Limbal anaesthesia versus topical anaesthesia for clear corneal phacoemulsification


Carlo Cagini
Policlinico Monteluce
Via Brunamonti
Perugia 06100
Tel: + 39 075 57 20 357
Fax: + 39 075 57 83 951


Purpose: To compare the safety and clinical efficacy provided by limbal anaesthesia with topical anaesthesia in cataract surgery.

Methods: A total of 117 consecutive patients undergoing routine cataract surgery were randomly assigned to receive limbal or topical anaesthesia. Limbal anaesthesia was administered with a cellulose ophthalmic sponge soaked in preservative-free lidocaine hydrochloride 4% applied to the temporal perilimbal area for 45 seconds immediately before surgery. For topical anaesthesia lidocaine 4% was instilled in each patient at 10-min intervals four times before surgery. We studied phaco time, perioperative pain, visual outcome and intraoperative complications. The level of intraoperative pain was scored on a scale of 1−10, where 1 = no pain and 10 = severe pain.

Results: 55 patients (91.6%) in the topical group and 54 patients (94.7%) in the limbal group tolerated the procedure well, giving pain scores of 1−3, with no statistical difference. No patients in either group required supplemental anaesthesia and no intraoperative complications were recorded. No eyes had epithelial defects at the end of surgery or at postoperative check-ups.

Conclusion: Limbal anaesthesia in cataract surgery is safe and the two anaesthesia techniques do not present differences in the degree of analgesia achieved.