
  • Krijn R. Vrijsen,

    1. Division Heart and Lungs, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Stefan Koudstaal,

    1. Division Heart and Lungs, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Joost P.G. Sluijter,

    1. Division Heart and Lungs, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
    2. Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of The Netherlands (ICIN), Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Johannes Frank W. Nijsen,

    1. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Hugo W. de Jong,

    1. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Imo E. Hoefer,

    1. Division Heart and Lungs, Department of Experimental Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Maarten-Jan M. Cramer,

    1. Division Heart and Lungs, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Pieter A. Doevendans,

    1. Division Heart and Lungs, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
    2. Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of The Netherlands (ICIN), Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Eric van Belle,

    1. Division Heart and Lungs, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Steven A.J. Chamuleau

    1. Division Heart and Lungs, Department of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Stem cell therapy is a new strategy for chronic ischaemic heart disease in patients. However, no consensus exists on the most optimal delivery strategy. This randomized study was designed to assess cell delivery efficiency of three clinically relevant strategies: intracoronary (IC) and transendocardial (TE) using electromechanical mapping guidance (NOGA) compared to surgical delivery in a chronic pig model of ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Twenty-four animals underwent delivery of 107 autologous Indium-oxine-labelled bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) 4 weeks after infarction and were randomized to one of three groups (n = 8 each group): IC, TE or surgical delivery (reference group). Primary endpoint was defined as percentage (%) of injected dose per organ and assessed by in vivo gamma-emission counting. In addition, troponin and coronary flow were assessed before and after MSC injection. Blinded endpoint analysis showed no significant difference in efficiency after surgical (16 ± 4%), IC (11 ± 1%) and TE (11 ± 3%) (= 0.52) injections. IC showed less variability in efficiency compared with TE and surgical injection. Overall, TE injection showed less distribution of MSC to visceral organs compared with other modalities. Troponin rise and IC flow did not differ between the percutaneous groups. This randomized study showed no significant difference in cell delivery efficiency to the myocardium in a clinically relevant ischaemic large animal model between IC and TE delivery. In addition, no differences in safety profile were observed. These results are important in view of the choice of percutaneous cell delivery modality in future clinical stem cell trials.

Ancillary