SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency. Code of practice for radiation protection in dentistry: Radiation Health Committee, 2005. http://www.ag.gov.au/cca
  • 2
    Stheeman SE, Mileman PA, van’ t Hof M, Van der Stelt PF. Room for improvement? The accuracy of dental practitioners who diagnose bony pathoses with radiographs Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996: 81: 251254.
  • 3
    Halsted MJ, Kumar H, Paquin JJ, et al. Diagnostic errors by radiology residents in interpreting pediatric radiographs in an emergency setting. Pediatr Radiol 2004: 34: 331336.
  • 4
    Margolis SA, Nilsson KA, Reed RL. Performance in reading radiographs: does level of education predict skill? J Contin Educ Health Prof 2003: 23: 4853.
  • 5
    Rohlin M, Hirschmann PN, Matteson S. Global trends in oral and maxillofacial radiology education. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995: 80: 517526.
  • 6
    Marchese TJ. Contexts for competency-based curricula in dental education. J Dent Educ 1994: 58: 339341.
  • 7
    Coles CR. Helping students with learning difficulties in medical and health-care education. Med Educ 1990: 24: 300312.
  • 8
    Savage R. Continuing education for general practice: a life long journey. Br J Gen Pract 1991: 41: 311312.
  • 9
    Norman GR, Schmidt HG. The psychological basis of problem-based learning: a review of the evidence. Acad Med 1992: 67: 557565.
  • 10
    Mann KV. Educating medical students: lessons from research in continuing education. Acad Med 1994: 69: 4147.
  • 11
    Gutmark R, Halsted MJ, Perry L, Gold G. Use of computer databases to reduce radiograph reading errors. J Am Coll Radiol 2007: 4: 6568.
  • 12
    White SC. Computer-aided differential diagnosis of oral radiographic lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1989: 18: 5359.
  • 13
    D’Orsi CJ, Getty DJ, Swets JA, Pickett RM, Seltzer SE, McNeil BJ. Reading and decision aids for improved accuracy and standardization of mammographic diagnosis. Radiology 1992: 184: 619622.
  • 14
    Abe H, MacMahon H, Engelmann R, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis in chest radiography: results of large-scale observer tests at the 1996–2001 rsna scientific assemblies. Radiographics 2003: 23: 255265.
  • 15
    White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation. St Louis, MO: Mosby, 2009.
  • 16
    Peters M, Laeng B, Latham K, Jackson M, Zaiyouna R, Richardson C. A redrawn vandenberg and kuse mental rotations test: different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain Cogn 1995: 28: 3958.
  • 17
    Farah CS, Maybury T. Implementing digital technology to enhance student learning of pathology. Eur J Dent Educ 2009: 13: 172178.
  • 18
    Farah CS, Maybury TS. The e-evolution of microscopy in dental education. J Dent Educ 2009: 73: 942949.
  • 19
    Maybury T, Farah CS. Perspective: electronic systems of knowledge in the world of virtual microscopy. Acad Med 2009: 84: 12441249.
  • 20
    Marton F, Saljo R. Approaches to learning. In: Marton F, Hounsell D, Entwistle N ed. The experience of learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1984: 3655.
  • 21
    Fransson A. On qualitative differences in learning: IV – effects of intrinsic motivation and extrinsic test anxiety on process and outcome. Br J Educ Psychol 1977: 47: 244257.
  • 22
    Ulmer GL. Internet invention: from literacy to electracy. Boston, MA: Longman, 2003.
  • 23
    Kress GR, Van Leeuwen T. Multimodal discourse: the modes and media of contemporary communication. London: Arnold, 2001.
  • 24
    Mitchell WJ. The reconfigured eye: visual truth in the post-photographic era. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.
  • 25
    Berbaum KS, Smoker WR, Smith WL. Measurement and prediction of diagnostic performance during radiology training. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985: 145: 13051311.
  • 26
    Nilsson T, Hedman L, Ahlqvist J. Visual-spatial ability and interpretation of three-dimensional information in radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2007: 36: 8691.