Évaluation du Fardeau economique de la Cysticercose Au Burkina Faso: (Evaluation of the economical burden of cysticercosis in Burkina Faso)
Prevalence case-control study of epilepsy in three Burkina Faso villages
Article first published online: 31 JAN 2012
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S
Acta Neurologica Scandinavica
Volume 126, Issue 4, pages 270–278, October 2012
How to Cite
- Issue published online: 1 SEP 2012
- Article first published online: 31 JAN 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 6 DEC 2011
- National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
- Fogarty International Center (FIC)
- Fogarty International Center (FIC) of the National Institutes of Health
- cross-sectional study;
- Sub-Saharan Africa
To estimate the association between the prevalence of epilepsy and potential risk factors in three Burkina Faso villages.
Three villages were selected based on local reports of high numbers of epilepsy cases and pig-rearing practices. One person aged 7 or older was selected at random from all households of selected concessions for epilepsy screening and blood sampling. Epilepsy was confirmed by a physician using the ILAE definition. The cross-sectional associations between epilepsy and selected factors and seroresponse to the antigens of Taenia solium were estimated using a Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression. Prevalence odds ratios (POR) and their 95% Bayesian Credible Intervals (95% BCI) were estimated.
Of 888 individuals interviewed, 39 of 70 screened positive were confirmed to have epilepsy for a lifetime prevalence of 4.5% (95% CI: 3.3; 6.0). The prevalence of epilepsy was associated with a positive reaction to cysticercosis Ag-ELISA serology (POR = 3.1, 95% BCI = 1.0; 8.3), past pork consumption (POR = 9.7, 95% BCI = 2.5; 37.9), and being salaried or a trader compared to a farmer or housewife (POR = 2.9, 95% BCI = 1.2; 6.4).
Several factors were associated with prevalent epilepsy, with Ag-ELISA suggesting the presence of neurocysticercosis. The association between epilepsy and some occupations may reflect differences in local attitudes toward epilepsy and should be further explored.