Reliability and validity of the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) in a Turkish population

  1. Elıf Pak Tunc1,
  2. Denız Firat2,
  3. Ozen Dogan Onur2,
  4. Vedat Sar3

Article first published online: 30 AUG 2005

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2005.00229.x

Issue

Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology

Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology

Volume 33, Issue 5, pages 357–362, October 2005

Additional Information

How to Cite

Tunc, E. P., Firat, D., Onur, O. D. and Sar, V. (2005), Reliability and validity of the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) in a Turkish population. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 33: 357–362. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2005.00229.x

Author Information

  1. 1

    Departments of Prosthodontics

  2. 2

    Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Çapa-Istanbul, Turkey

  3. 3

    Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, Çapa-Istanbul, Turkey

*Deniz Firat, Department of Oral Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, 34390, Çapa-Istanbul, Turkey Tel: 90 (212) 414 20 20-30289 Fax: 90 (212) 574 22 44 e-mail: refiadeniz@yahoo.com

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 30 AUG 2005
  2. Article first published online: 30 AUG 2005
  3. Submitted 20 May 2004; accepted 9 February 2005

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (68K)

Keywords:

  • behavioral science;
  • Dental Anxiety Scale;
  • Turkish population

Abstract –  Objectives:  Fear of dentistry is a common obstacle to obtaining dental care in Turkey. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability, validity and psychometric characteristics of the Turkish translation of the Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS) and compare it to the Dental Fear Survey (DFS) scores obtained in the same population.

Methods:  The Turkish translated version of the MDAS was administered to 115 dental patients; 21 subjects who suffered from dental phobia, requiring general anesthesia for dental procedures, and 94 who did not have dental anxiety, in addition to 442 subjects from the general population.

Results:  The Turkish translated version of the MDAS was internally consistent and reproducible. The patients with dentist phobia had the highest score. The Turkish MDAS correlated with the DFS (r = 0.80, P < 0.001). The MDAS scale correlated inversely (r = −0.14, P < 0.005) with level of education; however, it did not correlate with economic status. Women scored higher than men on the scale (mean = 12.3, SD = 5.2 vs. mean = 10.9, SD = 4.5, P < 0.005). At a cut-off point ≥15, sensitivity was 0.80, specificity 0.74, positive predictive value 0.41 and negative predictive value 0.94.

Conclusion:  Although the specificity values were low, the Turkish MDAS demonstrated acceptable sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values. Thus, high reliability and validity of the MDAS supports its cross-cultural validity and indicated that it may be a valuable tool in quantifying fear of dentistry among Turks.

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (68K)