SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Ashmole N. P. 1971. Seabird ecology and marine environment. – In: Farner D. S., King J. R. and Parkes K. C. (eds), Avian biology. Academic Press, pp. 224286.
  • Ballance L. T. 1995. Flight energetics of free-ranging red-footed boobies (Sula sula). Physiol. Zool. 68: 887914.
  • Ballance L. T. and Pitman R. L. 1999. Foraging ecology of tropical seabirds. – In: Adams N. J. and Slotow R. H. (eds), Proc. 22 Int. Ornithol. Congr., Durban. Johannesburg: BirdLife South Africa, pp. 20572071.
  • Ballance L. T., Pitman R. L. and Reilly S. B. 1997. Seabird community structure along a productivity gradient: importance of competition and energetic constraint. Ecology 78: 15021518.
  • Blaber S. J. M., Milton D. A., Smith G. C. and Farmer M. J. 1995. Trawl discards in the diets of tropical seabirds of the northern Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 127: 113.
  • Burke C. M. and Montevecchi W. A. 2009. The foraging decisions of a central place foraging seabird in response to fluctuations in local prey conditions. J. Zool. 278: 354361.
  • Cervigón F., Cipriani R., Fischer W., Garibaldi L., Hendrickx M., Lemus A. J., Márquez R., Poutiers J. M., Robaina G. and Rodriguez B. 1992. Fichas FAO de identificación de especies para los fines de la pesca. Guía de campo de las especies comerciales marinas y de aquas salobres de la costa septentrional de Sur América. – FAO, Rome.
  • Chastel O., Weimerskirch H. and Jouventin P. 1995. Influence of body condition on reproductive decision and reproductive success in the blue petrel. Auk 112: 964972.
  • Chaurand T. and Weimerskirch H. 1994. The regular alternation of short and long trips in the blue petrel Halobaena caerula: a previously undescribed strategy of food provisioning in a pelagic seabird. J. Anim. Ecol. 63: 275282.
  • Clarke J. R. 2001. Partitioning of foraging effort in Adélie penguins. Polar Biol. 24: 1620.
  • Crawley M. J. 2007. The R book. Wiley.
  • Croxall J. P., Reid K. and Prince P. A. 1999. Diet, provisioning and productivity responses of marine predators to differences in availability of Antarctic krill. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 177: 115131.
  • Dearborn D. C. 2001. Body condition and retaliation in the parental effort decisions of incubating great frigatebirds (Fregata minor). Behav. Ecol. 12: 200206.
  • Dorward D. F. 1962. Comparative biology of the white booby and the brown booby, Sula spp., at Ascension. Ibis 103: 221234.
  • Erikstad K. E., Asheim M., Fauchald P., Dalhaug L. and Tveraa T. 1997. Adjustment of parental effort in the puffin; the roles of adult body condition and chick size. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 40: 95100.
  • Faraway J. J. 2006. Extending the linear model with R: generalized linear, mixed effects and nonparametric regression models. – Chapman and Hall.
  • Fox J., Weisberg S., Hong J., Andersen R., Firth D. and Friendly M. 2012. Package „effects“ for the R software: effect displays for linear, generalized linear, multinomial-logit, proportional-odds logit models and mixed-effects models. – <www.r-project.org>, <http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/jfox/>.
  • Frimodt C. 1995. Multilingual illustrated guide to the world’s commercial warmwater fish. – Fishing News Books, Osney Mead, Oxford, England.
  • Garnett S. T., Szabo J. K. and Dutson G. 2010. The action plan for Australian Birds 2010. – CSIRO Publishing, Australia.
  • Garthe S., Montevecchi W. A., Chapdelaine G., Rail J. F. and Hedd A. 2007. Contrasting foraging tactics by northern gannets (Sula bassana) breeding in different oceanographic domains with different prey fields. Mar. Biol. 151: 687694.
  • Garthe S., Montevecchi W. A. and Davoren G. K. 2011. Inter-annual changes in prey fields trigger different foraging tactics in a large marine predator. Limnol. Oceanogr. 56: 802812.
  • Gilardi J. D. 1992. Sex-specific foraging distribution of brown boobies in the eastern tropical pacific. Colon. Waterbirds 15: 148151.
  • Gonzáles-Solís J., Croxall J. P. and Wood A. G. 2000. Sexual dimorphism and sexual segregation in foraging strategies of northern giant petrels Macronectes hall during incubation. Oikos 90: 390398.
  • Granadeiro J. P., Nunes M., Silva M. and Furness R. W. 1998. Flexible foraging strategy of Cory's shearwarter, Calonectris diomedea, during the chick-rearing period. Anim. Behav. 56: 11691176.
  • Green J. A., White C. R., Bunce A., Frappel P. B. and Butler P. J. 2010. Energetic consequences of plunge diving in gannets. Endanger. Species Res. 10: 269279.
  • Guerra M. and Drummond H. 1995. Reversed sexual size dimorphism and parental care: minimal division of labour in the blue-footed booby. Behaviour 132: 479496.
  • Guillemette M. 1994. Digestive rate constraint in wintering common eiders (Somateria mollissima): implication for flying capabilities. Auk 111: 900909.
  • Hamer K. C., Humphreys E. M., Magalhães M. C., Garthe S., Hennicke J., Peters G., Grémillet D., Skov H. and Wanless S. 2009. Fine-scale foraging behaviour of a medium-ranging marine predator. J. Anim. Ecol. 78: 880889.
  • Haury L. R., McGowan J. A. and Wiebe P. H. 1978. Patterns and processes in the time-space scales of plankton distribution. – In: Steele J. H. (ed.), Pattern in plankton communities. Plenum Press, pp. 227327.
  • Jackson S. 1992. Do seabird gut sizes and mean retention times reflect adaptation to diet and foraging method? Physiol. Zool. 65: 674697.
  • Kato A., Watanuki Y., Shaughnessy P., Le Maho Y. and Naito Y. 1999. Intersexual differences in the diving behaviour of foraging subantarctic cormorant (Phalacrocorax albiventer) and Japanese cormorant (P. filamentosus). C. R. Acad. Sci., Sciences de la vie (Paris) 322: 557562.
  • Kato A., Ropert-Coudert Y. and Chiaradia A. 2008. Regulation of trip duration by an inshore forager, the little penguin (Eudyptula minor), during incubation. Auk 125: 588593.
  • Lewis et al. 2001
  • Lewis S., Benvenuti S., Dall’Antonia L., Griffiths R., Money L., Sherratt T. N., Wanless S. and Hamer K. C. 2002. Sex-specific foraging behaviour in a monomorphic seabird. Proc. R. Soc. B 269: 16871693.
  • Lewis S., Benvenuti S., Daunt F., Wanless S., Dall’Antonia L., Luschi P., Elston D. A., Hamer K. C. and Sherratt T. N. 2004. Partitioning of diving effort in foraging trips of northern gannets. Can. J. Zool. 82: 19101916.
  • Lewis S., Schreiber E. A., Daunt F., Schenk G. A., Orr K., Adams A., Wanless S. and Hamer K. C. 2005. Sex-specific foraging behaviour in tropical boobies: does size matter? Ibis 147: 408414.
  • Mills K. L. 1998. Multispecies seabird feeding flocks in the Galapagos Islands. Condor 100: 277285.
  • Nelson B. 1978. The Sulidae: gannets and boobies. – Oxford Univ. Press.
  • Norberg U. M. 1986. Flying, gliding and soaring. – In: Hildebrand M., Bramble D. M., Liem K. F. and Wake D. B. (eds), Functional vertebrate morphology. Belknap Harvard Univ. Press.
  • Paiva V. H., Geraldes P., Ramírez I., Garthe S. and Ramos J. A. 2010. How area restricted search of a pelagic seabird changes while performing a dual foraging strategy. Oikos 119: 14231434.
  • Pennycuick C. J. 1972. Animal flight. – Arnold.
  • Pennycuick C. J. 1989. Bird flight performance: a practical calculation manual. – Oxford Univ. Press.
  • Phillips R. A., Xavier J. C. and Croxall J. P. 2003. Effects of satellite transmitters on albatrosses and petrels. Auk 120: 10821090.
  • Phillips R. A., Silk J. R. D., Phalan B., Catry P. and Croxall J. P. 2004. Seasonal sexual segregation in two Thalassarche albatross species: competitive exclusion, reproductive role specialization or foraging niche divergence? Proc. R. Soc. B 271: 12831291.
  • Phillips R. A., Wakefield E. D., Croxall J. P., Fukuda A. and Higuchi H. 2009. Albatross foraging behaviour: no evidence for dual foraging, and limited support for anticipatory regulation of provisioning at South Georgia. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 391: 279292.
  • Pinheiro J., Bates D., DebRoy S. and Sarkar D. 2012. Package ‘nlme’ for the R software: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. – <www.r-project.org>.
  • Priddel D., Hutton I., Olson S. and Wheeler R. 2005. Breeding biology of masked boobies (Sula dactylatra tasman) on Lord Howe Island. Emu 105: 105113.
  • Priddel D., Carlile N., Evans O., Evans B. and McCoy H. 2010. A review of the seabirds of Phillip Island in the Norfolk Island Group. Notornis 57: 113127.
  • Ropert-Coudert Y., Grémillet D., Kato A., Ryan P. G., Naito Y. and Le Maho Y. 2004a. A fine-scale time budget of Cape gannets provides insights into the foraging strategies of coastal seabirds. Anim. Behav. 67: 985992.
  • Ropert-Coudert Y., Grémillet D., Ryan P., Kato A., Naito Y. and Le Maho Y. 2004b. Between air and water: the plunge dive of the Cape gannet Morus capensis. Ibis 146: 281290.
  • Ropert-Coudert Y., Wilson R. P., Grémillet D., Kato A., Lewis S. and Ryan P. G. 2006. Electrocardiogram recordings in free-ranging gannets reveal minimum difference in heart rate during flapping versus gliding flight. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 328: 275284.
  • Ropert-Coudert Y., Daunt F., Kato A., Lewis S., Kobayashi K., Mori Y., Grémillet D. and Wanless S. 2009. Underwater wingbeats extend depth and duration of plunge dives in gannets. J. Avian Biol. 40: 380387.
  • Saraux S., Robinson-Laverick S. M., Le Maho Y., Ropert-Coudert Y. and Chiaradia A. 2011. Plasticity in foraging strategies of inshore birds: how little penguins maintain body reserves while feeding offspring. Ecology 92: 19091916.
  • Shaffer S. A., Weimerskirch H. and Costa D. P. 2001. Functional significance of sexual dimorphism in wandering albatrosses Diomedea exulans. Funct. Ecol. 15: 203210.
  • Sibly R. M. 1981. Strategies of digestion and defecation. – In: Townsend C. R. and Calow P. (eds), Physiological ecology: an evolutionary approach to resource use. Blackwell, pp. 109139.
  • Sommerfeld J. and Hennicke J. C. 2010. Comparison of trip duration, activity pattern and diving behaviour by red-tailed tropicbirds (Phaethon rubricauda) during incubation and chick-rearing. Emu 110: 7886.
  • Tanaka H., Takagi Y. and Naito Y. 2001. Swimming speeds and buoyancy compensation of migrating adult chum salmon Oncorhynchus keta revealed by speed/depth/acceleration data logger. J. Exp. Biol. 204: 38953904.
  • Thalmann S. J., Baker G. B., Hindell M. and Tuck G. N. 2009. Longline fisheries and foraging distribution of flesh-footed shearwaters in eastern Australia. J. Wildl. Manage. 73: 399406.
  • Tveraa T., Lorentsen S. H. and Sæther B. E. 1997. Regulation of foraging trips and costs of incubation shifts in the Antartic petrel (Thalassoica antarctica). Behav. Ecol. 8: 465469.
  • Tveraa T., Sæther B. E., Aanes R. and Erikstad K. E. 1998. Regulation of food provisioning in the Antarctic petrel: the importance of parental condition and chick body mass. J. Anim. Ecol. 67: 699704.
  • Vandenabeele S. P., Shepard E. L., Grogan A. and Wilson R. P. 2012. When three per cent may not be three per cent: device-equipped seabirds experience variable flight constraints. Mar. Biol. 159: 114.
  • Velando A. and Alonso-Alvarez C. 2003. Differential body condition regulation by males and females in response to experimental manipulations of brood size and parental effort in the blue-footed booby. J. Anim. Ecol. 72: 846856.
  • Weimerskirch H. 1998. How can a pelagic seabird provision its chick when relying on a distant food resource? Cyclic attendance at the colony, foraging decision and body condition in sooty shearwaters. J. Anim. Ecol. 67: 99109.
  • Weimerskirch H. and Cherel Y. 1998. Feeding ecology of short-tailed shearwaters: breeding in Tasmania and foraging in the Antarctic? Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 167: 261274.
  • Weimerskirch H., Fradet G. and Cherel Y. 1999. Natural and experimental changes in chick provisioning in a long-lived seabird, the Antarctic prion. J. Avian Biol. 30: 165174.
  • Weimerskirch H., Le Corre M. and Bost C. A. 2008. Foraging strategy of masked boobies from the largest colony in the world: relationship to environmental conditions and fisheries. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 362: 291302.
  • Weimerskirch H., Shaffer S. A., Tremblay Y., Costa D. P., Gadenne H., Kato A., Ropert-Coudert Y., Sato K. and Aurioles D. 2009a. Species- and sex-specific differences in foraging behaviour and foraging zones in blue-footed and brown boobies in the Gulf of California. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 391: 267278.
  • Weimerskirch H., Le Corre M., Gadenne H., Pinaud D., Kato A., Ropert-Coudert Y. and Bost C. A. 2009b. Relationship between reversed-sexual dimorphism, breeding investment and foraging ecology in a pelagic seabird, the masked booby. Oecologia 161: 637649.
  • Wilson R. P. and McMahon C. R. 2006. Measuring devices on wild animals: what constitutes acceptable practice? Front. Ecol. Environ. 4: 147154.
  • Yen P. P. W., Sydeman W. J. and Hyrenbach K. D. 2004. Marine bird and cetacean associations with bathymetric habitats and shallow-water topographies: implications for trophic transfer and conservation. J. Mar. Syst. 50: 7999.
  • Young H. S., Shaffer S. A., McCauley D. J., Foley D. G., Dirzo R. and Block B. A. 2010. Resource partitioning by species but not sex in sympatric boobies in the central Pacific Ocean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 403: 291301.
  • Zavalaga C. B., Benvenuti S., Dall’Antonia L. and Emsllie S. D. 2007. Diving behavior of blue-footed boobies Sula nebouxi in northern Peru in relation to sex, body size and prey type. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 336: 291303.
  • Zavalaga C. B., Emslie S. D., Estela F. A., Müller M. S., Dell’Omo G. and Anderson D. J. 2011. Overnight foraging trips by chick-rearing Nazca boobies Sula grant and the risk of attack by predatory fish. Ibis 154: 6173.
  • Zimmer I., Ropert-Coudert Y., Poulin N., Kato A. and Chiaradia A. 2011. Evaluating the relative importance of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on the foraging activity of top predators: a case study on female little penguins. Mar. Biol. 158: 715722.