Relative performance of different dental professional groups in screening for occlusal caries
Article first published online: 5 MAR 2012
© 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S
Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology
Volume 40, Issue 3, pages 239–246, June 2012
How to Cite
Brocklehurst, P., Ashley, J., Walsh, T. and Tickle, M. (2012), Relative performance of different dental professional groups in screening for occlusal caries. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 40: 239–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2012.00671.x
- Issue published online: 23 APR 2012
- Article first published online: 5 MAR 2012
- Submitted 5 October 2011; accepted 31 December 2011
- clinical research;
- diagnostic research
Brocklehurst P, Ashley J, Walsh T, Tickle M. Relative performance of different dental professional groups in screening for occlusal caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2012. © 2012 John Wiley & Sons A/S
Abstract – Objectives: The use of role substitution, where different levels of practitioner undertake the duties of the most qualified clinician, is common in medicine and dentistry. Proponents argue that role substitution has the potential to increase dentists’ efficiency and effectiveness, thereby freeing up resources to improve access and reduce oral health inequalities. Given the current global economic climate, many countries are re-examining models of service provision to utilize role substitution. The objective of this study was to determine whether different members of the dental team could meet the diagnostic threshold set by the World Health Organization, when screening photographs of occlusal surfaces for dental caries.
Methods: Participants were sampled purposively and included; final-year dental students, final-year hygiene-therapy students, primary care dentists, hygiene-therapists and dental nurses. Following a brief training package, participants were asked to score 102 clinical photographs of both carious and noncarious extracted teeth and determine whether the tooth was ‘healthy’ or had ‘suspected decay’. The time delay between consecutive photographs was set at 8-s. Judgment decisions were compared against the International Caries Detection and Assessment System as the gold standard, with scores of two or less representing ‘healthy’. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were determined for each participant and clinical group. Kappa was calculated to determine test–retest reliability.
Results: Dental nurses had the highest median sensitivity (87.9%), although all groups were comparable. The median specificity for the groups was lower than their sensitivity scores, with dentists scoring the highest (71.0%). Dentists also scored the highest median positive predictive value (57.8%), whilst dental nurses scored the highest negative predictive value (91.3%). The median level of agreement was high for all groups; the highest median score was for the final-year dental students (88.9%).
Conclusions: Even with minimal training, different members of the dental team show the potential to screen for occlusal caries to a similar standard as primary care dentists. This requires further testing in vivo, but has important implications for the productivity and design of the future dental workforce.