The aesthetic impact of enamel fluorosis on Irish adolescents
Article first published online: 3 JAN 2011
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S
Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology
Volume 39, Issue 2, pages 127–136, April 2011
How to Cite
Browne, D., Whelton, H., O’Mullane, D., Tavener, J. and Flannery, E. (2011), The aesthetic impact of enamel fluorosis on Irish adolescents. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 39: 127–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2010.00577.x
- Issue published online: 7 MAR 2011
- Article first published online: 3 JAN 2011
- Submitted 6 August 2009; accepted 29 July 2010
- photographic images
Browne D, Whelton H, O’Mullane D, Tavener J, Flannery E. The aesthetic impact of enamel fluorosis on Irish adolescents. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2011; 39: 127–136. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S
Abstract – Objectives: To assess the impact of differing degrees of enamel fluorosis on dental aesthetics according to Irish adolescents. The same participants also aesthetically rated other variations in dental appearances including a carious lesion, bleached teeth and a demarcated opacity.
Methods: One hundred and fifty adolescents examined seven identical template photographs of an attractive dental smile displaying varying levels of enamel fluorosis (TF1, TF2, TF3), a demarcated opacity, no fluorosis (TF0), anterior caries and very white or bleached teeth. By indicating their level of agreement or disagreement with five statements on a five-point Likert scale, the participants rated the aesthetic acceptability of each of the photographs.
Results: Using paired t-tests with the Bonferroni correction, it was found that the photographs depicting the very white teeth and anterior caries were rated as the most and least aesthetically pleasing images, respectively. There was no significant difference in the ratings of the photographs displaying TF0, TF1 and TF2 levels of fluorosis indicating that these photographs were viewed similarly (P > 0.002). The remaining two photographs (TF3 and the demarcated opacity) were rated similarly and significantly worse (P < 0.002) than the photographs showing no or low grades of fluorosis (TF0, TF1 and TF2).
Conclusions: TF3 level of fluorosis represented the break point at which enamel fluorosis became aesthetically objectionable to these participants. Low grades of fluorosis (TF1 and TF2) were rated similarly to the photograph depicting no fluorosis (TF0).